Are there any honest liberals who are Sick and disgusted with the race baiting?

[Discombobulated]

1. 
   Are there any honest liberals who are Sick and disgusted with the race baiting
   
   No.
   
   The liberal mantra depends on having a victim, and when they don't have one, they make one up.

This is so ironic. You are the ones constantly depicting yourselves as victims of racism.

You should really enjoy this one.

"Devoted to Marx" you're a lost cause moron..... Stick to the topic or move the fuck on

You are a very stupid little man. You seem to actually believe that you've made the case that everything is about race.

it was a question actually..and i got your little man boy... I crush pea brained marxist

I have no idea what this incoherent scree of nonsense means.

it means you don't who you're talking to boy... Comment on the topic or sit your ass down

I already did, you just didn't like the answer to your dishonest question.

 

[Stephanie]

1. 
   Are there any honest liberals who are Sick and disgusted with the race baiting
   
   No.
   
   The liberal mantra depends on having a victim, and when they don't have one, they make one up.

This is so ironic. You are the ones constantly depicting yourselves as victims of racism.

Oh, this is going to be a wonderful piece of convoluted logic, I can see that now.

Just exactly how do you purport that I claim to e a victim of racism?

My point was aimed at the collective: the preponderance of rightwingers. If you don't fit in those clodhoppers, don't wear them.

zzzzzzzzzzz
and you leftwingers aren't a collective? . Have you disagreed with one thing Obama and his party has done? Besides thinking he should be more of a thug? You can tell you are in one by the DNC/liberal talking points you just spewed. You aren't helping yourself any.

 

[Spare_change]

1. 
   Are there any honest liberals who are Sick and disgusted with the race baiting
   
   No.
   
   The liberal mantra depends on having a victim, and when they don't have one, they make one up.

This is so ironic. You are the ones constantly depicting yourselves as victims of racism.

Oh, this is going to be a wonderful piece of convoluted logic, I can see that now.

Just exactly how do you purport that I claim to e a victim of racism?

My point was aimed at the collective: the preponderance of rightwingers. If you don't fit in those clodhoppers, don't wear them.

Ok, I'll bite --- Just exactly how do you purport that the "preponderance of rightwingers" claim to be victims of racism?

LOL Read the racism, racial issues forum. Read the preponderance of threads in the politics and current events forums. Count.

i'll take that response to mean "I don't have a clue, but it sounded really good."

 

[Discombobulated]

Funny to watch the author of this dog shit thread paint himself into a corner with his own dim witted rhetoric.

 

[Stephanie]

1. 
   Are there any honest liberals who are Sick and disgusted with the race baiting
   
   No.
   
   The liberal mantra depends on having a victim, and when they don't have one, they make one up.

This is so ironic. You are the ones constantly depicting yourselves as victims of racism.

Oh, this is going to be a wonderful piece of convoluted logic, I can see that now.

Just exactly how do you purport that I claim to e a victim of racism?

My point was aimed at the collective: the preponderance of rightwingers. If you don't fit in those clodhoppers, don't wear them.

Ok, I'll bite --- Just exactly how do you purport that the "preponderance of rightwingers" claim to be victims of racism?

LOL Read the racism, racial issues forum. Read the preponderance of threads in the politics and current events forums. Count.

OMG, reading stuff off a message board must surly PROVE it. good grief. You weren't put on this earth to be the judge and jury of who or what is racist in this country. so please spare us

 

[Esmeralda]

This is so ironic. You are the ones constantly depicting yourselves as victims of racism.

Oh, this is going to be a wonderful piece of convoluted logic, I can see that now.

Just exactly how do you purport that I claim to e a victim of racism?

My point was aimed at the collective: the preponderance of rightwingers. If you don't fit in those clodhoppers, don't wear them.

Ok, I'll bite --- Just exactly how do you purport that the "preponderance of rightwingers" claim to be victims of racism?

LOL Read the racism, racial issues forum. Read the preponderance of threads in the politics and current events forums. Count.

i'll take that response to mean "I don't have a clue, but it sounded really good."

Well, you can take it that way, but you'd be lying to yourself, denying the truth and reality. It isn't my job to go through all the threads and posts to find it is rightwingers who bring up this subject more often and claim race baitng, against themselves, and racism against them, etc. It becomes very obvious very soon who is screaming about racism the most. But you are too lazy to confirm or rebut your own contentions. Has nothing whatsoever to do with me.

 

[Stephanie]

Oh, this is going to be a wonderful piece of convoluted logic, I can see that now.

Just exactly how do you purport that I claim to e a victim of racism?

