Lewdog
Gold Member
Based on statistics. Yes statistics,
The UK has 0.07 acts of violent gun deaths per 100,000 residents compared to 3.85 acts of violent gun deaths in the U.S. per 100,000 people.
Now that is a stat that matters, and shows just how ridiculous your threads are.
Gun Violence: How The U.S. Compares With Other Countries
Let me also fill you in on a little something about statistics that obviously is beyond your grasp. When you start with such a low number, and it goes up even a VERY small amount, the percent increased is going to be disproportional than if you start with a high number and it increases.
Let me give an example, because I highly doubt you will be able to grasp it without one.
If you start with a number like 2, and the next year it goes up to 3, you are going to have a 50% increase... despite the fact you still only had 3 acts.
Now if you start out with 100 and the number goes up by 10, you only have a 10% increase.
So which group is doing the better job? The one with the 50% increase or the one with the 10% increase? Can you understand that the percentages you are using are not vindictive of what's actually going on?
The UK has 0.07 acts of violent gun deaths per 100,000 residents compared to 3.85 acts of violent gun deaths in the U.S. per 100,000 people.
Now that is a stat that matters, and shows just how ridiculous your threads are.
Gun Violence: How The U.S. Compares With Other Countries
Let me also fill you in on a little something about statistics that obviously is beyond your grasp. When you start with such a low number, and it goes up even a VERY small amount, the percent increased is going to be disproportional than if you start with a high number and it increases.
Let me give an example, because I highly doubt you will be able to grasp it without one.
If you start with a number like 2, and the next year it goes up to 3, you are going to have a 50% increase... despite the fact you still only had 3 acts.
Now if you start out with 100 and the number goes up by 10, you only have a 10% increase.
So which group is doing the better job? The one with the 50% increase or the one with the 10% increase? Can you understand that the percentages you are using are not vindictive of what's actually going on?