*BOMBSHELL* donor scandal about to break wide open with NEW:

[Lakhota]

Wow, another Breitbart scoop.

 

[RosieS]

I have been watching the news all day-um day and not one day-um word about no day-um Obama donor scandal.

I want my day-um donor scandal on the 24 hour news channels and I want the day-um donor scandal NOW!!!!

TYVM.

Regards from Rosie

Of course not. The report used has zero accusations that Obama is receiving foreign money, and only points to the risks of it happening to either presidential or congressional candidate. It also suggests the potential of people setting up scam sites to hustle money.

Yeah I know. Approximately 50% of my posts drip with sarcasm. This was one of 'em. You know it ain't gonna happen; I know it ain't gonna happen; but psychotic righties will stay glued to Murdoch Inc. hoping it will.

And James O'Keefe will get sex he doesn't have to pay for this year, too.

Regards from Rosie

 

[GuyPinestra]

They sure don't. Thankfully, they can come here to take advantage of our lax gun laws. Fast and Furious proved that

Winger, you are such a fucking moron you don't even realize how stupid this post is.

Fast and Furious only proved that American gun dealers have more fucking sense than the Justice Department. They tried to get these gun-runners BUSTED, and they were told by ATF to LET THEM WALK.

Fast & Furious also proved that our current laws work very well if they're not IGNORED in the name of an 'agenda'.

That's because in Arizona anyone over 18 who passes a criminal background check can walk into a gun shop and purchase as many guns as they want. They can also resell them. Here's how Patrick Cunningham, the US attorney's former criminal chief in Arizona, described the state's laws: "[P]urchasing multiple long guns in Arizona is lawful... Transferring them to another is lawful and even sale or barter of the guns to another is lawful unless the United States can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the firearm is intended to be used to commit a crime." That's usually a difficult case to make, so prosecutors are reluctant to go after straw-purchasing, which carries a relatively small penalty anyway.
Take, for example, the guns that set off this controversy—the two that ended up at the murder scene of an elite border-patrol agent. The man who bought the guns, Jaime Avila, was suspected of straw-purchasing, but prior to the incident on the border prosecutors were reluctant to indict him for lack of evidence. And while Mr Avila's purchase was reported to the ATF, the agents had no chance to seize the weapons, says Fortune. In the context of Arizona's weak laws and timid prosecution, it seems rather plausible that the guns in Operation Fast and Furious walked off on their own, so to speak.

Operation Fast and Furious: Hard to untangle | The Economist

You know how big a load of shit you're trying to shovel here? The gunshop OWNERS called the ATF to have the buyers busted and the ATF told them to let the buyers WALK. Prosecutors weren't reluctant to indict, the field agents never presented prosecutors with a case TO indict. ATF let the buyers cross the border with those guns, never ONCE trying to interdict the shipments or arrest the criminals.

 

[JimH52]

I have been watching the news all day-um day and not one day-um word about no day-um Obama donor scandal.

I want my day-um donor scandal on the 24 hour news channels and I want the day-um donor scandal NOW!!!!

TYVM.

Regards from Rosie

Of course not. The report used has zero accusations that Obama is receiving foreign money, and only points to the risks of it happening to either presidential or congressional candidate. It also suggests the potential of people setting up scam sites to hustle money.

Another Block Buster busted?

 

[Sarah G]

I have been watching the news all day-um day and not one day-um word about no day-um Obama donor scandal.

I want my day-um donor scandal on the 24 hour news channels and I want the day-um donor scandal NOW!!!!

TYVM.

Regards from Rosie

Of course not. The report used has zero accusations that Obama is receiving foreign money, and only points to the risks of it happening to either presidential or congressional candidate. It also suggests the potential of people setting up scam sites to hustle money.

Another Block Buster busted?

I was wondering whatever happened with the big ass donor scandal.

 

[rightwinger]

Winger, you are such a fucking moron you don't even realize how stupid this post is.

Fast and Furious only proved that American gun dealers have more fucking sense than the Justice Department. They tried to get these gun-runners BUSTED, and they were told by ATF to LET THEM WALK.

Fast & Furious also proved that our current laws work very well if they're not IGNORED in the name of an 'agenda'.