My point was aimed at the collective: the preponderance of rightwingers. If you don't fit in those clodhoppers, don't wear them.

Ok, I'll bite --- Just exactly how do you purport that the "preponderance of rightwingers" claim to be victims of racism?

LOL Read the racism, racial issues forum. Read the preponderance of threads in the politics and current events forums. Count.

i'll take that response to mean "I don't have a clue, but it sounded really good."

Well, you can take it that way, but you'd be lying to yourself, denying the truth and reality. It isn't my job to go through all the threads and posts to find it is rightwingers who bring up this subject more often and claim race baitng, against themselves, and racism against them, etc. It becomes very obvious very soon who is screaming about racism the most. But you are too lazy to confirm or rebut your own contentions. Has nothing whatsoever to do with me.

maybe you can comment on THE TOPIC of thread?
Are there any honest liberals who are Sick and disgusted with the race baiting?

or you're more interested in ranting?

 

[Spare_change]

Oh, this is going to be a wonderful piece of convoluted logic, I can see that now.

Just exactly how do you purport that I claim to e a victim of racism?

My point was aimed at the collective: the preponderance of rightwingers. If you don't fit in those clodhoppers, don't wear them.

Ok, I'll bite --- Just exactly how do you purport that the "preponderance of rightwingers" claim to be victims of racism?

LOL Read the racism, racial issues forum. Read the preponderance of threads in the politics and current events forums. Count.

i'll take that response to mean "I don't have a clue, but it sounded really good."

Well, you can take it that way, but you'd be lying to yourself, denying the truth and reality. It isn't my job to go through all the threads and posts to find it is rightwingers who bring up this subject more often and claim race baitng, against themselves, and racism against them, etc. It becomes very obvious very soon who is screaming about racism the most. But you are too lazy to confirm or rebut your own contentions. Has nothing whatsoever to do with me.

So, instead, you propose that I just accept it as gospel (forgive me for using THAT word) just because you said it? I am supposed to fall to my knees in glorious gratitude because you deigned to pass on the wisdom from the gods (dang - sorry, I shouldn't have used THAT word).

 

[Stephanie]

maybe you can comment on THE TOPIC of thread?
Are there any honest liberals who are Sick and disgusted with the race baiting?

Like this?

Are there any honest liberals who are Sick and disgusted with the race baiting

One of the best things about today's liberal extremists (yes, I'm serious, read on) is that they have no controls, little discipline, and even less accurate sense of reality.

They really live in a fantasy world created by themselves and their cohorts. They will tell themselves that Michael Brown was surrendering when the cop shot him... telling themselves that so many times, that they will actually believe it, despite having heard no reliable testimony about it. And then, when the Grand Jury transcripts are released, showing six different witnesses (plus the cop) say that it wasn't that way at all, that he held his hands only to shoulder level and only for one second, before dropping his arms into a football blocking position and charging headlong at the cop, who kept yelling at him "Stop, stop!", before finally opening fire......

....The liberals will keep right on believing the (now obvious) lie anyway.

They have no connection to reality. They will believe the above lie despite all evidence to the contrary. And then it is an easy step to believing that the cop WANTED to shoot a black man... and then just another small step to believing that the cop was secretly hunting black men to shoot... and on and on down into the depths of their delusions.
So why do I call that "one of the best things" about the liberals?

Because when they do that, more and more of them whose capacity for delusion is not quite as complete, eventually start realizing that the ones who keep doing it are insane, and hopelessly incorrigible. And they begin to distance themselves from the more extreme ones. And the extremists simply let them go... and even cast them off as "sellouts" or "closet conservatives"... still without ever considering the possibility that they, the extremists, are the ones who are wrong.

Liberalism carries in it, the seeds of its own destruction. Liberals cannot stay together as a group. Because some of them always run off the deep end and the group fragments, historically into a bloody civil war (or worse). There is no way to avoid this breakup. Sometimes it takes a long time (slightly more than a hundred years and counting in the United States), but the breakup always comes. (The Soviet Union only took 80 years, and post-WWI Germany only took around 25 years but got "help" from countries around them in their breakup).

The only problem with that the inevitability of leftist-liberal-fanatic breakups, is that if they gain enough political power before descending into the depths, they might take an entire country with them.

Your question about any liberals being sick and disgusted with the race-baiting of their cohorts who are presently running things, will receive more and more "yes" answers as the division sharpens. And questions about people's disgust with class warfare, government expansion and micromanagement, cockeyed Keynesian economics, and all the other fatal tendencies of modern liberals, will likewise receive more and more "Yes" answers. But the division started generations ago, exemplified by people like Ronald Reagan who started as a Democrat, but eventually admitted "I didn't leave the Democrat party, the Democrat party left me". He recognized the inevitable destructive course of liberals quite early, and did the only sensible thing: Got out. As did many others.

