Attempts to Roll Back Marriage Equality since the Trump Election.

[EvilCat Breath]

Since Obergefel, the issue of same sex marriage is settled. Now, it's the rights of of those who do not want to embrace perversion for themselves that need to be protected.

No actually it isn't. And the reason why it isn't is because of the main beneficiaries of the marriage contract: Children. Children did not have any unique representation at Obergefell for the main benefit they derived from the marriage contract: the guarantee of BOTH a mother and father. You cannot revise contracts in the US without all parties to said contract at the table with unique representation. Worse still, especially contracts cannot be revised to the demise of children that were involved in them. Can't be done. No contract involving children can contain terms onerous to them or terms that strip a vital provision away from them. Cant' be done.

On that point alone Obergefell could be overturned. But worse still, at least one, but probably two Justices were in violation of Capterton v A.T. Massey Coal (2009)'s findings that say no judge can advertise bias towards the outcome of a case in advance of hearing it. Ginsburg went on public media several weeks before the 2015 Hearing and told the world her verdict on Obergefell before she even sat on over it. That case can be overturned on that alone; or at a minimum...reheard with ALL parties to the proposed mandated contract revision having representation there..

Supreme Court decisions do not get revisited and overturned- they do not get 'reheard'.

Now it is possible a new case could come before the court- but no new case will argue your bizarre fictoin of 'contract' law.

Technically, it would take a new case where a challenge was made to a SCOTUS case that returned power of qualifiers for marriage to the states....like one demanding polygamy be legal on all the "logic" of Obergefell. A new SCOTUS would have to merely interpret the states powers differently than Obergefell and in the name of equality of all lifestyles, remand the power of qualifying for marriage back to the states.

There are no such laws guaranteeing a mother and a father. If you think so, then the monster chimera children with neither a mother or a father will totally confuse you.

The what?

There has to be a remedial reading class around you.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Since Obergefel, the issue of same sex marriage is settled. Now, it's the rights of of those who do not want to embrace perversion for themselves that need to be protected.

No actually it isn't. And the reason why it isn't is because of the main beneficiaries of the marriage contract: Children. Children did not have any unique representation at Obergefell for the main benefit they derived from the marriage contract: the guarantee of BOTH a mother and father. You cannot revise contracts in the US without all parties to said contract at the table with unique representation. Worse still, especially contracts cannot be revised to the demise of children that were involved in them. Can't be done. No contract involving children can contain terms onerous to them or terms that strip a vital provision away from them. Cant' be done.

On that point alone Obergefell could be overturned. But worse still, at least one, but probably two Justices were in violation of Capterton v A.T. Massey Coal (2009)'s findings that say no judge can advertise bias towards the outcome of a case in advance of hearing it. Ginsburg went on public media several weeks before the 2015 Hearing and told the world her verdict on Obergefell before she even sat on over it. That case can be overturned on that alone; or at a minimum...reheard with ALL parties to the proposed mandated contract revision having representation there..

Supreme Court decisions do not get revisited and overturned- they do not get 'reheard'.

Now it is possible a new case could come before the court- but no new case will argue your bizarre fictoin of 'contract' law.

Technically, it would take a new case where a challenge was made to a SCOTUS case that returned power of qualifiers for marriage to the states....like one demanding polygamy be legal on all the "logic" of Obergefell. A new SCOTUS would have to merely interpret the states powers differently than Obergefell and in the name of equality of all lifestyles, remand the power of qualifying for marriage back to the states.

There are no such laws guaranteeing a mother and a father. If you think so, then the monster chimera children with neither a mother or a father will totally confuse you.

The what?

There has to be a remedial reading class around you.

Listen, you don't need to be a bitch. I'm just asking a question. 'Monster chimera children' isn't that great of a description, it's just an opinion.

For fucks sake, people get bent out of shape for little to nothing nowadays.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Since Obergefel, the issue of same sex marriage is settled. Now, it's the rights of of those who do not want to embrace perversion for themselves that need to be protected.

No actually it isn't. And the reason why it isn't is because of the main beneficiaries of the marriage contract: Children. Children did not have any unique representation at Obergefell for the main benefit they derived from the marriage contract: the guarantee of BOTH a mother and father. You cannot revise contracts in the US without all parties to said contract at the table with unique representation. Worse still, especially contracts cannot be revised to the demise of children that were involved in them. Can't be done. No contract involving children can contain terms onerous to them or terms that strip a vital provision away from them. Cant' be done.

On that point alone Obergefell could be overturned. But worse still, at least one, but probably two Justices were in violation of Capterton v A.T. Massey Coal (2009)'s findings that say no judge can advertise bias towards the outcome of a case in advance of hearing it. Ginsburg went on public media several weeks before the 2015 Hearing and told the world her verdict on Obergefell before she even sat on over it. That case can be overturned on that alone; or at a minimum...reheard with ALL parties to the proposed mandated contract revision having representation there..

Supreme Court decisions do not get revisited and overturned- they do not get 'reheard'.

Now it is possible a new case could come before the court- but no new case will argue your bizarre fictoin of 'contract' law.

Technically, it would take a new case where a challenge was made to a SCOTUS case that returned power of qualifiers for marriage to the states....like one demanding polygamy be legal on all the "logic" of Obergefell. A new SCOTUS would have to merely interpret the states powers differently than Obergefell and in the name of equality of all lifestyles, remand the power of qualifying for marriage back to the states.

There are no such laws guaranteeing a mother and a father. If you think so, then the monster chimera children with neither a mother or a father will totally confuse you.

The what?

There has to be a remedial reading class around you.

Listen, you don't need to be a bitch. I'm just asking a question. 'Monster chimera children' isn't that great of a description, it's just an opinion.

For fucks sake, people get bent out of shape for little to nothing nowadays.

If you read back through this thread you will find out about the monsters.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I see the Pedo-Friendlies still fear losing their ability to accumulate personal kiddie harems. Sick freaks, all of them.

I see bigots like you trying to paint homosexuals as pedos- knowing at the same time that you endanger the safety of children doing so.

I see liars like yourself still trying to promote the lie homosexuals are not pedo-friendlies and do indeed need to be kept away from children, and don't give a rat's ass about the safety of children, especially when it might contradict some trendy fashionable nonsense peddled by deviants.

The guy who appropriated the rainbow flag was a pedo, Harry Hay.

So was Harvey Milk and he's a hero to gays.

 

[Picaro]

I see the Pedo-Friendlies still fear losing their ability to accumulate personal kiddie harems. Sick freaks, all of them.

I see bigots like you trying to paint homosexuals as pedos- knowing at the same time that you endanger the safety of children doing so.

I see liars like yourself still trying to promote the lie homosexuals are not pedo-friendlies and do indeed need to be kept away from children, and don't give a rat's ass about the safety of children, especially when it might contradict some trendy fashionable nonsense peddled by deviants.

The guy who appropriated the rainbow flag was a pedo, Harry Hay.

Almost all of the known 'activists' are extremely pedo-friendly; they think it's 'enlightened' and all 'avant garde' n stuff. As for a few homos not liking pedoes, the mentally ill don't usually like other mentally ill people like themselves, and the sociopathic nature of homosexuals is well documented by their own 'hotlines', where some 50% of the reports of 'gay bashing' involve homos bashing each other, not some skinhead weirdos running around beating them up, though the their media propaganda is entirely devoted to creating the myth it's 'nazis' and 'Xians' doing it all. The rate at which they spread AIDS throught their 'community' is alone more than enough to get a sense of just how much they like each other, and they still top the list of new infection every year, so it's clear they don't like each other much at all. despite all the feely good nonsense they peddle in their media campaigns.

The atheist hero Richard Dawkins is also a victim of a homo pedophile, by the way, and he thinks a little pedophilia is okay, said so several times.

Harry Hay is the major 'Father of Homo rights' on the West Coast. His 'NAMBLA Walks With Me' sign is world (in)famous, but the fake 'Rights' movement likes to claim they don't know a thing about it, like they pretend NAMBLA wasn't a beloved and valued organization for the 'Rainbow' sickos for decades. Another pedo-friendly hero of homos was of course Gore Vidal; the list just goes on and on of these kiddie raper fans. Their latest 'Martyr' Mathew Sheppard has two arrests involving two 8 year old boys, which is why his parents never asked for the death penalty for his fellow homo buddies who murdered him; the defense could have subpeonaed and opened his juvie record for court sentencing purposes in death penalty cases, and then there would be no 'Foundation' and silly assed play touring the country. They are having just as hard a time as the media at finding a legitimate 'martyr' for 'da movement' as it is from the likes of the Michael Johnsons and Freddy Greys for their cop-killing campaign.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I think PP has a fair point. I know there are faggots who hate pedos... Because they were molested themselves.

That is as stupid as stupid gets. People are not gay because they were molested.

I didn't say they were. All I said was there are faggots who were molested.

But you have proven my point with that Freudian slip, PP. Most homos have been molested.. And it was by another homo.

How the fuck do you know so much about "homos" smiley? Here. Try to learn something:

Members of disliked minority groups are often stereotyped as representing a danger to the majority's most vulnerable members. For example, Jews in the Middle Ages were accused of murdering Christian babies in ritual sacrifices. Black men in the United States were often lynched after being falsely accused of raping White women.

