regent
Gold Member
- Jan 30, 2012
- 10,459
- 1,148
- 245
I have no love for Barry and his cronies. I firmly believe that Barrack Hussein Obama, by the time his second term is over, will have come as close as anyone, including Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter, to destroying this nation. Abandoning four Americans in Benghazi, the IRS affair, NSA, Obamacare, the decline in race relations, the economy, 8 TRILLION dollars added to the national debt just during his term, my God in heaven the list goes on and on. And I haven't even begun to speak of the Department of Justice, Eric Holder and the list of abuses by that agency.
However, I DO NOT want Obama impeached for any of that. Until the time that someone can definatively say that Barrack Hussein Obama committed a crime and has the proof, proof that will stand up in a court of law, the American people have spoken and we must try to endure. I believe that it is ludicrous and wrong to try and impeach a sitting American President for anything short of verifiable, criminal activity. Richard Nixon actively covered up the Watergate burglaries. He didn't order them, but he used government agencies to pursue those looking to the burglaries and he tried to use the FBI, the IRS, and the CIA to persecute those looking into the burglaries. That was a criminal act. He was caught on tape giving the orders to Halderman.
Now if someone comes up with the proof that Barry personally ordered the IRS to single out conservative groups, then I am all for it. That is a criminal act and is an impeachable offense. But lets face it, Barry never ran anything and is a dyed-in-the-wool amateur. The fact that he has no clue what is really happening in any of these situations should not surprise anyone. As a matter of fact, at this very moment he is doing the only thing he knows how to do, and that is campaign. He's not a leader and he has no clue how to lead a nation. He makes campaign speeches and leaves the details to a group that borders on the criminally ignorant, like Valerie Jarrett.
You can oppose the President's policies and his agendas, but you cannot rightly overturn the results of an election, simply because you disagree with the results.
There is no court of law, there is no need for a crime, high crimes is an undefined term meaning whatever the Senate and House want it to mean. The House has the votes to impeach tomorrow, but the Senate belongs to the Democrats. So it's all talk. Impeachment talk is done with many presidents, and its purpose may be to excite.