It's the ones who maintain the same destructive course, despite all evidence and common sense, who will propel the party to its doom. But the fact that some of them presently occupy the highest offices in the land, puts the entire country at risk of being dragged down with them.

Elections like the one on Nov. 4, 2014, help reduce this number.

We can only hope that such elections aren't too little, too late.

maybe you can comment on THE TOPIC of thread?
Are there any honest liberals who are Sick and disgusted with the race baiting?

Like this?

Are there any honest liberals who are Sick and disgusted with the race baiting

One of the best things about today's liberal extremists (yes, I'm serious, read on) is that they have no controls, little discipline, and even less accurate sense of reality.

They really live in a fantasy world created by themselves and their cohorts. They will tell themselves that Michael Brown was surrendering when the cop shot him... telling themselves that so many times, that they will actually believe it, despite having heard no reliable testimony about it. And then, when the Grand Jury transcripts are released, showing six different witnesses (plus the cop) say that it wasn't that way at all, that he held his hands only to shoulder level and only for one second, before dropping his arms into a football blocking position and charging headlong at the cop, who kept yelling at him "Stop, stop!", before finally opening fire......

....The liberals will keep right on believing the (now obvious) lie anyway.

They have no connection to reality. They will believe the above lie despite all evidence to the contrary. And then it is an easy step to believing that the cop WANTED to shoot a black man... and then just another small step to believing that the cop was secretly hunting black men to shoot... and on and on down into the depths of their delusions.
So why do I call that "one of the best things" about the liberals?

Because when they do that, more and more of them whose capacity for delusion is not quite as complete, eventually start realizing that the ones who keep doing it are insane, and hopelessly incorrigible. And they begin to distance themselves from the more extreme ones. And the extremists simply let them go... and even cast them off as "sellouts" or "closet conservatives"... still without ever considering the possibility that they, the extremists, are the ones who are wrong.

Liberalism carries in it, the seeds of its own destruction. Liberals cannot stay together as a group. Because some of them always run off the deep end and the group fragments, historically into a bloody civil war (or worse). There is no way to avoid this breakup. Sometimes it takes a long time (slightly more than a hundred years and counting in the United States), but the breakup always comes. (The Soviet Union only took 80 years, and post-WWI Germany only took around 25 years but got "help" from countries around them in their breakup).

The only problem with that the inevitability of leftist-liberal-fanatic breakups, is that if they gain enough political power before descending into the depths, they might take an entire country with them.

Your question about any liberals being sick and disgusted with the race-baiting of their cohorts who are presently running things, will receive more and more "yes" answers as the division sharpens. And questions about people's disgust with class warfare, government expansion and micromanagement, cockeyed Keynesian economics, and all the other fatal tendencies of modern liberals, will likewise receive more and more "Yes" answers. But the division started generations ago, exemplified by people like Ronald Reagan who started as a Democrat, but eventually admitted "I didn't leave the Democrat party, the Democrat party left me". He recognized the inevitable destructive course of liberals quite early, and did the only sensible thing: Got out. As did many others.

It's the ones who maintain the same destructive course, despite all evidence and common sense, who will propel the party to its doom. But the fact that some of them presently occupy the highest offices in the land, puts the entire country at risk of being dragged down with them.

Elections like the one on Nov. 4, 2014, help reduce this number.

We can only hope that such elections aren't too little, too late.

this was my post in the thread you have on this: I watched it happen in my 60 years

All true. there are no DEMOCRATS today that party has been fully infiltrated by socialist/communist. Hopefully the people in the country are waking up to this fact, and a good sign was them kicking out Obama's party from the House first and finished them off in these last elections by taking away the Senate in only SIX YEARS of the progressive party in charge under Obama.

time to take our country back folks. You've made a good start

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Liberals are, of course, sick of, and disgusted with, the contrivances and lies propagated by most on the right.

It is not the right claiming every time a black criminal dies and it happens to be a white officer that race was the reason the criminal breaking the law was killed.

 

[Little-Acorn]

maybe you can comment on THE TOPIC of thread?
Are there any honest liberals who are Sick and disgusted with the race baiting?

Like this?

Are there any honest liberals who are Sick and disgusted with the race baiting

One of the best things about today's liberal extremists (yes, I'm serious, read on) is that they have no controls, little discipline, and even less accurate sense of reality.