That's because in Arizona anyone over 18 who passes a criminal background check can walk into a gun shop and purchase as many guns as they want. They can also resell them. Here's how Patrick Cunningham, the US attorney's former criminal chief in Arizona, described the state's laws: "[P]urchasing multiple long guns in Arizona is lawful... Transferring them to another is lawful and even sale or barter of the guns to another is lawful unless the United States can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the firearm is intended to be used to commit a crime." That's usually a difficult case to make, so prosecutors are reluctant to go after straw-purchasing, which carries a relatively small penalty anyway.
Take, for example, the guns that set off this controversy—the two that ended up at the murder scene of an elite border-patrol agent. The man who bought the guns, Jaime Avila, was suspected of straw-purchasing, but prior to the incident on the border prosecutors were reluctant to indict him for lack of evidence. And while Mr Avila's purchase was reported to the ATF, the agents had no chance to seize the weapons, says Fortune. In the context of Arizona's weak laws and timid prosecution, it seems rather plausible that the guns in Operation Fast and Furious walked off on their own, so to speak.

Operation Fast and Furious: Hard to untangle | The Economist

You know how big a load of shit you're trying to shovel here? The gunshop OWNERS called the ATF to have the buyers busted and the ATF told them to let the buyers WALK. Prosecutors weren't reluctant to indict, the field agents never presented prosecutors with a case TO indict. ATF let the buyers cross the border with those guns, never ONCE trying to interdict the shipments or arrest the criminals.

The problem up till then was that the buyers were low level mules being used to cover for large scale dealers. Busting the buyers does nothing to stop the gun trade...there are always more to take their place
What they wanted was to trace the guns once they left the shop. Arizona gun laws made that impossible

 

[daveman]

I believe he's saying YOU'RE that stupid and that partisan. Hope that helps.

You believed Nixon, too, right?

And I KNOW you believed Clinton when he said he "didn't have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinsky".

I know I don't believe Romney when he says he has a plan to lower the debt.

Of course you don't. You're incapable of thinking for yourself.

 

[daveman]

Are you really this stupid? Or just this partisan? Who Proved he wasn't involved? Oh yeah, His own Justice Department which he runs.

lol

I'm sure VLWC believed Nixon when he said he wasn't a crook.

Nixon denied something of which he had not been accused.

You can't point to him stealing anything, either, you twit.

Didn't stop liberals from painting him as a crook, did it?

VLWC is a partisan hack. He'd believe Obama if Obama said the sun came up in the west.

 

[daveman]

Are you really this stupid? Or just this partisan? Who Proved he wasn't involved? Oh yeah, His own Justice Department which he runs.

lol

I'm sure VLWC believed Nixon when he said he wasn't a crook.

You know...it's very interesting you bring up Nixon....his own AG...John Mitchell...was found GUILTY of helping with the cover up. Isn't it odd that being AG didn't protect him like you think it does Holder. Seems to me, those accusing the Justice Dept itself of not doing its job owes them an apology.

What is it with leftists thinking they're entitled to things they want? Can you explain that to me?

 

[Vast LWC]

Didn't stop liberals from painting him as a crook, did it?

VLWC is a partisan hack. He'd believe Obama if Obama said the sun came up in the west.

Funny, I don't remember throwing around crazy accusations about my political opponents.

Unlike some people.

But then, I guess my "partisan hackery" is clouding my mind.

Perhaps you could refresh me as to when I've spouted insane criminal conspiracy theories about Mr Romney.

Perhaps you could point out where I've made criminal accusations concerning Mr Bush.

 

[daveman]

Remember: His Lord Obama can do no wrong.

You're asking the guy to admit his deity is not perfect. Never gonna happen, guy.

Dude, you people make EVERYTHING into a conspiracy theory. And by everything I mean everything.

When Obama takes a shit, you people theorize as to why he took so long in there, and pretend that it's a threat to national security.

And then you claim that the left deifies Obama because they argue against your crazy-assed, black-helicopter BS.

Give it up man. Obama is a US citizen, he's not a Muslim, he's not trying to destroy capitalism, he's didn't have cocaine laden sex with that guy from Texas, Bin Laden is really dead... Etc, etc, etc.

When you throw out literally HUNDREDS of conspiracy theories, at some point it just becomes utterly ridiculous.

I'm not responsible for any of those claims, because I never made them.

Meanwhile: Your Lord Obama can do no wrong.

 

[daveman]

I'm sure VLWC believed Nixon when he said he wasn't a crook.

Nixon was in fact a crook.

However, what he did wasn't half as bad as Iran-Contra.

Though I imagine that, in your mind, since Reagan was President, it was Reagan that cleared Reagan, right?

Don't project your inability to grasp logic on me.

Meanwhile, your Lord Obama can do no wrong.

 

[Dick Tuck]

Remember: His Lord Obama can do no wrong.

You're asking the guy to admit his deity is not perfect. Never gonna happen, guy.

Dude, you people make EVERYTHING into a conspiracy theory. And by everything I mean everything.

When Obama takes a shit, you people theorize as to why he took so long in there, and pretend that it's a threat to national security.

And then you claim that the left deifies Obama because they argue against your crazy-assed, black-helicopter BS.

