Biden Blames Guns For Rising Crime

No effort has been posted to object to Gun Controls. The only fall back position is a four word phrase: "shall not be infringed".

That too is an absurd excuse since nothing in the 2nd A. mentions guns, only Arms. And no rational person will take, "shall not be infringed" to allow all Arms in the hands of our citizens.

Mass Shootings in America | Everytown Research & Policy

The evidence is clear, and of course those above who rely on the four words will not read the evidence that gun controls are necessary.


Necessary for what, it's been proven time and again that gun controls don't effect criminals. They only prevent law abiding citizens from protecting themselves. It's way past time to get more criminal controls, that is the only evidence that is clear.

.
You're ludicrous. Gun Control is a general term, not one specific to already criminals. If you had not mocked Everytown Research & Policy you might, possibly, well unlikely understand that those who have never committed a crime will murder at will.


So give the class the odds that you will be one that will murder at will? That's assuming you're not already a fucking criminal.

.
You've now passed being ludicrous, you've now reached the level of preposterous.


Just extending your supposed point to it's logical conclusion. Does that make you uncomfortable?

.
Not at all. Well, spending my time responding to you and jc456 is like talking to my dog, she gets simple commands and short phrases such as "Dinner Time", Come" and "do your business". Actually, she's smarter than jc456 and all of the Trumpanzees.
 
No effort has been posted to object to Gun Controls. The only fall back position is a four word phrase: "shall not be infringed".

That too is an absurd excuse since nothing in the 2nd A. mentions guns, only Arms. And no rational person will take, "shall not be infringed" to allow all Arms in the hands of our citizens.

Mass Shootings in America | Everytown Research & Policy

The evidence is clear, and of course those above who rely on the four words will not read the evidence that gun controls are necessary.


Necessary for what, it's been proven time and again that gun controls don't effect criminals. They only prevent law abiding citizens from protecting themselves. It's way past time to get more criminal controls, that is the only evidence that is clear.

.
You're ludicrous. Gun Control is a general term, not one specific to already criminals. If you had not mocked Everytown Research & Policy you might, possibly, well unlikely understand that those who have never committed a crime will murder at will.


So give the class the odds that you will be one that will murder at will? That's assuming you're not already a fucking criminal.

.
You've now passed being ludicrous, you've now reached the level of preposterous.


Just extending your supposed point to it's logical conclusion. Does that make you uncomfortable?

.
Do speed limits affect criminals? No? Let's get rid of them.

Do laws against drugs affect criminals? No? Then let's get rid of those laws too.

Did laws against political graft affect the trump's? No? Then out they go.
 
Does having speed limits prevent speeding? The evidence OVERWHELMINGLY suggests otherwise
Do people even follow speed limits?
Very True, both insipid and sophistry.

Do all drivers have a license to drive, and if they drive too fast to often they will lose said license and driving with a suspended or revoked license requires all vehicles registered to the speeder [in some states), or drunk driver/reckless drivers will have their vehicle confiscated.


Actually no, not all drivers have a license.

.
 
Not at all. Well, spending my time responding to you and jc456 is like talking to my dog, she gets simple commands and short phrases such as "Dinner Time", Come" and "do your business". Actually, she's smarter than jc456 and all of the Trumpanzees.
so insults huh? really where you want to go? I've asked you for a debate and you never respond, so it's like you can't follow along. When people ask questions, most often an answer is expected. not with you all.
 
Because we all know the world was crime free before the first gun.
I put my guns in a corner in front of me so I can keep on eye on them in case they get any criminal ideas.
Do you believe that easy availability to drugs causes more drug use?

Would having no speed limits on our highways lead to more accidents?
Do you believe that easy availability to drugs causes more drug use?

Poor sample.

Millions of people have used prescription drugs legally with suffering addition, or misuse.

So, why have laws against them being sold at any store without a doctor? Can't people just make an self informed decision?

You think people should need a prescription to be able to take advantage of a Constitutional Right?
"shall not be infringed" is not an absolute right. Try to board a commercial aircraft with a gun.
 
Does having speed limits prevent speeding? The evidence OVERWHELMINGLY suggests otherwise
Do people even follow speed limits?
Very True, both insipid and sophistry.

Do all drivers have a license to drive, and if they drive too fast to often they will lose said license and driving with a suspended or revoked license requires all vehicles registered to the speeder [in some states), or drunk driver/reckless drivers will have their vehicle confiscated.


Actually no, not all drivers have a license.

.
So, why require anyone to get a license. Fucking criminals don't have them.....

Insurance fuck that too. Name me one criminal that has insurance motherfucker...


Don't need any of that shit - Adam Smith
 
I have never seen any gun commit a crime without help from a person.
WOW, what an original comment. Not only is it insipid, it's foolish too.
Wow bet the irony of you saying that to anyone is totally lost on you. What is stupid, foolish and insipid is someone blaming the weapon used any crime for the crime. The rise we are seeing in crime across the country is primarily due to defunding the police, trashing and vilifying police and treating every cop like they are Derek Chauvin and in some cases dumb ass District Attorney’s who refuse prosecute people. These have far more to do with the rise in crime than the choice weapon used to commit the crimes wise up.
 
