Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1) That's called murderHoly fuck.
It's the act that defines homicide, negligence or defense. No wonder you support hate crimes, you feel things instead of thinking through them.
It is not the act .
You can shoot someone dead . That's the act .
But what if
1) you shot the guy cause you walked in on him banging your wife.
2) you shot the guy while cleaning your gun
3) you shot the guy cause he was an intruder in your house.
According to you all 3 are the same . What you were thinking doesn't make a difference .
2) Negligent discharge. Not murder but Involuntary manslaughter or some such charge.
3) Self defense. Cops chuckle and roll to the next call.
Bingo ! But the difference is what the guy is thinking. Motive .
So enough of this "what people are thinking doesn't matter " nonsense .
Apples and oranges.
What you're trying to do is make a comparison between different types of killings and killing based on category of people. If I kill an intruder it doesn't matter what race, sex or religion that person is. The same if I accidentally shoot somebody or catch them sleeping with my wife.
However Hate Crimes are special protections for potential Democrat voters like gays and minorities. How would you like if Republicans got leadership and made it an automatic death penalty for killing cops, CEO's or religious leaders?
No special group of people should have more advanced protection than all the other groups of people. It's a violation of Equal Protection. Furthermore is the hypocrisy from the left that have always protested capital punishment which is part of a Hate Crimes sentencing.
It is equal protection .
You realize white people can be victims of hate crimes right ? There's this misconception that hate crimes don't cover everyone .
Right, acts. Acts to kill, acts of negligence and acts of self defense are not the same. Nor are they treated as such by law.Huh? All three were acts, not thoughts. Are you on LSD?1) That's called murderHoly fuck.
It's the act that defines homicide, negligence or defense. No wonder you support hate crimes, you feel things instead of thinking through them.
It is not the act .
You can shoot someone dead . That's the act .
But what if
1) you shot the guy cause you walked in on him banging your wife.
2) you shot the guy while cleaning your gun
3) you shot the guy cause he was an intruder in your house.
According to you all 3 are the same . What you were thinking doesn't make a difference .
2) Negligent discharge. Not murder but Involuntary manslaughter or some such charge.
3) Self defense. Cops chuckle and roll to the next call.
Bingo ! But the difference is what the guy is thinking. Motive .
So enough of this "what people are thinking doesn't matter " nonsense .
No . It's the same act . You shot the person .
I tend to want to agree but I like stiffer penalties for people who kill cops or target seniorsHate crime legislation is an attempt to punish thoughts. It is unconstitutional and very dangerous to a free society.
If someone kills you because of your race or kills you to steal your money, the crime is murder, it doesn't matter what the criminal was thinking when he committed the crime.
I tend to want to agree but I like stiffer penalties for people who kill cops or target seniorsHate crime legislation is an attempt to punish thoughts. It is unconstitutional and very dangerous to a free society.
If someone kills you because of your race or kills you to steal your money, the crime is murder, it doesn't matter what the criminal was thinking when he committed the crime.
Fair? Like the rich kid who killed 4 and got probation for affluenza? Then violated probation and went to Mexico and still won't do serious timeI tend to want to agree but I like stiffer penalties for people who kill cops or target seniorsHate crime legislation is an attempt to punish thoughts. It is unconstitutional and very dangerous to a free society.
If someone kills you because of your race or kills you to steal your money, the crime is murder, it doesn't matter what the criminal was thinking when he committed the crime.
I can agree with that, but we have a Constitution to abide by, and we are all supposed to be treated equally under the law regardless of race, gender or religion. If anything, let's up the prison time for everybody, and then let the judges make the decision on who gets the max. At least it's fair that way.
1) That's called murderHoly fuck.Umm no . The exact opposite . It's all about what people are thinking . That's what makes crime .just the opposite. a crime is a crime no matter what the criminal was thinking at the time.
That's why we don't charge animals with crimes .
It's the act that defines homicide, negligence or defense. No wonder you support hate crimes, you feel things instead of thinking through them.A dead body doesn't mean murder one death penalty .
It is not the act .
You can shoot someone dead . That's the act .
But what if
1) you shot the guy cause you walked in on him banging your wife.
2) you shot the guy while cleaning your gun
3) you shot the guy cause he was an intruder in your house.
According to you all 3 are the same . What you were thinking doesn't make a difference .
2) Negligent discharge. Not murder but Involuntary manslaughter or some such charge.
3) Self defense. Cops chuckle and roll to the next call.
Bingo ! But the difference is what the guy is thinking. Motive .