In recent years, antigay activists have routinely asserted that gay people are child molesters. This argument was often made in debates about the Boy Scouts of America's policy to exclude gay scouts and scoutmasters. More recently, in the wake of Rep. Mark Foley's resignation from the US House of Representatives in 2006, antigay activists and their supporters seized on the scandal to revive this canard. read:Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

Selected Excerpts:

The number of Americans who believe the myth that gay people are child molesters has declined substantially. In a 1970 national survey, more than 70% of respondents agreed with the assertions that "Homosexuals are dangerous as teachers or youth leaders because they try to get sexually involved with children" or that "Homosexuals try to play sexually with children if they cannot get an adult partner."1

By contrast, in a 1999 national poll, the belief that most gay men are likely to molest or abuse children was endorsed by only 19% of heterosexual men and 10% of heterosexual women.

Even fewer – 9% of men and 6% of women – regarded most lesbians as child molesters.

Apparently you're a part of the moronic minority( Yes a play on words lifted from the moral majority)

One problem is that none of the studies in this area have obtained data from a probability sample, that is, a sample that can be assumed to be representative of the population of all child molesters. Rather, most research has been conducted only with convicted perpetrators or with pedophiles who sought professional help. Consequently, they may not accurately describe child molesters who have never been caught or have not sought treatment.

A second problem is that the terminology used in this area is often confusing and can even be misleading. We can begin to address that problem by defining some basic terms.

Pedophilia and child molestation are used in different ways, even by professionals. Pedophilia usually refers to an adult psychological disorder characterized by a preference for prepubescent children as sexual partners; this preference may or may not be acted upon. The term hebephilia is sometimes used to describe adult sexual attractions to adolescents or children who have reached puberty.

Child molestation and child sexual abuse refer to actions, and don't imply a particular psychological makeup or motive on the part of the perpetrator. Not all incidents of child sexual abuse are perpetrated by pedophiles or hebephiles; in some cases, the perpetrator has other motives for his or her actions and does not manifest an ongoing pattern of sexual attraction to children.

Thus, not all child sexual abuse is perpetrated by pedophiles (or hebephiles) and not all pedophiles and hebephiles actually commit abuse. Consequently, it is important to use terminology carefully.

Hopfully, you are beginning to see that the issue is a bit more complicated than your small mind is able or willing to contemplate

Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men2 is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation

.

Now we are getting to the crux of the issue. Still with me, or are you watching porn and jerking off, rather than trying to learn something?

As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).

To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men's sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men's abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don't implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator's sexual orientation.

Typologies of
Offenders

The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.

So all of this blathering about "homos" and 'pedos" is just ignorant equine excrement

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I see the Pedo-Friendlies still fear losing their ability to accumulate personal kiddie harems. Sick freaks, all of them.

I see bigots like you trying to paint homosexuals as pedos- knowing at the same time that you endanger the safety of children doing so.

I see liars like yourself still trying to promote the lie homosexuals are not pedo-friendlies and do indeed need to be kept away from children, and don't give a rat's ass about the safety of children, especially when it might contradict some trendy fashionable nonsense peddled by deviants.

The guy who appropriated the rainbow flag was a pedo, Harry Hay.

Almost all of the known 'activists' are extremely pedo-friendly; they think it's 'enlightened' and all 'avant garde' n stuff. As for a few homos not liking pedoes, the mentally ill don't usually like other mentally ill people like themselves, and the sociopathic nature of homosexuals is well documented by their own 'hotlines', where some 50% of the reports of 'gay bashing' involve homos bashing each other, not some skinhead weirdos running around beating them up, though the their media propaganda is entirely devoted to creating the myth it's 'nazis' and 'Xians' doing it all. The rate at which they spread AIDS throught their 'community' is alone more than enough to get a sense of just how much they like each other, and they still top the list of new infection every year, so it's clear they don't like each other much at all. despite all the feely good nonsense they peddle in their media campaigns.

The atheist hero Richard Dawkins is also a victim of a homo pedophile, by the way, and he thinks a little pedophilia is okay, said so several times.

Harry Hay is the major 'Father of Homo rights' on the West Coast. His 'NAMBLA Walks With Me' sign is world (in)famous, but the fake 'Rights' movement likes to claim they don't know a thing about it, like they pretend NAMBLA wasn't a beloved and valued organization for the 'Rainbow' sickos for decades. Another pedo-friendly hero of homos was of course Gore Vidal; the list just goes on and on of these kiddie raper fans. Their latest 'Martyr' Mathew Sheppard has two arrests involving two 8 year old boys, which is why his parents never asked for the death penalty for his fellow homo buddies who murdered him; the defense could have subpeonaed and opened his juvie record for court sentencing purposes in death penalty cases, and then there would be no 'Foundation' and silly assed play touring the country. They are having just as hard a time as the media at finding a legitimate 'martyr' for 'da movement' as it is from the likes of the Michael Johnsons and Freddy Greys for their cop-killing campaign.

Platform and positions Google
hl=en&q=216.220.97.17&btnG=Search

NAMBLA describes itself as a "support group for intergenerational relationships," and uses the slogan "sexual freedom for all." According to the group's web site, its aim is to "support the rights of youth as well as adults to choose the partners with whom they wish to share and enjoy their bodies." Google Search of NAMBLA's IP

You will see that nowhere in this lengthy piece is NAMBLA identified as a gay organization, nore does the organization itself even mention the issue of being gay.

History Brief history of the modern childlove movement

NAMBLA emerged from the tumultuous political atmosphere of the 1970s, particularly from the leftist wing of the Gay Liberation movement which followed the 1969 Stonewall Riots in New York City. Although discussion of gay adult-minor sex did take place, gay rights groups immediately following the Stonewall Riot were more concerned with issues of police harassment, nondiscrimination in employment, health care and other areas.

These were desperate days for the fledgling gay rights movement. Even then, the NAMBLA was consider a fringe group within the gay community

Ostracism:

Some gay rights groups immediately following "Stonewall Inn", perceived age-of-consent laws as governmental tools to suppress homosexual behavior rather than as the safeguards against the sexual abuse of small children that they claimed to be. In many states that didn't explicitly criminalize homosexual behavior (the sodomy laws), age-of-consent laws were significantly lower for heterosexual couples than for homosexual couples. For example, in the state of Massachusetts, "Lawrence v. Texas", the age of consent for heterosexual couples was as low as 13 (with parental approval) but was 18 for homosexual men.

The relative acceptance or indifference to opposition of the age-of-consent began to change at the same time as accusations that gays were child pornographers and child molesters became common. Judianne Densen-Gerber, founder of the New York drug rehabilitation center Odyssey House, argued that gays were responsible for child pornography. In 1977 former beauty queen Anita Bryant staked a similar position, starting the "Save Our Children" campaign. "The recruitment of our children," she argued, "is absolutely necessary for the survival and growth of homosexuality."

You are dishonestly, or perhaps willfully ignorantly, relying on ancient history by invoking NAMBLA

In 1980 a group called the “Lesbian Caucus – Lesbian Gay Pride March Committee” distributed a hand-out urging women to split from the annual New York City Gay Pride March because the organizing committee had supposedly been dominated by NAMBLA and its supporters. The next year, after some lesbians threatened to picket, the Cornell University gay group Gay PAC (Gay People at Cornell) rescinded its invitation to NAMBLA founder David Thorstad to be the keynote speaker at the annual May Gay Festival. And in the following years, gay rights groups attempted to block NAMBLA’s participation in gay pride parades, prompting Harry Hay to wear a sign proclaiming “NAMBLA walks with me” as he participated in a 1986 gay pride march in Los Angeles.

Thus by the mid-1980s, NAMBLA was virtually alone in its positions and found itself politically isolated. Gay rights organizations, burdened by accusations of child recruitment and child abuse, had abandoned the radicalism of their early years and had "retreat[ed] from the idea of a more inclusive politics," opting instead to appeal more to the mainstream. Support for "groups perceived as being on the fringe of the gay community," such as NAMBLA, vanished in the process. Today almost all gay rights groups disavow any ties to NAMBLA, voice disapproval of its objectives, and attempt to prevent NAMBLA from having a role in gay and lesbian rights events.

Here is more:

Gregory King of the Human Rights Campaign later said that "NAMBLA is not a gay organization ... They are not part of our community and we thoroughly reject their efforts to insinuate that pedophilia is an issue related to gay and lesbian civil rights." NAMBLA responded by claiming that "man/boy love is by definition homosexual," that "man/boy lovers are part of the gay movement and central to gay history and culture," and that "homosexuals denying that it is 'not gay' to be attracted to adolescent boys are just as ludicrous as heterosexuals saying it's 'not heterosexual' to be attracted to adolescent girls."

And more:

In 1994 the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) adopted a "Position Statement Regarding NAMBLA" saying GLAAD "deplores the North American Man Boy Love Association's (NAMBLA) goals, which include advocacy for sex between adult men and boys and the removal of legal protections for children. These goals constitute a form of child abuse and are repugnant to GLAAD." Also in 1994 the Board of Directors of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) adopted a resolution on NAMBLA that said: "NGLTF condemns all abuse of minors, both sexual and any other kind, perpetrated by adults. Accordingly, NGLTF condemns the organizational goals of NAMBLA and any other such organization."

