Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No...were that unlikely event to ensue...Trumpists would morph into instant terrorists...and target innocents with the usual terrorist tactics..bombs and such--the tactics of cowards...which would suit most of them to a T..as if you have the US military out-gunned..too funny.
So you think a bunch of Trump supporters are going to walk out into a field and fight the U.S. military? Is that how you think a civil war would go down?
Oh the irony about Liberals getting their panties in a bunch about a protest turned violent and justifying use of firearms to deter them. Hey, the good news is they finally get it.
It was a mob engaged in a riot, committing federal felonies. That made the protest illegal.She just followed the mob. It’s implicit in your statement you’re attempting to paint her sympathetically as having done nothing wrong.and act blameless.
Where did I say that was "blameless"? Damn dude.
This was a protest, against alleged rigging of the election, not a "mob".
The girl was UNARMED, and that needs to be emphasized. When the left starts shooting unarmed women for being veterans of military service, that's a disgrace.
I don’t think it as necessary to shoot her either, said so many times. But the police will be able to claim they felt imminent threat and they will win their argument because it’s worked so many times before.you’re attempting to paint her sympathetically as having done nothing wrong.
Not at all. She was wrong to be in that building. She was wrong to attempt to climb through that window.
Now, was it necessary for the cop to shoot her? I don't think so.
That obese drug dealing hood ho was not lying in her bed. You are just pissed because she was black.shot a woman in her bed...yall were good with it.....why not shot a woman breaking into the capitol...she was a terrorist when shot....yall are just pissed cause she was white
I don’t think it as necessary to shoot her either, said so many times. But the police will be able to claim they felt imminent threat and they will win their argument because it’s worked so many times before.
Not at all. I’m just saying what the police will be saying if charges were ever filed.How were the police supposed to know she was unarmed?
So you AGREE that cops should be able to shoot suspects under the assumption that they must be armed because, after all, how does a cop KNOW that they are NOT armed, right?
It was a mob engaged in a riot, committing federal felonies. That made the protest illegal.She just followed the mob. It’s implicit in your statement you’re attempting to paint her sympathetically as having done nothing wrong.and act blameless.
Where did I say that was "blameless"? Damn dude.
This was a protest, against alleged rigging of the election, not a "mob".
The girl was UNARMED, and that needs to be emphasized. When the left starts shooting unarmed women for being veterans of military service, that's a disgrace.
Lafayette Square was cleared by the national guard after a water bottle was thrown in the general vicinity of law enforcement. By that standard, the protest was illegal the second they started shoving past capital police.
How were the police supposed to know she was unarmed?
The seditionists should have armed themselves.
Has nothing to do with her being right wing. She was breaking into a federal building.I don’t think it as necessary to shoot her either, said so many times. But the police will be able to claim they felt imminent threat and they will win their argument because it’s worked so many times before.
I agree that it's likely that the cop will skate because he works for the government and the victim was right-wing so, end of story.
Had it been a white cop shooting dead a black, female, member of BLM, he'd be crucified and Nancy and Chuck would be apologizing to the woman's family.
Standard is that you don’t have to wait to be shot at before you use deadly force. It’s been used to justify the deaths of many other people and is a doctrine supported by conservatives when it suits them apparently.The police could have noted that the broad wasn't shooting at them.
If Law Enforcement was returning fire, I could have seen it, but that wasn't the case here.
When the liberals rioted in Ferguson, the police didn't mow them down- and this was a PEACEFUL protest where no buildings were burned.
That’s what they say when they shoot unarmed blacks people and it works.
Zero reason to believe she wasn’t. Do you have to wait to find out? Nope. If someone comes running at the president, do you think secret service would wait to find out if they were armed?In this case the cop had ZERO reason to believe that she was armed.
Imagine if she had been a BLM member breaking into the Oval Office?
Has nothing to do with her being right wing. She was breaking into a federal building.I don’t think it as necessary to shoot her either, said so many times. But the police will be able to claim they felt imminent threat and they will win their argument because it’s worked so many times before.
I agree that it's likely that the cop will skate because he works for the government and the victim was right-wing so, end of story.
Had it been a white cop shooting dead a black, female, member of BLM, he'd be crucified and Nancy and Chuck would be apologizing to the woman's family.
Imagine if she had been a BLM member breaking into the Oval Office? You think anyone would complain they would have been shot?