Armed SWAT team violently storms family’s home, kidnaps three children for not being vaccinated

Actually, I didn't see abuse or violence but a hellluva lot of neglect. Maybe I don't know the violence part.
 
If your child has a fever of >105, and a doctor orders you to take him to an emergenecy room...and you don't..I hope you get arrested and your child gets a little vacation from you for a little while.
That's because you're a piece of shit. Nobody expects you to say anything other than the stupid shit you always say.
 
W
Yeah how stupid to not expect govt to force their way into your house for no reason...except a DRs hurt pride that someone disregarded his advise which is their right to do
Are you serious? No reason? A court agreed with him.
Everything you need to know is conveyed by DCS effort to hide this from public scrutiny.....

It is all a conspiracy. The government is polluting their precious bodily fluids with fluoride in the water, which turns them into commie robots...
 
W
Yeah how stupid to not expect govt to force their way into your house for no reason...except a DRs hurt pride that someone disregarded his advise which is their right to do
Are you serious? No reason? A court agreed with him.
Everything you need to know is conveyed by DCS effort to hide this from public scrutiny.....
The police report doesn't mean anything? Or the court? DCS would not take the chilldren if it wasn't warranted.
 
Everything you need to know is conveyed by DCS effort to hide this from public scrutiny.....
Haha..."everything we need to know is contained in everything we don't know. But we know it anyway. Because we don't know it. Uh..."

Hidden...yet all over local and national news....public police report...
 
If your child has a fever of >105, and a doctor orders you to take him to an emergenecy room...and you don't..I hope you get arrested and your child gets a little vacation from you for a little while.
That's because you're a piece of shit. Nobody expects you to say anything other than the stupid shit you always say.
Then clearly my morals and ethics are more well developed than yours are. Put down the iron age book of fairy tales, join us.
 
Title is misleading and untrue. The children were taken because they were taken to a doctor with 105 fever and then she didn't take them to the ER like the doctor said needed to be done. The fact that they were not vaccinated made the doctor fear the worst.

Its no different than any other child neglect case. This instance had a doctor actually see the patient and would be able to testify that they needed to get to an ER.
 
W
Yeah how stupid to not expect govt to force their way into your house for no reason...except a DRs hurt pride that someone disregarded his advise which is their right to do
Are you serious? No reason? A court agreed with him.
Everything you need to know is conveyed by DCS effort to hide this from public scrutiny.....
The police report doesn't mean anything? Or the court? DCS would not take the chilldren if it wasn't warranted.
If they were so righteous why the need to hide...….
 
W
Yeah how stupid to not expect govt to force their way into your house for no reason...except a DRs hurt pride that someone disregarded his advise which is their right to do
Are you serious? No reason? A court agreed with him.
Everything you need to know is conveyed by DCS effort to hide this from public scrutiny.....
The police report doesn't mean anything? Or the court? DCS would not take the chilldren if it wasn't warranted.
If they were so righteous why the need to hide...….
Hide what?
 
Title is misleading and untrue. The children were taken because they were taken to a doctor with 105 fever and then she didn't take them to the ER like the doctor said needed to be done. The fact that they were not vaccinated made the doctor fear the worst.
Title is misleading and untrue. The children were taken because they were taken to a doctor with 105 fever and then she didn't take them to the ER like the doctor said needed to be done. The fact that they were not vaccinated made the doctor fear the worst.

Its no different than any other child neglect case. This instance had a doctor actually see the patient and would be able to testify that they needed to get to an ER.
That would be because too young to be for that disease.
 
W
Yeah how stupid to not expect govt to force their way into your house for no reason...except a DRs hurt pride that someone disregarded his advise which is their right to do
Are you serious? No reason? A court agreed with him.
Everything you need to know is conveyed by DCS effort to hide this from public scrutiny.....
The police report doesn't mean anything? Or the court? DCS would not take the chilldren if it wasn't warranted.
If they were so righteous why the need to hide...….
Hide what?
Hide it from the public....bottom of article
 
Title is misleading and untrue. The children were taken because they were taken to a doctor with 105 fever and then she didn't take them to the ER like the doctor said needed to be done. The fact that they were not vaccinated made the doctor fear the worst.
Title is misleading and untrue. The children were taken because they were taken to a doctor with 105 fever and then she didn't take them to the ER like the doctor said needed to be done. The fact that they were not vaccinated made the doctor fear the worst.

Its no different than any other child neglect case. This instance had a doctor actually see the patient and would be able to testify that they needed to get to an ER.
That would be because too young to be for that disease.
Huh? I don't think you are making sense.
 
Title is misleading and untrue. The children were taken because they were taken to a doctor with 105 fever and then she didn't take them to the ER like the doctor said needed to be done. The fact that they were not vaccinated made the doctor fear the worst.
Title is misleading and untrue. The children were taken because they were taken to a doctor with 105 fever and then she didn't take them to the ER like the doctor said needed to be done. The fact that they were not vaccinated made the doctor fear the worst.

Its no different than any other child neglect case. This instance had a doctor actually see the patient and would be able to testify that they needed to get to an ER.
That would be because too young to be for that disease.
But then it seemed as if DCS decided to make everything harder for the parents, because now the press was interested, as was the Arizona DCS Oversight Group, a local organization that fights for families' rights, and a state legislator, Rep. Kelly Townsend (R–Mesa), who had helped write the law requiring DCS to get a warrant before removing a child. Townsend has been lobbing zingers like, "What about the parents' rights to decide what's best for their child? Parents felt the child was fine. Next thing we know, the Gestapo is at their door."

In court, DCS tried to convince the judge, Jennifer Green, to bar the press from covering the dispute. A lawyer for the agency even claimed that the parents had gone against the best interests of the children by involving the media. Green rejected this argument, saying, "In Arizona we like our courts to be open."
Huh? I don't think you are making sense.
OMG,,,and you criticize others for not reading every link ,Mom Ignores Doctor When Her Sick 2-Year-Old Starts Feeling Better, Child Services Send a SWAT Team
But then it seemed as if DCS decided to make everything harder for the parents, because now the press was interested, as was the Arizona DCS Oversight Group, a local organization that fights for families' rights, and a state legislator, Rep. Kelly Townsend (R–Mesa), who had helped write the law requiring DCS to get a warrant before removing a child. Townsend has been lobbing zingers like, "What about the parents' rights to decide what's best for their child? Parents felt the child was fine. Next thing we know, the Gestapo is at their door."

In court, DCS tried to convince the judge, Jennifer Green, to bar the press from covering the dispute. A lawyer for the agency even claimed that the parents had gone against the best interests of the children by involving the media. Green rejected this argument, saying, "In Arizona we like our courts to be open."
 

Forum List

Back
Top