Today

More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts. NAMBLA maintains a web site at NAMBLA that shows addresses in New York and San Francisco and a phone contact in New York, and offers publications for sale, including the NAMBLA Bulletin.

NAMBLA is identified as a lobby group in Jon Stewart's America: The Book A Citizen's Guide to Democracy Inaction (2004), and is also alluded to on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, often tagged on to an existing lobby group's acronym for the parody.

Gay rights groups opposed to NAMBLA contend that their reason for disavowing NAMBLA has always been their sharing of the general public's disdain for pedophilia and child sexual abuse (as expressed in issues statements). These gay rights groups reject NAMBLA's claims of an analogy between the campaign for gay and lesbian equality and the abolition of age-of-consent laws, and view NAMBLA's rhetoric about "the sexual rights of youth" as a cover for its members' "real agenda".

Now read this and tell me that they are not a bunch of crazy sick fucks. I will tell you that few if any gay men agree with this tripe: Frequently Asked Questions About NAMBLA and Man/Boy Love

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

I see the Pedo-Friendlies still fear losing their ability to accumulate personal kiddie harems. Sick freaks, all of them.

I see bigots like you trying to paint homosexuals as pedos- knowing at the same time that you endanger the safety of children doing so.

I see liars like yourself still trying to promote the lie homosexuals are not pedo-friendlies and do indeed need to be kept away from children, and don't give a rat's ass about the safety of children, especially when it might contradict some trendy fashionable nonsense peddled by deviants.

The guy who appropriated the rainbow flag was a pedo, Harry Hay.

Almost all of the known 'activists' are extremely pedo-friendly; they think it's 'enlightened' and all 'avant garde' n stuff. As for a few homos not liking pedoes, the mentally ill don't usually like other mentally ill people like themselves, and the sociopathic nature of homosexuals is well documented by their own 'hotlines', where some 50% of the reports of 'gay bashing' involve homos bashing each other, not some skinhead weirdos running around beating them up, though the their media propaganda is entirely devoted to creating the myth it's 'nazis' and 'Xians' doing it all. The rate at which they spread AIDS throught their 'community' is alone more than enough to get a sense of just how much they like each other, and they still top the list of new infection every year, so it's clear they don't like each other much at all. despite all the feely good nonsense they peddle in their media campaigns.

The atheist hero Richard Dawkins is also a victim of a homo pedophile, by the way, and he thinks a little pedophilia is okay, said so several times.

Harry Hay is the major 'Father of Homo rights' on the West Coast. His 'NAMBLA Walks With Me' sign is world (in)famous, but the fake 'Rights' movement likes to claim they don't know a thing about it, like they pretend NAMBLA wasn't a beloved and valued organization for the 'Rainbow' sickos for decades. Another pedo-friendly hero of homos was of course Gore Vidal; the list just goes on and on of these kiddie raper fans. Their latest 'Martyr' Mathew Sheppard has two arrests involving two 8 year old boys, which is why his parents never asked for the death penalty for his fellow homo buddies who murdered him; the defense could have subpeonaed and opened his juvie record for court sentencing purposes in death penalty cases, and then there would be no 'Foundation' and silly assed play touring the country. They are having just as hard a time as the media at finding a legitimate 'martyr' for 'da movement' as it is from the likes of the Michael Johnsons and Freddy Greys for their cop-killing campaign.

Platform and positions Google
hl=en&q=216.220.97.17&btnG=Search

NAMBLA describes itself as a "support group for intergenerational relationships," and uses the slogan "sexual freedom for all." According to the group's web site, its aim is to "support the rights of youth as well as adults to choose the partners with whom they wish to share and enjoy their bodies." Google Search of NAMBLA's IP

You will see that nowhere in this lengthy piece is NAMBLA identified as a gay organization, nore does the organization itself even mention the issue of being gay.

History Brief history of the modern childlove movement

NAMBLA emerged from the tumultuous political atmosphere of the 1970s, particularly from the leftist wing of the Gay Liberation movement which followed the 1969 Stonewall Riots in New York City. Although discussion of gay adult-minor sex did take place, gay rights groups immediately following the Stonewall Riot were more concerned with issues of police harassment, nondiscrimination in employment, health care and other areas.

These were desperate days for the fledgling gay rights movement. Even then, the NAMBLA was consider a fringe group within the gay community

Ostracism:

Some gay rights groups immediately following "Stonewall Inn", perceived age-of-consent laws as governmental tools to suppress homosexual behavior rather than as the safeguards against the sexual abuse of small children that they claimed to be. In many states that didn't explicitly criminalize homosexual behavior (the sodomy laws), age-of-consent laws were significantly lower for heterosexual couples than for homosexual couples. For example, in the state of Massachusetts, "Lawrence v. Texas", the age of consent for heterosexual couples was as low as 13 (with parental approval) but was 18 for homosexual men.

The relative acceptance or indifference to opposition of the age-of-consent began to change at the same time as accusations that gays were child pornographers and child molesters became common. Judianne Densen-Gerber, founder of the New York drug rehabilitation center Odyssey House, argued that gays were responsible for child pornography. In 1977 former beauty queen Anita Bryant staked a similar position, starting the "Save Our Children" campaign. "The recruitment of our children," she argued, "is absolutely necessary for the survival and growth of homosexuality."

You are dishonestly, or perhaps willfully ignorantly, relying on ancient history by invoking NAMBLA

In 1980 a group called the “Lesbian Caucus – Lesbian Gay Pride March Committee” distributed a hand-out urging women to split from the annual New York City Gay Pride March because the organizing committee had supposedly been dominated by NAMBLA and its supporters. The next year, after some lesbians threatened to picket, the Cornell University gay group Gay PAC (Gay People at Cornell) rescinded its invitation to NAMBLA founder David Thorstad to be the keynote speaker at the annual May Gay Festival. And in the following years, gay rights groups attempted to block NAMBLA’s participation in gay pride parades, prompting Harry Hay to wear a sign proclaiming “NAMBLA walks with me” as he participated in a 1986 gay pride march in Los Angeles.

Thus by the mid-1980s, NAMBLA was virtually alone in its positions and found itself politically isolated. Gay rights organizations, burdened by accusations of child recruitment and child abuse, had abandoned the radicalism of their early years and had "retreat[ed] from the idea of a more inclusive politics," opting instead to appeal more to the mainstream. Support for "groups perceived as being on the fringe of the gay community," such as NAMBLA, vanished in the process. Today almost all gay rights groups disavow any ties to NAMBLA, voice disapproval of its objectives, and attempt to prevent NAMBLA from having a role in gay and lesbian rights events.

Here is more:

Gregory King of the Human Rights Campaign later said that "NAMBLA is not a gay organization ... They are not part of our community and we thoroughly reject their efforts to insinuate that pedophilia is an issue related to gay and lesbian civil rights." NAMBLA responded by claiming that "man/boy love is by definition homosexual," that "man/boy lovers are part of the gay movement and central to gay history and culture," and that "homosexuals denying that it is 'not gay' to be attracted to adolescent boys are just as ludicrous as heterosexuals saying it's 'not heterosexual' to be attracted to adolescent girls."

And more:

In 1994 the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) adopted a "Position Statement Regarding NAMBLA" saying GLAAD "deplores the North American Man Boy Love Association's (NAMBLA) goals, which include advocacy for sex between adult men and boys and the removal of legal protections for children. These goals constitute a form of child abuse and are repugnant to GLAAD." Also in 1994 the Board of Directors of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) adopted a resolution on NAMBLA that said: "NGLTF condemns all abuse of minors, both sexual and any other kind, perpetrated by adults. Accordingly, NGLTF condemns the organizational goals of NAMBLA and any other such organization."

Today

More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts. NAMBLA maintains a web site at NAMBLA that shows addresses in New York and San Francisco and a phone contact in New York, and offers publications for sale, including the NAMBLA Bulletin.

NAMBLA is identified as a lobby group in Jon Stewart's America: The Book A Citizen's Guide to Democracy Inaction (2004), and is also alluded to on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, often tagged on to an existing lobby group's acronym for the parody.

Gay rights groups opposed to NAMBLA contend that their reason for disavowing NAMBLA has always been their sharing of the general public's disdain for pedophilia and child sexual abuse (as expressed in issues statements). These gay rights groups reject NAMBLA's claims of an analogy between the campaign for gay and lesbian equality and the abolition of age-of-consent laws, and view NAMBLA's rhetoric about "the sexual rights of youth" as a cover for its members' "real agenda".

Now read this and tell me that they are not a bunch of crazy sick fucks. I will tell you that few if any gay men agree with this tripe: Frequently Asked Questions About NAMBLA and Man/Boy Love

Lol....it's about man and boy love...that means it is a homosexual organization as well as a pedo one.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I see bigots like you trying to paint homosexuals as pedos- knowing at the same time that you endanger the safety of children doing so.

I see liars like yourself still trying to promote the lie homosexuals are not pedo-friendlies and do indeed need to be kept away from children, and don't give a rat's ass about the safety of children, especially when it might contradict some trendy fashionable nonsense peddled by deviants.

The guy who appropriated the rainbow flag was a pedo, Harry Hay.

