As President Trump is indicted for January 6, more evidence emerges that it was a set-up.

[Arlette]

You have no proof of any of that.

That's what a trial is for.

 

[WEATHER53]

The powers that be, Dems, did zero to prepare for this, to prevent this, and to decrease the effect of this.

 

[Leo123]

That's what a trial is for.

Oh so now after summarily convicting Trump in your mind you allude to a trial. I have asked you for proof of anything you have posted regarding Trump's guilt and so far you have exactly nothing. All you do is parrot fake indictments from a biased prosecutor. This Democrat garbage is an attempt to preclude their most viable political opponent from being able to run for office. 3rd world crap from 3rd world Marxists.

 

[BackAgain]

That's a lie. Trump did not offer national guard.

Your reply is the lie. He sure did.

 

[Arlette]

Oh so now after summarily convicting Trump in you mind you allude to a trial. I have asked you for proof of anything you have posted and so far you have exactly nothing.

Cry me a fucking river. I don't care what Trumpen dreck like you ask for. Trump will get his day in court. That's all he is entitled to. Not my sympathy

 

[Leo123]

Cry me a fucking river. I don't care what Trumpen dreck like you ask for. Trump will get his day in court. That's all he is entitled to. Not my sympathy

It's obvious you got nothing but hatred. You have deflected, avoided and have done nothing but parrot Democrat talking points. Trump should not have to even go to court. No one asked you for sympathy, just proof and so far you are devoid of it.

 

[Concerned American]

Cry me a fucking river. I don't care what Trumpen dreck like you ask for. Trump will get his day in court. That's all he is entitled to. Not my sympathy

Tsk, tsk, tsk, TRIGGERED. Please calm down.

 

[Arlette]

It's obvious you got nothing but hatred. You have deflected, avoided and have done nothing but parrot Democrat talking points. Trump should not have to even go to court. No one asked you for sympathy, just proof and so far you are devoid of it.

Read the indictment. The charges are backed up by evidence that let a grand jury to indict. That's all that matters.

 

[Concerned American]

The charges are backed up by evidence that let a grand jury to indict.

That's what Adam Schiff said in two scam impeachments. I see nothing different with this admittedly partisan democrat, Fani Willis. Twelve million pages---ROTFLMAO. In what morons universe?

 

[Arlette]

That's what Adam Schiff said in two scam impeachments. I see nothing different with this admittedly partisan democrat, Fani Willis. Twelve million pages---ROTFLMAO. In what morons universe?

That's not Fani, the millions of pages are in his federal case in DC. That's Jack Smith.

Next

 

[Concerned American]

That's not Fani, the millions of pages are in his federal case in DC. That's Jack Smith.

Next

So it is. No difference. Exchange Fani Willis for Jack Smith. Next

 

[lennypartiv]

I bet the Deep State was involved in this too.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

 

[SavannahMann]

As President Trump is indicted for January 6, ​

more evidence emerges that it was a set-up.​

As President Trump is indicted for January 6, more evidence emerges that it was a set-up.

Coincidentally, I’m sure, in the lead-up to his being taken off the air at Fox News, Tucker Carlson and his team were investigating events on January 6—the same events that are serving as the basis for Jack Smith’s creative indictme...

www.americanthinker.com

5 Au 2023 ~~ By Andrea Widburg

Once Trump announced a rally in D.C., he and his supporters were doomed.
Coincidentally, I’m sure, in the lead-up to his being taken off the air at Fox News, Tucker Carlson and his team were investigating events on January 6—the same events that are serving as the basis for Jack Smith’s creative indictment against Donald Trump. One of the things that Fox News prevented from airing was an interview with former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund, during which he told Tucker that the FBI had “a lot of operatives” in the crowd. There was more, and it all feeds into the reasonable belief that January 6 was a set-up.

January 6 has been enormously useful to the Democrats:

• It allowed them to certify the electoral college votes without any objections. These objections (which Democrats have vigorously made over the years) are a prerequisite to challenging the count.
• It allowed them to round up almost 1,000 Trump supporters and destroy their lives, a useful lesson to anyone else who might think about opposing the Biden regime…er, administration.
• It allowed them to pretend that the lack of crowds in D.C. for Biden’s inauguration was due to security requirements rather than to the reality, which is that no one would have shown up anyway.
• And, of course, most usefully at all, it’s just allowed them to indict Biden’s chief rival, President Donald Trump, in the lead-up to the 2024 election. The charge, while failing to use the word “insurrection,” essentially alleges that Trump defrauded America by ignoring those of his advisors who believed in the 2024 election (many of whom have been outed as fervent Trump haters) and, instead, looking to evidence of election of fraud and believing that election.

Knowing how useful January 6 was for Democrats—and considering that the “insurrection” narrative kicked within fewer than 24 hours —it’s worth considering a very loose rundown of the timeline.

