BREAKING: Last year Hillary Clinton quietly settled a campaign finance violation over reporting the *Steele Dossier* funding as legal services

[Dragonlady]

No because a judge dismissed the case on new findings

No they did not. There was no new evidence. Trump pardoned Flynn. A pardon is an admission of guilt.

 

[meaner gene]

Flynn Charges Dismissed By Federal Appeals Court

The decision was handed down about two months after the Department of Justice asked for the case to be dropped.

www.forbes.com

Your citation was from 6/24/20

Read what happened 2 months later (and final ruling)

Appeals court deals setback to Flynn’s attempt to end DOJ case against him

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals voted 8-2 to reject Flynn's effort to dismiss the case immediately.

www.politico.com

A federal appeals court has dealt a setback to Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump‘s first national security adviser, ruling that a District Court judge can proceed with a planned hearing on the Justice Department’s attempt to abandon the criminal false-statement case against Flynn.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, voted 8-2 to reject Flynn’s effort to dismiss the case immediately. The court’s ruling Monday also rejected efforts by Flynn to remove District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan from the case over allegations of bias.

The new decision effectively overturns a June ruling from a divided three-judge panel, who backed Flynn’s attempt to force an end to the prosecution.

 

[meaner gene]

No they did not. There was no new evidence. Trump pardoned Flynn. A pardon is an admission of guilt.

That's what finally ended the case.

Dec. 8, 2020. WASHINGTON — President Trump pardoned on Wednesday his former national security adviser Michael T. Flynn

 

[Fueri]

Correct! What Hillary and the DNC did was far worse.

Far worse. They funded that phony dossier, then more dems, including John Podesta, that hag's campaign manager, went on to create "The Alliance for Securing Democracy", which still claims to be unbiased (LOL), and concocted a list of Russian bots out of people that were simply conservatives and pushed the "Russian bots" and misinformation narrative, on Twitter and elsewhere, and telling Twitter that conservatives were Russian bots.

They concocted it to try to win the election, then created an organization to continue to falsely push that narrative to undermine him and to silence opponents.

And millions of rubes bought it.

 

[excalibur]

A pardon is an admission of guilt.

Not.

Although the Supreme Court's opinion stated that a pardon carries "an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it," this was part of the Court's dictum for the case. Whether the acceptance of a pardon constitutes an admission of guilt by the recipent is disputed.​

​

And.​

​

In Lorance v. Commandant, USDB (2021) the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that "there is no confession and Lorance does not otherwise lose his right to petition for habeas corpus relief for his court-martial conviction and sentence. The case was remanded for further action not inconsistent with the court’s opinion."​

​

Primary Holding

The Court concluded appellant's acceptance of a presidential pardon did not have the legal effect of a confession of guilt and did not constitute a waiver of his habeas rights.​

​

 

[Nostra]

What do you think Flynn, Manafort, and Gates were convicted of, Simp?

Not a thing to do with Russia collusion, Moron.

You have to be the dumbest person on this planet.

Dragonlady

 

[Nostra]

Michael Flynn

What about him, Dumbass?

 

[meaner gene]

Not.

Although the Supreme Court's opinion stated that a pardon carries "an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it," this was part of the Court's dictum for the case. Whether the acceptance of a pardon constitutes an admission of guilt by the recipent is disputed.​

​

And.​

​

In Lorance v. Commandant, USDB (2021) the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that "there is no confession and Lorance does not otherwise lose his right to petition for habeas corpus relief for his court-martial conviction and sentence. The case was remanded for further action not inconsistent with the court’s opinion."​

​

Primary Holding

The Court concluded appellant's acceptance of a presidential pardon did not have the legal effect of a confession of guilt and did not constitute a waiver of his habeas rights.​

​

A pardon is a document that has to be executed by the recipient. And is at their option. If they are innocent, they can lay the pardon aside, and exercise their legal rights to prove their innocence.
Otherwise, they could effectively admit their guilt by forgoing their right to prove their innocence by exercising the pardon, by delivering it to the court of jurisdiction.

 

[easyt65]

Look what's been uncovered. Can you say hypocrisy!!! MAGA Macho Man has the receipts!

She paid a fine and was never arrested.

You would really have something here if it wasn't for the criminal Democrats' corrupt 3rd world 2-tiered Justice System.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Nothing remotely similar in the two cases.

Of course it's different because Trump and Russia and Jan. 6 and MAGA, and TRUUUUUUUMP !!!

 

[meaner gene]

Of course it's different because Trump and Russia and Jan. 6 and MAGA, and TRUUUUUUUMP !!!

Actually the difference is that in the Clinton case they laid all their records open for public scrutiny, where every last detail could be checked, double checked, and triple checked. And that's when an error in expense category was found.

Trumps finances were in his taxes, which he fought for years and years to keep secret, knowing his deliberate falsifications.

 

[westwall]

Nothing remotely similar in the two cases.

It's actually worse in the shrilarys case, she hired foreign agents to do her dirty work.

 

[westwall]

Actually the difference is that in the Clinton case they laid all their records open for public scrutiny, where every last detail could be checked, double checked, and triple checked. And that's when an error in expense category was found.

Trumps finances were in his taxes, which he fought for years and years to keep secret, knowing his deliberate falsifications.

What a contemptible lie.

You fuckers are despicable.

 

[meaner gene]

What a contemptible lie.

You fuckers are despicable.

Realy? Then why did Trump take it all the way to the Supreme Court to keep people from looking at his taxes. And when he lost and his taxes were looked at, the first thing they found were falsifications. Which were repeated in his business records.

 

[westwall]

Realy? Then why did Trump take it all the way to the Supreme Court to keep people from looking at his taxes. And when he lost and his taxes were looked at, the first thing they found were falsifications. Which were repeated in his business records.

Because it's none of their business. The shrilary used a foreign agent (which is a FELONY) to generate her fake dossier.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Your citation was from 6/24/20

Read what happened 2 months later (and final ruling)

Appeals court deals setback to Flynn’s attempt to end DOJ case against him

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals voted 8-2 to reject Flynn's effort to dismiss the case immediately.

www.politico.com

A federal appeals court has dealt a setback to Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump‘s first national security adviser, ruling that a District Court judge can proceed with a planned hearing on the Justice Department’s attempt to abandon the criminal false-statement case against Flynn.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, voted 8-2 to reject Flynn’s effort to dismiss the case immediately. The court’s ruling Monday also rejected efforts by Flynn to remove District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan from the case over allegations of bias.

The new decision effectively overturns a June ruling from a divided three-judge panel, who backed Flynn’s attempt to force an end to the prosecution.

Judge dismissed the case. The end

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Because it's none of their business. The shrilary used a foreign agent (which is a FELONY) to generate her fake dossier.

Now stop it with the facts the lemming will get triggered

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Because Trump pardoned him.

You can't be pardon if the judges dismissed the case

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Actually the difference is that in the Clinton case they laid all their records open for public scrutiny, where every last detail could be checked, double checked, and triple checked. And that's when an error in expense category was found.

Trumps finances were in his taxes, which he fought for years and years to keep secret, knowing his deliberate falsifications.

Sure they did the Clinton's have always been honest. I'm no Trump fan ,but you people will crawl across broken glass on fire to support Democratic party politicians. It's pathological and terrifying.

 

[Faun]

You can't be pardon if the judges dismissed the case
View attachment 767498

Imbecile, Flynn was pardoned. The pardon came before the judge dismissed the case.