Bill Maher: Comparing the violence of Islam to Christianity is liberal bullshit

[007]

There have been more Christian inspired terrorist attacks in the US than Muslim attacks.

Wrong. There have been over 70 Islamic attacks inside the USA thus far. The Oklahoma bombing was done by Tim McVeigh who was trained in explosives by an Iraqi Muslim terrorist. That is the truth behind the McVeigh bombing and the Feds know it. So much for your christian inspired terror attacks.

You left out abortion clinic bombings and murders, assaults, attempted murders on abortion doctors.

That number FAR exceed attacks by Islamic extremists.

PROVE IT, you filthy muslim/terrorist APOLOGIST.

Then show me when the last time was a Christian flew airplanes into buildings killing thousands of innocent people and causing billions of dollars in damage.

You fucking pathetic ball of dick puss.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Wrong. There have been over 70 Islamic attacks inside the USA thus far. The Oklahoma bombing was done by Tim McVeigh who was trained in explosives by an Iraqi Muslim terrorist. That is the truth behind the McVeigh bombing and the Feds know it. So much for your christian inspired terror attacks.

You left out abortion clinic bombings and murders, assaults, attempted murders on abortion doctors.

That number FAR exceed attacks by Islamic extremists.

PROVE IT, you filthy muslim/terrorist APOLOGIST.

Then show me when the last time was a Christian flew airplanes into buildings killing thousands of innocent people and causing billions of dollars in damage.

You fucking pathetic ball of dick puss.

If you don't think bombing abortion clinics is terrorism, you're no different than Al Qaeda.

 

[007]

You left out abortion clinic bombings and murders, assaults, attempted murders on abortion doctors.

That number FAR exceed attacks by Islamic extremists.

PROVE IT, you filthy muslim/terrorist APOLOGIST.

Then show me when the last time was a Christian flew airplanes into buildings killing thousands of innocent people and causing billions of dollars in damage.

You fucking pathetic ball of dick puss.

If you don't think bombing abortion clinics is terrorism, you're no different than Al Qaeda.

It's not, shit for brains. It's fanatics on both sides of a social issue.

But noted once again you could NOT prove your ABSURD comments.

WORLD WIDE, ISLAM is responsible for killing MASSIVE numbers of INNOCENT people, WORLD WIDE. Rare, random abortion clinic mishaps PALE in comparison to the COLD BLOODED, HORRENDOUS number of TERRORIST KILLINGS by the hands of MUSLIMS.

And now even DUMBASS LIBERALS like Bill Maher are ADMITTING it. Time for jack off retarded liberal hacks like yourself to realize that you only look STUPID at this point with your continued EXCUSES and DEFENSE of COLD BLOODED MUSLIMS KILLERS.

 

[g5000]

My, my, my. Look at the anger level from the defenders of Christianity!

In the Deep South, for over a century, Christians terrorized those who went against their beliefs. They used the cross Christ was martyred on as their symbol.

The entire society of Christians in the South tolerated this terrorist activity for over a century.

The entire society.

Look at this photo and think about what it tells you:

These Christians felt secure enough to terrorize the lunch counter protesters in broad daylight, with cameras rolling. They knew they had the full protection and blessing of the forces of government behind them.

The entire right wing conservative Christian society tolerated the terrorists. And when agents of peaceful change tried to turn them away from their terroristic ways, the entire society rebelled against the interlopers. They jailed them, lynched them, burned Christian crosses on their lawns, and spewed their hatred into any microphone placed before them.

This was an entire society. Not just a few "elitists".


Using the illogic of the special idiot Islamophobes, one would have to use the same argument there was no such thing as a good Christian based on the things we saw from these Chrisitans in our own lifetime. In fact, we saw the rise of black people who said there were no good white people, using the behavior of the white society as their evidence. Islamophobes and the Black Panthers have a lot in common.

The Islamic community is only about one half of a heartbeat behind the right wing white terrorist Christians of our own lifetime.

So how were the terrorist Christians defeated? If you look at that photo, they clearly had the vast majority of people on their side. They had the government on their side. They had all the force on their side. So how did they lose?