Does having speed limits prevent speeding? The evidence OVERWHELMINGLY suggests otherwise
Do people even follow speed limits?
Very True, both insipid and sophistry.

Do all drivers have a license to drive, and if they drive too fast to often they will lose said license and driving with a suspended or revoked license requires all vehicles registered to the speeder [in some states), or drunk driver/reckless drivers will have their vehicle confiscated.


Actually no, not all drivers have a license.

.
Duh. implied in my sentence are drivers who violate the vehicle code will lose a license if they have one, if they don't they have violated other parts of the code. Only children and idiots don't know that they must - in I supposed every state - pass a driving test and secure a license (which is not a Right).

Remember, my dog has a license too, and if she bites other animals or people she will lose her liberty and possibly her life. Of course our dog is well trained, unlike you and jc and other Trumpanzees who will bite anyone who doesn't do or say what they like.
 
Because we all know the world was crime free before the first gun.
I put my guns in a corner in front of me so I can keep on eye on them in case they get any criminal ideas.
President Biden is correct, the number of gun crimes have increased:







Not from guns, sorry. People are the causation.
 
"Shall not be infringed"


Because some damn criminals doesn't motherfucking care...

We don't need no stinking laws about not shooting up my neighbors house, because some goddamned criminal can do it any freaking time.

Guns on airplanes? We freaking need that too. You think some criminal is gonna be stopped by some laws and rules at the airport???? Hell no, criminal gonna take his motherfucking gun on the plane and shot anyone's ass who questions them. Probably offer some drugs to the people too.
 
I have never seen any gun commit a crime without help from a person.
WOW, what an original comment. Not only is it insipid, it's foolish too.
Wow bet the irony of you saying that to anyone is totally lost on you. What is stupid, foolish and insipid is someone blaming the weapon used any crime for the crime. The rise we are seeing in crime across the country is primarily due to defunding the police, trashing and vilifying police and treating every cop like they are Derek Chauvin and in some cases dumb ass District Attorney’s who refuse prosecute people. These have far more to do with the rise in crime than the choice weapon used to commit the crimes wise up.
This is your opinion. I don't know of any Police or Sheriff's Dept to have yet been defunded. No such agencies within the jurisdiction of California have been defunded. There are very few prosecutors who refuse to prosecute people. Maybe you ought to do some research before you make silly statements.
 
No effort has been posted to object to Gun Controls. The only fall back position is a four word phrase: "shall not be infringed".

That too is an absurd excuse since nothing in the 2nd A. mentions guns, only Arms. And no rational person will take, "shall not be infringed" to allow all Arms in the hands of our citizens.

Mass Shootings in America | Everytown Research & Policy

The evidence is clear, and of course those above who rely on the four words will not read the evidence that gun controls are necessary.


Necessary for what, it's been proven time and again that gun controls don't effect criminals. They only prevent law abiding citizens from protecting themselves. It's way past time to get more criminal controls, that is the only evidence that is clear.

.
You're ludicrous. Gun Control is a general term, not one specific to already criminals. If you had not mocked Everytown Research & Policy you might, possibly, well unlikely understand that those who have never committed a crime will murder at will.


So give the class the odds that you will be one that will murder at will? That's assuming you're not already a fucking criminal.

.
You've now passed being ludicrous, you've now reached the level of preposterous.


Just extending your supposed point to it's logical conclusion. Does that make you uncomfortable?

.
Not at all. Well, spending my time responding to you and jc456 is like talking to my dog, she gets simple commands and short phrases such as "Dinner Time", Come" and "do your business". Actually, she's smarter than jc456 and all of the Trumpanzees.


And obviously smarter than you.

.
 
No effort has been posted to object to Gun Controls. The only fall back position is a four word phrase: "shall not be infringed".

That too is an absurd excuse since nothing in the 2nd A. mentions guns, only Arms. And no rational person will take, "shall not be infringed" to allow all Arms in the hands of our citizens.

Mass Shootings in America | Everytown Research & Policy

The evidence is clear, and of course those above who rely on the four words will not read the evidence that gun controls are necessary.


Necessary for what, it's been proven time and again that gun controls don't effect criminals. They only prevent law abiding citizens from protecting themselves. It's way past time to get more criminal controls, that is the only evidence that is clear.

.
You're ludicrous. Gun Control is a general term, not one specific to already criminals. If you had not mocked Everytown Research & Policy you might, possibly, well unlikely understand that those who have never committed a crime will murder at will.


So give the class the odds that you will be one that will murder at will? That's assuming you're not already a fucking criminal.

.
You've now passed being ludicrous, you've now reached the level of preposterous.


Just extending your supposed point to it's logical conclusion. Does that make you uncomfortable?

.
Do speed limits affect criminals? No? Let's get rid of them.

Do laws against drugs affect criminals? No? Then let's get rid of those laws too.

Did laws against political graft affect the trump's? No? Then out they go.
Are speed limits affecting a constitutional right? No.

Are drug laws affecting a constitutional right? Maybe. You will get no argument from me on repealing all drug laws.

I don't know what the fuck that last one is supposed to be about. I think you've gone retarded.
 
"Shall not be infringed"


Because some damn criminals doesn't motherfucking care...

We don't need no stinking laws about not shooting up my neighbors house, because some goddamned criminal can do it any freaking time.

Guns on airplanes? We freaking need that too. You think some criminal is gonna be stopped by some laws and rules at the airport???? Hell no, criminal gonna take his motherfucking gun on the plane and shot anyone's ass who questions them. Probably offer some drugs to the people too.
Now you're completely unhinged.
 
I have never seen any gun commit a crime without help from a person.
WOW, what an original comment. Not only is it insipid, it's foolish too.
Wow bet the irony of you saying that to anyone is totally lost on you. What is stupid, foolish and insipid is someone blaming the weapon used any crime for the crime. The rise we are seeing in crime across the country is primarily due to defunding the police, trashing and vilifying police and treating every cop like they are Derek Chauvin and in some cases dumb ass District Attorney’s who refuse prosecute people. These have far more to do with the rise in crime than the choice weapon used to commit the crimes wise up.
This is your opinion. I don't know of any Police or Sheriff's Dept to have yet been defunded. No such agencies within the jurisdiction of California have been defunded. There are very few prosecutors who refuse to prosecute people. Maybe you ought to do some research before you make silly statements.
Maybe you should take your own advice. Look at the cities who are having the biggest increase in crime New York, Chicago, Portland and Los Angles all have done some of this. But you continue to blame the weapon that is so much easier than looking at the policies that are causing the problem.
 
Why doesn't Joe Dufus blame the Negroes? They are the ones committing most of the gun crime in the US.
Post evidence.


Chicago

Baltimore

Detroit

Houston

Atlanta

New Orleans

Should I go on????????????

.


More Negroes are murdered in Chicago almost every week than people of all races are killed in many mostly White states in several years.



Year to Date
Shot & Killed: 314
Shot & Wounded: 1478
Total Shot: 1792
Total Homicides: 332

 
No effort has been posted to object to Gun Controls. The only fall back position is a four word phrase: "shall not be infringed".

That too is an absurd excuse since nothing in the 2nd A. mentions guns, only Arms. And no rational person will take, "shall not be infringed" to allow all Arms in the hands of our citizens.

Mass Shootings in America | Everytown Research & Policy

The evidence is clear, and of course those above who rely on the four words will not read the evidence that gun controls are necessary.


Necessary for what, it's been proven time and again that gun controls don't effect criminals. They only prevent law abiding citizens from protecting themselves. It's way past time to get more criminal controls, that is the only evidence that is clear.

.
You're ludicrous. Gun Control is a general term, not one specific to already criminals. If you had not mocked Everytown Research & Policy you might, possibly, well unlikely understand that those who have never committed a crime will murder at will.


So give the class the odds that you will be one that will murder at will? That's assuming you're not already a fucking criminal.

.
You've now passed being ludicrous, you've now reached the level of preposterous.


Just extending your supposed point to it's logical conclusion. Does that make you uncomfortable?

.
Do speed limits affect criminals? No? Let's get rid of them.

Do laws against drugs affect criminals? No? Then let's get rid of those laws too.

Did laws against political graft affect the trump's? No? Then out they go.


Your gibberish has nothing to do with the post you quoted, do you have anything other than deflection? Oh right, it's that ESL thing again, you obviously don't comprehend the language.

.
 
Because we all know the world was crime free before the first gun.
I put my guns in a corner in front of me so I can keep on eye on them in case they get any criminal ideas.
President Biden is correct, the number of gun crimes have increased:







Not from guns, sorry. People are the causation.
Another brilliant remark. How many times is this ludicrous comment going to be posted?

Q. How many mass murders have been committed by one person without a gun?

A. A Bomb (Unibomber, Timothy McVeigh, Eric Rudolph come to my mind); a knife (Richard Speck); and how many murdered by guns per day on the average this year:

"Through the first five months of 2021, gunfire killed more than 8,100 people in the United States, about 54 lives lost per day, according to a Washington Post analysis of data from the Gun Violence Archive, a nonprofit research organization. That’s 14 more deaths per day than the average toll during the same period of the previous six years."

 
Guns in unbalanced & untrained hands are Not helping keep the death rate from guns down.
That is not the problem.

The problem is the HATE that leads to PREMEDITATED MURDER which will just as easily be accomplished by other means — and more easily be explained away or excused as a natural death in a coroner's verdict or a medical examiner's — if a gun is not available as "the" murder weapon of choice.
 

Forum List

Back
Top