So enough of this "what people are thinking doesn't matter " nonsense .
1) That's called murderHoly fuck.
It's the act that defines homicide, negligence or defense. No wonder you support hate crimes, you feel things instead of thinking through them.
It is not the act .
You can shoot someone dead . That's the act .
But what if
1) you shot the guy cause you walked in on him banging your wife.
2) you shot the guy while cleaning your gun
3) you shot the guy cause he was an intruder in your house.
According to you all 3 are the same . What you were thinking doesn't make a difference .
2) Negligent discharge. Not murder but Involuntary manslaughter or some such charge.
3) Self defense. Cops chuckle and roll to the next call.
Bingo ! But the difference is what the guy is thinking. Motive .
So enough of this "what people are thinking doesn't matter " nonsense .
Apples and oranges.
What you're trying to do is make a comparison between different types of killings and killing based on category of people. If I kill an intruder it doesn't matter what race, sex or religion that person is. The same if I accidentally shoot somebody or catch them sleeping with my wife.
However Hate Crimes are special protections for potential Democrat voters like gays and minorities. How would you like if Republicans got leadership and made it an automatic death penalty for killing cops, CEO's or religious leaders?
No special group of people should have more advanced protection than all the other groups of people. It's a violation of Equal Protection. Furthermore is the hypocrisy from the left that have always protested capital punishment which is part of a Hate Crimes sentencing.
It is equal protection .
You realize white people can be victims of hate crimes right ? There's this misconception that hate crimes don't cover everyone .
Fair? Like the rich kid who killed 4 and got probation for affluenza? Then violated probation and went to Mexico and still won't do serious timeI tend to want to agree but I like stiffer penalties for people who kill cops or target seniorsHate crime legislation is an attempt to punish thoughts. It is unconstitutional and very dangerous to a free society.
If someone kills you because of your race or kills you to steal your money, the crime is murder, it doesn't matter what the criminal was thinking when he committed the crime.
I can agree with that, but we have a Constitution to abide by, and we are all supposed to be treated equally under the law regardless of race, gender or religion. If anything, let's up the prison time for everybody, and then let the judges make the decision on who gets the max. At least it's fair that way.
1) That's called murderIt is not the act .
You can shoot someone dead . That's the act .
But what if
1) you shot the guy cause you walked in on him banging your wife.
2) you shot the guy while cleaning your gun
3) you shot the guy cause he was an intruder in your house.
According to you all 3 are the same . What you were thinking doesn't make a difference .
2) Negligent discharge. Not murder but Involuntary manslaughter or some such charge.
3) Self defense. Cops chuckle and roll to the next call.
Bingo ! But the difference is what the guy is thinking. Motive .
So enough of this "what people are thinking doesn't matter " nonsense .
Apples and oranges.
What you're trying to do is make a comparison between different types of killings and killing based on category of people. If I kill an intruder it doesn't matter what race, sex or religion that person is. The same if I accidentally shoot somebody or catch them sleeping with my wife.
However Hate Crimes are special protections for potential Democrat voters like gays and minorities. How would you like if Republicans got leadership and made it an automatic death penalty for killing cops, CEO's or religious leaders?
No special group of people should have more advanced protection than all the other groups of people. It's a violation of Equal Protection. Furthermore is the hypocrisy from the left that have always protested capital punishment which is part of a Hate Crimes sentencing.
It is equal protection .
You realize white people can be victims of hate crimes right ? There's this misconception that hate crimes don't cover everyone .
We cannot punish the hate, we can only punish the crime. Hating is NOT a crime.
1) That's called murderHoly fuck.Umm no . The exact opposite . It's all about what people are thinking . That's what makes crime .
That's why we don't charge animals with crimes .
It's the act that defines homicide, negligence or defense. No wonder you support hate crimes, you feel things instead of thinking through them.A dead body doesn't mean murder one death penalty .
It is not the act .
You can shoot someone dead . That's the act .
But what if
1) you shot the guy cause you walked in on him banging your wife.
2) you shot the guy while cleaning your gun
3) you shot the guy cause he was an intruder in your house.
According to you all 3 are the same . What you were thinking doesn't make a difference .
2) Negligent discharge. Not murder but Involuntary manslaughter or some such charge.
3) Self defense. Cops chuckle and roll to the next call.
Bingo ! But the difference is what the guy is thinking. Motive .
So enough of this "what people are thinking doesn't matter " nonsense .
totally wrong, but to take your idiotic reasoning to its logical conclusion, we will be punishing people for their thoughts before any act is committed.