Almost all of the known 'activists' are extremely pedo-friendly; they think it's 'enlightened' and all 'avant garde' n stuff. As for a few homos not liking pedoes, the mentally ill don't usually like other mentally ill people like themselves, and the sociopathic nature of homosexuals is well documented by their own 'hotlines', where some 50% of the reports of 'gay bashing' involve homos bashing each other, not some skinhead weirdos running around beating them up, though the their media propaganda is entirely devoted to creating the myth it's 'nazis' and 'Xians' doing it all. The rate at which they spread AIDS throught their 'community' is alone more than enough to get a sense of just how much they like each other, and they still top the list of new infection every year, so it's clear they don't like each other much at all. despite all the feely good nonsense they peddle in their media campaigns.

The atheist hero Richard Dawkins is also a victim of a homo pedophile, by the way, and he thinks a little pedophilia is okay, said so several times.

Harry Hay is the major 'Father of Homo rights' on the West Coast. His 'NAMBLA Walks With Me' sign is world (in)famous, but the fake 'Rights' movement likes to claim they don't know a thing about it, like they pretend NAMBLA wasn't a beloved and valued organization for the 'Rainbow' sickos for decades. Another pedo-friendly hero of homos was of course Gore Vidal; the list just goes on and on of these kiddie raper fans. Their latest 'Martyr' Mathew Sheppard has two arrests involving two 8 year old boys, which is why his parents never asked for the death penalty for his fellow homo buddies who murdered him; the defense could have subpeonaed and opened his juvie record for court sentencing purposes in death penalty cases, and then there would be no 'Foundation' and silly assed play touring the country. They are having just as hard a time as the media at finding a legitimate 'martyr' for 'da movement' as it is from the likes of the Michael Johnsons and Freddy Greys for their cop-killing campaign.

Platform and positions Google
hl=en&q=216.220.97.17&btnG=Search

NAMBLA describes itself as a "support group for intergenerational relationships," and uses the slogan "sexual freedom for all." According to the group's web site, its aim is to "support the rights of youth as well as adults to choose the partners with whom they wish to share and enjoy their bodies." Google Search of NAMBLA's IP

You will see that nowhere in this lengthy piece is NAMBLA identified as a gay organization, nore does the organization itself even mention the issue of being gay.

History Brief history of the modern childlove movement

NAMBLA emerged from the tumultuous political atmosphere of the 1970s, particularly from the leftist wing of the Gay Liberation movement which followed the 1969 Stonewall Riots in New York City. Although discussion of gay adult-minor sex did take place, gay rights groups immediately following the Stonewall Riot were more concerned with issues of police harassment, nondiscrimination in employment, health care and other areas.

These were desperate days for the fledgling gay rights movement. Even then, the NAMBLA was consider a fringe group within the gay community

Ostracism:

Some gay rights groups immediately following "Stonewall Inn", perceived age-of-consent laws as governmental tools to suppress homosexual behavior rather than as the safeguards against the sexual abuse of small children that they claimed to be. In many states that didn't explicitly criminalize homosexual behavior (the sodomy laws), age-of-consent laws were significantly lower for heterosexual couples than for homosexual couples. For example, in the state of Massachusetts, "Lawrence v. Texas", the age of consent for heterosexual couples was as low as 13 (with parental approval) but was 18 for homosexual men.

The relative acceptance or indifference to opposition of the age-of-consent began to change at the same time as accusations that gays were child pornographers and child molesters became common. Judianne Densen-Gerber, founder of the New York drug rehabilitation center Odyssey House, argued that gays were responsible for child pornography. In 1977 former beauty queen Anita Bryant staked a similar position, starting the "Save Our Children" campaign. "The recruitment of our children," she argued, "is absolutely necessary for the survival and growth of homosexuality."

You are dishonestly, or perhaps willfully ignorantly, relying on ancient history by invoking NAMBLA

In 1980 a group called the “Lesbian Caucus – Lesbian Gay Pride March Committee” distributed a hand-out urging women to split from the annual New York City Gay Pride March because the organizing committee had supposedly been dominated by NAMBLA and its supporters. The next year, after some lesbians threatened to picket, the Cornell University gay group Gay PAC (Gay People at Cornell) rescinded its invitation to NAMBLA founder David Thorstad to be the keynote speaker at the annual May Gay Festival. And in the following years, gay rights groups attempted to block NAMBLA’s participation in gay pride parades, prompting Harry Hay to wear a sign proclaiming “NAMBLA walks with me” as he participated in a 1986 gay pride march in Los Angeles.

Thus by the mid-1980s, NAMBLA was virtually alone in its positions and found itself politically isolated. Gay rights organizations, burdened by accusations of child recruitment and child abuse, had abandoned the radicalism of their early years and had "retreat[ed] from the idea of a more inclusive politics," opting instead to appeal more to the mainstream. Support for "groups perceived as being on the fringe of the gay community," such as NAMBLA, vanished in the process. Today almost all gay rights groups disavow any ties to NAMBLA, voice disapproval of its objectives, and attempt to prevent NAMBLA from having a role in gay and lesbian rights events.

Here is more:

Gregory King of the Human Rights Campaign later said that "NAMBLA is not a gay organization ... They are not part of our community and we thoroughly reject their efforts to insinuate that pedophilia is an issue related to gay and lesbian civil rights." NAMBLA responded by claiming that "man/boy love is by definition homosexual," that "man/boy lovers are part of the gay movement and central to gay history and culture," and that "homosexuals denying that it is 'not gay' to be attracted to adolescent boys are just as ludicrous as heterosexuals saying it's 'not heterosexual' to be attracted to adolescent girls."

And more:

In 1994 the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) adopted a "Position Statement Regarding NAMBLA" saying GLAAD "deplores the North American Man Boy Love Association's (NAMBLA) goals, which include advocacy for sex between adult men and boys and the removal of legal protections for children. These goals constitute a form of child abuse and are repugnant to GLAAD." Also in 1994 the Board of Directors of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) adopted a resolution on NAMBLA that said: "NGLTF condemns all abuse of minors, both sexual and any other kind, perpetrated by adults. Accordingly, NGLTF condemns the organizational goals of NAMBLA and any other such organization."

Today

More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts. NAMBLA maintains a web site at NAMBLA that shows addresses in New York and San Francisco and a phone contact in New York, and offers publications for sale, including the NAMBLA Bulletin.

NAMBLA is identified as a lobby group in Jon Stewart's America: The Book A Citizen's Guide to Democracy Inaction (2004), and is also alluded to on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, often tagged on to an existing lobby group's acronym for the parody.

Gay rights groups opposed to NAMBLA contend that their reason for disavowing NAMBLA has always been their sharing of the general public's disdain for pedophilia and child sexual abuse (as expressed in issues statements). These gay rights groups reject NAMBLA's claims of an analogy between the campaign for gay and lesbian equality and the abolition of age-of-consent laws, and view NAMBLA's rhetoric about "the sexual rights of youth" as a cover for its members' "real agenda".

Now read this and tell me that they are not a bunch of crazy sick fucks. I will tell you that few if any gay men agree with this tripe: Frequently Asked Questions About NAMBLA and Man/Boy Love

Lol....it's about man and boy love...that means it is a homosexual organization as well as a pedo one.

You don't read very well do you?

 

[Silhouette]

Poor progressive patriot thought his cult had this all locked up. Now he's swimming against the tide. Seems false information and a lack of science doesn't always "fake it till you make it" PP.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Poor progressive patriot thought his cult had this all locked up. Now he's swimming against the tide. Seems false information and a lack of science doesn't always "fake it till you make it" PP.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

I think PP has a fair point. I know there are faggots who hate pedos... Because they were molested themselves.

That is as stupid as stupid gets. People are not gay because they were molested.

I didn't say they were. All I said was there are faggots who were molested.

But you have proven my point with that Freudian slip, PP. Most homos have been molested.. And it was by another homo.

How the fuck do you know so much about "homos" smiley? Here. Try to learn something:

Members of disliked minority groups are often stereotyped as representing a danger to the majority's most vulnerable members. For example, Jews in the Middle Ages were accused of murdering Christian babies in ritual sacrifices. Black men in the United States were often lynched after being falsely accused of raping White women.

In recent years, antigay activists have routinely asserted that gay people are child molesters. This argument was often made in debates about the Boy Scouts of America's policy to exclude gay scouts and scoutmasters. More recently, in the wake of Rep. Mark Foley's resignation from the US House of Representatives in 2006, antigay activists and their supporters seized on the scandal to revive this canard. read:Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

Selected Excerpts:

The number of Americans who believe the myth that gay people are child molesters has declined substantially. In a 1970 national survey, more than 70% of respondents agreed with the assertions that "Homosexuals are dangerous as teachers or youth leaders because they try to get sexually involved with children" or that "Homosexuals try to play sexually with children if they cannot get an adult partner."1

By contrast, in a 1999 national poll, the belief that most gay men are likely to molest or abuse children was endorsed by only 19% of heterosexual men and 10% of heterosexual women.

Even fewer – 9% of men and 6% of women – regarded most lesbians as child molesters.

Apparently you're a part of the moronic minority( Yes a play on words lifted from the moral majority)

One problem is that none of the studies in this area have obtained data from a probability sample, that is, a sample that can be assumed to be representative of the population of all child molesters. Rather, most research has been conducted only with convicted perpetrators or with pedophiles who sought professional help. Consequently, they may not accurately describe child molesters who have never been caught or have not sought treatment.

