Breaking: FBI BACKS CIA View that Russia Intervened to Help Trump Win Election

[Penelope]

Hmmm this is odd. Just not but a couple days ago Comey told Trump over the phone that there was no evidence of a Russian hack. I wonder what new information or what happened in the last couple of days.

Is that what Trump said or Comey?

 

[Zander]

Read the actual article carefully. There is no proof of anything. Just the "word" of unnamed "U.S. officials"...

“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.

“The three of us also agree that our organizations, along with others, need to focus on completing the thorough review of this issue that has been directed by President Obama and which is being led by the DNI,” Brennan’s message read.

The CIA and FBI declined to comment.

​

Did he actually say this? Maybe. Nobody really knows. It's called "FAKE NEWS" for a reason.

 

[percysunshine]

Gee, it's about time.

FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.

Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.

“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
​

Rest here: FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election

.
Are you getting paid more than minimum wages to post this stuff?

 

[S.J.]

No matter what side you're on, if you aren't outraged over Russia's interference in our fucking election, you should be put to sleep -- permanently.

So, anyone who doesn't blindly walk in lockstep with you should be killed?

Ah, thanks for outing yourself as the traitor you are. Russia -- an enemy of the USA -- wants to manipulate our election? S.J says "that's a-ok with me!"

I suggest you move to Russia, scumbag.

I think maybe YOU should move to a country that practices Sharia Law, since you are in favor of executing anyone who doesn't agree with you.

Let me make this very clear to you, traitor -- if you are siding with Russia then get the fuck out of my country.

You're either with us, or you're with the enemy. Fucking scum.

Please post a quote of me siding with Russia or fuck off, POS.

 

[Lewdog]

Well if this is true, this evidence needs to be made available immediately before the Electoral College casts their votes.

How about if they show the evidence to Congress?

Who knows what they've shown to Congress already?

They haven't shown Congress anything.

How do you know? Are you a congressman that has sat in on the briefings?

So, all the Congressmen are lying?

Who said they were lying? Maybe they were told not to share the information until the CIA and other intelligence groups said they could? Do you have any understanding of how information within the intelligence agencies work?

 

[Weatherman2020]

If Hillary were honest and transparent there would have been nothing for Russia to expose.

 

[Dale Smith]

Are they actually going to go brief Congress or just keep illegally violating Congressional subpoenas?

Read the article, they have been giving briefs for months to Congress.

Not on the Russian situation. The last one was in OCTOBER, and the CIA just criminally violated a Congressional subpoena by being a 'No-Show'.

WRONG. Read the fucking links you lazy fucks.

"The CIA shared its latest assessment with key senators in a closed-door briefing on Capitol Hill about two weeks ago in which agency officials cited a growing body of intelligence from multiple sources. Specifically, CIA briefers told the senators it was now “quite clear” that electing Trump was one of Russia’s goals, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters."

The CIA aka "Crooks In Action"? The same group that has been training ISIS/ al qaeda? The same group that was behind the murder of JFK? The same group that was the OSS that brought in thousands of Nazis under "Operation PaperClip after WWII??? Thye same ones that use MK-Ultra trauma based mind control???? The ones that put in "Cointel-Pro" to infiltrate groups that were not "globalist friendly"???? The same ones that infiltrated the media under "Operation Mockingbird"???? The same group that has been flying opium into this country since the Korean War to fund their black ops? The same group that has orchestrated the overthrow of dozens of duly elected leaders that didn't play ball with their globalists because their country had resources that they coveted??? THAT group!!?!?!?!?!?!? Good call!!!!!

 

[Penelope]

Thank God if they did. They exposed the Democrats and all major affiliations as nasty and corrupt.

The Obama admin. was a failure, and they aimed to destroy our country, either intentionally or simply because they're evil, incompetent and/or putrid.

Lesson fucking learned, do shit the right way or expect to be exposed if you don't. Ever heard the term "don't do anything you'd undo if caught"? You figure the Democrats, and really the USA as a whole learned that lesson?

So if someone hacked your email and showed your wife you were cheating on her, you wouldn't be mad because you were in the wrong by cheating?

Been done, and happens all the time. What the issue is here is the democrat party is claiming that the soviet bear hacked the election. Not specifically what was hacked. The fact the information does not dismiss the information that was in the emails.

No not like this and we should not stand for it. the Issue is that it did hurt Clinton.

 

[Iceweasel]

Are they actually going to go brief Congress or just keep illegally violating Congressional subpoenas?

Read the article, they have been giving briefs for months to Congress.

Not on the Russian situation. The last one was in OCTOBER, and the CIA just criminally violated a Congressional subpoena by being a 'No-Show'.

WRONG. Read the fucking links you lazy fucks.

"The CIA shared its latest assessment with key senators in a closed-door briefing on Capitol Hill about two weeks ago in which agency officials cited a growing body of intelligence from multiple sources. Specifically, CIA briefers told the senators it was now “quite clear” that electing Trump was one of Russia’s goals, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters."

"“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message."

It's like global warming, a consensus isn't science. Or evidence.

 

[Lewdog]

Are they actually going to go brief Congress or just keep illegally violating Congressional subpoenas?

Read the article, they have been giving briefs for months to Congress.

