Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fake news is a libturds goldLook at all the right wing imbeciles freaking out over this news because it directly contradicts the fake news they're force-fed by Breitbart.
"But muh narrative!!!"
So that's what you think about? Wow, now that's sick.I want testimony UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY
This way it will be up to DJT to pardon PRIVATE CITIZEN Obama.
.
Funny isn't it? You post an article saying he wants revenge for something that didn't happen... and then I show you the actual things he said, which refutes your post... and what do you do? You then attack him. That's some funny shit. Quit posting fake news.
Funny isn't.
That you take his bullshit assertions as if they were the gospel.
Fuck off.
.
Yeah I should take an opinion piece of what he said over what he actually said...
So , if you want to fellate him while he is president you only have about 30 days left.
Is your name Monica Lewinsky?
.
.
I'm sorry, I can't understand the words coming out of your mouth, with Putin and Trump's dicks in there.
Gee, it's about time.
FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.Rest here: FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election
Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.
“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
Why would he FBI deny the truth?
Conservatives have always been upfront about the threat Russia poses to America. It has always been the Democrats that excused and downplayed the Russian threat. In the 80's they criticized Reagan for calling them an evil empire. They ridiculed Reagan for supporting missile defense, saying that it is impossible and a pipe dream. Under Obama's foreign policy America capitulated to Russia's demand that America drop missile defense in Eastern Europe. Obama was caught having the Russian president relay a message to Putin that he only has one more election, and after the election he'll have more flexibility to further neuter America's military efforts in Eastern Europe.
When Romney and Republicans criticized Obama for making deals with the Russians that he is keeping secret from Americans, the Democrats ridiculed him. Democrats all collectively said Russia is a trusted ally and Romney was trying to relive the Cold War.
It is Obama's foreign policy that emboldened Russia to invade Crimea and openly defy America is Syria. It is Obama's foreign policy that led to the rise of ISIS.
Furthermore, if I opened a suspicious email and caused my company's computer system to be hacked, do you think I would be held accountable? The Russians, according to the CIA and Obama, unsuccessfully attempted to hack the RNC. The Democrats, just like Clinton did with State Department emails, put the country in risk and allowed Russia to gain access to and embarrass Clinton.
To sit there and try and assign some political motive to Russia attempting to disrupt the American election is based solely on subjective politically motivated opinions. The left are sore losers and just want a scapegoat other than the complete ineptitude, arrogance and stupidity of the Clinton campaign for their failures. They showed themselves to be completely untrustworthy with America's security.
Russia did NOT invade Crimea.
After a Plebiscite Crimeans chose to be part of Russia.
.
To be clear you are unequivocally absolutely incorrect. I will provide the multiple videos of Obama contradicting your, to be frank, stunningly stupid statement that Russia did not invade Crimea and/or Crimea's annexation was done legally and willfully by the Ukrainian government. State Department press conferences, White House press secretary--we went to the UN to enact economic sanctions against Russia and the justification we provided to the international community was Russia's military annexation of Crimea. And the UN approved the sanctions.
In fact is the only government, besides China, North Korea, Syria, and Sudan to vote against the sanctions and insist Russia had nothing to do with the military annexation of Crimea is RUSSIA.
Again, a special kind of stupid.
In 2014, Russia made several military incursions into Ukrainian territory. After Euromaidan protests and the fall of Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych, Russian soldiers without insignias took control of strategic positions and infrastructure within the Ukrainian territory of Crimea. Russia then annexed Crimea after a disputed referendum in which Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation.[7][62][63][64][65] Subsequently, demonstrations by pro-Russian groups in the Donbass area of Ukraine escalated into an armed conflict between the Ukrainian government and separatist forces of the self-declared Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics. In August, Russian military vehicles crossed the border in several locations of Donetsk Oblast[31][66][67][68][69][70] The incursion by the Russian military was seen as responsible for the defeat of Ukrainian forces in early September.[71][72]
In November 2014, the Ukrainian military reported intensive movement of troops and equipment from Russia into the separatist controlled parts of eastern Ukraine.[73] The Associated Press reported 80 unmarked military vehicles on the move in rebel-controlled areas.[74] An OSCE Special Monitoring Mission observed convoys of heavy weapons and tanks in DPR-controlled territory without insignia.[75] OSCE monitors further stated they observed vehicles transporting ammunition and soldiers' dead bodies crossing the Russian-Ukrainian border under the guise of humanitarian aid convoys.[76] As of early August 2015, OSCE observed over 21 such vehicles marked with the Russian military code for soldiers killed in action.[77]According to The Moscow Times, Russia has tried to intimidate and silence human rights workers discussing Russian soldiers' deaths in the conflict.[78] OSCE repeatedly reported that its observers were denied access to the areas controlled by "combined Russian-separatist forces".[79]
The majority of members of the international community and organizations such as Amnesty International have condemned Russia for its actions in post-revolutionary Ukraine, accusing it of breaking international law and violating Ukrainian sovereignty. Many countries implemented economic sanctions against Russia, Russian individuals or companies – to which Russia responded in kind.
