Are Blacks More Racist Than Whites? Most Americans Say Yes

[katsteve2012]

Not really concerned if you do or not. The two are no where near comparable, so you were corrected.

The end.

Actually they are comparable, they're both racist organizations.

No. The Klan has been connected with lynchings and church bombings. That makes them a RACISTS AS WELL AS TERRORIST organization.

Read some history. It's bad form to appear to be so ignorant.

They are both racist organizations. Suck it up, princess.

No. One advocates for what is believed to be a far too high number of unarmed blacks being killed.

The Klans mission was to terrorize, intimidate and too many cases kill not only blacks, but also Jews, gays and anyone else who did not represent their ideology of white supremacy.

You are sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid, little girl.

The Klan's mission now is to promote the white race, which is what BLM does.

The Klan is the same old Klan. They are white supremacists. They've just taken their idiocy to the internet where they find fools like you to recruit.

 

[JQPublic1]

Not really concerned if you do or not. The two are no where near comparable, so you were corrected.

The end.

Actually they are comparable, they're both racist organizations.

Really? That’s like saying an airplane is the same as a car because they both have wheels. Sorry, but a white nationalist that is unable to see the difference between both groups, is not the best source for qualifying what is racist. You have shown throughout this thread and in other threads, that even advocating for civil rights is racist in your eyes, especially considering how you made a banana reference to a black member. So your credibility is shot.

I didn't say they were the same, only comparable because they are both racist organizations. Maybe you should buy yourself a dictionary.

They aren't even comparable.

They are both racist organizations.

No..the KKK. is racist...the BLM movement is reactionary.. The latter was formed to protest
against racism. If something so obvious escapes you, there's no way we can continue this dialogue.People like you are truly the enemy because you stare the truth right ib the face and refuse to acknowledge it.

 

[JQPublic1]

Not really concerned if you do or not. The two are no where near comparable, so you were corrected.

The end.

Actually they are comparable, they're both racist organizations.

No. The Klan has been connected with lynchings and church bombings. That makes them a RACISTS AS WELL AS TERRORIST organization.

Read some history. It's bad form to appear to be so ignorant.

They are both racist organizations. Suck it up, princess.

No. One advocates for what is believed to be a far too high number of unarmed blacks being killed.

The Klans mission was to terrorize, intimidate and too many cases kill not only blacks, but also Jews, gays and anyone else who did not represent their ideology of white supremacy.

You are sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid, little girl.

The Klan's mission now is to promote the white race, which is what BLM does.

How do you know what the Klan's mission is?
Are you a member? Secondly, i am damn sure you don't know what BLM's mission is. You are just spouting your gut feelings without regard to logic or reason.

 

[Taz]

Actually they are comparable, they're both racist organizations.

No. The Klan has been connected with lynchings and church bombings. That makes them a RACISTS AS WELL AS TERRORIST organization.

Read some history. It's bad form to appear to be so ignorant.

They are both racist organizations. Suck it up, princess.

No. One advocates for what is believed to be a far too high number of unarmed blacks being killed.

The Klans mission was to terrorize, intimidate and too many cases kill not only blacks, but also Jews, gays and anyone else who did not represent their ideology of white supremacy.

You are sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid, little girl.

The Klan's mission now is to promote the white race, which is what BLM does.

The Klan is the same old Klan. They are white supremacists. They've just taken their idiocy to the internet where they find fools like you to recruit.

You're living in the past, when was the last time they lynched a black boy?

 

[Taz]

Actually they are comparable, they're both racist organizations.

Really? That’s like saying an airplane is the same as a car because they both have wheels. Sorry, but a white nationalist that is unable to see the difference between both groups, is not the best source for qualifying what is racist. You have shown throughout this thread and in other threads, that even advocating for civil rights is racist in your eyes, especially considering how you made a banana reference to a black member. So your credibility is shot.

I didn't say they were the same, only comparable because they are both racist organizations. Maybe you should buy yourself a dictionary.

They aren't even comparable.

They are both racist organizations.

No..the KKK. is racist...the BLM movement is reactionary.. The latter was formed to protest
against racism. If something so obvious escapes you, there's no way we can continue this dialogue.People like you are truly the enemy because you stare the truth right ib the face and refuse to acknowledge it.

Being racist when you protest kinda defeats the purpose, but you all are too dim to see that.

