Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. I kind of look paste his posts as they are all over the place as if he was just trying to stoke division between both sides. Thanks for the tip though. I did find it and watched the Manchin video and, once again, I agree with him. We need to dump the extremes on both sides.Did you seen the Manchin thread posted by Basque at 1:32 PM?
I think he is going for threadpost count, but this one is about Manchin's opinion while overseas relating to first amendment and social media. Social media can be a pain in the ass, but I do not trust government to regulate it.No. I kind of look paste his posts as they are all over the place as if he was just trying to stoke division between both sides.
Yup. You can't throw mud at another person without getting some on yourself if you've the same thing. And no, it doesn't have to be exactly the same thing. The mere fact that he took the documents in the first place are the scandal now.Scandal?! Haha
There really is no way to police this stuff because any police would have to use their own values or interpret someone else's values to police with but that doesn't mean in government we can't find a way to ignore the extremes and govern with a consensus without having to be held hostage by the extreme factions. Government wasn't ever meant to be hijacked by just a handful of people.I think he is going for threadpost count, but this one is about Manchin's opinion while overseas relating to first amendment and social media. Social media can be a pain in the ass, but I do not trust government to regulate it.
Did you see the movie Absence Malice? Part of Wilford Brimley's scene on news media applies to social media.
"I think I know where we're headed here. Before we get there, I want to say something to you. You know and I know that we can't tell you what to print or what not to. We hope the press will act responsibly, but when you don't, there ain't a lot we can do about it." "And worse than that, by God it ain't right."
I am against socialism and wokeness. It needs to be destroyed at all possible costs. When democrats return to their pre-woke unsocialist behaviors, I could start voting for them again, such as Manchin. I'd be happy to vote for him. But, until that happens, even Trump is better than the woke socialists.
You should be used to this as it is exactly what you do.So, you lie when you say you are not partians.
Got it.
Thanks.
I am 100% against socialism and wokeness so, yes, I am not bipartisan when it comes to that. However, I will consider any and all moderates who actually have a chance of winning, no matter which side they are on. But, I'm not going to vote for someone who literally has no chance.So, you lie when you say you are not partians.
Got it.
Thanks.
I am 100% against socialism and wokeness so, yes, I am not bipartisan when it comes to that. However, I will consider any and all moderates who actually have a chance of winning, no matter which side they are on. But, I'm not going to vote for someone who literally has no chance.
You're just plain lying because my posts clearly say and have said that I have voted for many who weren't Republicans over many decades. In fact, I used to be a registered Democrat long ago. Do you think you win debates by out and out lying? If you can't be honest then that makes YOU the partisan.That is a lot of words to just say you are a loyal Republican voter. You could have saved yourself a lot of typing.
You're just plain lying because my posts clearly say and have said that I have voted for many who weren't Republicans over many decades. In fact, I used to be a registered Democrat long ago. Do you think you win debates by out and out lying? If you can't be honest then that makes YOU the partisan.
Nope congress has nothing to do with it, she automatically becomes President.I think the Dems knew this was going to come out during House hearings, so they decided to get in front of it and spin. Biden was never going to run in 2024 and was going to make Kamala the FBF President by resigning. Since a new VP must be approved by both Houses of Congress, it will have to be someone who would not run in 2024.
People who voted for Biden didn't know he was as demented as he is.I think he will run. I just hope we have choices and maybe not anointing due to position, and not just of some forgotten documents. I think the border and immigration reform are important enough for us as a country, to warrant other choices in that party, and yes, not to forget sheer age being a factor.
Why is that a scandal??Yup. You can't throw mud at another person without getting some on yourself if you've the same thing. And no, it doesn't have to be exactly the same thing. The mere fact that he took the documents in the first place are the scandal now.
That's the best part of this thread. LOL! Scandal! What a joke.Scandal?! Haha
The snowballs here couldn’t be any more comical. Such drama queensThat's the best part of this thread. LOL! Scandal! What a joke.
Basement Joe was never going to run for reelection.AND THERE IT IS.....
i don’t think he will resign…there is too much criminal liability if he does. At least as long as he is in office he’ll have to go through impeachment and removal first, which could delay things at leastNope congress has nothing to do with it, she automatically becomes President.
Does the vice president take over if the president resigns?
The 25th Amendment, Section 1, clarifies Article II, Section 1, Clause 6, by stating unequivocally that the vice president is the direct successor of the president, and becomes president if the incumbent dies, resigns or is removed from office.
What mud do you think I threw? Do you have an example?Yup. You can't throw mud at another person without getting some on yourself if you've the same thing. And no, it doesn't have to be exactly the same thing. The mere fact that he took the documents in the first place are the scandal now.