Give it up man. Obama is a US citizen, he's not a Muslim, he's not trying to destroy capitalism, he's didn't have cocaine laden sex with that guy from Texas, Bin Laden is really dead... Etc, etc, etc.

When you throw out literally HUNDREDS of conspiracy theories, at some point it just becomes utterly ridiculous.

I'm not responsible for any of those claims, because I never made them.

Meanwhile: Your Lord Obama can do no wrong.

Change your depends and use your head. The moron who posted the OP, used Brainfart speculation based on an analysis that said both presidential candidates and members of Congress were at risk of foreign money getting into their campaigns. Now what exactly does this have to do with Obama?

 

[daveman]

It's objection to Obama's political agenda of pandering to the liberal socialistic
use of govt while also pulling the same favoritism toward corporate financiers
that all politicians do using the given system of getting elected this way.

People who object to Bush and corporate powermongers as "abuse of white privilege"
are also opposing the bullying by CLASS but blaming it on Race as a cultural identity factor.

It's not really the race of the person, it's the CLASS they are taken to represent.

Bush represented to opponents the abuse of upper class influence in govt to pander to corporations like oil companies he and his family were associated with.

Obama represents pandering both to corporate financiers doing this same thing from the left, but also exploiting the lower classes for their votes by claiming to represent them.

So that is seen as worse, because it is doubly dishonest and damaging.

Note: I believe Obama's policy of teaching dependence on govt (instead of promoting local governance and responsibility) is more dangerous and damaging, but we may still end up with 8 years of Obama to balance having 8 years of Bush. Since all this is part of the learning curve in society and politics, we may suffer equal backlash until we learn our lessons and work together to succeed, instead of competing to make others wrong or fail.
It seems both right and left are taking turns punishing and blaming the other, until it becomes clear this does not solve problems but perpetuates endless denial and backlash.

See, but while you have good points, you're speaking from the point of view of someone who attacks his policies, rather than someone who comes up with a new conspiracy theory every day.

Therefore, you can't really speak for these hacks, because you just don't know.

I'll keep my suspicions. I feel they're justified.

Of course you do. That's because you operate solely on emotion.

 

[Vast LWC]

Don't project your inability to grasp logic on me.

Meanwhile, your Lord Obama can do no wrong.

So, you're saying the Tower Commission wasn't Reagan-appointed?

That's an... interesting point of view.

 

[Vast LWC]

Of course you do. That's because you operate solely on emotion.

That's funny. I don't feel emotional about the subject at all.

I came to that particular conclusion based on pure process of elimination.

 

[daveman]

Didn't stop liberals from painting him as a crook, did it?

VLWC is a partisan hack. He'd believe Obama if Obama said the sun came up in the west.

Funny, I don't remember throwing around crazy accusations about my political opponents.

Unlike some people.

But then, I guess my "partisan hackery" is clouding my mind.

Perhaps you could refresh me as to when I've spouted insane criminal conspiracy theories about Mr Romney.

Perhaps you could point out where I've made criminal accusations concerning Mr Bush.

Your inane babbling aside, you don't have to have done any of that to be an Obamabot.

 

[daveman]

Dude, you people make EVERYTHING into a conspiracy theory. And by everything I mean everything.

When Obama takes a shit, you people theorize as to why he took so long in there, and pretend that it's a threat to national security.

And then you claim that the left deifies Obama because they argue against your crazy-assed, black-helicopter BS.

Give it up man. Obama is a US citizen, he's not a Muslim, he's not trying to destroy capitalism, he's didn't have cocaine laden sex with that guy from Texas, Bin Laden is really dead... Etc, etc, etc.

When you throw out literally HUNDREDS of conspiracy theories, at some point it just becomes utterly ridiculous.

I'm not responsible for any of those claims, because I never made them.

Meanwhile: Your Lord Obama can do no wrong.

Change your depends and use your head. The moron who posted the OP, used Brainfart speculation based on an analysis that said both presidential candidates and members of Congress were at risk of foreign money getting into their campaigns. Now what exactly does this have to do with Obama?

Pssst! It's Obama's website that doesn't use standard security protocol.

Dumbass.

 

[daveman]

Don't project your inability to grasp logic on me.

Meanwhile, your Lord Obama can do no wrong.

So, you're saying the Tower Commission wasn't Reagan-appointed?

That's an... interesting point of view.

No, I'm not saying that. Is English your distant-second language?

 

[daveman]

Of course you do. That's because you operate solely on emotion.

That's funny. I don't feel emotional about the subject at all.

I came to that particular conclusion based on pure process of elimination.

Really? It looks like you're willing to disregard anything that even slightly criticizes The One.