No they haven't. If you've got proof, post it up.

Read the article...it says they have. Lindsey Graham said he's been getting information for months about his hack... fucking keep up and read the information provided to you. I'm not going to repost something just because you are too lazy to read the links.

I've got the asshole blocked so didn't see any link. I'm not going to think for you. What they have is politically motivated speculation, here's some research you should have done.


Intel analysis shows Putin approved election hacking
"We don't have Putin's fingerprints on anything or a piece of paper that shows he signed the order, but the nature of the operation was such that this had to be approved by top levels of the Russian government," a senior administration official with access to the intelligence on the hacking told CNN.

So you commented in a thread about information you didn't have. Congrats, that's the definition of ignorance.

 

[Penelope]

If Hillary were honest and transparent there would have been nothing for Russia to expose.

I wonder what is in your emails, I can only imagine Trumps emails by his tweets.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If this is true and I doubt it is, I am touched by Putin's help in saving us from democrats. Vladimir Putin cares more about the American people than our own politicians.

 

[Zander]

Are they actually going to go brief Congress or just keep illegally violating Congressional subpoenas?

Read the article, they have been giving briefs for months to Congress.

Not on the Russian situation. The last one was in OCTOBER, and the CIA just criminally violated a Congressional subpoena by being a 'No-Show'.

WRONG. Read the fucking links you lazy fucks.

"The CIA shared its latest assessment with key senators in a closed-door briefing on Capitol Hill about two weeks ago in which agency officials cited a growing body of intelligence from multiple sources. Specifically, CIA briefers told the senators it was now “quite clear” that electing Trump was one of Russia’s goals, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters."

So, we are supposed to believe the word of unnamed sources?

Unnamed sources have informed me that you are a gullible fool........

 

[SYTFE]

Read the actual article carefully. There is no proof of anything. Just the "word" of unnamed "U.S. officials"...

“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.

“The three of us also agree that our organizations, along with others, need to focus on completing the thorough review of this issue that has been directed by President Obama and which is being led by the DNI,” Brennan’s message read.

The CIA and FBI declined to comment.

​

Did he actually say this? Maybe. Nobody really knows. It's called "FAKE NEWS" for a reason.

You really are one dumb fucking idiot.

FBI agrees with CIA assessment that Russia wanted to help Trump win

I guess NBC is lying too? Moron.

 

[TheDude]

Let's be honest, the liberals are seriously butt-hurt by the election results. Liberals as a whole practice projection, blame and hypocrisy. As a result of this election and their poor dispositions, they'd blame the position of the moon if it meant denying what they've become, and their utter failure.

 

[Penelope]

Are they actually going to go brief Congress or just keep illegally violating Congressional subpoenas?

Read the article, they have been giving briefs for months to Congress.

Not on the Russian situation. The last one was in OCTOBER, and the CIA just criminally violated a Congressional subpoena by being a 'No-Show'.

WRONG. Read the fucking links you lazy fucks.

"The CIA shared its latest assessment with key senators in a closed-door briefing on Capitol Hill about two weeks ago in which agency officials cited a growing body of intelligence from multiple sources. Specifically, CIA briefers told the senators it was now “quite clear” that electing Trump was one of Russia’s goals, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters."

"“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message."

It's like global warming, a consensus isn't science. Or evidence.[/QUO

Are they actually going to go brief Congress or just keep illegally violating Congressional subpoenas?

Read the article, they have been giving briefs for months to Congress.

Not on the Russian situation. The last one was in OCTOBER, and the CIA just criminally violated a Congressional subpoena by being a 'No-Show'.

WRONG. Read the fucking links you lazy fucks.

"The CIA shared its latest assessment with key senators in a closed-door briefing on Capitol Hill about two weeks ago in which agency officials cited a growing body of intelligence from multiple sources. Specifically, CIA briefers told the senators it was now “quite clear” that electing Trump was one of Russia’s goals, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters."

"“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message."

It's like global warming, a consensus isn't science. Or evidence.

Global warming is a fact just like the DNC hack, denial never works.

 

[Lewdog]

Hmmm this is odd. Just not but a couple days ago Comey told Trump over the phone that there was no evidence of a Russian hack. I wonder what new information or what happened in the last couple of days.

Is that what Trump said or Comey?

Ed Klein: Comey Tells Trump Russians Didn't Influence the Election

 

[jc456]

Show the proof....we're waiting

As if they're going to reveal to the public every little detail of exactly how Russian operatives successfully hacked the DNC. Unless you're a member of congress, you won't be "shown" a goddamn thing. The world doesn't revolve around your childish whining to see the "proof" with your own eyes. Grow up.

so show the US Congress. why won't they? you have that answer?

 

[Weatherman2020]

If Hillary were honest and transparent there would have been nothing for Russia to expose.

I wonder what is in your emails, I can only imagine Trumps emails by his tweets.

Not my fault Hillary is corrupt and secretive.

 

[Dale Smith]

Game over, folks....the CIA claims that Russia stole the election from the Hildebeast........why would they lie when they have such a sterling record for truth telling? Trump should just concede right now and let the Hildebeast take office......she has a pedophile trafficking ring to oversee and Trump would only be in the way......