Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So fucking what? They have something to ask for in exchange for what they have to offer. You think it’s welfare for the corporations. I say it’s business and common sense.This has been covered many times. They wanted more than tax breaks so bite me.
So fucking what? They have something to ask for in exchange for what they have to offer. You think it’s welfare for the corporations. I say it’s business and common sense.
And no thanks. Bite yourself. And, feel obliged to go play with some murder hornets’ nest, you useless fuckwit.
The tax payers don’t pick up any bill for a tax not imposed in the first place, you idiot. 25,000 newly employed people do pay the same taxes they would have to have paid if they had gotten another job. But tens of thousands get jobs that weren’t preciously available.Yes you love corporate Socialism. Make the taxpayers pick up the bills for business. We have covered this many times.
The tax payers don’t pick up any bill for a tax not imposed in the first place, you idiot.
Again. So what? It’s called bargaining. The city gets some of what it wants and needs and the company gets some of what it wants and needs. This concept is new to you?They wanted more than tax breaks. Ignore it again if you wish.
Again. So what? It’s called bargaining. The city gets some of what it wants and needs and the company gets some of what it wants and needs. This concept is new to you?
Ignore reality again if you insist.
So what? You support the taxpayers picking up the costs of business. Corporate welfare. This is just going around in circles.
I note you support corporate welfare. You tell me I am wrong and then go on to explain why you support corporate welfare.
I didn’t endorse any such thing. In fact, I denied your ignorant contention. If the government imposes a tax on say Amazon,
You’re a dishonest coward. I did reply to your bleating. You just can’t refute how I shredded your argument. Run away, ya hapless pussy. It’s fine. You aren’t fooling anyone.If you are going to ignore what I say, I have no obligation to reply.
AOC does not have to go berserk, she is there already.
Ocasio-Cortez to Clarence Thomas: Resign or face impeachment
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday called on Justice Clarence Thomas to resign or face impeachment for what she depicted as a pattern of ethical breaches. “Clarence Thomas should res…thehill.com
Clarence Thomas should resign. If not, his failure to disclose income from right-wing organizations, recuse himself from matters involving his wife, and his vote to block the Jan 6th commission from key information must be investigated and could serve as grounds for impeachment.
What are your thoughts? Should Clarence Thomas resign in shame, or should he protect his traitor wife?
It doesn't matter, they have personal, clear conflicts of interest because both have sat on cases dealing with the subjects of their activism.The justices you mentioned... are they affiliated with the Jan 6 fiasco? Not like Ms. Thomas. You seem to think it's all imaginary what went down. Pretty sad.
You can have that so called justice Thomas. He should never been appointed in the first place. You can thank affirmative action for that.
www.biography.com
You’re a dishonest coward. I did reply to your bleating. You just can’t refute how I shredded your argument. Run away, ya hapless pussy. It’s fine. You aren’t fooling anyone.
He's not the one bitching or pissing his pants, you're the fool here that can't make a cogent argument.You can bitch till you're pissing your pants. Fuck off.
You aren't holding anything but a handful of air and you make a bigger fool of yourself with each and every post.Not on your behalf asshole. I am holding ground on my opinion and if you don't like it that's your prerogative.
The SCOTUS has never been held to the same standards as lower court justices, stop making shit up.A Supreme Court justice deciding that regulations do not apply to them (when it does) is a real issue.
There is no ethical conflict unless a case involving his wife comes before the court.Ethics comes to mind and/or not having them.
You have no clue what their sleeping arrangements are and until Ginny is convicted of insurrection, which we all know will be the third Thursday after Never, and her case comes before the court there is no conflict.He sleeps in the same bed every night as an insurrectionist. Nothing loony about wanting this major conflict of interest booted out of the SCOTUS
I said they bargained, you dull lump. Bargaining isn’t limited to just taxes, stupid.You continue to argue taxes even though you know it was more than taxes and you continue to argue even though we agree.
You support corporate welfare.
What are you, a sock puppet?He's not the one bitching or pissing his pants, you're the fool here that can't make a cogent argument.
Thomas won't be stepping down nor will he be recusing himself nor should he.
His wife does not sit on the court, he does.
So your math skills are as poor as your ability to be honest I see.?
Stop acting like over 1000 insurrectionists have not been arrested. I know you’re smarter than this.
SCOTUS judges cannot be on the bench if married to traitors