You are looking right at it. You are looking right at what caused them to lose.

The spotlight. The camera. The Eye. The hatred was captured on film for all to see. Society was shamed into changing.

And the people being terrorized took that Christian religion and turned it back on the terrorists. They began to build a Christian faith built on social justice. They modeled their movement on the political power of the terroristic Christians and their government backing. The social justice Christians acquired the political backing of the FEDERAL government, and have not turned back since.

 

[J.E.D]

Suddenly wingnuts like Maher

You guys are easy

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

You are a broken clock that keeps on ticking and be wrong all the time.

You are easy!

 

[007]

My, my, my. Look at the anger level from the defenders of Christianity!

The "anger level" is over the CONTINUED DEFENSE OF A BLOODY MURDERING CULT called ISLAM by YOU LIBTARD DIP SHITS.

Get a clue, because at this point, you defenders are looking real STUPID and ANTI AMERICAN.

Now what's that one of your own finally admitted? Oh yeah... "it's liberal bull shit."

 

[g5000]

My, my, my. Look at the anger level from the defenders of Christianity!

The "anger level" is over the CONTINUED DEFENSE OF A BLOODY MURDERING CULT called ISLAM by YOU LIBTARD DIP SHITS.

Get a clue, because at this point, you defenders are looking real STUPID and ANTI AMERICAN.

Now what's that one of your own finally admitted? Oh yeah... "it's liberal bull shit."

I'm old school Conservative, son. You neocon hatemongers have infected the party ever since the Southern Strategy and it is time for you to leave.

Sucks to be lumped in with Christian terrorists, dunnit? I am glad it pisses you off. It is far past time for you assholes to have a taste of your own bigoted medicine.

 

[Decus]

Beheading Witches in the 21st Century

"A source close to the Saudi religious police told Arab newspaper al Hayat that authorities who searched Nassar's home found a book about witchcraft, 35 veils and glass bottles full of "an unknown liquid used for sorcery" among her possessions. According to reports, authorities said Nassar claimed to be a healer and would sell a veil and three bottles for 1500 riyals, or about $400.

According to the ministry, Nassar's death sentence was upheld by an appeals court and the Saudi Supreme Judicial Council."

Saudi Woman Beheaded for 'Witchcraft' - ABC News

Men and women are treated equally.

Muree bin Ali bin Issa al-Asiri, Saudi Arabian Man, Executed For 'Witchcraft And Sorcery'

THIS IS THE PRESENT LEVEL OF THINKING IN ISLAM. Is there nothing shocking about this?

 

[Crackerjaxon]

Bill Maher is dead wrong.

If he thinks that Christianity is not a least as violent as radical Islam, I have one word for him:

"HOLOCAUST"

How quickly we forget. (and yes, the Nazi were originally called the "Christian Democratic Party", they were rife with anti-semitism long before Hitler joined, and the basis of this was the Lutherian religion).

Really? Who says?

What a reprehensible abuse of the English language.

Does that mean that atheism is responsible for the millions Stalin killed in the Soviet Union?

Is atheism responsible for the Pol Pot slaughter machine?

Is the American education system responsible for your woeful ignorance?

No need to answer the last question, It is rhetorical.

Since you obviously know nothing about Hitler's philosophy and justification for the holocaust, I suggest that you read Mien Kompf.

Hitler was a devote Christian and justified all his beliefs thru religion and spirituality. The German Christian Democratic party was fanatically anti-semitic long before he joined, and yes, Martin Luther hated Jews.

Sorry for your ignorance on this subject. I realize that few Americans know much about Hitler and the Nazis beyond what they learned watching Hogan's Heroes.