Orwell had it right, big brother is watching you------------------and monitoring your thoughts.
1) That's called murderHoly fuck.
It's the act that defines homicide, negligence or defense. No wonder you support hate crimes, you feel things instead of thinking through them.
It is not the act .
You can shoot someone dead . That's the act .
But what if
1) you shot the guy cause you walked in on him banging your wife.
2) you shot the guy while cleaning your gun
3) you shot the guy cause he was an intruder in your house.
According to you all 3 are the same . What you were thinking doesn't make a difference .
2) Negligent discharge. Not murder but Involuntary manslaughter or some such charge.
3) Self defense. Cops chuckle and roll to the next call.
Bingo ! But the difference is what the guy is thinking. Motive .
So enough of this "what people are thinking doesn't matter " nonsense .
Apples and oranges.
What you're trying to do is make a comparison between different types of killings and killing based on category of people. If I kill an intruder it doesn't matter what race, sex or religion that person is. The same if I accidentally shoot somebody or catch them sleeping with my wife.
However Hate Crimes are special protections for potential Democrat voters like gays and minorities. How would you like if Republicans got leadership and made it an automatic death penalty for killing cops, CEO's or religious leaders?
No special group of people should have more advanced protection than all the other groups of people. It's a violation of Equal Protection. Furthermore is the hypocrisy from the left that have always protested capital punishment which is part of a Hate Crimes sentencing.
It is equal protection .
You realize white people can be victims of hate crimes right ? There's this misconception that hate crimes don't cover everyone .
1) That's called murderIt is not the act .
You can shoot someone dead . That's the act .
But what if
1) you shot the guy cause you walked in on him banging your wife.
2) you shot the guy while cleaning your gun
3) you shot the guy cause he was an intruder in your house.
According to you all 3 are the same . What you were thinking doesn't make a difference .
2) Negligent discharge. Not murder but Involuntary manslaughter or some such charge.
3) Self defense. Cops chuckle and roll to the next call.
Bingo ! But the difference is what the guy is thinking. Motive .
So enough of this "what people are thinking doesn't matter " nonsense .
Apples and oranges.
What you're trying to do is make a comparison between different types of killings and killing based on category of people. If I kill an intruder it doesn't matter what race, sex or religion that person is. The same if I accidentally shoot somebody or catch them sleeping with my wife.
However Hate Crimes are special protections for potential Democrat voters like gays and minorities. How would you like if Republicans got leadership and made it an automatic death penalty for killing cops, CEO's or religious leaders?
No special group of people should have more advanced protection than all the other groups of people. It's a violation of Equal Protection. Furthermore is the hypocrisy from the left that have always protested capital punishment which is part of a Hate Crimes sentencing.
It is equal protection .
You realize white people can be victims of hate crimes right ? There's this misconception that hate crimes don't cover everyone .
We cannot punish the hate, we can only punish the crime. Hating is NOT a crime.
Fair? Like the rich kid who killed 4 and got probation for affluenza? Then violated probation and went to Mexico and still won't do serious timeI tend to want to agree but I like stiffer penalties for people who kill cops or target seniorsHate crime legislation is an attempt to punish thoughts. It is unconstitutional and very dangerous to a free society.
If someone kills you because of your race or kills you to steal your money, the crime is murder, it doesn't matter what the criminal was thinking when he committed the crime.
I can agree with that, but we have a Constitution to abide by, and we are all supposed to be treated equally under the law regardless of race, gender or religion. If anything, let's up the prison time for everybody, and then let the judges make the decision on who gets the max. At least it's fair that way.
Or Hillary Clinton violating federal classified data protection laws and getting away with it. No one should be above the law-----------------including your beloved Clintons.
Ovey!Fair? Like the rich kid who killed 4 and got probation for affluenza? Then violated probation and went to Mexico and still won't do serious timeI tend to want to agree but I like stiffer penalties for people who kill cops or target seniorsHate crime legislation is an attempt to punish thoughts. It is unconstitutional and very dangerous to a free society.
If someone kills you because of your race or kills you to steal your money, the crime is murder, it doesn't matter what the criminal was thinking when he committed the crime.
I can agree with that, but we have a Constitution to abide by, and we are all supposed to be treated equally under the law regardless of race, gender or religion. If anything, let's up the prison time for everybody, and then let the judges make the decision on who gets the max. At least it's fair that way.
Or Hillary Clinton violating federal classified data protection laws and getting away with it. No one should be above the law-----------------including your beloved Clintons.
