Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How could Trump tower be "under surveillance" if it wasn't wiretapped?I gave you the facts that Nunes stated. I'll even repeat them.Apparently not, dickhead.All anyone has at this point is opinions. Don't be such a fucking tardThe national review can go suck a root. This is purely opinion, not fact. Nobody gives a horses ass what liberal journalists think anyway.Trump’s Wiretap Allegation Was a Self-Inflicted WoundWiretapped.
But surveillance was done.
Nunes has more than an opinion, fucknuts.
The Surveillance was legal.
The unmasking of names was not.
Trump Tower was not wiretapped.
ROFL! There's plenty of evidence. Who would be doing it if not Obama's handpicked stooges?
However, only retards think that's what "wiretapped" means when referring to surveillance by intelligence agencies.Is your definition of 'wiretapped' hooking into a copper telephone wire? If so, I think the veracity of your assertion may be valid in this case.
And we see the Clintons and Obama gutting our defense and shutting down manned space missions at NASA.
It could have been just his cellphone while they were in Trump Towers.Actually he said he had been wiretapped by Obama. Could have been his servers. Could have been his phones. That's what they're in the process of finding out.Trump said his phones in Trump Towers were wiretapped by Obama.
You're nuts to think he was right.
It could have only been his phones, since Trumps server, actually just being used by Trump, wasn't located in Trump Tower.
This is how dishonest liberal assholes on this forum hide from the truth. Even if they are 100% wrong and all the facts spelled out in detail, they'll still look for a way to deny it. Wiretapping is that way for now.
"Trump insiders" were working for intelligence agencies before he was inaugurated? How would that work?ROFL! There's plenty of evidence. Who would be doing it if not Obama's handpicked stooges?
Trump insiders who don't like what Trump is doing, or how he's doing it.
How could Trump tower be "under surveillance" if it wasn't wiretapped? .
I REALLY 'need' you to provide the links and evidence to support your claim that Trump's team is 100% proven 'Russian Operatives'.Trump has surrounded himself with Russian operatives. ...How many dots do you need?
Is your definition of 'wiretapped' hooking into a copper telephone wire? If so, I think the veracity of your assertion may be valid in this case.
"Obama tapped my wires"
That's pretty self explanatory.
Are you saying '911' can also be used to call the Russians? ;pHow do the police get a recording of the people who dial 911?
I guess we'll all be tuning in to here Nunes later today...
"Trump insiders" were working for intelligence agencies before he was inaugurated? How would that work?
Since he exposed improper / illegal activity by Obama and / or his holdovers, he MUST be, right?!Nunes is nothing but a surrogate of Trump.
When did anyone on Trump's team dial 911? What possible excuse was there for recording their phone calls?How could Trump tower be "under surveillance" if it wasn't wiretapped? .
How do the police get a recording of the people who dial 911?
Obviously your phone must be tapped? Right?
Are you saying '911' can also be used to call the Russians? ;pHow do the police get a recording of the people who dial 911?
Only evidence produced by leftwing sources that incriminates Republicans is credible.Since he exposed improper / illegal activity by Obama and / or his holdovers, he MUST be, right?!Nunes is nothing but a surrogate of Trump.
View attachment 118390
I was actually making a joke with my comment, but great answer!...If the 911 operator calls up the Russian embassy, YES. And they'll be picked up by the FISA approved warrant
When did anyone on Trump's team dial 911? What possible excuse was there for recording their phone calls?
You have a disability that precludes you from performing simple logic.Trumpsplainin'.Is your definition of 'wiretapped' hooking into a copper telephone wire? If so, I think the veracity of your assertion may be valid in this case.
"Obama tapped my wires"
That's pretty self explanatory.
In the strict denotative meaning I believe that you may be correct, not in the connotative meaning though...
You can't infer more than what he said unless you're asserting that Trump has some sort of disability that makes it difficult for him to express himself clearly.
LOLOLWhat are you talking about? It has already been established that the Intel leaks to the press ARE ILLEGAL. that is not even in questions. Comey was just asked if the leaks to the press are considered 'Espionage', which he answered 'YES'I knew you couldn't quote either of them saying a crime "was" committed. Thanks for proving you are batshit insane, just as I said.
ILLEGAL:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/...s-to-news-media-in-a-twitter-flurry.html?_r=0
ILLEGAL:
Leaking Flynn's name to the press was illegal, but utterly justified
ILLEGAL:
Gregg Jarrett: The leak of Flynn's conversations is a crime
Nice try to spin, but FAIL!
You're as fucking insane as the come.
You said, the heads of the FBI and NSA (Comey and Rogers) have said Obama or his people committed espionage....
I challenge you to quote them since neither of them actually said that...
You then cheer for yourself as you post three links, supposedly as evidence of your delusions.
But do any of your links contain quotes by either Comey or Rogers claiming Obama or his people committed a crime?
of course not.
Your first link is Trump claiming a crime was committed.
Your second link is an op/ed from Maclellan and Palamar and doesn't even say Obama or his people were the leakers.
Your third link is again the opinion of Trump.
You lose because you're a natural born loser.
In order to continue to deny that Obama and his cronies did not break the law you are having to do some un-paralleled spinning of epic proportions.
CNN has already reported Obama broke the law. Criminal Activity Established.
-- Once the NSA / FBI said there was no crime / no foreign intel value in their collections the personal info collected should have been immediately destroyed as it was PROTECTED CLASSIFIED information. it was not. Instead it was used to facilitate illegal leaks for political gain.
It has already been declared that providing the 16 Intel agencies with protected, secret personal information on Americans that did not consist of any foreign Intel value was a CRIME. Criminal Activity Established.
The leaks of the personal information has already been considered illegal - criminal activity established.
NONE of this is up for debate - it has been proven.
Comey was asked if the leaks to the press - already proven to have been perpetrated by Obama holdovers, consisting of the illegally obtained/kept and disseminated info from Obama - constituted Felony Acts of Espionage: Comey declared YES!
Only a snowflake could could continue to argue that no criminal activity has been perpetrated by the leakers, which was illegally facilitated by Obama in his last days as President.
Only a snowflake could argue that a President and his administration that has already illegally spied on Americans, illegally spied on reporters, illegally spied on the media, illegally spied on Congress, and lied about it under oath did NOT engage in illegal activity in this case when the fact that information illegally obtained/kept was illegally shared and illegally released to the press.
Dude, you have no more credibility on the subject, and dealing with your spinning and rants is pointless as you are obviously delusional / dain bramaged. Consider yourself ignored at this point.