 

[Taz]

Actually they are comparable, they're both racist organizations.

No. The Klan has been connected with lynchings and church bombings. That makes them a RACISTS AS WELL AS TERRORIST organization.

Read some history. It's bad form to appear to be so ignorant.

They are both racist organizations. Suck it up, princess.

No. One advocates for what is believed to be a far too high number of unarmed blacks being killed.

The Klans mission was to terrorize, intimidate and too many cases kill not only blacks, but also Jews, gays and anyone else who did not represent their ideology of white supremacy.

You are sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid, little girl.

The Klan's mission now is to promote the white race, which is what BLM does.

How do you know what the Klan's mission is?
Are you a member? Secondly, i am damn sure you don't know what BLM's mission is. You are just spouting your gut feelings without regard to logic or reason.

There was a documentary on the KKK on PBS a while back, they interviewing some Wizard guys and shit like that. They all had their faces uncovered and said they are now simply promoting the white race, like other groups promote their own race, you know, Black Music Awards and the like. So maybe try to inform yourself next time before getting all upset.

 

[katsteve2012]

No. The Klan has been connected with lynchings and church bombings. That makes them a RACISTS AS WELL AS TERRORIST organization.

Read some history. It's bad form to appear to be so ignorant.

They are both racist organizations. Suck it up, princess.

No. One advocates for what is believed to be a far too high number of unarmed blacks being killed.

The Klans mission was to terrorize, intimidate and too many cases kill not only blacks, but also Jews, gays and anyone else who did not represent their ideology of white supremacy.

You are sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid, little girl.

The Klan's mission now is to promote the white race, which is what BLM does.

The Klan is the same old Klan. They are white supremacists. They've just taken their idiocy to the internet where they find fools like you to recruit.

You're living in the past, when was the last time they lynched a black boy?

Talking about history is not living in the past, you thick headed dunce.


When has BLM or the Nation Of Islam ever in its existence lynched a white boy?

 

[Tilly]

Can we just be clear on what racism is.

What is racism to you ?

vvvvvvvvvv This - from YOU - strange that you have to ask vvvvvvvvvv

No white person is African. If anything killing them is to good for them. I would kill.the white supremacists kids in front of them. Have them watch. I would get a bunch of black men to rape their daughters and make them watch. And then kill their daughters in front of them. And then laugh at them. treat them exactly how they treat. So I agree with every worthless white bastard who has died in SA

 

[Tilly]

Racism test for conservative whites.

Racism
noun
1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.
2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

source: the definition of racism

Questions to determine if you are racist or not (but not limited to).

• Do you believe most poor people, in the US (not children), are poor because of personal flaws or weaknesses?
• Do you believe that had whites had an experience like blacks, in degree and kind, that whites would be in a better socioeconomic situation condition than blacks are today?
• Do you believe that blacks dominate football, basketball, track, ect, because they work harder at those sports than whites?
• Do you believe that black and whites have the same innate intelligence capacity at birth?

Answer the questions honestly without being evasive or obfuscating the question to avoid self incrimination. Don't answer a question with a question, unless its a question seeking clarification of the above questions.

Obviously few people want to see themselves as racist and hence will attempt to circumvent the direct line of questioning...if they feel they may be racist. Attempts to obfuscate, deflect, attack, discredit...without answering the question, indicates hiding something. However, for most posters, the answers to most of those questions have been stated or implied numerous times in various debate topics.In other words, most posters have already answered these questions indirectly.

People who chose not to answer, but respond anyway, will be ignored.

Unless you are a very weak person, and are crushed by a dirty look.....how does what anyone else believes hurt you?

If a person's belief leads them to do and say hurtful things intentionally then it goes beyond just their belief. As far as being weak if you are crushed by a dirty look - I think that some folks just get sick and tired of seeing that dirty look over and over again, day in and day out. I think it is more of a frustration that they still have to deal with folks who see them as inferior.

You haven’t legislated against dirty looks yet. That next?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Racism test for conservative whites.

Racism
noun
1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.
2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

source: the definition of racism

Questions to determine if you are racist or not (but not limited to).