They really live in a fantasy world created by themselves and their cohorts. They will tell themselves that Michael Brown was surrendering when the cop shot him... telling themselves that so many times, that they will actually believe it, despite having heard no reliable testimony about it. And then, when the Grand Jury transcripts are released, showing six different witnesses (plus the cop) say that it wasn't that way at all, that he held his hands only to shoulder level and only for one second, before dropping his arms into a football blocking position and charging headlong at the cop, who kept yelling at him "Stop, stop!", before finally opening fire......

....The liberals will keep right on believing the (now obvious) lie anyway.

They have no connection to reality. They will believe the above lie despite all evidence to the contrary. And then it is an easy step to believing that the cop WANTED to shoot a black man... and then just another small step to believing that the cop was secretly hunting black men to shoot... and on and on down into the depths of their delusions.

So why do I call that "one of the best things" about the liberals?

Because when they do that, more and more of them whose capacity for delusion is not quite as complete, eventually start realizing that the ones who keep doing it are insane, and hopelessly incorrigible. And they begin to distance themselves from the more extreme ones. And the extremists simply let them go... and even cast them off as "sellouts" or "closet conservatives"... still without ever considering the possibility that they, the extremists, are the ones who are wrong.

Liberalism carries in it, the seeds of its own destruction. Liberals cannot stay together as a group. Because some of them always run off the deep end and the group fragments, historically into a bloody civil war (or worse). There is no way to avoid this breakup. Sometimes it takes a long time (slightly more than a hundred years and counting in the United States), but the breakup always comes. (The Soviet Union only took 80 years, and post-WWI Germany only took around 25 years but got "help" from countries around them in their breakup).

The only problem with that the inevitability of leftist-liberal-fanatic breakups, is that if they gain enough political power before descending into the depths, they might take an entire country with them.

Your question about any liberals being sick and disgusted with the race-baiting of their cohorts who are presently running things, will receive more and more "yes" answers as the division sharpens. And questions about people's disgust with class warfare, government expansion and micromanagement, cockeyed Keynesian economics, and all the other fatal tendencies of modern liberals, will likewise receive more and more "Yes" answers. But the division started generations ago, exemplified by people like Ronald Reagan who started as a Democrat, but eventually admitted "I didn't leave the Democrat party, the Democrat party left me". He recognized the inevitable destructive course of liberals quite early, and did the only sensible thing: Got out. As did many others.

It's the ones who maintain the same destructive course, despite all evidence and common sense, who will propel the party to its doom. But the fact that some of them presently occupy the highest offices in the land, puts the entire country at risk of being dragged down with them.

Elections like the one on Nov. 4, 2014, help reduce this number.

We can only hope that such elections aren't too little, too late.

 

[Esmeralda]

My point was aimed at the collective: the preponderance of rightwingers. If you don't fit in those clodhoppers, don't wear them.

Ok, I'll bite --- Just exactly how do you purport that the "preponderance of rightwingers" claim to be victims of racism?

LOL Read the racism, racial issues forum. Read the preponderance of threads in the politics and current events forums. Count.

i'll take that response to mean "I don't have a clue, but it sounded really good."

Well, you can take it that way, but you'd be lying to yourself, denying the truth and reality. It isn't my job to go through all the threads and posts to find it is rightwingers who bring up this subject more often and claim race baitng, against themselves, and racism against them, etc. It becomes very obvious very soon who is screaming about racism the most. But you are too lazy to confirm or rebut your own contentions. Has nothing whatsoever to do with me.

So, instead, you propose that I just accept it as gospel (forgive me for using THAT word) just because you said it? I am supposed to fall to my knees in glorious gratitude because you deigned to pass on the wisdom from the gods (dang - sorry, I shouldn't have used THAT word).

Do you have reading comprehension difficulties? I proposed you go through the board and count yourself to find the veracity of my contention. Please, don't just accept what I say, but don't expect me to confirm what you say either: confirm it yourself. BTW, your hyperbole is comic, as opposed to being clever, which is what you intended.

 

[Little-Acorn]

this was my post in the thread you have on this: I watched it happen in my 60 years

All true. there are no DEMOCRATS today that party has been fully infiltrated by socialist/communist. Hopefully the people in the country are waking up to this fact, and a good sign was them kicking out Obama's party from the House first and finished them off in these last elections by taking away the Senate in only SIX YEARS of the progressive party in charge under Obama.

time to take our country back folks. You've made a good start

My apologies for opening the topic into more than was in the OP.

The OP was only about the Democrats' incessant race-baiting. I expanded it into all things liberal-leftist, since ALL those things are getting worse and worse, not just the race-baiting. It was a subject that really deserved a completely separate thread.

 

[Spare_change]

Ok, I'll bite --- Just exactly how do you purport that the "preponderance of rightwingers" claim to be victims of racism?