• Trump announced a rally in D.C. on the day that the Senate was set to certify the election.
• Trump asks for extra security in D.C. for that day, a request that is refused.
• Trump tells those at the rally who “will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voice heard.”
• The crowd at the Capitol did not become agitated until the police, without any warning to the crowd to disperse, suddenly fired flash bangs into the crowd.
• People in whom the FBI had no interest were filmed removing barriers and urging people into the Capitol. (See here and here.) Significantly, those who weren’t on the front lines would have had no idea that they weren’t being invited into the Capitol, especially because the Capitol police were welcoming them in (which should negate any charges that they were illegally trespassing).
• Trump immediately issued tweets telling the crowd to remain peaceful and disperse. (See here and here.) Soon after, Twitter shut down his account, making his tweet inaccessible for posterity to revisit.
• Trump tried to get to the Capitol to calm the crowd but was prevented from doing so.
• Capitol police apparently beat one Trump supporter to death and shot to death an unarmed woman. Otherwise, no one suffered any serious injuries at the hands of the crowd—although Democrats lied relentlessly about Officer Sicknick, who emerged unscathed on January 6, only to die later from a stroke.

In event after event, it’s the system, not Trump, that’s inexorably pulling the crowd into the Capitol. And in event after event, it was Trump who tried to put the brakes on things, only to be blocked.
The previously hidden revelations from former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund are entirely consistent with the above facts:

Former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund told Tucker Carlson “there was a fair amount of law enforcement” in the January 6th crowd, in footage exclusively obtained by The National Pulse. The bombshell news follows revelations that Sund had called the events surrounding the Capitol riot “a cover up,” adding his concerns over provocateurs like Ray Epps.​

Indeed, added Sund, in over 30 years of police work, he’d never seen so much law enforcement. In the same suppressed interview, Sund also revealed that the FBI had worked with him during the IMF protests and the Bush inauguration.
You can see the entire interview at The National Pulse.


Commentary:
Yes!, It was a setup. conservatives would be wise to watch for even more false flag operations heading into the 2024 elections. Not just the presidential race, but any conservative gathering. Expect more Democrat governor kidnapping plots, more Republican rallies infiltrated by ANTIFA and FBI/Stasi, more terrorist parents protecting their children and there are always those Catholic terrorists. Just watch how it unfolds. It has been so successful so why wouldn't the Maoist/DSA Democrat Commies just ramp it up?
Conservatives need to be very, very careful.
It is highly probable that there was indeed a conspiracy to obstruct government processes, but it was the opposite of what Smith alleges. It was a Democratic operation led by Nancy Pelosi and demonstrated by FBI/Stasi operatives. Among the many reasons for the Left to prevent Trump's re-election is the possibility that a real inquiry into Jan 6 would be conducted.

Yeah. Just like the Stolen Election right?

 

[Doc7505]

