As a Black voter, I find this offensive: ‘What about 9/11?’ Twitter furious after Biden calls Capitol storming ‘worst attack since Civil War"

All the protesters wanted is for the results from some states to be rejected. That's perfectly inline with what you just posted.
All they wanted was the person who got 8 million fewer votes, and lost 306 to 232 in the electoral college, to be declared the winner.
 
Last edited:
Good to know we can overthrow the government with just a few dozen people trespassing in the Capitol.
Those 280 million guns can be kept in our gun safes.
Why lie about how many stormed the Capitol? "Few dozen?" Some 400 have already been arrested and another roughly 200 are still being hunted down. So by a "few dozen," you really mean about 50 dozen?

In what rightarded world is 50, a few?
Well, considering 70 million think the election was stolen, the coup planned this summer should go well.
 
Nothing says LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT like hiding behind piles of razor wire and 30,000 troops you don’t trust.
Nothing says you need piles of razor wire, and 30,000 troops than having the capitol invaded by dozens of scores of armed insurrectionists.
 
It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?
They could have taken lawmakers as hostages and held them for ransom unless they declared Trump as president.
calvin-and-hobbes-rofl.jpg
LOL

This guy's facing 20 years in prison. You think he's laughing?

gettyimages-1294932395-cropped.jpg
 
It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?
They could have taken lawmakers as hostages and held them for ransom unless they declared Trump as president.
calvin-and-hobbes-rofl.jpg
LOL

This guy's facing 20 years in prison. You think he's laughing?

gettyimages-1294932395-cropped.jpg
That's a dummy, dummy.
 
Your attempt to imply an actual armed insurrection (meaning with firearms) when it clearly was a protest that got out of control (not even a riot, at most a mass trespass) doesn't mean that reality folds to make it an actual insurrection.

Armed does not need to be with firearms. I'm sure if they showed up with RPG's you would say they weren't firearms, so it didn't count.
 
It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?

Do you argue that they could not physically have killed Pence, Pelosi, Schumer, Ocasio-Cortez or any of the other elected officials for whom they were hunting?

They could have started killing the cops they were getting past and they didn't. They didn't kill the media people recording them.

And your question is goalpost moving. Even detaining congress wouldn't have overthrown the government.

The only person who died in the capitol was an unarmed woman, and you guys jerk off to images of that.

You think the injuries suffered by the Capitol Police weren't worth mentioning? What the fuck is wrong with you people?
 
They had no guns, moron. That's what "unarmed" means. It doesn't mean a few of them had hollow aluminum flag poles that wouldn't even make a bump on your head.
See that, fucking moron? It is once again you who's proving you're a fucking moron, no one else needs to.

Fucking moron, "armed" does not mean "guns." It means any weapon which can include guns but doesn't need to.

furnished with weapons

In our society when you call someone armed, it is assumed it's with a firearm.

usually when it's a melee weapon it's referred to as wielding.
Words have meaning, even if you don't know what that is. "Armed" means being in possession of a weapon. That mob was armed.

Words have meanings that are also interpreted by most people, and most people think "gun" when you call a person armed.
Hutch Starskey so when a dispatcher calls out for a cop to be on the look out for an armed suspect, what do you think they mean?
 
Your attempt to imply an actual armed insurrection (meaning with firearms) when it clearly was a protest that got out of control (not even a riot, at most a mass trespass) doesn't mean that reality folds to make it an actual insurrection.

Armed does not need to be with firearms. I'm sure if they showed up with RPG's you would say they weren't firearms, so it didn't count.
so when a dispatcher calls out for a cop to be on the look out for an armed suspect, what do you think they mean? flag pole? hahahahhahhahahahaha. ever hear the phrase don't bring a knife to a gun fight?
 
Your attempt to imply an actual armed insurrection (meaning with firearms) when it clearly was a protest that got out of control (not even a riot, at most a mass trespass) doesn't mean that reality folds to make it an actual insurrection.

Armed does not need to be with firearms. I'm sure if they showed up with RPG's you would say they weren't firearms, so it didn't count.
I heard one woman had a stapler in her hand.
 
They had no guns, moron. That's what "unarmed" means. It doesn't mean a few of them had hollow aluminum flag poles that wouldn't even make a bump on your head.
See that, fucking moron? It is once again you who's proving you're a fucking moron, no one else needs to.

Fucking moron, "armed" does not mean "guns." It means any weapon which can include guns but doesn't need to.

furnished with weapons

In our society when you call someone armed, it is assumed it's with a firearm.

usually when it's a melee weapon it's referred to as wielding.
Words have meaning, even if you don't know what that is. "Armed" means being in possession of a weapon. That mob was armed.

Words have meanings that are also interpreted by most people, and most people think "gun" when you call a person armed.
Hutch Starskey so when a dispatcher calls out for a cop to be on the look out for an armed suspect, what do you think they mean?
Starskey believes they should be looking for anyone carrying a flag.
 
y what mechanism with the numbers and tools they had on them would the government been overthrown?
A reasonable chance of success is not a requirement for the label.

Stop being such a hack, admit it was what it was, and disavow the people who participated and precipitated it.
I don't recall seeing you in the meeting. Were you hiding behind the potted plants again?

Face it, they were trying to disrupt a proceeding, not overthrow the government.
Hairsplitting. How fun
They are as different as a group of bystanders pushing a cop off a suspect's neck is different from that same group chasing all the LEO out of town and installing their own Police force.
The purpose of "disrupting the proceeding"?
To force reconsideration of the vote tallies and investigate apparent discrepancies. Since neither you nor I can read minds, it's as good an explanation as "DEY WAS OBERTROWIN DA GUBMINT, I TELLS YA!"
 
The government was still in place, and the change of government wasn't delayed at all.
Not for lack of trying.

They was no possible way for them to impact it. There was no pathway to an actual insurrection.

As opposed to the whole CHOP thing, where the actual implementation of local government control was in fact terminated for a period of weeks.
 
They had no guns, moron. That's what "unarmed" means. It doesn't mean a few of them had hollow aluminum flag poles that wouldn't even make a bump on your head.
See that, fucking moron? It is once again you who's proving you're a fucking moron, no one else needs to.

Fucking moron, "armed" does not mean "guns." It means any weapon which can include guns but doesn't need to.

furnished with weapons

In our society when you call someone armed, it is assumed it's with a firearm.

usually when it's a melee weapon it's referred to as wielding.
Words have meaning, even if you don't know what that is. "Armed" means being in possession of a weapon. That mob was armed.

Words have meanings that are also interpreted by most people, and most people think "gun" when you call a person armed.
Hutch Starskey so when a dispatcher calls out for a cop to be on the look out for an armed suspect, what do you think they mean?
Starskey believes they should be looking for anyone carrying a flag.
I know, right?
 
He said worst attack on our democracy, dumbass brainwashed functional morons. Try to figure out the difference for crying out loud.
 
Good to know we can overthrow the government with just a few dozen people trespassing in the Capitol.
Those 280 million guns can be kept in our gun safes.
Why lie about how many stormed the Capitol? "Few dozen?" Some 400 have already been arrested and another roughly 200 are still being hunted down. So by a "few dozen," you really mean about 50 dozen?

In what rightarded world is 50, a few?
Almost all of them were charged with nothing more than trespassing, NAZI.
 

Forum List

Back
Top