• Do you believe most poor people, in the US (not children), are poor because of personal flaws or weaknesses?
• Do you believe that had whites had an experience like blacks, in degree and kind, that whites would be in a better socioeconomic situation condition than blacks are today?
• Do you believe that blacks dominate football, basketball, track, ect, because they work harder at those sports than whites?
• Do you believe that black and whites have the same innate intelligence capacity at birth?

Answer the questions honestly without being evasive or obfuscating the question to avoid self incrimination. Don't answer a question with a question, unless its a question seeking clarification of the above questions.

Obviously few people want to see themselves as racist and hence will attempt to circumvent the direct line of questioning...if they feel they may be racist. Attempts to obfuscate, deflect, attack, discredit...without answering the question, indicates hiding something. However, for most posters, the answers to most of those questions have been stated or implied numerous times in various debate topics.In other words, most posters have already answered these questions indirectly.

People who chose not to answer, but respond anyway, will be ignored.

Unless you are a very weak person, and are crushed by a dirty look.....how does what anyone else believes hurt you?

If a person's belief leads them to do and say hurtful things intentionally then it goes beyond just their belief. As far as being weak if you are crushed by a dirty look - I think that some folks just get sick and tired of seeing that dirty look over and over again, day in and day out. I think it is more of a frustration that they still have to deal with folks who see them as inferior.

You haven’t legislated against dirty looks yet. That next?

You know they would if they could.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Russians need do nothing. Without screaming "racism" there would be no democratic party.

Your an idiot. In what none dictatorial political construct does there not exist an opposition party? If you think that liberalism is based upon race, the world over, you are an idiot.

In conclusion: You are an idiot.

You're either a liar or a fool....you can choose.



This is the reason why Liberals keep the racism farrago going:


But, the Dems can's take a chance on losing the black constituency....so, here we are.
They're pretty much saddled with this donkey.


"...what would happen if a smaller percentage of blacks turned out:

- At 90 percent black turn-out, Wisconsin’s 10 electoral votes slide into the GOP column.

- At 75 percent black turn-out, Pennsylvania’s 21 electoral votes go Republican.

- At 70 percent Michigan’s 17 electoral votes turn from blue to red.

- At 50 percent the GOP collects Delawre’s three electoral votes.

I don’t know what a realistic number to project is for the effects of angry black apathy, but I’ll stop at 50 percent. It may be that going as low as 75 percent is unrealistic. Most likely it’s impossible to say. (And this doesn’t take into account things like congressional districts where black voters make the margin of difference.)"

Do Democrats need the black vote? | RobertEmmet





But what exactly would that mean? In how many states do black voters make the difference? I ran some rough numbers over at Robert Emmet -- check them out. Depending on how much of a drop-off you assume, it could cost the Democrats 10 to 76 electoral votes.

The Democrats and the Black Vote | HuffPost



Democrats are heavily dependent on the black vote. That’s an opportunity for the GOP.
The black vote has become important enough to the Democratic party that a small drop in support could make a big difference.

in the 1992 election, 13 percent of the Democratic vote came from black voters. In 2014, it was 23 percent.

That's the overall trend. On a state-by-state basis -- which is much more important in presidential politics -- it's more complex.

If there'd been a one-point swing from Obama to McCain in North Carolina in 2008, McCain would have won the state. And if the black vote in Florida and Ohio in 2012 had been as strong for the Republicans as it was in 2004 -- in the pre-Obama era -- Romney would have won both." Democrats are heavily dependent on the black vote. That’s an opportunity for the GOP.

So..conversely that means the GOP depends on the RW white radical vote...and their collective name is LEGION.

There is no 'white radical vote' ......just as there is no Far Right in this country.....only a Far Left, your masters.

You, my dear, epitomize, RW radicalism.
One symptom of that is not being able to discern it in your self. But the whole USMB village knows who and what you are.

I'm a conservative.
I support the values upon which this nation was formed: individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Radical would be any that support the antithesis of those doctrines.
Hence, only Liberalism, Progressivism, Communism, Socialism, Nazism or Fascism would be radical in America.


There is no Far Right in this country.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Actually they are comparable, they're both racist organizations.

No. The Klan has been connected with lynchings and church bombings. That makes them a RACISTS AS WELL AS TERRORIST organization.

Read some history. It's bad form to appear to be so ignorant.

They are both racist organizations. Suck it up, princess.

No. One advocates for what is believed to be a far too high number of unarmed blacks being killed.