A second problem is that the terminology used in this area is often confusing and can even be misleading. We can begin to address that problem by defining some basic terms.

Pedophilia and child molestation are used in different ways, even by professionals. Pedophilia usually refers to an adult psychological disorder characterized by a preference for prepubescent children as sexual partners; this preference may or may not be acted upon. The term hebephilia is sometimes used to describe adult sexual attractions to adolescents or children who have reached puberty.

Child molestation and child sexual abuse refer to actions, and don't imply a particular psychological makeup or motive on the part of the perpetrator. Not all incidents of child sexual abuse are perpetrated by pedophiles or hebephiles; in some cases, the perpetrator has other motives for his or her actions and does not manifest an ongoing pattern of sexual attraction to children.

Thus, not all child sexual abuse is perpetrated by pedophiles (or hebephiles) and not all pedophiles and hebephiles actually commit abuse. Consequently, it is important to use terminology carefully.

Hopfully, you are beginning to see that the issue is a bit more complicated than your small mind is able or willing to contemplate

Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men2 is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation

.

Now we are getting to the crux of the issue. Still with me, or are you watching porn and jerking off, rather than trying to learn something?

As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).

To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men's sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men's abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don't implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator's sexual orientation.

Typologies of
Offenders

The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.

So all of this blathering about "homos" and 'pedos" is just ignorant equine excrement

I'll one-up you with a more recent study from the Mayo Clinic:

" Homosexuality is 4 to 20 times more common in pedophiles than in the general population. In addition, homosexual pedophiles on average abuse twice as many children as heterosexual pedophiles.

From the Mayo Clinic:
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings...

Pedophiles are usually attracted to a particular age range and/or sex of child. Research categorizes male pedophiles by whether they are attracted to only male children (homosexual pedophilia), female children (heterosexual pedophilia), or children from both sexes (bisexual pedophilia). [3,6,10,29] The percentage of homosexual pedophiles ranges from 9% to 40%, which is approximately 4 to 20 times higher than the rate of adult men attracted to other adult men (using a prevalence rate of adult homosexuality of 2%-4%).[5,7,10,19,29,30] This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children. [19] Individuals attracted to females usually prefer children between the ages of 8 and 10 years. [3,5,31] Individuals attracted to males usually prefer slightly older boys between the ages of 10 and 13 years. [3,5]

Heterosexual pedophiles, in self-report studies, have on average abused 5.2 children and committed an average of 34 sexual acts vs homosexual pedophiles who have on average abused 10.7 children and committed an average of 52 acts. [15]Bisexual offenders have on average abused 27.3 children and committed more than 120 acts. [15] A study by Abel et al [32] of 377 nonincarcerated, non-incest-related pedophiles, whose legal situations had been resolved and who were surveyed using an anonymous self-report questionnaire, found that heterosexual pedophiles on average reported abusing 19.8 children and committing 23.2 acts, whereas homosexual pedophiles had abused 150.2 children and committed 281.7 acts. These studies confirm law enforcement reports about the serial nature of the crime, the large number of children abused by each pedophile, and the underreporting of assaults. [1] Studies that used self-reports and polygraphs show that pedophiles currently in treatment underreport their current interest in children and past behaviors. [33,34]"

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I think PP has a fair point. I know there are faggots who hate pedos... Because they were molested themselves.

That is as stupid as stupid gets. People are not gay because they were molested.

I didn't say they were. All I said was there are faggots who were molested.

But you have proven my point with that Freudian slip, PP. Most homos have been molested.. And it was by another homo.

How the fuck do you know so much about "homos" smiley? Here. Try to learn something:

Members of disliked minority groups are often stereotyped as representing a danger to the majority's most vulnerable members. For example, Jews in the Middle Ages were accused of murdering Christian babies in ritual sacrifices. Black men in the United States were often lynched after being falsely accused of raping White women.

In recent years, antigay activists have routinely asserted that gay people are child molesters. This argument was often made in debates about the Boy Scouts of America's policy to exclude gay scouts and scoutmasters. More recently, in the wake of Rep. Mark Foley's resignation from the US House of Representatives in 2006, antigay activists and their supporters seized on the scandal to revive this canard. read:Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

Selected Excerpts:

The number of Americans who believe the myth that gay people are child molesters has declined substantially. In a 1970 national survey, more than 70% of respondents agreed with the assertions that "Homosexuals are dangerous as teachers or youth leaders because they try to get sexually involved with children" or that "Homosexuals try to play sexually with children if they cannot get an adult partner."1

By contrast, in a 1999 national poll, the belief that most gay men are likely to molest or abuse children was endorsed by only 19% of heterosexual men and 10% of heterosexual women.

Even fewer – 9% of men and 6% of women – regarded most lesbians as child molesters.

Apparently you're a part of the moronic minority( Yes a play on words lifted from the moral majority)

One problem is that none of the studies in this area have obtained data from a probability sample, that is, a sample that can be assumed to be representative of the population of all child molesters. Rather, most research has been conducted only with convicted perpetrators or with pedophiles who sought professional help. Consequently, they may not accurately describe child molesters who have never been caught or have not sought treatment.

A second problem is that the terminology used in this area is often confusing and can even be misleading. We can begin to address that problem by defining some basic terms.

Pedophilia and child molestation are used in different ways, even by professionals. Pedophilia usually refers to an adult psychological disorder characterized by a preference for prepubescent children as sexual partners; this preference may or may not be acted upon. The term hebephilia is sometimes used to describe adult sexual attractions to adolescents or children who have reached puberty.

Child molestation and child sexual abuse refer to actions, and don't imply a particular psychological makeup or motive on the part of the perpetrator. Not all incidents of child sexual abuse are perpetrated by pedophiles or hebephiles; in some cases, the perpetrator has other motives for his or her actions and does not manifest an ongoing pattern of sexual attraction to children.

Thus, not all child sexual abuse is perpetrated by pedophiles (or hebephiles) and not all pedophiles and hebephiles actually commit abuse. Consequently, it is important to use terminology carefully.

Hopfully, you are beginning to see that the issue is a bit more complicated than your small mind is able or willing to contemplate

Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men2 is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation

.

Now we are getting to the crux of the issue. Still with me, or are you watching porn and jerking off, rather than trying to learn something?

As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).

To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men's sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men's abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don't implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator's sexual orientation.

Typologies of
Offenders

The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.

So all of this blathering about "homos" and 'pedos" is just ignorant equine excrement

I'll one-up you with a more recent study from the Mayo Clinic:

" Homosexuality is 4 to 20 times more common in pedophiles than in the general population. In addition, homosexual pedophiles on average abuse twice as many children as heterosexual pedophiles.

From the Mayo Clinic:
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings...

Pedophiles are usually attracted to a particular age range and/or sex of child. Research categorizes male pedophiles by whether they are attracted to only male children (homosexual pedophilia), female children (heterosexual pedophilia), or children from both sexes (bisexual pedophilia). [3,6,10,29] The percentage of homosexual pedophiles ranges from 9% to 40%, which is approximately 4 to 20 times higher than the rate of adult men attracted to other adult men (using a prevalence rate of adult homosexuality of 2%-4%).[5,7,10,19,29,30] This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children. [19] Individuals attracted to females usually prefer children between the ages of 8 and 10 years. [3,5,31] Individuals attracted to males usually prefer slightly older boys between the ages of 10 and 13 years. [3,5]

Heterosexual pedophiles, in self-report studies, have on average abused 5.2 children and committed an average of 34 sexual acts vs homosexual pedophiles who have on average abused 10.7 children and committed an average of 52 acts. [15]Bisexual offenders have on average abused 27.3 children and committed more than 120 acts. [15] A study by Abel et al [32] of 377 nonincarcerated, non-incest-related pedophiles, whose legal situations had been resolved and who were surveyed using an anonymous self-report questionnaire, found that heterosexual pedophiles on average reported abusing 19.8 children and committing 23.2 acts, whereas homosexual pedophiles had abused 150.2 children and committed 281.7 acts. These studies confirm law enforcement reports about the serial nature of the crime, the large number of children abused by each pedophile, and the underreporting of assaults. [1] Studies that used self-reports and polygraphs show that pedophiles currently in treatment underreport their current interest in children and past behaviors. [33,34]"

Wow! What a fail!! Do you even realize what this is saying?? You have been putting out the unsupported tripe that most homosexuals were molested (Post 287) You have expressed your hatred for gays in numerous posts and you have consistently agreed and supported Silouette 's rants, and the idiocy of others about how gays are all pedophiles and that they should not have children in their care.

Never a word from you indicating that you think differently. So, If you're going to try to tell me that you don't harbor the idiotic belief that a high percentage of homosexuals are child predators, I 'm going to call bullshit if you do. Yes that's right, bullshit because that is not what this from Mayo says. You heard me, it says that a high percentage of men who molest children victimize boys and they are them referred to as "homosexual pedophiles. Is it possible that you don't understand that this in no ways means that a high percentage of homosexuals are child predators! These "homosexual pedophiles are not the homosexuals that we talk about when discussing marriage, and by the way that is what this thread is about. In fact, as I have documented most of these pedophiles are not much interested in age appropriate relations.

