- Feb 22, 2017
- 109,792
- 38,270
- 2,290
LOL, what is your IQ? 60?
If it were that low it would still be double of yours.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL, what is your IQ? 60?
Yes, I suppose you do believe that.Put it to a vote of just women
Put in in front of only the female members of the Senate or SCOTUS
Abortion would never be outlawed
Yeah white land owning men.Which of those words, "moral" or "religious", means "white" in your language?
Prove that one.Very little. In fact on most cases where a woman is seeking an abortion the father wants no part
What language are you speaking? Show me the definitions of "moral" and "religious" in your dictionary.Yeah white land owning men.
Here in this country Congress can still pass a law overriding the president's EO
. Like Congress did to Obama after one of his first EO's. Also, the Courts can declare an EO unconstitutional like they did to Trump many times.
I disagree with your claim, but both men and women can vote in the USA. So lets let the voters of each state decide this issue. Why are you libs so scared of the will of the people?Put it to a vote of just women
Put in in front of only the female members of the Senate or SCOTUS
Abortion would never be outlawed
Period.Biden is not permitted to decree that states which prohibit abortions must now allow them
correct, he signed an illegal EO. No president can override a SC decision with an EOBiden is not permitted to decree that states which prohibit abortions must now allow them
their desperation is making them even more stupid than before.Period.
The democraps are getting more and more desperate by the second!
The idiot cannot use an EO to override a SC decision. its an illegal EO that will not stand a court challenge.
Put it to a vote of just women
Put in in front of only the female members of the Senate or SCOTUS
Abortion would never be outlawed
making it a federal issue after the SC ruled that it was a state issue. That is overriding a SC decision, its really not complicated.What makes you think it does that? It doesn't change a single state law banning abortion does it?
Very little. In fact on most cases where a woman is seeking an abortion the father wants no part
It prohibits them from banning abortions by trying a similar end run around states that occurred in 1973.What makes you think it does that? It doesn't change a single state law banning abortion does it?
How could that dumb of a statement be made by that poster when it’s the entire crux of the issue?making it a federal issue after the SC ruled that it was a state issue. That is overriding a SC decision, its really not complicated.
If it were that low it would still be double of yours.