The Klans mission was to terrorize, intimidate and too many cases kill not only blacks, but also Jews, gays and anyone else who did not represent their ideology of white supremacy.

You are sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid, little girl.

The Klan's mission now is to promote the white race, which is what BLM does.

The Klan is the same old Klan. They are white supremacists. They've just taken their idiocy to the internet where they find fools like you to recruit.

Are you referring to the military arm of the Democrat Party....the KKK????

The oldest racist organization in America.....the Democrat Party.

They 'recruit' black folks who don't know their history.

Raise your paw.

 

[Tilly]

BLM is the black KKK. But BLM = good, and KKK = bad. As per usual.

For White People Who Compare Black Lives Matter to White Supremacy

Argument: Both white supremacists and Black Lives Matter are racist.
White supremacist groups like the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the American Nazi Party and others are specifically dedicated to the uplift and empowerment of white people. A few white supremacists and alt-right adherents claim that they aren’t racist and that they have no qualm with people of other colors, genders and sexualities. This notion is the simplest to debunk of all. Simply send a person of color to a KKK meeting, a neo-Nazi gathering or a white nationalist convention and watch what happens.

Conversely, every Black Lives Matter meeting, rally or symposium is filled with people of different races, ethnicities and sexual preferences. Black Lives Matter states it is “committed to acknowledging, respecting and celebrating difference(s) and commonalities.”

https://www.theroot.com/for-white-people-who-compare-black-lives-matter-to-whit-1798349198

Both orgs promote their own race. But at one BLM protest, they hired a bus to get there and wanted the whites to sit in the back.

Conversely, every Black Lives Matter meeting, rally or symposium is filled with people of different races, ethnicities and sexual preferences.

What part of that do you not understand?

What part of this do you not understand?

White people to the back of the march': Black Lives Matter protest leader calls for racial segregation of her supporters during demonstration outside the DNC

• Protesters at a Black Lives Matter demonstration demanded segregation
• An organizer pointed at individual white people and ordered them to move
• She said their positions in the crowd should be taken over by black people

Read more: Black Lives Matter protest leader calls for racial segregation during demonstration | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[Tilly]

Not all native born black people came from slavery. A lot of native born black people are mixed races. Again, how do you determine how much and who gets what?

All native born blacks faced racial discrimination and American Aparthied. A mixed race black was considered black. .I think if you are going to argue, you should know what you are arguing abut instead of seeking ways to discredit an argument based in not knowing any of the facts. I am quite sure we are capable of determining eligibility for reparations and the majority opinion seems to be that the money be put in funds for specific types of programs instead of paying individuals. If you thought about this with some common sense instead of race baited thinking, you would see this is the perfect solution. If blacks are awarded reparations and we piss it away with no improvements, we have nothing more to complain about as whites would have done all they could do to make up for the wrongs done..

Unless angry whites decide to burn down prosperous black communities and projects again.

You just want hand outs instead of working and earning your way. If you are successful, why do you need charity?

And you actually think what we have endured means we are asking for charity? Then you wondrr why you get called dumb? You can't read apparetly?

All native born blacks faced racial discrimination and American Aparthied. A mixed race black was considered black. .I think if you are going to argue, you should know what you are arguing abut instead of seeking ways to discredit an argument based in not knowing any of the facts. I am quite sure we are capable of determining eligibility for reparations and the majority opinion seems to be that the money be put in funds for specific types of programs instead of paying individuals. If you thought about this with some common sense instead of race baited thinking, you would see this is the perfect solution. If blacks are awarded reparations and we piss it away with no improvements, we have nothing more to complain about as whites would have done all they could do to make up for the wrongs done..

So I will not get any money unless I am developing a program or business in the black community to increase economic development and growth in that community.

So read this again and understand that you have no logical argument.

RACE - The Power of an Illusion


A Long History of Affirmative Action - For Whites

Many middle-class white people, especially those of us from the suburbs, like to think that we got to where we are today by virtue of our merit - hard work, intelligence, pluck, and maybe a little luck. And while we may be sympathetic to the plight of others, we close down when we hear the words "affirmative action" or "racial preferences." We worked hard, we made it on our own, the thinking goes, why don't 'they'? After all, the Civil Rights Act was enacted almost 40 years ago.

