DigitalDrifter
Diamond Member
He's already way too old to be in office now, and it's irresponsible of anyone to run for office that is 80+ fucking years old!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True, but the difference between mistakes and criminality lie within intent. Prime example was Hillary’s email server
You have a good point....and obviously it was much easier to prove intent with Clinton, then even Xiden....and far much easier then Trump.True, but the difference between mistakes and criminality lie within intent. Prime example was Hillary’s email server
Did you miss where other people are calling it that as well? It's a scandal whether you want it to be or not. You should educate the headline writers at NewsWeek, MSN and the NY Post, for example. You sound like the usual suspects who, when confronted with the reality that the economy had slipped into a recession, desperately scrambled to find a different definition of recession so they could avoid having to admit it had. Then, of course, they had to defend Quid Pro's strange pronouncement that there was no inflation in July. That was hilarious, watching them.Doesn’t seem like you know what the word scandal means. Add that to you list of words to look up along with insurrection.
Perhaps it is a scandal to the snowflakes out there. I guess you can call it that if that’s you
When it comes to classified information, intent doesn't provide a lot of protection, unless you're a high ranking democrat official, in which case it doesn't matter what excuse you give, it's accepted by the flock.True, but the difference between mistakes and criminality lie within intent. Prime example was Hillary’s email server
Or if he intentionally mishandled them or if it was a mistake a staffer made by moving the wrong box to the wrong place. That would be the primary question.Nope. Possession is one crime, which we already know Biden is guilty of. Intent needs to be proved by investigating what he planned to do with the stolen documents. If his intent was to sell them or use them for personal gain, those are other crimes.
Trumps intent were is outright lies when officials were asking for the documents back. World of difference from Biden who voluntarily gave them back after he found them.You have a good point....and obviously it was much easier to prove intent with Clinton, then even Xiden....and far much easier then Trump.
The raid came because trump lied. Mueller came because trump lied… Biden is president because trump lied. Are you seeing the trend?So to me the scandal lies in the fact that Garland and Xiden knew the Clinton standard, and still ordered the Stalinist raid
Hahahahaha. So you’re saying that things that appear in a news media headlines are automatically true?! You’re shitting me right?Did you miss where other people are calling it that as well? It's a scandal whether you want it to be or not. You should educate the headline writers at NewsWeek, MSN and the NY Post, for example. You sound like the usual suspects who, when confronted with the reality that the economy had slipped into a recession, desperately scrambled to find a different definition of recession so they could avoid having to admit it had. Then, of course, they had to defend Quid Pro's strange pronouncement that there was no inflation in July. That was hilarious, watching them.
Face it, this is a scandal. How big it is and how much impact it will have on Quid Pro going into retirement peacefully or kicking and screaming remains to be seen, but it's a scandal.
Thanks for sharing… it always goes back to the deep state conspiracies doesn’t it??When it comes to classified information, intent doesn't provide a lot of protection, unless you're a high ranking democrat official, in which case it doesn't matter what excuse you give, it's accepted by the flock.
Well, let's recap. You said,Hahahahaha. So you’re saying that things that appear in a news media headlines are automatically true?! You’re shitting me right?
You brought it up, I didn't. I just noted the truth, there are no consequences for high-ranking democrats who get caught with classified documents.Thanks for sharing… it always goes back to the deep state conspiracies doesn’t it??
No he didn't...he literally handed over 15 boxes, and gave them access to the guarded compound. Xiden literally had a hired lawyer go in and try to move the TOP SECRET docs out of a file he labeled "personal" not expecting the lawyer would rat him out....and have them moved to his garage or home with all the other stuff he'd been hiding for over half a decade.Trumps intent were is outright lies when officials were asking for the documents back. World of difference from Biden who voluntarily gave them back after he found them.
Biden didn’t get caught lying or hiding… Trump did. That’s the difference
That dembots believe their lying propagandist? The raid came because Xiden is a Stalinist, Mueller was appointed because of the BIG LIE, the Russian hoax, that was started by Demafascist, and Xiden's president because of lies from the propagandist and fear mongering over the Chinese Virus.The raid came because trump lied. Mueller came because trump lied… Biden is president because trump lied. Are you seeing the trend?
Really. Ever heard of General Petreous ?You brought it up, I didn't. I just noted the truth, there are no consequences for high-ranking democrats who get caught with classified documents.
I don’t believe youThat dembots believe their lying propagandist? The raid came because Xiden is a Stalinist, Mueller was appointed because of the BIG LIE, the Russian hoax, that was started by Demafascist, and Xiden's president because of lies from the propagandist and fear mongering over the Chinese Virus.
of courseI don’t believe you
Sure have.Really. Ever heard of General Petreous ?