Black "pastor" arrested for crime of watering his neighbours garden

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Not according to the law that has been posted in this thread.

Interfering with a police investigation is obstruction of justice. Everyone knows that.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Interfering with a police investigation is obstruction of justice. Everyone knows that.

Refusing an unlawful order is not interfering with a police investigation. Everyone knows that.

 

[progressive hunter]

Interfering with a police investigation is obstruction of justice. Everyone knows that.

he didnt do that,,

 

[Superbadbrutha]

He did have that obligation and the law says he did. That's why he was charged.

State the Law that says he was obligated to show his ID.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

State the Law that says he was obligated to show his ID.

I already have, ad nauseam.

How about you post the law, or amendment to the law that exempts Jennings from following the law that prohibits obstruction of justice.

Y'all's belief that anyone can tell cops to buzz off, while they're investigating a complaint is beyond moronic.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

he didnt do that,,

He refused to confirm his identity. So yes, that's exactly what he did.

 

[progressive hunter]

He refused to confirm his identity. So yes, that's exactly what he did.

he did what the law required him to do,,,

how can they demand an ID if they dont require you to have one??

 

[progressive hunter]

I already have, ad nauseam.

How about you post the law, or amendment to the law that exempts Jennings from following the law that prohibits obstruction of justice.

Y'all's belief that anyone can tell cops to buzz off, while they're investigating a complaint is beyond moronic.

no you havent,, the law has been posted many times and all it says is he has to give his name, address and reasons for his actions,,

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

no you havent,, the law has been posted many times and all it says is he has to give his name, address and reasons for his actions,,

So, if he lied about who he is, he has that right? If he said he was Mickey Mouse, the cops would have to accept that and go on about their business?

I don't think you guys are seeing the stupidity of your suggestions...lol

 

[progressive hunter]

So, if he lied about who he is, he has that right? If he said he was Mickey Mouse, the cops would have to accept that and go on about their business?

I don't think you guys are seeing the stupidity of your suggestions...lol

who said he had a right to lie?? if he did that it would be illegal,,

I dont think youre seeing the law of it that only requires he give his name and address,,
he gives it and the cops call it in and if hes lying they take him to jail for lying to the police,,,

how can they require he give something hes not required to have in the first place???

 

[MarcATL]

it shows they cuffed him for refusing to identify,,,

The police had no right to request identity according to state law.

They were, in fact, trespassing.

 

[MarcATL]

This is what these people want....

View attachment 687210

Fascism. It's the Republican way!

 

[MarcATL]

Okay, I finally watched the video.

The guy was aggressive, confrontational and LOOKING for a fight. He certainly wasn't very Christ-like.

Jessie Jackson is a "pastor".

So is the "Reverend" AL Sharpton.

Both are race hustlers in it for the payday.

The guy handle it all wrong. He was looking for a fight

Folks, what you've just read is the purely emotional rantings of a racist partisan lunatic.

No mention of the truth, no semblance of it either.

#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC #AllTheGOPHasForAmericansIsCultureWarBS

 

[MarcATL]

America has NEVER followed Jesus, so why do you want to hold this black pastor to a standard you don't even follow.

Shots fired!!! Shots fired! *Brukka, brukka, brukka, brukka*

 

[surada]

She created the situation by overreacting to a non-issue

She could have thanked him and offered him some string beans and squash for his trouble. People are so damned negative.. and paranoid.

 

[MarcATL]

The cops were conducting an investigation, because they had reasonable suspicion. Therefore, Jennings had a legal obligation to comply.

Interfering with an investigation is literally called, "obstruction of justice" and it's a crime.

What was this "reasonable suspicion?"

 

[MarcATL]

He did no such thing. he had no obligation to give his ID since there was no reasonable suspicion he was committing a crime.

Actually, the state law is pretty clear, police have no right to ask for ID on private property.

They can do it all day on public property, but on private property they are the ones who are trespassing.

 

[surada]

Guilty.
Does that mean she deserves what is highly likely to happen to her in the coming week or two?
This situation most likely went like this...
Woman sees someone walking around her neighbors house, she knows is on vacation. She watches the dude for a few seconds and doesn't recognize him. She calls the police, probably could have walked outside and hollered over, but can you really blame her? With all of the violence/crime happening? Or maybe she should have kept looking for a while and maybe recognized the man, or seen he started to water plants and let it go. Probably. But she didn't.
The police get the call, the officers that arrive have not one single clue about what is actually occurring. All they know is a neighbor said there is a man prowling around she doesn't recognoze.
What are the police supposed to do?
Do you think they have never arrived at a crime scene and everyone starts acting all innocent? You think this is new?? No guilty person has ever acted innocent or claimed to be doing something innocent?
How are they supposed to know?
Easy - ask for that persons ID. If they supply it... situation is over. Done.
Or the person can start claiming their rights, start getting angry with them, start calling them names... and wind up in handcuffs.
Black or white - there are 100,000s of videos on YouTube just like this with both white and black people being stupid.

Check yourself. You've become nihilistic... and that destroys your soul.

 

[progressive hunter]

Actually, the state law is pretty clear, police have no right to ask for ID on private property.

They can do it all day on public property, but on private property they are the ones who are trespassing.

you are 100% wrong on that one,, the law doesnt allow to ask for ID since there is no law that requires you have an ID,,

but they can demand you state your name, address and reason for your actions if they have RAS of a crime regardless of private or public property,,,

of course you could post the law you are talking about that proves me wrong like we did on what I said??

 

[progressive hunter]

Actually, the state law is pretty clear, police have no right to ask for ID on private property.

They can do it all day on public property, but on private property they are the ones who are trespassing.

you find that law yet??