What we don't readily acknowledge is that racial preferences have a long, institutional history in this country - a white history. Here are a few ways in which government programs and practices have channeled wealth and opportunities to white people at the expense of others.

Let us continue....

Affirmative action in the American "workplace" first began in the late 17th century when European indentured servants - the original source of unfree labor on the new tobacco plantations of Virginia and Maryland - were replaced by African slaves. In exchange for their support and their policing of the growing slave population, lower-class Europeans won new rights, entitlements, and opportunities from the planter elite.

White Americans were also given a head start with the help of the U.S. Army. The 1830 Indian Removal Act, for example, forcibly relocated Cherokee, Creeks and other eastern Indians to west of the Mississippi River to make room for white settlers. The 1862 Homestead Act followed suit, giving away millions of acres of what had been Indian Territory west of the Mississippi. Ultimately, 270 million acres, or 10% of the total land area of the United States, was converted to private hands, overwhelmingly white, under Homestead Act provisions.

The 1790 Naturalization Act permitted only "free white persons" to become naturalized citizens, thus opening the doors to European immigrants but not others. Only citizens could vote, serve on juries, hold office, and in some cases, even hold property. In this century, Alien Land Laws passed in California and other states, reserved farm land for white growers by preventing Asian immigrants, ineligible to become citizens, from owning or leasing land. Immigration restrictions further limited opportunities for nonwhite groups. Racial barriers to naturalized U.S. citizenship weren't removed until the McCarran-Walter Act in 1952, and white racial preferences in immigration remained until 1965.

In the South, the federal government never followed through on General Sherman's Civil War plan to divide up plantations and give each freed slave "40 acres and a mule" as reparations. Only once was monetary compensation made for slavery, in Washington, D.C. There, government officials paid up to $300 per slave upon emancipation - not to the slaves, but to local slaveholders as compensation for loss of property.

When slavery ended, its legacy lived on not only in the impoverished condition of Black people but in the wealth and prosperity that accrued to white slaveowners and their descendents. Economists who try to place a dollar value on how much white Americans have profited from 200 years of unpaid slave labor, including interest, begin their estimates at $1 trillion.

Let us continue.....

Less known are more recent government racial preferences, first enacted during the New Deal, that directed wealth to white families and continue to shape life opportunities and chances.

The landmark Social Security Act of 1935 provided a safety net for millions of workers, guaranteeing them an income after retirement. But the act specifically excluded two occupations: agricultural workers and domestic servants, who were predominately African American, Mexican, and Asian. As low-income workers, they also had the least opportunity to save for their retirement. They couldn't pass wealth on to their children. Just the opposite. Their children had to support them.

Like Social Security, the 1935 Wagner Act helped establish an important new right for white people. By granting unions the power of collective bargaining, it helped millions of white workers gain entry into the middle class over the next 30 years. But the Wagner Act permitted unions to exclude non-whites and deny them access to better paid jobs and union protections and benefits such as health care, job security, and pensions. Many craft unions remained nearly all-white well into the 1970s. In 1972, for example, every single one of the 3,000 members of Los Angeles Steam Fitters Local #250 was still white.

But it was another racialized New Deal program, the Federal Housing Administration, that helped generate much of the wealth that so many white families enjoy today. These revolutionary programs made it possible for millions of average white Americans - but not others - to own a home for the first time. The government set up a national neighborhood appraisal system, explicitly tying mortgage eligibility to race. Integrated communities were ipso facto deemed a financial risk and made ineligible for home loans, a policy known today as "redlining." Between 1934 and 1962, the federal government backed $120 billion of home loans. More than 98% went to whites. Of the 350,000 new homes built with federal support in northern California between 1946 and 1960, fewer than 100 went to African Americans.

Let us continue....

Today, Black and Latino mortgage applicants are still 60% more likely than whites to be turned down for a loan, even after controlling for employment, financial, and neighborhood factors. According to the Census, whites are more likely to be segregated than any other group. As recently as 1993, 86% of suburban whites still lived in neighborhoods with a black population of less than 1%.

Let us continue....

One result of the generations of preferential treatment for whites is that a typical white family today has on average eight times the assets, or net worth, of a typical African American family, according to economist Edward Wolff. Even when families of the same income are compared, white families have more than twice the wealth of Black families. Much of that wealth difference can be attributed to the value of one's home, and how much one inherited from parents.