In 2014, Russia made several military incursions into Ukrainian territory. After Euromaidan protests and the fall of Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych, Russian soldiers without insignias took control of strategic positions and infrastructure within the Ukrainian territory of Crimea. Russia then annexed Crimea after a disputed referendum in which Crimeans voted to join the Russian Federation.[7][62][63][64][65] Subsequently, demonstrations by pro-Russian groups in the Donbass area of Ukraine escalated into an armed conflict between the Ukrainian government and separatist forces of the self-declared Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics. In August, Russian military vehicles crossed the border in several locations of Donetsk Oblast[31][66][67][68][69][70] The incursion by the Russian military was seen as responsible for the defeat of Ukrainian forces in early September.[71][72]
In November 2014, the Ukrainian military reported intensive movement of troops and equipment from Russia into the separatist controlled parts of eastern Ukraine.[73] The Associated Press reported 80 unmarked military vehicles on the move in rebel-controlled areas.[74] An OSCE Special Monitoring Mission observed convoys of heavy weapons and tanks in DPR-controlled territory without insignia.[75] OSCE monitors further stated they observed vehicles transporting ammunition and soldiers' dead bodies crossing the Russian-Ukrainian border under the guise of humanitarian aid convoys.[76] As of early August 2015, OSCE observed over 21 such vehicles marked with the Russian military code for soldiers killed in action.[77]According to The Moscow Times, Russia has tried to intimidate and silence human rights workers discussing Russian soldiers' deaths in the conflict.[78] OSCE repeatedly reported that its observers were denied access to the areas controlled by "combined Russian-separatist forces".[79]
The majority of members of the international community and organizations such as Amnesty International have condemned Russia for its actions in post-revolutionary Ukraine, accusing it of breaking international law and violating Ukrainian sovereignty. Many countries implemented economic sanctions against Russia, Russian individuals or companies – to which Russia responded in kind.
What Should We Do About Crimea?
When the mainstream media discusses Crimea they are all lock-step: that’s the peninsula Putin annexed. Never do they mention that there was a referendum in which the vast majority of the population (who are mostly ethnic Russians) voted to join Russia. The US media never reports on this referendum because it produced results that Washington doesn’t like. How arrogant it must sound to the rest of the world that Washington reserves the right to approve or disapprove elections thousands of miles away – meanwhile we find out from the DNC hacked files that we don’t have a lot of room to criticize elections overseas."
And that wraps it up. You can rely on your FAKE NEWS SOURCES if you choose.
'nuff said.
.
And how many of the votes were casts by Russians? We already know that many of the people that were called "rebels" fighting for the annex, were actually Russian soldiers, using Russian equipment.
HUH?
Oh, its you, useless
And you "know" this how?
Oh wait , you have sources inside the CIA but because of "national security" they will remain nameless (wink. wink) don't respond I know the narrative.
.
Russian chics do have a pretty good rap.Gee, it's about time.
FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.Rest here: FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election
Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.
“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
Gee, it's about time.
FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.Rest here: FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election
Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.
“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
What espionage?Oh, so we are now going to put qualifications on exactly who can disseminate information?Now you apply some critical thought. There are thousands of agencies in this country and around the world that release information designed to influence how people vote.
The main stream media in this country alone has admitted to influencing voters simply by picking and choosing the information they see fit to shape and promote a specific narrative. You can see by their meltdown that they were influencing information to ensure that their candidate won the election. Going so far as to time and release information to make it appear that Clinton was a lock for winning.
Now, information has come to light about the Clinton's, the media was busy trying to shape how voters thought about the election, so wikileaks ran with information they would not.