Keep in mind, everyone's out to get conservatives. They know who you are.
Be afraid, be very afraid.

~~~~~~

​

 

[Concerned American]

Then why didn't Trump call it off?

He didn't start it, it is not his position to call off riots. Why didn't democrat governors and mayors call off the BLM/Antifa riots?

 

[Dagosa]

As President Trump is indicted for January 6, ​

more evidence emerges that it was a set-up.​

As President Trump is indicted for January 6, more evidence emerges that it was a set-up.

Coincidentally, I’m sure, in the lead-up to his being taken off the air at Fox News, Tucker Carlson and his team were investigating events on January 6—the same events that are serving as the basis for Jack Smith’s creative indictme...

www.americanthinker.com

5 Au 2023 ~~ By Andrea Widburg

Once Trump announced a rally in D.C., he and his supporters were doomed.
Coincidentally, I’m sure, in the lead-up to his being taken off the air at Fox News, Tucker Carlson and his team were investigating events on January 6—the same events that are serving as the basis for Jack Smith’s creative indictment against Donald Trump. One of the things that Fox News prevented from airing was an interview with former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund, during which he told Tucker that the FBI had “a lot of operatives” in the crowd. There was more, and it all feeds into the reasonable belief that January 6 was a set-up.

January 6 has been enormously useful to the Democrats:

• It allowed them to certify the electoral college votes without any objections. These objections (which Democrats have vigorously made over the years) are a prerequisite to challenging the count.
• It allowed them to round up almost 1,000 Trump supporters and destroy their lives, a useful lesson to anyone else who might think about opposing the Biden regime…er, administration.
• It allowed them to pretend that the lack of crowds in D.C. for Biden’s inauguration was due to security requirements rather than to the reality, which is that no one would have shown up anyway.
• And, of course, most usefully at all, it’s just allowed them to indict Biden’s chief rival, President Donald Trump, in the lead-up to the 2024 election. The charge, while failing to use the word “insurrection,” essentially alleges that Trump defrauded America by ignoring those of his advisors who believed in the 2024 election (many of whom have been outed as fervent Trump haters) and, instead, looking to evidence of election of fraud and believing that election.

Knowing how useful January 6 was for Democrats—and considering that the “insurrection” narrative kicked within fewer than 24 hours —it’s worth considering a very loose rundown of the timeline.

• Trump announced a rally in D.C. on the day that the Senate was set to certify the election.
• Trump asks for extra security in D.C. for that day, a request that is refused.
• Trump tells those at the rally who “will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voice heard.”
• The crowd at the Capitol did not become agitated until the police, without any warning to the crowd to disperse, suddenly fired flash bangs into the crowd.
• People in whom the FBI had no interest were filmed removing barriers and urging people into the Capitol. (See here and here.) Significantly, those who weren’t on the front lines would have had no idea that they weren’t being invited into the Capitol, especially because the Capitol police were welcoming them in (which should negate any charges that they were illegally trespassing).
• Trump immediately issued tweets telling the crowd to remain peaceful and disperse. (See here and here.) Soon after, Twitter shut down his account, making his tweet inaccessible for posterity to revisit.
• Trump tried to get to the Capitol to calm the crowd but was prevented from doing so.
• Capitol police apparently beat one Trump supporter to death and shot to death an unarmed woman. Otherwise, no one suffered any serious injuries at the hands of the crowd—although Democrats lied relentlessly about Officer Sicknick, who emerged unscathed on January 6, only to die later from a stroke.

In event after event, it’s the system, not Trump, that’s inexorably pulling the crowd into the Capitol. And in event after event, it was Trump who tried to put the brakes on things, only to be blocked.
The previously hidden revelations from former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund are entirely consistent with the above facts:

Former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund told Tucker Carlson “there was a fair amount of law enforcement” in the January 6th crowd, in footage exclusively obtained by The National Pulse. The bombshell news follows revelations that Sund had called the events surrounding the Capitol riot “a cover up,” adding his concerns over provocateurs like Ray Epps.​

Indeed, added Sund, in over 30 years of police work, he’d never seen so much law enforcement. In the same suppressed interview, Sund also revealed that the FBI had worked with him during the IMF protests and the Bush inauguration.
You can see the entire interview at The National Pulse.


Commentary:
Yes!, It was a setup. conservatives would be wise to watch for even more false flag operations heading into the 2024 elections. Not just the presidential race, but any conservative gathering. Expect more Democrat governor kidnapping plots, more Republican rallies infiltrated by ANTIFA and FBI/Stasi, more terrorist parents protecting their children and there are always those Catholic terrorists. Just watch how it unfolds. It has been so successful so why wouldn't the Maoist/DSA Democrat Commies just ramp it up?
Conservatives need to be very, very careful.
It is highly probable that there was indeed a conspiracy to obstruct government processes, but it was the opposite of what Smith alleges. It was a Democratic operation led by Nancy Pelosi and demonstrated by FBI/Stasi operatives. Among the many reasons for the Left to prevent Trump's re-election is the possibility that a real inquiry into Jan 6 would be conducted.

The American thinker opinion page….No evidence, just bull shit. You dullards will fall or anything. .

 

[Wapasha]

LOL

They were offered. Period.

Capitol Police rejected offers of federal help to quell mob

WASHINGTON (AP) — Three days before supporters of President Donald Trump rioted at the Capitol, the Pentagon asked the U.S Capitol Police if it needed National Guard manpower.

apnews.com

The president really does not have the power to call up the National Guard all on his own. Congress gave the president this power right after Katrina, but then state's governors and legislators were objecting to this power being granted to the president, and it was rescinded.

What Trump did before Jan 6th was voice his recommendation and his support for calling up the National Guard. So by that metric, he did offer the guard, but it was only symbolic. People did refuse to take Trump's advice, but that is on them.

People on the anti-Trump one side say it's a lie to claim trump offered the guard, because there is no proof he made any official actions to call up the guard. He CAN"T call up the guard. So it's really silly if people are demanding proof of Trump turning to someone and offering his advice. It's not like presidential advice is documented anywhere.

What a president can do is offer his support for such an action, thereby giving more justification for the Guard being called up.

 

[Wapasha]

The American thinker opinion page….No evidence, just bull shit. You dullards will fall or anything. .

So tell me, what form would this so called evidence of Trump offering the National Guard take? What would it look like, what form would it take? I'll wager you cannot answer this, because it does not exist, since the president cannot simply call up the National Guard, and gee golly, he's just waiting for someone like the Speaker of the House to give him the nod.

 

[Dagosa]

So tell me, what form would this so called evidence of Trump offering the National Guard take? What would it look like, what form would it take? I'll wager you cannot answer this, because it does not exist, since the president cannot simply call up the National Guard, and gee golly, he's just waiting for someone like the Speaker of the House to give him the nod.

Wrong. The guard units are under control of the commander in chief ( thevfed) AND the gov in which the NG unit in states reside. ONLY. Trump had the authority to call up the guard, Not Pelosi. It takes just a fking phone call to the guard unit commander . Here is proof.

10 U.S. Code § 12406 - National Guard in Federal service: call

www.law.cornell.edu