Anti-gun talking points ….

She didn't prosecute because the CPD couldn't tell her who fired the first shot.

The thing is when Rittenhouse can shoot three unarmed people and claim self-defense, even after being caught on video, then people who fired in potential self defense and you can't say who fired the first shot, couldn't be prosecuted.

This is the world you want to live in, dummy. The world where all God's children have guns and that's how we resolve disputes.

Or did you think that would only apply to white people?

Wrong asshole....all felons in gangs on video....she didnt want to prosecute them because they were black....

A shoot out with illegal guns by felons....all caught on video with a couple of the felons on the ground with holes in them
 
Another lie.
Two of them were armed, the third tried to disarm him.

The two he killed were unarmed. The one he maimed wasn't aiming a gun at him.

The video clearly establishes that he shot three people IN SELF DEFENSE. You refuse to accept that.

But this is the point I was making to Dick Tiny. When you have a video of him shooting people, no doubt he was the aggressor and he was armed, and his lawyers could STILL make an argument for self-defense, in the case in Chicago, you had a shootout where the CPD could not tell Foxx who fired the first shot. So she was unable to charge anyone.
 
You are lying.
You claimed they were unarmed.
Two of them were armed, the third tried to disarm him.

Let's go to the facts

Rosenbaum was at the unrest after having just been discharged from a hospital in Milwaukee, his fiancée, Kariann Swart, testified at the trial.

The 36-year-old crossed paths with Rittenhouse in a used-car lot as Rittenhouse brandished an AR-15-style rifle. Rosenbaum, meanwhile, was unarmed and carried a plastic bag containing a toothbrush, toothpaste, socks, deodorant and some papers.

According to Rittenhouse's lawyers, Rosenbaum approached Rittenhouse and attempted to "engage" him. Afraid, Rittenhouse took off running and Rosenbaum gave chase. Videos of the incident show that Rosenbaum eventually threw the plastic bag he was carrying at Rittenhouse, who responded by firing four shots at the man.


Next

But along the way, several protesters who believed Rittenhouse was an active shooter began chasing after him. Anthony Huber was among them.

The 26-year-old, who grew up in Kenosha and was an avid skateboarder, was at the protest with his girlfriend, Hannah Gittings.

Huber eventually caught up to Rittenhouse and tried to stop him by hitting him with a skateboard.

Within seconds of the tussle, Rittenhouse fired a single fatal shot into Huber, who can be seen staggering away, then collapsing onto the ground, in video footage of the incident.


Next

Gaige Grosskreutz, along with Huber, was one of several people who chased Rittenhouse after he shot and killed Rosenbaum. Prosecutors have said that the group believed that Rittenhouse was an active shooter.

Grosskreutz was armed with a pistol that night.

Grosskreutz said he was not intentionally pointing his weapon at Rittenhouse, but during cross-examination agreed that it was pointed at Rittenhouse at the moment he was shot.

Rittenhouse shot Grosskreutz in the arm.



Two unarmed, one armed.
 
Why can't people accept the same set of facts?

Rittenhouse lived their dream.

The rest of these people sit at home all day, fondling their gun with affection, pining for the day they can shoot them someone they don't like.

To them, Rittenhouse was a "Real Man".

To the rest of us, he's some pudgy wannabe who got in over his head and shot his way out.
 
The two he killed were unarmed. The one he maimed wasn't aiming a gun at him.



But this is the point I was making to Dick Tiny. When you have a video of him shooting people, no doubt he was the aggressor and he was armed, and his lawyers could STILL make an argument for self-defense, in the case in Chicago, you had a shootout where the CPD could not tell Foxx who fired the first shot. So she was unable to charge anyone.

Wrong, dumb fuck.....

All of the shooters were gang members, felons, in possession of illegal guns shooting at each other on a public street......so nothing they did was legal, and there was no legitimate self defense claim for any of them.
 
You mean when you try to hit a maniac who is firing into a crowd?

He wasn't firing into a crowd, he didn't shoot until he was attacked by each one of the various brown shirts....
 
Wrong, dumb fuck.....

All of the shooters were gang members, felons, in possession of illegal guns shooting at each other on a public street......so nothing they did was legal, and there was no legitimate self defense claim for any of them.
Again, that wasn't the issue at play.

The issue was, "Who shot first?" The CPD couldn't tell Foxx who shot first. Therefore no one could be charged.
 
Thomas is only there because he's black.
Barrett is only there because she has a vagina and no rape victims are likely to pop up.
Hmmm, projection much? Yup, we checked, it's projection.
They are both morons who have no business being on the court.
Now, if they had only asked you, we wouldn't have had to deal with all those crazy insurrectionists trying to stop Congress from doing their duty when Kavanaugh was affirmed. Why didn't you tell them you already had all the answers? You're being derelict in your duty.
No, just your freakish interpretation of the Militia Amendment, which is not what the Founding Slave Rapists intended.
Man, the hits just keep on coming. Why do we even need a Supreme Court when we have random internet keyboard jockeys with more advanced law degrees?
Of course, it isn't 1787, so what they intended just ain't that important.
When you send your opinion to us written with a quill pen on parchment paper and delivered by a man on horseback, we'll make sure the government doesn't stop you from expressing it. Short of that, we won't. Deal?
What is important is that thanks to your bizarre interpretation, we have absolute batshit crazy people buying weapons of war and mowing down preschoolers.
When did Hollie get into the majority on the Supreme Court? You would think somebody on here would have caught that.
 
Again, that wasn't the issue at play.

The issue was, "Who shot first?" The CPD couldn't tell Foxx who shot first. Therefore no one could be charged.

Wrong.....you fucking dumb ass....

All of them were criminals with illegal guns....it doesn't fucking matter who shot first, they are all breaking the law merely possessing those guns, and shooting them, no matter the reason, makes them felons in commission of a violent felony...
 

Forum List

Back
Top