I don't see anyone on the left complaining about the media influencing the vote. I didn't see you complain about the New York Times releasing Trumps taxes, even though the information was gained under questionable means.
Sorry, but all of this just highlights why Clinton is a flawed human being (as noted by the campaign discussions) and also brings to light their indifference to security, a trait I would not want anywhere near the White House.
Sorry, but this is just sour grapes.
Unless you want to talk about what measures should be taken by political parties to ensure that they take their IT security seriously.
The media isn't a foreign entity who targeted a candidate and their party, obtained information through theft with the intention of using it against them during the campaign.
Certainly you can see the difference.
You do understand that this was an act of international espionage and not simply a reporter running down a lead?
Really, you see no difference?
Espionage publicly encouraged by the, soon the be, president. Well, at least he is Putin Approved...
Gee, it's about time.
FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.Rest here: FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election
Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.
“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
The Washington Post? Does anyone believe in the journalistic integrity of that paper at this point? They've been publishing "fake news" for so long, I don't think they even remember what responsible journalism IS anymore!
Gee, it's about time.
FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.Rest here: FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election
Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.
“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
The Washington Post? Does anyone believe in the journalistic integrity of that paper at this point? They've been publishing "fake news" for so long, I don't think they even remember what responsible journalism IS anymore!
Republican and russian fake news elected stump, the next president.
Well prove it and tell me what they did. How is hacking something in 2015 affecting voters in 2016. And why was it funny in October?What espionage?Oh, so we are now going to put qualifications on exactly who can disseminate information?The media isn't a foreign entity who targeted a candidate and their party, obtained information through theft with the intention of using it against them during the campaign.
Certainly you can see the difference.
You do understand that this was an act of international espionage and not simply a reporter running down a lead?
Really, you see no difference?
Espionage publicly encouraged by the, soon the be, president. Well, at least he is Putin Approved...
Don't be an idiot like Stump. The Russians hacked the DNC in an effort to give the election to Stump. They succeeded. You better reserve you russian language lessons now. The wing nuts are lining up to learn the country's new language.
Ok!Gee, it's about time.
FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.Rest here: FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election
Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.
“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
The Washington Post? Does anyone believe in the journalistic integrity of that paper at this point? They've been publishing "fake news" for so long, I don't think they even remember what responsible journalism IS anymore!
Republican and russian fake news elected stump, the next president.
What did the Russians give him?What espionage?Oh, so we are now going to put qualifications on exactly who can disseminate information?The media isn't a foreign entity who targeted a candidate and their party, obtained information through theft with the intention of using it against them during the campaign.
Certainly you can see the difference.
You do understand that this was an act of international espionage and not simply a reporter running down a lead?
Really, you see no difference?
Espionage publicly encouraged by the, soon the be, president. Well, at least he is Putin Approved...
Don't be an idiot like Stump. The Russians hacked the DNC in an effort to give the election to Stump. They succeeded. You better reserve you russian language lessons now. The wing nuts are lining up to learn the country's new language.
What did the Russians give him?What espionage?Oh, so we are now going to put qualifications on exactly who can disseminate information?
You do understand that this was an act of international espionage and not simply a reporter running down a lead?
Really, you see no difference?
Espionage publicly encouraged by the, soon the be, president. Well, at least he is Putin Approved...
Don't be an idiot like Stump. The Russians hacked the DNC in an effort to give the election to Stump. They succeeded. You better reserve you russian language lessons now. The wing nuts are lining up to learn the country's new language.
How?What did the Russians give him?What espionage?You do understand that this was an act of international espionage and not simply a reporter running down a lead?
Really, you see no difference?
Espionage publicly encouraged by the, soon the be, president. Well, at least he is Putin Approved...
Don't be an idiot like Stump. The Russians hacked the DNC in an effort to give the election to Stump. They succeeded. You better reserve you russian language lessons now. The wing nuts are lining up to learn the country's new language.
They gave him the United States, so that he can turn it into another Russian state.
And podesta was warned by staffersIt certainly does when they only target one
candidate and their party to attack.
LOL They targeted BOTH PARTIES!
Egads! Use your head man!
Did they? They supposedly tried the RNC. Any congressional candidates, staffers, associates?
The difference is that no one in the RNC was stupid enough to fall for an obvious phishing attack, as Podesta obviously was.