Finally, from your own source:

This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children.

https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-correlation-between-homosexuality-and-pedophilia
So, no, you have not done me "one better" Dude

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Some of you pedophile obsessed people might believe this too:

Rick Wiles: Flynn Forced Out By ‘Devil-Worshiping, Luciferian, Demon-Possessed Maniacs’ Behind Global Child Molestation Ring | Right Wing Watch

Yesterday, extremist conspiracy theorist and End Times radio host Rick Wiles dedicated the first half of his radio program to asserting that President Trump’s national security adviser Michael Flynn was forced out of office because he knew the truth about “Pizzagate,” the absurd conspiracy theory claiming that Hillary Clinton and her allies help to operate a child sex ring out of a Washington, D.C., pizza parlor.

Claiming that a tweet from Clinton mocking the conspiracy theory was itself proof that the conspiracy is real, Wiles declared that Christians have no idea how many of their elected leaders are part of a “demonic system” that kidnaps children “to be raped, molested and then murdered.”

In fact its a safe bet that you do

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

I think PP has a fair point. I know there are faggots who hate pedos... Because they were molested themselves.

That is as stupid as stupid gets. People are not gay because they were molested.

I didn't say they were. All I said was there are faggots who were molested.

But you have proven my point with that Freudian slip, PP. Most homos have been molested.. And it was by another homo.

How the fuck do you know so much about "homos" smiley? Here. Try to learn something:

Members of disliked minority groups are often stereotyped as representing a danger to the majority's most vulnerable members. For example, Jews in the Middle Ages were accused of murdering Christian babies in ritual sacrifices. Black men in the United States were often lynched after being falsely accused of raping White women.

In recent years, antigay activists have routinely asserted that gay people are child molesters. This argument was often made in debates about the Boy Scouts of America's policy to exclude gay scouts and scoutmasters. More recently, in the wake of Rep. Mark Foley's resignation from the US House of Representatives in 2006, antigay activists and their supporters seized on the scandal to revive this canard. read:Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

Selected Excerpts:

The number of Americans who believe the myth that gay people are child molesters has declined substantially. In a 1970 national survey, more than 70% of respondents agreed with the assertions that "Homosexuals are dangerous as teachers or youth leaders because they try to get sexually involved with children" or that "Homosexuals try to play sexually with children if they cannot get an adult partner."1

By contrast, in a 1999 national poll, the belief that most gay men are likely to molest or abuse children was endorsed by only 19% of heterosexual men and 10% of heterosexual women.

Even fewer – 9% of men and 6% of women – regarded most lesbians as child molesters.

Apparently you're a part of the moronic minority( Yes a play on words lifted from the moral majority)

One problem is that none of the studies in this area have obtained data from a probability sample, that is, a sample that can be assumed to be representative of the population of all child molesters. Rather, most research has been conducted only with convicted perpetrators or with pedophiles who sought professional help. Consequently, they may not accurately describe child molesters who have never been caught or have not sought treatment.

A second problem is that the terminology used in this area is often confusing and can even be misleading. We can begin to address that problem by defining some basic terms.

Pedophilia and child molestation are used in different ways, even by professionals. Pedophilia usually refers to an adult psychological disorder characterized by a preference for prepubescent children as sexual partners; this preference may or may not be acted upon. The term hebephilia is sometimes used to describe adult sexual attractions to adolescents or children who have reached puberty.

Child molestation and child sexual abuse refer to actions, and don't imply a particular psychological makeup or motive on the part of the perpetrator. Not all incidents of child sexual abuse are perpetrated by pedophiles or hebephiles; in some cases, the perpetrator has other motives for his or her actions and does not manifest an ongoing pattern of sexual attraction to children.

Thus, not all child sexual abuse is perpetrated by pedophiles (or hebephiles) and not all pedophiles and hebephiles actually commit abuse. Consequently, it is important to use terminology carefully.

Hopfully, you are beginning to see that the issue is a bit more complicated than your small mind is able or willing to contemplate

Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men2 is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation

.

Now we are getting to the crux of the issue. Still with me, or are you watching porn and jerking off, rather than trying to learn something?

As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).

To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men's sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men's abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don't implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator's sexual orientation.

Typologies of
Offenders

The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.

So all of this blathering about "homos" and 'pedos" is just ignorant equine excrement

I'll one-up you with a more recent study from the Mayo Clinic:

" Homosexuality is 4 to 20 times more common in pedophiles than in the general population. In addition, homosexual pedophiles on average abuse twice as many children as heterosexual pedophiles.

From the Mayo Clinic:
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings...

Pedophiles are usually attracted to a particular age range and/or sex of child. Research categorizes male pedophiles by whether they are attracted to only male children (homosexual pedophilia), female children (heterosexual pedophilia), or children from both sexes (bisexual pedophilia). [3,6,10,29] The percentage of homosexual pedophiles ranges from 9% to 40%, which is approximately 4 to 20 times higher than the rate of adult men attracted to other adult men (using a prevalence rate of adult homosexuality of 2%-4%).[5,7,10,19,29,30] This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children. [19] Individuals attracted to females usually prefer children between the ages of 8 and 10 years. [3,5,31] Individuals attracted to males usually prefer slightly older boys between the ages of 10 and 13 years. [3,5]

Heterosexual pedophiles, in self-report studies, have on average abused 5.2 children and committed an average of 34 sexual acts vs homosexual pedophiles who have on average abused 10.7 children and committed an average of 52 acts. [15]Bisexual offenders have on average abused 27.3 children and committed more than 120 acts. [15] A study by Abel et al [32] of 377 nonincarcerated, non-incest-related pedophiles, whose legal situations had been resolved and who were surveyed using an anonymous self-report questionnaire, found that heterosexual pedophiles on average reported abusing 19.8 children and committing 23.2 acts, whereas homosexual pedophiles had abused 150.2 children and committed 281.7 acts. These studies confirm law enforcement reports about the serial nature of the crime, the large number of children abused by each pedophile, and the underreporting of assaults. [1] Studies that used self-reports and polygraphs show that pedophiles currently in treatment underreport their current interest in children and past behaviors. [33,34]"

Wow! What a fail!! Do you even realize what this is saying?? You have been putting out the unsupported tripe that most homosexuals were molested (Post 287) You have expressed your hatred for gays in numerous posts and you have consistently agreed and supported Silouette 's rants, and the idiocy of others about how gays are all pedophiles and that they should not have children in their care.

Never a word from you indicating that you think differently. So, If you're going to try to tell me that you don't harbor the idiotic belief that a high percentage of homosexuals are child predators, I 'm going to call bullshit if you do. Yes that's right, bullshit because that is not what this from Mayo says. You heard me, it says that a high percentage of men who molest children victimize boys and they are them referred to as "homosexual pedophiles. Is it possible that you don't understand that this in no ways means that a high percentage of homosexuals are child predators! These "homosexual pedophiles are not the homosexuals that we talk about when discussing marriage, and by the way that is what this thread is about. In fact, as I have documented most of these pedophiles are not much interested in age appropriate relations.

Finally, from your own source:

This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children.

https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-correlation-between-homosexuality-and-pedophilia
So, no, you have not done me "one better" Dude

Hey idiot...it does show that homosexuals have a higher propensity for molestation.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

That is as stupid as stupid gets. People are not gay because they were molested.

I didn't say they were. All I said was there are faggots who were molested.

But you have proven my point with that Freudian slip, PP. Most homos have been molested.. And it was by another homo.

How the fuck do you know so much about "homos" smiley? Here. Try to learn something:

Members of disliked minority groups are often stereotyped as representing a danger to the majority's most vulnerable members. For example, Jews in the Middle Ages were accused of murdering Christian babies in ritual sacrifices. Black men in the United States were often lynched after being falsely accused of raping White women.

In recent years, antigay activists have routinely asserted that gay people are child molesters. This argument was often made in debates about the Boy Scouts of America's policy to exclude gay scouts and scoutmasters. More recently, in the wake of Rep. Mark Foley's resignation from the US House of Representatives in 2006, antigay activists and their supporters seized on the scandal to revive this canard. read:Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

Selected Excerpts:

The number of Americans who believe the myth that gay people are child molesters has declined substantially. In a 1970 national survey, more than 70% of respondents agreed with the assertions that "Homosexuals are dangerous as teachers or youth leaders because they try to get sexually involved with children" or that "Homosexuals try to play sexually with children if they cannot get an adult partner."1

By contrast, in a 1999 national poll, the belief that most gay men are likely to molest or abuse children was endorsed by only 19% of heterosexual men and 10% of heterosexual women.

Even fewer – 9% of men and 6% of women – regarded most lesbians as child molesters.

Apparently you're a part of the moronic minority( Yes a play on words lifted from the moral majority)

One problem is that none of the studies in this area have obtained data from a probability sample, that is, a sample that can be assumed to be representative of the population of all child molesters. Rather, most research has been conducted only with convicted perpetrators or with pedophiles who sought professional help. Consequently, they may not accurately describe child molesters who have never been caught or have not sought treatment.

A second problem is that the terminology used in this area is often confusing and can even be misleading. We can begin to address that problem by defining some basic terms.

Pedophilia and child molestation are used in different ways, even by professionals. Pedophilia usually refers to an adult psychological disorder characterized by a preference for prepubescent children as sexual partners; this preference may or may not be acted upon. The term hebephilia is sometimes used to describe adult sexual attractions to adolescents or children who have reached puberty.

