Now Pattycake, you are such a dumb fuck that you will just accept what anyone tells you without checking the facts. There, indeed, has been one Scientific Society that has been forced to change it's stance on AGW by the membership. That is the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2007 AAPG revised position
Acknowledging that the association's previous policy statement on Climate Change was "not supported by a significant number of our members and prospective members",[9] AAPG's formal stance was reviewed and changed in July 2007.
The new statement formally accepts human activity as at least one contributor to carbon dioxide increase, but does not confirm its link to climate change, saying its members are "divided on the degree of influence that anthropogenic CO2 has" on climate. AAPG also stated support for "research to narrow probabilistic ranges on the effect of anthropogenic CO2 on global climate."[10]
AAPG also withdrew its earlier criticism of other scientific organizations and research stating, "Certain climate simulation models predict that the warming trend will continue, as reported through NAS, AGU, AAAS, and AMS. AAPG respects these scientific opinions but wants to add that the current climate warming projections could fall within well-documented natural variations in past climate and observed temperature data. These data do not necessarily support the maximum case scenarios forecast in some models."
Of course they have. Remember ENRON? They figured out that making money from dupes like you for doing nothing but shuffling paper is a pretty good deal so the oil companies have jumped all over the "green energy" hype.
Look who's the shill for the oil companies! It's you dipshit!
Last edited: