Rye Catcher
Platinum Member
- Nov 21, 2019
- 12,780
- 7,607
- 940
- Banned
- #121
Not at all. Well, spending my time responding to you and jc456 is like talking to my dog, she gets simple commands and short phrases such as "Dinner Time", Come" and "do your business". Actually, she's smarter than jc456 and all of the Trumpanzees.You've now passed being ludicrous, you've now reached the level of preposterous.You're ludicrous. Gun Control is a general term, not one specific to already criminals. If you had not mocked Everytown Research & Policy you might, possibly, well unlikely understand that those who have never committed a crime will murder at will.No effort has been posted to object to Gun Controls. The only fall back position is a four word phrase: "shall not be infringed".
That too is an absurd excuse since nothing in the 2nd A. mentions guns, only Arms. And no rational person will take, "shall not be infringed" to allow all Arms in the hands of our citizens.
Mass Shootings in America | Everytown Research & Policy
The evidence is clear, and of course those above who rely on the four words will not read the evidence that gun controls are necessary.
Necessary for what, it's been proven time and again that gun controls don't effect criminals. They only prevent law abiding citizens from protecting themselves. It's way past time to get more criminal controls, that is the only evidence that is clear.
.
So give the class the odds that you will be one that will murder at will? That's assuming you're not already a fucking criminal.
.
Just extending your supposed point to it's logical conclusion. Does that make you uncomfortable?
.