LOL Read the racism, racial issues forum. Read the preponderance of threads in the politics and current events forums. Count.

i'll take that response to mean "I don't have a clue, but it sounded really good."

Well, you can take it that way, but you'd be lying to yourself, denying the truth and reality. It isn't my job to go through all the threads and posts to find it is rightwingers who bring up this subject more often and claim race baitng, against themselves, and racism against them, etc. It becomes very obvious very soon who is screaming about racism the most. But you are too lazy to confirm or rebut your own contentions. Has nothing whatsoever to do with me.

So, instead, you propose that I just accept it as gospel (forgive me for using THAT word) just because you said it? I am supposed to fall to my knees in glorious gratitude because you deigned to pass on the wisdom from the gods (dang - sorry, I shouldn't have used THAT word).

Do you have reading comprehension difficulties? I proposed you go through the board and count yourself to find the veracity of my contention. Please, don't just accept what I say, but don't expect me to confirm what you say either: confirm it yourself. BTW, your hyperbole is comic, as opposed to being clever, which is what you intended.

I'm not trying to confirm what I said -- I'm trying to confirm what YOU said. 1) Did you lie, or 2) did you say it not knowing what you were saying, or 3) you can't prove it?

 

[Esmeralda]

Anyone with one eye open can see how pervasive are the threads and posts on here by the RW whining about race bating and reverse racism or just being racist toward blacks. It is COMMON KNOWLEDGE. And I'm not about to go round and round with you on this. Keep checking, bet you've got a noggin in there somewhere.

 

[Spare_change]

Anyone with one eye open can see how pervasive are the threads and posts on here by the RW whining about race bating and reverse racism or just being racist toward blacks. It is COMMON KNOWLEDGE. And I'm not about to go round and round with you on this. Keep checking, bet you've got a noggin in there somewhere.

Got it. No response, so you attack?

Rule No. 4. When lacking a cogent or coherent counter-argument, attack the poster.

 

[Esmeralda]

Anyone with one eye open can see how pervasive are the threads and posts on here by the RW whining about race bating and reverse racism or just being racist toward blacks. It is COMMON KNOWLEDGE. And I'm not about to go round and round with you on this. Keep checking, bet you've got a noggin in there somewhere.

Got it. No response, so you attack?

Rule No. 4. When lacking a cogent or coherent counter-argument, attack the poster.

I have an argument. I've given you the argument. I'm not going to spend hours leading your around the board by the hand like you are a two year old. You're tiresome as hell and now on ignore.

 

[Spare_change]

Anyone with one eye open can see how pervasive are the threads and posts on here by the RW whining about race bating and reverse racism or just being racist toward blacks. It is COMMON KNOWLEDGE. And I'm not about to go round and round with you on this. Keep checking, bet you've got a noggin in there somewhere.

Got it. No response, so you attack?

Rule No. 4. When lacking a cogent or coherent counter-argument, attack the poster.

I have an argument. I've given you the argument. I'm not going to spend hours leading your around the board by the hand like you are a two year old. You're tiresome as hell and now on ignore.

No, you didn't give me an argument - you made a statement - an ad hominem attack on a group - without justification or proof.

That's all you did -

 

[Esmeralda]

Anyone with one eye open can see how pervasive are the threads and posts on here by the RW whining about race bating and reverse racism or just being racist toward blacks. It is COMMON KNOWLEDGE. And I'm not about to go round and round with you on this. Keep checking, bet you've got a noggin in there somewhere.

Got it. No response, so you attack?

Rule No. 4. When lacking a cogent or coherent counter-argument, attack the poster.

I have an argument. I've given you the argument. I'm not going to spend hours leading your around the board by the hand like you are a two year old. You're tiresome as hell and now on ignore.

No, you didn't give me an argument - you made a statement - an ad hominem attack on a group - without justification or proof.

That's all you did -

I have better things to do.

 

[Spare_change]

Anyone with one eye open can see how pervasive are the threads and posts on here by the RW whining about race bating and reverse racism or just being racist toward blacks. It is COMMON KNOWLEDGE. And I'm not about to go round and round with you on this. Keep checking, bet you've got a noggin in there somewhere.

Got it. No response, so you attack?

Rule No. 4. When lacking a cogent or coherent counter-argument, attack the poster.

I have an argument. I've given you the argument. I'm not going to spend hours leading your around the board by the hand like you are a two year old. You're tiresome as hell and now on ignore.

No, you didn't give me an argument - you made a statement - an ad hominem attack on a group - without justification or proof.

That's all you did -

I have better things to do.

And, I certainly hope you do them better than this.