Ralph Norton
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2022
- 4,855
- 4,921
- 1,928
No. But he IS a fuckwad.This President did of course NOT try to do that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. But he IS a fuckwad.This President did of course NOT try to do that
None of that negates the fact that the anti-abortion movement is primarily driven by MENAbsolutely not. Why does being a woman mean you get to make decisions over other women's bodies? Our bodies are our own, they don't belong to others whether they are the same sex or not
You really need to cut down on the drinking, Lush. Oh, and you're a racist
See that's exactly what Jackass's do. In your case, a Kaz-Ass.
None of that negates the fact that the anti-abortion movement is primarily driven by MEN
“One father” ? “In most cases” would mean MOST fathers dufus
You mean he only gave help to those citizens that needed it? Imagine that. Usually they just loosely sling money around everywhere hoping the ones that need it will get in on it. Sounds too fiscally conservative for this administration. Was it a Republican recommendation?These policies are designed to target specific states, not all states equally. Hardly the purpose of federal directives, way outside purpose of an EO.
He is stating that the SC decision to make abortion a state decision cannot be implemented. By illegal, imperialistic decree he has retuned the status to the way it was before this recent SC decision.No, it doesn't.
"The president's powers are constrained because U.S. states can make laws restricting abortion and access to medication, and the executive order is expected to have a limited impact.
"What we're witnessing wasn't a constitutional judgment, it was an exercise in raw political power," Biden told reporters at the White House after quoting heavily from the dissenting opinion in the ruling."
![]()
Biden signs executive order on abortion, declares Supreme Court 'out of control'
The order offered few specifics and promises to have limited impact in practice.www.reuters.com
In Friday's speech, Biden instead laid out how abortion rights could be secured by voters if they elected more pro-choice senators, and noted the Supreme Court majority opinion referred to women's "political power."
Sut up liar, you didn't even read it, and that isn't what it says or does.He is stating that the SC decision to make abortion a state decision cannot be implemented.
moony said:The great flood was a mistake by Thor, no? If we are given free will then why is abortion outlawed in a land of free will?
No he isn't.He is stating that the SC decision to make abortion a state decision cannot be implemented. By illegal, imperialistic decree he has retuned the status to the way it was before this recent SC decision.
Try to be In less of a hysterical hurry when you bang out blather. That’s exactly what he decreed, that a state cannot make abortion illegal, abortion is back to federal purview.Sut up liar, you didn't even read it, and that isn't what it says or does.
Two ways. They think they can do each other in the ass and procreate. They will go extinct if the Alphabet Pedo lobby cannot adopt. That should be against the law btw to let them adopt.How are them thar liberals stupid on all levels? Then prove they are a liberal.
Could he make an EO making murder legal, just as a hypothetical?
A shameless, idiotic lie. You should probably just shut up now.That’s exactly what he decreed, that a state cannot make abortion illegal
this would expand protection to the abortion pill, contraception, and IUD access as covered under the Affordable Care Act.Could he make an EO making murder legal, just as a hypothetical?
Perhaps the thread title is then incorrectthis would expand protection to the abortion pill, contraception, and IUD access as covered under the Affordable Care Act.
It would not protect anyone from getting "in office" abortions.
Wrong, the issue at hand is a state issue, not federal. The EO distributes national resources to select states, to an even smaller subsection of the population based solely on a political basis. Clearly an abuse of office.You mean he only gave help to those citizens that needed it? Imagine that. Usually they just loosely sling money around everywhere hoping the ones that need it will get in on it. Sounds too fiscally conservative for this administration. Was it a Republican recommendation?
You mean his EO may not pass muster when you challenge it? Let me know when the legal brief is ready. I'll read over it for ya. Got a skilled lawyer lined up or are you going to go with a trump lawyer?Wrong, the issue at hand is a state issue, not federal. The EO distributes national resources to select states, to an even smaller subsection of the population based solely on a political basis. Clearly an abuse of office.