But a family's net worth is not simply the finish line, it's also the starting point for the next generation. Those with wealth pass their assets on to their children - by financing a college education, lending a hand during hard times, or assisting with the down payment for a home. Some economists estimate that up to 80 percent of lifetime wealth accumulation depends on these intergenerational transfers. White advantage is passed down, from parent to child to grand-child. As a result, the racial wealth gap - and the head start enjoyed by whites - appears to have grown since the civil rights days.

In 1865, just after Emancipation, it is not surprising that African Americans owned 0.5 percent of the total worth of the United States. But by 1990, a full 135 years after the abolition of slavery, Black Americans still possessed only a meager 1 percent of national wealth.

RACE - The Power of an Illusion | White Advantage

Of course you'll use the I did not get, I did not do argument. I doesn't exist at the macro level. WE do. And we are talking about a macro level situation. Do you know the difference between micro and macro level?

Do you know the difference between past and present? Sure, the past affects the present, but thats life. Move on and quit whining. There is no macro or micro level when it comes to who should get compensated. You are jyst an angry man who hates white people

LOL! We are owed, Every group that's been wronged n his nation has gotten reparations except us.. If no one had ever got them we have no right to ask. But that's not what happened . So again you need to be quiet if you don't know what you are talking abut.

You’ve waited your whole 50+ years of life thus far begging for this handout that you’re not going to get.
What a waste.

 

[Tilly]

You know what? Let the government aka us tax paying citizens, pay reparations and be done with it. Any whining after that people can shut the fuck up.

Giving them money (trillions, btw) will do absolutely nothing to stop the whining.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Can we just be clear on what racism is.

What is racism to you ?

vvvvvvvvvv This - from YOU - strange that you have to ask vvvvvvvvvv

No white person is African. If anything killing them is to good for them. I would kill.the white supremacists kids in front of them. Have them watch. I would get a bunch of black men to rape their daughters and make them watch. And then kill their daughters in front of them. And then laugh at them. treat them exactly how they treat. So I agree with every worthless white bastard who has died in SA

So glad you posted what that Neanderthal wrote.

What a disgusting low-life.

 

[Tilly]

Can we just be clear on what racism is.

What is racism to you ?

vvvvvvvvvv This - from YOU - strange that you have to ask vvvvvvvvvv

No white person is African. If anything killing them is to good for them. I would kill.the white supremacists kids in front of them. Have them watch. I would get a bunch of black men to rape their daughters and make them watch. And then kill their daughters in front of them. And then laugh at them. treat them exactly how they treat. So I agree with every worthless white bastard who has died in SA

So glad you posted what that Neanderthal wrote.

What a disgusting low-life.

Interestingly, not another black poster or leftie on the thread had a single thing to say about it. I was, and am still, shocked. Guess I shouldn't be.

 

[MizMolly]

You know what? Let the government aka us tax paying citizens, pay reparations and be done with it. Any whining after that people can shut the fuck up.

So, a mixed race person has to pay reparations to themselves?

 

[Tilly]

You know what? Let the government aka us tax paying citizens, pay reparations and be done with it. Any whining after that people can shut the fuck up.

So, a mixed race person has to pay reparations to themselves?

Lol. Great point. Also the Africans who enslaved them and sold them on should surely pay reparations first, since they formed the beginning of the chain of enslavement, brutality and misery.

 

[MizMolly]

Would you feel better if I amended my statement and say that BLM is a budding KKK? KKK lite? KKK wannabes? Your choice.

Not really concerned if you do or not. The two are no where near comparable, so you were corrected.

The end.

Actually they are comparable, they're both racist organizations.

No. The Klan has been connected with lynchings and church bombings. That makes them a RACISTS AS WELL AS TERRORIST organization.

Read some history. It's bad form to appear to be so ignorant.

They are both racist organizations. Suck it up, princess.

No. One advocates for what is believed to be a far too high number of unarmed blacks being killed.

The Klans mission was to terrorize, intimidate and in many cases kill not only blacks, but also Jews, gays and anyone else who did not represent their ideology of white supremacy.

You are sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid, little girl.

Most police shootings are justified. There are exceptions, but not the norm. Those cops should be held accountable, but not just because they shot a black person. Black cops shoot black and white perps.
Police -- Racism Isn’t Why Black Men Get Shot | National Review