Breaking: Democrats and Leftist Media Dread As Tucker Carlson to Fully Reveal January 6 Truth Tonight.

[progressive hunter]

Please profuse the time stamp where he says the dispute is from Dems who’s claim isn’t supported.

show where he said he disputes how he got in???

as we all know actions speak louder than words and his actions were to show how he got in,,,

 

[Marener]

show where he said he disputes how he got in???

as we all know actions speak louder than words and his actions were to show how he got in,,,

No. Show where Tucker says the dispute is from Dems as you claim.

Third time asking the same simple question.

 

[Mac1958]

that goes both ways,,

Talk to a left winger about that.

 

[progressive hunter]

No. Show where Tucker says the dispute is from Dems as you claim.

yes show where he said he disputed it,,,

him posting video of how it happened is the proof of his POV

 

[progressive hunter]

No. Show where Tucker says the dispute is from Dems as you claim.

Third time asking the same simple question.

just watched it again,,
he said "to this day there are disputes as to how he got in",,,

no where did he say he disputes it,,,

 

[Marener]

yes show where he said he disputed it,,,

him posting video of how it happened is the proof of his POV

I give up. You’re too stupid to even answer a simple question.

The fact is you’re a liar. The dispute isn’t from Dems and Tucker never made any such claim. You made that up. One thing I know is that Chansley disputed how he got in, but was caught lying and the judge was pissed about it.

Judge who said QAnon Shaman 'blatantly lied' during '60 Minutes' interview released 2 new videos disproving shaman's claims

The footage appears to debunk claims made by the QAnon Shaman that officers "waved" protesters in on January 6 during the mob of the Capitol.

news.yahoo.com

 

[Marener]

no where did he say he disputes it,

I said that Tucker claimed it was in dispute.

 

[progressive hunter]

I said that Tucker claimed it was in dispute.

yes some people dispute it,, tucker didnt say he was one of them and showed exactly how he got in,,,

 

[MagicMike]

I just mentioned that he wanted Carlson's show banned. Do you think a government official should go after a journalist?

Gee I don't know.
Whadda you think?

 

[Faun]

Yep, physically in the capital, he wasn’t committing physical violence! His charges

LOLOL

You're such a fucking idiot. No moron, he pled guilty to this charge...

18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)
(Obstruction of an Official Proceeding)

(c) Whoever corruptly—

(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.​

​

 

[progressive hunter]

I guess Carlson is an idiot then.

here is you claiming tucker didnt know how he got in,,

 

[Lisa558]

I haven’t read all 156 pages, but basically we have a) a non-violent man who was sent to prison for four years and placed in solitary confinement for trespassing, b) when it turns out he was invited in and escorted around by the police, and c) the Democrats of the Witch-hunt Committee withheld exculpatory evidence from his defense team that could have exonerated him totally or at least softened his sentence.

Forget a new trial. The verdict should be vacated, the framed man should be released immediately, he should be awarded millions for being a victim of the Democrat-led Weaponized Government, and Pelosi et al should be charged with the equivalent of prosecutorial misconduct.

 

[Marener]

here is you claiming tucker didnt know how he got in,,

Nope. I said that Tucker said there was dispute. You denied it.

theres no dispute and tucker never implied different,,

so we wasted a lot of time just to get back to the fact that you’re wrong.

Tucker omitted a bunch of time that Chansley was in the Capitol, specifically when he confronted a line officers on the second floor.

 

[Marener]

I haven’t read all 156 pages, but basically we have a) a non-violent man who was sent to prison for four years and placed in solitary confinement for trespassing, b) when it turns out he was invited in and escorted around by the police, and c) the Democrats of the Witch-hunt Committee withheld exculpatory evidence from his defense team that could have exonerated him totally or at least softened his sentence.

Forget a new trial. The verdict should be vacated, the framed man should be released immediately, he should be awarded millions for being a victim of the Democrat-led Weaponized Government, and Pelosi et al should be charged with the equivalent of prosecutorial misconduct.

a) he wasnt convicted of trespassing. He pled guilty to obstructing a congressional proceeding.

b) he wasn’t invited in by the police. He came in when rioters broke down the doors

c) the evidence isn’t exculpatory and he was given a ton of video including the body cam footage and security footage

 

[progressive hunter]

Nope. I said that Tucker said there was dispute. You denied it.

so we wasted a lot of time just to get back to the fact that you’re wrong.

Tucker omitted a bunch of time that Chansley was in the Capitol, specifically when he confronted a line officers on the second floor.

and then you said tucker was an idiot, that implied he was one of them when he showed exactly how he got in,,

what did he omitt??

he posted the encounter with the line of cops,,,

are you telling me you didnt watch the whole thing???

 

[progressive hunter]

a) he wasnt convicted of trespassing. He pled guilty to obstructing a congressional proceeding.

b) he wasn’t invited in by the police. He came in when rioters broke down the doors

c) the evidence isn’t exculpatory and he was given a ton of video including the body cam footage and security footage

you forgot to provide your link for this claim,,,

 

[Marener]

and then you said tucker was an idiot, that implied he was one of them when he showed exactly how he got in,,

what did he omitt??

he posted the encounter with the line of cops,,,

are you telling me you didnt watch the whole thing???

Can you post the time stamp where he met the line of cops?

Carlson omitted who disputed how he got in. He also admitted that it’s indisputable how he got in.

 

[Marener]

you forgot to provide your link for this claim,,,

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/case-multi-defendant/file/1430996/download

Notice (Other) – #79 in United States v. CHANSLEY (D.D.C., 1:21-cr-00003) – CourtListener.com

NOTICE of Discovery Status by USA as to JACOB ANTHONY CHANSLEY (Paschall, Kimberly) (Entered: 11/05/2021)

www.courtlistener.com

 

[progressive hunter]

Can you post the time stamp where he met the line of cops?

Carlson omitted who disputed how he got in. He also admitted that it’s indisputable how he got in.

FFS youre a dumb mother fucker,,,

its seconds after he said it was disputed how he got in,,,,

 

[progressive hunter]