Child molestation and child sexual abuse refer to actions, and don't imply a particular psychological makeup or motive on the part of the perpetrator. Not all incidents of child sexual abuse are perpetrated by pedophiles or hebephiles; in some cases, the perpetrator has other motives for his or her actions and does not manifest an ongoing pattern of sexual attraction to children.

Thus, not all child sexual abuse is perpetrated by pedophiles (or hebephiles) and not all pedophiles and hebephiles actually commit abuse. Consequently, it is important to use terminology carefully.

Hopfully, you are beginning to see that the issue is a bit more complicated than your small mind is able or willing to contemplate

Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men2 is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation

.

Now we are getting to the crux of the issue. Still with me, or are you watching porn and jerking off, rather than trying to learn something?

As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).

To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men's sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men's abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don't implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator's sexual orientation.

Typologies of
Offenders

The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.

So all of this blathering about "homos" and 'pedos" is just ignorant equine excrement

I'll one-up you with a more recent study from the Mayo Clinic:

" Homosexuality is 4 to 20 times more common in pedophiles than in the general population. In addition, homosexual pedophiles on average abuse twice as many children as heterosexual pedophiles.

From the Mayo Clinic:
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings...

Pedophiles are usually attracted to a particular age range and/or sex of child. Research categorizes male pedophiles by whether they are attracted to only male children (homosexual pedophilia), female children (heterosexual pedophilia), or children from both sexes (bisexual pedophilia). [3,6,10,29] The percentage of homosexual pedophiles ranges from 9% to 40%, which is approximately 4 to 20 times higher than the rate of adult men attracted to other adult men (using a prevalence rate of adult homosexuality of 2%-4%).[5,7,10,19,29,30] This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children. [19] Individuals attracted to females usually prefer children between the ages of 8 and 10 years. [3,5,31] Individuals attracted to males usually prefer slightly older boys between the ages of 10 and 13 years. [3,5]

Heterosexual pedophiles, in self-report studies, have on average abused 5.2 children and committed an average of 34 sexual acts vs homosexual pedophiles who have on average abused 10.7 children and committed an average of 52 acts. [15]Bisexual offenders have on average abused 27.3 children and committed more than 120 acts. [15] A study by Abel et al [32] of 377 nonincarcerated, non-incest-related pedophiles, whose legal situations had been resolved and who were surveyed using an anonymous self-report questionnaire, found that heterosexual pedophiles on average reported abusing 19.8 children and committing 23.2 acts, whereas homosexual pedophiles had abused 150.2 children and committed 281.7 acts. These studies confirm law enforcement reports about the serial nature of the crime, the large number of children abused by each pedophile, and the underreporting of assaults. [1] Studies that used self-reports and polygraphs show that pedophiles currently in treatment underreport their current interest in children and past behaviors. [33,34]"

Wow! What a fail!! Do you even realize what this is saying?? You have been putting out the unsupported tripe that most homosexuals were molested (Post 287) You have expressed your hatred for gays in numerous posts and you have consistently agreed and supported Silouette 's rants, and the idiocy of others about how gays are all pedophiles and that they should not have children in their care.

Never a word from you indicating that you think differently. So, If you're going to try to tell me that you don't harbor the idiotic belief that a high percentage of homosexuals are child predators, I 'm going to call bullshit if you do. Yes that's right, bullshit because that is not what this from Mayo says. You heard me, it says that a high percentage of men who molest children victimize boys and they are them referred to as "homosexual pedophiles. Is it possible that you don't understand that this in no ways means that a high percentage of homosexuals are child predators! These "homosexual pedophiles are not the homosexuals that we talk about when discussing marriage, and by the way that is what this thread is about. In fact, as I have documented most of these pedophiles are not much interested in age appropriate relations.

Finally, from your own source:

This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children.

https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-correlation-between-homosexuality-and-pedophilia
So, no, you have not done me "one better" Dude

Hey idiot...it does show that homosexuals have a higher propensity for molestation.

Seriously dude??! If you really believe that after my critique of your post, I would have to say that you have some serious reading comprehension problems and analytical deficits. I explained EXACTLY why it does not say what you want it to say or imagined it to say.

The fact that you had to spit up on yourself in an apoplectic fit and call me stupid, while having no actual defense makes it clear that you know that you got caught with your pants down and made a damned ass of yourself.

YOUR OWN SOURCE contradicts the claim that you're making.....and you can't see that??

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

I didn't say they were. All I said was there are faggots who were molested.

But you have proven my point with that Freudian slip, PP. Most homos have been molested.. And it was by another homo.

How the fuck do you know so much about "homos" smiley? Here. Try to learn something:

Members of disliked minority groups are often stereotyped as representing a danger to the majority's most vulnerable members. For example, Jews in the Middle Ages were accused of murdering Christian babies in ritual sacrifices. Black men in the United States were often lynched after being falsely accused of raping White women.

In recent years, antigay activists have routinely asserted that gay people are child molesters. This argument was often made in debates about the Boy Scouts of America's policy to exclude gay scouts and scoutmasters. More recently, in the wake of Rep. Mark Foley's resignation from the US House of Representatives in 2006, antigay activists and their supporters seized on the scandal to revive this canard. read:Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

Selected Excerpts:

The number of Americans who believe the myth that gay people are child molesters has declined substantially. In a 1970 national survey, more than 70% of respondents agreed with the assertions that "Homosexuals are dangerous as teachers or youth leaders because they try to get sexually involved with children" or that "Homosexuals try to play sexually with children if they cannot get an adult partner."1

Even fewer – 9% of men and 6% of women – regarded most lesbians as child molesters.

Apparently you're a part of the moronic minority( Yes a play on words lifted from the moral majority)

One problem is that none of the studies in this area have obtained data from a probability sample, that is, a sample that can be assumed to be representative of the population of all child molesters. Rather, most research has been conducted only with convicted perpetrators or with pedophiles who sought professional help. Consequently, they may not accurately describe child molesters who have never been caught or have not sought treatment.

A second problem is that the terminology used in this area is often confusing and can even be misleading. We can begin to address that problem by defining some basic terms.

Pedophilia and child molestation are used in different ways, even by professionals. Pedophilia usually refers to an adult psychological disorder characterized by a preference for prepubescent children as sexual partners; this preference may or may not be acted upon. The term hebephilia is sometimes used to describe adult sexual attractions to adolescents or children who have reached puberty.

Child molestation and child sexual abuse refer to actions, and don't imply a particular psychological makeup or motive on the part of the perpetrator. Not all incidents of child sexual abuse are perpetrated by pedophiles or hebephiles; in some cases, the perpetrator has other motives for his or her actions and does not manifest an ongoing pattern of sexual attraction to children.

Thus, not all child sexual abuse is perpetrated by pedophiles (or hebephiles) and not all pedophiles and hebephiles actually commit abuse. Consequently, it is important to use terminology carefully.

Hopfully, you are beginning to see that the issue is a bit more complicated than your small mind is able or willing to contemplate

Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men2 is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation

.

Now we are getting to the crux of the issue. Still with me, or are you watching porn and jerking off, rather than trying to learn something?

As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).

To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men's sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men's abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don't implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator's sexual orientation.

Typologies of
Offenders

The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.

So all of this blathering about "homos" and 'pedos" is just ignorant equine excrement

I'll one-up you with a more recent study from the Mayo Clinic:

" Homosexuality is 4 to 20 times more common in pedophiles than in the general population. In addition, homosexual pedophiles on average abuse twice as many children as heterosexual pedophiles.

From the Mayo Clinic:
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings...

Pedophiles are usually attracted to a particular age range and/or sex of child. Research categorizes male pedophiles by whether they are attracted to only male children (homosexual pedophilia), female children (heterosexual pedophilia), or children from both sexes (bisexual pedophilia). [3,6,10,29] The percentage of homosexual pedophiles ranges from 9% to 40%, which is approximately 4 to 20 times higher than the rate of adult men attracted to other adult men (using a prevalence rate of adult homosexuality of 2%-4%).[5,7,10,19,29,30] This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children. [19] Individuals attracted to females usually prefer children between the ages of 8 and 10 years. [3,5,31] Individuals attracted to males usually prefer slightly older boys between the ages of 10 and 13 years. [3,5]

Heterosexual pedophiles, in self-report studies, have on average abused 5.2 children and committed an average of 34 sexual acts vs homosexual pedophiles who have on average abused 10.7 children and committed an average of 52 acts. [15]Bisexual offenders have on average abused 27.3 children and committed more than 120 acts. [15] A study by Abel et al [32] of 377 nonincarcerated, non-incest-related pedophiles, whose legal situations had been resolved and who were surveyed using an anonymous self-report questionnaire, found that heterosexual pedophiles on average reported abusing 19.8 children and committing 23.2 acts, whereas homosexual pedophiles had abused 150.2 children and committed 281.7 acts. These studies confirm law enforcement reports about the serial nature of the crime, the large number of children abused by each pedophile, and the underreporting of assaults. [1] Studies that used self-reports and polygraphs show that pedophiles currently in treatment underreport their current interest in children and past behaviors. [33,34]"

Wow! What a fail!! Do you even realize what this is saying?? You have been putting out the unsupported tripe that most homosexuals were molested (Post 287) You have expressed your hatred for gays in numerous posts and you have consistently agreed and supported Silouette 's rants, and the idiocy of others about how gays are all pedophiles and that they should not have children in their care.

