Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Interesting! I had ancestors that fought the comanches in the 1850s and 1870s.Nope it was the Comanches, they thought the Apache’s were a bunch of wussies. Apaches were infantry which limited their strategic mobility, the Comanches were light cavalry. My Great great grandmother was a Comanche. From the stories she told me in her old age, Comanches were NOT nice people.
Comanche weren't hunters. They were mongols.This does not match the real data. Savage hunters have never been advanced in military affairs, their counterpart in Asia is the Evenks, they are also fishermen and hunters. They could only form a slave army of empire, but then it is not clear how they could oppose the slaves of the empire itself.
These were the Inde (Apache), warlike tribes. There is no doubt.
Read a book please.This is nonsense, the Apaches were cavalry, they were the most skilled riders in America.
Your book is wrong.Indеs (Apaches) no one has ever won. I read a historical study, they fought simultaneously with 3 empires and all the Indians and win them all.
Their name Inde in ancient times meant "winners" (as the name of the Indian Indra is translated)
Wait. You are arguing the US cavalry were Apaches? Did anyone tell Custer and Stuart they were Apaches?There was no US cavalry other than Apaches. In Europe, the cavalry then was only among the free peoples. These were mainly Cossacks and hussars of Poland. Imperial troops were infantry.
No wild hunters were ever cavalry, they ate horses but did not fight on horseback. It's a lie.
There was no US cavalry other than Apaches. In Europe, the cavalry then was only among the free peoples. These were mainly Cossacks and hussars of Poland. Imperial troops were infantry.
No wild hunters were ever cavalry, they ate horses but did not fight on horseback. It's a lie.
The names are not the names you quote. The names of groups or tribes in India do not translate to the tribes in America.Indеs (Apaches) no one has ever won. I read a historical study, they fought simultaneously with 3 empires and all the Indians and win them all.
Their name Inde in ancient times meant "winners" (as the name of the Indian Indra is translated)
You were talking about some mythical "white people", trying to prove that cowboys are not Apaches but British slaves. Define what you mean by this "term"
WinterBorn
If cowboys were British colonists, then why is cowboy style called Western? Weren't British slaves settled in the east?
What do you mean by that? What is the genetics of the "white man", what are the signs?
WinterBorn
Why did the British slaves need to adopt the style of clothing of the Indians? Why did the Prussian peasants not adopt the style of the winged hussars?
Texas Rangers kicked a lot of Comanche ass.
The Injins ganged up on the first few settlers. When the Whites got the numbers they ganged up on the Injins.They did eventually. But even the Texas Rangers had to adapt their fighting style to match them.
No they weren’t. Apaches were infantry who lived in mountainous terrain unsuitable for horses.This is nonsense, the Apaches were cavalry, they were the most skilled riders in America.
No horses existed in North America after the Ice Age. The mustangs were from horses that escaped from the Spanish Conquistadors and bred quickly since they had no natural predators in North America except wolves who would generally avoid herd animals like Bison and Horses.According to everyone.
It was the Indus who were the original inhabitants of the prairies with mustangs.
You’ve been watching too many movies. That’s not the way plains Indians dressed.Surely the US cavalry was formed from the same Indes. Cowboys have exactly the same clothes as the Indians, jackets and fringed trousers. These were the Indians
