Arizona Judge Rejects Kari Lake’s Effort to Overturn Her Election Loss

I don't know where you're trying to go with this. I didn't vote for her. Obviously she should have been better prepared.. So there.

Gateway Pundit is not a go to source unless they are sourcing what they publish.

You should know, you post that crap all the time.
 
It’s a victory for democracy and a defeat for conservatives in their war on democracy.

But the war is far from over – conservatives will remain an ongoing threat to our democratic institutions and the will of the people, Lake’s dishonest, meritless ‘lawsuit’ is proof of that.
You think stealing and cheating is a victory for democracy?????????????????

You can't claim you're fighting for democracy only when you win. Democracy means both sides have a chance to win. That's what democracy is. The will of the people over the will of the state.
 
Lake Loses Suit Over Her Defeat In Arizona Governor's Race.


Judge Peter Thompson said, “The Court cannot accept speculation or conjecture in place of clear and convincing evidence,

Shrunken Ballots is not evidence, it's specualtion and conjecture. Lying Lake Fucking Lost The Fucking Election.
 
He proved respectability to the world when he turned his back on our allies who had no idea whatsoever he was running out of Afghanistan.
History will show how trump surrendered to the Taliban, releasing thousands of Taliban terrorist. trump was the biggest mistake this country ever made. MAGA is on life support.
 
Lake Loses Suit Over Her Defeat In Arizona Governor's Race.


Judge Peter Thompson said, “The Court cannot accept speculation or conjecture in place of clear and convincing evidence,

Shrunken Ballots is not evidence, it's specualtion and conjecture. Lying Lake Fucking Lost The Fucking Election.
Shrunken ballots is absolute evidence of tampering, you lying asshole!!!!!!!!
 
History will show how trump surrendered to the Taliban, releasing thousands of Taliban terrorist. trump was the biggest mistake this country ever made. MAGA is on life support.
Little more complicated than you know.

Yes, as part of a deal made with the Taliban in 2020, the Trump administration agreed to the release of up to 5,000 Taliban prisoners in exchange for the release of up to 1,000 prisoners “of the other side.
_______________________________________
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the agreement was a “historic opportunity” and the first step toward potential peace in Afghanistan. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell welcomed the agreement, although warned the U.S. must be vigilant in dealing with the Taliban. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the agreement was “an important initial step,” but that much more work must be done to achieve peace.
__________________________________________

There were several conditions as part of the agreement. They included pledges that the U.S. would withdraw its troops by May 1, 2021, and that the Taliban would not “allow any of its members, other individuals or groups, including al-Qaida, to use the soil of Afghanistan to threaten the security of the United States and its allies.” The Taliban and al-Qaida still maintain a relationship, according to the U.S. and United Nations.
___________________________________________
“Up to five thousand (5,000) prisoners of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban and up to one thousand (1,000) prisoners of the other side will be released by March 10, 2020,” the agreement said.
___________________________________________
The release of prisoners paved the way for the beginning of peace talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government. The two sides first met on Sept. 12, 2020, in Doha, Qatar, and met sporadically in the following months, but talks never made substantial progress, according to the Congressional Research Service.

Yes, the Trump administration in 2020 agreed to the release of 5,000 Taliban prisoners

Biden screwed up the agreement by postponing the withdrawal.
 
If that's the case, nobody in Arizona should be wasting any more time on adjudicated solutions. I would suggest they demand that their representatives shut down the government immediately, and obstruct their next Governor in every conceivable way.
Sounds like a plan. Tell us how it works out.
 
Judge followed the law. MAGAs hate that.
Nonsense. Even if the judge did follow “the” law, conservatives endorse that. (Not all conservatives are supporters of MAGA, and the idea of making America great again isn’t something which can be so easily disparaged anyway).

The questions are whether the judge was right in dismissing so many claims in the first place and whether the judge used a proper legal standard on the claims that remained. Fodder for an appeal — regardless of liberal angst.
 
Nonsense. Even if the judge did follow “the” law, conservatives endorse that. (Not all conservatives are supporters of MAGA, and the idea of making America great again isn’t something which can be so easily disparaged anyway).

The questions are whether the judge was right in dismissing so many claims in the first place and whether the judge used a proper legal standard on the claims that remained. Fodder for an appeal — regardless of liberal angst.

More lame ass excuses.
 

Forum List

Back
Top