From Wikipedia:

Luther argued that the Jews were no longer the chosen people but "the devil's people": he referred to them with violent, vile language.[210][211] Luther advocated setting synagogues on fire, destroying Jewish prayerbooks, forbidding rabbis from preaching, seizing Jews' property and money, and smashing up their homes, so that these "poisonous envenomed worms" would be forced into labour or expelled "for all time".[212] In Robert Michael's view, Luther's words "We are at fault in not slaying them" amounted to a sanction for murder.[213] Luther's "recommendations" for how to treat the Jews was a clear reference to the "sharp mercy" of Deuteronomy 13, the punishments prescribed by Moses for those who led others to "false gods".[214]

Since it is you who knows nothing about the spiritual underpinnings of of Naziism, other than what you have been able to weakly surmise from Mein Kampf, which I seriously doubt you have read, I suggest you explore the links between Norse Paganism and its symbols to Nazism. I know you won't, since you mistakenly think you know everything, but I believe everyone is redeemable.

The jump from Martin Luther to modern Nazism would make Evel Knievel quake. That's quite a chasm you're jumping.

Certainly, Christianity had an anti-semitic bias during the Reformation. Equating that to Nazism is wishful thinking on your part.

 

[Hum Dinger]

My, my, my. Look at the anger level from the defenders of Christianity!

The "anger level" is over the CONTINUED DEFENSE OF A BLOODY MURDERING CULT called ISLAM by YOU LIBTARD DIP SHITS.

Get a clue, because at this point, you defenders are looking real STUPID and ANTI AMERICAN.

Now what's that one of your own finally admitted? Oh yeah... "it's liberal bull shit."

We are not defending violent radical Islam. We are, in a historical context, indicting violent radical Christianity.

The world did not begin the day you were born.

 

[Sallow]

Bill Maher is dead wrong.

If he thinks that Christianity is not a least as violent as radical Islam, I have one word for him:

"HOLOCAUST"

How quickly we forget. (and yes, the Nazi were originally called the "Christian Democratic Party", they were rife with anti-semitism long before Hitler joined, and the basis of this was the Lutherian religion).

He is and he isn't.

He isn't if you are just talking about the "now".

He is if you take history into account.

In any case..he's basically just being provocative. And the conservatives are eating it up.

 

[Mac1958]

.

It's 2013. In today's world, to reference Maher's points:

Today, which religions want to kill you if you draw a picture of their prophet?

Today, which religions want to kill you if you you leave that religion?

Also, today, which religions have leaders who want you dead if you do not belong to that religion?

Any straight answers to these questions?

.

Looks like we're going back a few years to compare Christianity & Islam.

Anyone want to take a whack at these questions?

.

 

[g5000]

The neocons infecting the GOP are sending a very clear message. They hate non-whites, non-Christians, and non-heterosexuals. This topic is just one of a million examples of their confirmation bias.

They have the exact same platform of the old Dixiecrats.

Identical.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

If you can prove that the definition of terrorism is limited to 'bombings',

you win. Otherwise, shut up.

I see the problem, you don't understand English.

Educate yourself.

The New Legal Definition Of 'Domestic Terrorism'

18 USC § 2331 - Definitions | Title 18 - Crimes and Criminal Procedure | U.S. Code | LII / Legal Information Institute

Thanks for proving us right, not that we needed you to do it:

1) in paragraph (1)(B)(iii), by striking `by assassination or kidnapping' and inserting `by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping';


Assassination is murder you dumbass.

I guess I have to spoon feed you.

(B) appear to be intended--

`(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

`(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or

`(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

Without the intent, or the appearance of intent, it is not terrorism.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

But murder can be terrorism.
You shoot up an abortion clinic due to your religious or political beliefs that is terrorism.

An amazing grasp of the obvious, but wtf is your point? The organizations which advocate violence for attacking Abortion clinics should be under the same scrutiny as others according to their threat.

What makes you think they aren't?

 

[Hum Dinger]

Really? Who says?

What a reprehensible abuse of the English language.

Does that mean that atheism is responsible for the millions Stalin killed in the Soviet Union?

Is atheism responsible for the Pol Pot slaughter machine?

Is the American education system responsible for your woeful ignorance?

No need to answer the last question, It is rhetorical.

Since you obviously know nothing about Hitler's philosophy and justification for the holocaust, I suggest that you read Mien Kompf.

Hitler was a devote Christian and justified all his beliefs thru religion and spirituality. The German Christian Democratic party was fanatically anti-semitic long before he joined, and yes, Martin Luther hated Jews.