Ovey!Fair? Like the rich kid who killed 4 and got probation for affluenza? Then violated probation and went to Mexico and still won't do serious timeI tend to want to agree but I like stiffer penalties for people who kill cops or target seniorsHate crime legislation is an attempt to punish thoughts. It is unconstitutional and very dangerous to a free society.
If someone kills you because of your race or kills you to steal your money, the crime is murder, it doesn't matter what the criminal was thinking when he committed the crime.
I can agree with that, but we have a Constitution to abide by, and we are all supposed to be treated equally under the law regardless of race, gender or religion. If anything, let's up the prison time for everybody, and then let the judges make the decision on who gets the max. At least it's fair that way.
Or Hillary Clinton violating federal classified data protection laws and getting away with it. No one should be above the law-----------------including your beloved Clintons.
Regurgitating bull crud again I see.....
She broke no law.
1) That's called murderHoly fuck.
It's the act that defines homicide, negligence or defense. No wonder you support hate crimes, you feel things instead of thinking through them.
It is not the act .
You can shoot someone dead . That's the act .
But what if
1) you shot the guy cause you walked in on him banging your wife.
2) you shot the guy while cleaning your gun
3) you shot the guy cause he was an intruder in your house.
According to you all 3 are the same . What you were thinking doesn't make a difference .
2) Negligent discharge. Not murder but Involuntary manslaughter or some such charge.
3) Self defense. Cops chuckle and roll to the next call.
Bingo ! But the difference is what the guy is thinking. Motive .
So enough of this "what people are thinking doesn't matter " nonsense .
totally wrong, but to take your idiotic reasoning to its logical conclusion, we will be punishing people for their thoughts before any act is committed.
Orwell had it right, big brother is watching you------------------and monitoring your thoughts.
Actually, no. As the reasoning you're criticizing requires a criminal act to trigger it. Not merely a thought about a criminal act.
1) That's called murder
2) Negligent discharge. Not murder but Involuntary manslaughter or some such charge.
3) Self defense. Cops chuckle and roll to the next call.
Bingo ! But the difference is what the guy is thinking. Motive .
So enough of this "what people are thinking doesn't matter " nonsense .
Apples and oranges.
What you're trying to do is make a comparison between different types of killings and killing based on category of people. If I kill an intruder it doesn't matter what race, sex or religion that person is. The same if I accidentally shoot somebody or catch them sleeping with my wife.
However Hate Crimes are special protections for potential Democrat voters like gays and minorities. How would you like if Republicans got leadership and made it an automatic death penalty for killing cops, CEO's or religious leaders?
No special group of people should have more advanced protection than all the other groups of people. It's a violation of Equal Protection. Furthermore is the hypocrisy from the left that have always protested capital punishment which is part of a Hate Crimes sentencing.
It is equal protection .
You realize white people can be victims of hate crimes right ? There's this misconception that hate crimes don't cover everyone .
We cannot punish the hate, we can only punish the crime. Hating is NOT a crime.
We can punish hate. The question is, should we? I find the entire idea....problematic.
Ovey!Fair? Like the rich kid who killed 4 and got probation for affluenza? Then violated probation and went to Mexico and still won't do serious timeI tend to want to agree but I like stiffer penalties for people who kill cops or target seniorsHate crime legislation is an attempt to punish thoughts. It is unconstitutional and very dangerous to a free society.
If someone kills you because of your race or kills you to steal your money, the crime is murder, it doesn't matter what the criminal was thinking when he committed the crime.
I can agree with that, but we have a Constitution to abide by, and we are all supposed to be treated equally under the law regardless of race, gender or religion. If anything, let's up the prison time for everybody, and then let the judges make the decision on who gets the max. At least it's fair that way.
Or Hillary Clinton violating federal classified data protection laws and getting away with it. No one should be above the law-----------------including your beloved Clintons.
Regurgitating bull crud again I see.....
She broke no law.
Ovey!Fair? Like the rich kid who killed 4 and got probation for affluenza? Then violated probation and went to Mexico and still won't do serious timeI tend to want to agree but I like stiffer penalties for people who kill cops or target seniors
I can agree with that, but we have a Constitution to abide by, and we are all supposed to be treated equally under the law regardless of race, gender or religion. If anything, let's up the prison time for everybody, and then let the judges make the decision on who gets the max. At least it's fair that way.
Or Hillary Clinton violating federal classified data protection laws and getting away with it. No one should be above the law-----------------including your beloved Clintons.
Regurgitating bull crud again I see.....
She broke no law.
Its a hail mary, 'please god, let me change the topic' sort of thing.
