Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,439
- 2,290
No problem. Let's stop subsidizing big oil with tax breaks.
Big oil gets the same tax breaks as any other company. That's besides the fact subsidizes are not tax breaks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No problem. Let's stop subsidizing big oil with tax breaks.
Bio fuel makes more sense.
All domestic and negative emissions.
Could be ethanol, palm oil, hydrogen, etc.
You‘re using almost the same amount of fossil fuels to produce and use the EV as you would for a gas car. Oh with the added bonus of participating in slave labor in Africa to mine the resources to make the batterie. Woohooo!
Fusión? I know it’s not a thing yet but…No energy has negative emissions.
.
Dilithium crystals! Duh!![]()
Maybe you do. Maybe you don't. When I stop for gas I don't have to spend twenty to thirty minutesIt wouldnt be much more than a normal car. When you stop for gas on a long trip you stretch your legs, buy snacks, go to the bathroom, etc. Its probably a 20 minute stop with a gas powered vehicle too.
Fusión? I know it’s not a thing yet but…
Maybe you do. Maybe you don't. When I stop for gas I don't have to spend twenty to thirty minutes
fueling up (which I never ever do otherwise) in my gasoline powered automobile.
The whole thing from start to finish takes ten minutes or less, as I never fuel all the way up.
The more I learn about ALL the drawbacks of electric autos the less I like them.
It’s emission is helium an inert gas.If it becomes reality, it still won't be zero emissions.
.
The manufacture of electric batteries require rare minerals which have to be mined using fossil fuels and electricity itself requires fossil fuels to get into those charging stations.It’s emission is helium an inert gas.
What does that have to do with fusion energy?The manufacture of electric batteries require rare minerals which have to be mined using fossil fuels and electricity itself requires fossil fuels to get into those charging stations.
And electric batteries don't last forever and need to be recycled which also requires fossil fuels.
The issue is more complicated than you are willing to believe.
It has to do with gasoline powered vehicles being phased out in favor of electric vehicles.What does that have to do with fusion energy?
It’s emission is helium an inert gas.
That has zero to do with the actual power generation.And how many emissions will be produced to get electricity to my wall receptacle.
.
Yeah I get it but my comment was in response to someone saying there were no zero emission power sources. Fusion though not online yet if/when it’s does will be zero emission.It has to do with gasoline powered vehicles being phased out in favor of electric vehicles.
Are you familiar with Super Spreader Joe's latest comments on the matter?
Maybe you should check which thread you are adding your dubious input into.
That has zero to do with the actual power generation.
Ok so what are they. why the stupid back and forth.Wrong, emissions will be produced to contain the reaction, transfer the heat and much more.
.
Ok so what are they. why the stupid back and forth.
I did you refuted it. Onus is on you. Otherwise you’re just talking out your assYou tell me, it's your theoretical energy source.
.