Sorry for your ignorance on this subject. I realize that few Americans know much about Hitler and the Nazis beyond what they learned watching Hogan's Heroes.

From Wikipedia:

Luther argued that the Jews were no longer the chosen people but "the devil's people": he referred to them with violent, vile language.[210][211] Luther advocated setting synagogues on fire, destroying Jewish prayerbooks, forbidding rabbis from preaching, seizing Jews' property and money, and smashing up their homes, so that these "poisonous envenomed worms" would be forced into labour or expelled "for all time".[212] In Robert Michael's view, Luther's words "We are at fault in not slaying them" amounted to a sanction for murder.[213] Luther's "recommendations" for how to treat the Jews was a clear reference to the "sharp mercy" of Deuteronomy 13, the punishments prescribed by Moses for those who led others to "false gods".[214]

Since it is you who knows nothing about the spiritual underpinnings of of Naziism, other than what you have been able to weakly surmise from Mein Kampf, which I seriously doubt you have read, I suggest you explore the links between Norse Paganism and its symbols to Nozism. I know you won't, since you mistakenly think you know everything, but I believe everyone is redeemable.

The jump from Martin Luther to modern Nazism would make Evel Knievel quake. That's quite a chasm you're crossing.

Certainly, Christianity had an anti-semitic bias during the Reformation. Equating that to Nazism is wishful thinking on your part.

"There is none so blind as those who will not see"

Here's a few quotes from Mein Kompf for ya:

"I was not in accord with its sharp anti-Semitic tone; but again and again I found that its arguments gave me grounds for serious thought. / Anyhow, it was as a result of such reading that I came to know the man and the movement which then determined the fate of Vienna. These were Dr. Karl Lueger and the Christian Socialist Movement."

"And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord."

"Therefore, I am convinced that I am acting as the agent of our Creator. By fighting off the Jews, I am doing the Lord's work."

"I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator."

I don't believe that it's a leap of logic to assume that a religion, whose founder was extremely anti-semetic and was very popular in Germany, strongly influenced one of the major political parties that was also profoundly anti-semetic. Nor that it's leader who was the most extreme anti-semetic in history, was entirely unrelated.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

But murder can be terrorism.
You shoot up an abortion clinic due to your religious or political beliefs that is terrorism.

Not true.

If I shoot up an abortion clinic because I want the government to cut taxes, that would be terrorism. If I shoot it up because the flying spaghetti monster told me too, that is just murder.

Isn't that what I stated? Frick! You people can't follow a post to save your life.

What you said.
"If I shoot up an abortion clinic because I want the government to cut taxes, that would be terrorism."
What I said.
"You shoot up an abortion clinic due to your religious or political beliefs that is terrorism"

Tomato tomato

What is the problem here? If I shoot up the clinic because of religion it is not terrorism, there has to be a political motive for it to be terrorism. The reason for that is actually pretty simple, no religion on Earth uses terror to accomplish its goals, the only organizations that use terror are about politics.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Murders done to terrorize are terrorism. No sane person disagrees with that.

No, murders done to change government policy or coerce the public are terrorism. If we used your definition every murder would be an act of terrorism. I already provided the links, go read them.

Link to where I defined terrorism as every murder.

Do you understand what a conditional clause is?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

You don't have to be a "practicing Jew" to be Jewish. And you don't know what the fuck you're talking about when you say I attack people for loving Jews. Show me where I've ever done that, idiot.

Are you saying you are not a religious bigot, that, in reality, you are just a racist?

I'm not a religious bigot OR a racist, but I won't shy away from criticizing someone for their behavior, no matter WHAT their race or religion is just to avoid being labeled a racist.

You are the person that mentioned Maher's race, and you attributed his actions to his race. That, by definition, makes you a racist.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

The fact is that at this time in history, there is no major Christian or Jewish group that condones the murder of Muslims. So if you ignore history, then what Bill Maher says is correct, however if you take history into account, Christianity has been at least as brutal as radical Islam is today.

Hey, be glad that I haven't mentioned the Spanish Inquisition...yet....

That must be why Maher said we don't live in history, this is 2013. Today there is only one religion that condones violence as a means to an end.