Never a word from you indicating that you think differently. So, If you're going to try to tell me that you don't harbor the idiotic belief that a high percentage of homosexuals are child predators, I 'm going to call bullshit if you do. Yes that's right, bullshit because that is not what this from Mayo says. You heard me, it says that a high percentage of men who molest children victimize boys and they are them referred to as "homosexual pedophiles. Is it possible that you don't understand that this in no ways means that a high percentage of homosexuals are child predators! These "homosexual pedophiles are not the homosexuals that we talk about when discussing marriage, and by the way that is what this thread is about. In fact, as I have documented most of these pedophiles are not much interested in age appropriate relations.

Finally, from your own source:

This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children.

https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-correlation-between-homosexuality-and-pedophilia
So, no, you have not done me "one better" Dude

Hey idiot...it does show that homosexuals have a higher propensity for molestation.

Seriously dude??! If you really believe that after my critique of your post, I would have to say that you have some serious reading comprehension problems and analytical deficits. I explained EXACTLY why it does not say what you want it to say or imagined it to say.

The fact that you had to spit up on yourself in an apoplectic fit and call me stupid, while having no actual defense makes it clear that you know that you got caught with your pants down and made a damned ass of yourself.

YOUR OWN SOURCE contradicts the claim that you're making.....and you can't see that??

Bro..you're a fucking moron.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

No...my source shows homosexual pedos are lunatics. 2% of the population commits that much molestation? Wow.

I'm surprised you can keep a straight face and support such perverted filth.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

How the fuck do you know so much about "homos" smiley? Here. Try to learn something:

Selected Excerpts:

Apparently you're a part of the moronic minority( Yes a play on words lifted from the moral majority)

Hopfully, you are beginning to see that the issue is a bit more complicated than your small mind is able or willing to contemplate

.

Now we are getting to the crux of the issue. Still with me, or are you watching porn and jerking off, rather than trying to learn something?

Typologies of
Offenders

So all of this blathering about "homos" and 'pedos" is just ignorant equine excrement

I'll one-up you with a more recent study from the Mayo Clinic:

" Homosexuality is 4 to 20 times more common in pedophiles than in the general population. In addition, homosexual pedophiles on average abuse twice as many children as heterosexual pedophiles.

From the Mayo Clinic:
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings...

Pedophiles are usually attracted to a particular age range and/or sex of child. Research categorizes male pedophiles by whether they are attracted to only male children (homosexual pedophilia), female children (heterosexual pedophilia), or children from both sexes (bisexual pedophilia). [3,6,10,29] The percentage of homosexual pedophiles ranges from 9% to 40%, which is approximately 4 to 20 times higher than the rate of adult men attracted to other adult men (using a prevalence rate of adult homosexuality of 2%-4%).[5,7,10,19,29,30] This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children. [19] Individuals attracted to females usually prefer children between the ages of 8 and 10 years. [3,5,31] Individuals attracted to males usually prefer slightly older boys between the ages of 10 and 13 years. [3,5]

Heterosexual pedophiles, in self-report studies, have on average abused 5.2 children and committed an average of 34 sexual acts vs homosexual pedophiles who have on average abused 10.7 children and committed an average of 52 acts. [15]Bisexual offenders have on average abused 27.3 children and committed more than 120 acts. [15] A study by Abel et al [32] of 377 nonincarcerated, non-incest-related pedophiles, whose legal situations had been resolved and who were surveyed using an anonymous self-report questionnaire, found that heterosexual pedophiles on average reported abusing 19.8 children and committing 23.2 acts, whereas homosexual pedophiles had abused 150.2 children and committed 281.7 acts. These studies confirm law enforcement reports about the serial nature of the crime, the large number of children abused by each pedophile, and the underreporting of assaults. [1] Studies that used self-reports and polygraphs show that pedophiles currently in treatment underreport their current interest in children and past behaviors. [33,34]"

Wow! What a fail!! Do you even realize what this is saying?? You have been putting out the unsupported tripe that most homosexuals were molested (Post 287) You have expressed your hatred for gays in numerous posts and you have consistently agreed and supported Silouette 's rants, and the idiocy of others about how gays are all pedophiles and that they should not have children in their care.

Never a word from you indicating that you think differently. So, If you're going to try to tell me that you don't harbor the idiotic belief that a high percentage of homosexuals are child predators, I 'm going to call bullshit if you do. Yes that's right, bullshit because that is not what this from Mayo says. You heard me, it says that a high percentage of men who molest children victimize boys and they are them referred to as "homosexual pedophiles. Is it possible that you don't understand that this in no ways means that a high percentage of homosexuals are child predators! These "homosexual pedophiles are not the homosexuals that we talk about when discussing marriage, and by the way that is what this thread is about. In fact, as I have documented most of these pedophiles are not much interested in age appropriate relations.

Finally, from your own source:

This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children.

https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-correlation-between-homosexuality-and-pedophilia
So, no, you have not done me "one better" Dude

Hey idiot...it does show that homosexuals have a higher propensity for molestation.

Seriously dude??! If you really believe that after my critique of your post, I would have to say that you have some serious reading comprehension problems and analytical deficits. I explained EXACTLY why it does not say what you want it to say or imagined it to say.

The fact that you had to spit up on yourself in an apoplectic fit and call me stupid, while having no actual defense makes it clear that you know that you got caught with your pants down and made a damned ass of yourself.

YOUR OWN SOURCE contradicts the claim that you're making.....and you can't see that??

Bro..you're a fucking moron.

Still can't actually explain how that is though, can you?

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

I'll one-up you with a more recent study from the Mayo Clinic:

" Homosexuality is 4 to 20 times more common in pedophiles than in the general population. In addition, homosexual pedophiles on average abuse twice as many children as heterosexual pedophiles.

From the Mayo Clinic:
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings...

Pedophiles are usually attracted to a particular age range and/or sex of child. Research categorizes male pedophiles by whether they are attracted to only male children (homosexual pedophilia), female children (heterosexual pedophilia), or children from both sexes (bisexual pedophilia). [3,6,10,29] The percentage of homosexual pedophiles ranges from 9% to 40%, which is approximately 4 to 20 times higher than the rate of adult men attracted to other adult men (using a prevalence rate of adult homosexuality of 2%-4%).[5,7,10,19,29,30] This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children. [19] Individuals attracted to females usually prefer children between the ages of 8 and 10 years. [3,5,31] Individuals attracted to males usually prefer slightly older boys between the ages of 10 and 13 years. [3,5]

Heterosexual pedophiles, in self-report studies, have on average abused 5.2 children and committed an average of 34 sexual acts vs homosexual pedophiles who have on average abused 10.7 children and committed an average of 52 acts. [15]Bisexual offenders have on average abused 27.3 children and committed more than 120 acts. [15] A study by Abel et al [32] of 377 nonincarcerated, non-incest-related pedophiles, whose legal situations had been resolved and who were surveyed using an anonymous self-report questionnaire, found that heterosexual pedophiles on average reported abusing 19.8 children and committing 23.2 acts, whereas homosexual pedophiles had abused 150.2 children and committed 281.7 acts. These studies confirm law enforcement reports about the serial nature of the crime, the large number of children abused by each pedophile, and the underreporting of assaults. [1] Studies that used self-reports and polygraphs show that pedophiles currently in treatment underreport their current interest in children and past behaviors. [33,34]"

Wow! What a fail!! Do you even realize what this is saying?? You have been putting out the unsupported tripe that most homosexuals were molested (Post 287) You have expressed your hatred for gays in numerous posts and you have consistently agreed and supported Silouette 's rants, and the idiocy of others about how gays are all pedophiles and that they should not have children in their care.

Never a word from you indicating that you think differently. So, If you're going to try to tell me that you don't harbor the idiotic belief that a high percentage of homosexuals are child predators, I 'm going to call bullshit if you do. Yes that's right, bullshit because that is not what this from Mayo says. You heard me, it says that a high percentage of men who molest children victimize boys and they are them referred to as "homosexual pedophiles. Is it possible that you don't understand that this in no ways means that a high percentage of homosexuals are child predators! These "homosexual pedophiles are not the homosexuals that we talk about when discussing marriage, and by the way that is what this thread is about. In fact, as I have documented most of these pedophiles are not much interested in age appropriate relations.

Finally, from your own source:

This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children.

https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-correlation-between-homosexuality-and-pedophilia
So, no, you have not done me "one better" Dude

Hey idiot...it does show that homosexuals have a higher propensity for molestation.

Seriously dude??! If you really believe that after my critique of your post, I would have to say that you have some serious reading comprehension problems and analytical deficits. I explained EXACTLY why it does not say what you want it to say or imagined it to say.

The fact that you had to spit up on yourself in an apoplectic fit and call me stupid, while having no actual defense makes it clear that you know that you got caught with your pants down and made a damned ass of yourself.

YOUR OWN SOURCE contradicts the claim that you're making.....and you can't see that??

Bro..you're a fucking moron.

Still can't actually explain how that is though, can you?

You explain it perfectly yourself. You're dumb.