Im not! I just agreed with you, happened to use a black guy as an example, and you're the one who made it about race. Go back and see you did that. So what Herman was black? Has nothing to do with my comment.You said no other politician or "white male" as you put it, could get away with the womanizing Clinton got away with. I agree. That womanizing made Herman Cain have to drop outThe same womanizing took out Herman Cain true true.You said Cosby when you meant Clinton.
Now you can't deny that's what you are doing to Clinton. You only thinks that's what's happening to Cosby because its exactly what you're doing to Clinton.
The motive of the Republican leadership in supporting the Paula JOnes case was indeed almost certainly partisan advantage.
(Personally I was pretty offended that Bill Clinton got a pass on behavior that would have destroyed nearly every other white male in the country, AT THAT TIME.)
That being said, how do you know that that is NOT what is happening to Cosby?
NOt sure of your meaning here.
Jesus Christ! I was just mentioning why I was so offended by the Pass BIll got as an minor aside while agreeing that with you about the motives of the GOP during the Clinton Scandal.
Of course you laser focus on the racial aspect. lIbs.
Congrats, a liberal just agreed with you on something