BREAKING: Last year Hillary Clinton quietly settled a campaign finance violation over reporting the *Steele Dossier* funding as legal services

Is there a difference in reporting opposition research as legal fee and paying off the Hooker you boinked to be quite about it and classifying that a opposition research.

Guess not in the Neo-GOP land. The Dirty Don could murder somebody on 5th Avenue and the Neo-Bunch would complain if he got indicted for a crime.
He never classified it as opposition research.

I am amazed how people can give a pass to those they like and refuse to give a pass to those the dont.

But hey....if you are happy about NYS spending taxpayer money for a political witch hunt, then you are a [pathetic individual.
 
Oh lord...8th thread on this topic.

Opposition research is what all campaigns do; Using campaign funds for it, negative TV ads, etc... is campaigning 101. Using the money to pay hush money to a porn star is in no way the same thing.
But it isnt illegal.

People agree to non disclsure agreements all the time. They are legal.

Unless, of course, someone looks for a loophole...and apparently that is what Bragg is working on.
 
He never classified it as opposition research.

I am amazed how people can give a pass to those they like and refuse to give a pass to those the dont.

But hey....if you are happy about NYS spending taxpayer money for a political witch hunt, then you are a [pathetic individual.
Fuck, my bad, legal fees.......Trump classified paying his whore as legal fees.......

Hey if you support a criminal POS like the Trumpybear, you and your entire party are pathetic.
 
Thanks for finally admitting she didn't hire a British agent.


You are a true brainless retard. She used the law firm as a "cut out". Look up the term you twat.
 
Nothing remotely similar in the two cases.
Sure there is. Campaign finance law violations are campaign finance law violations. Just because one might be a porn star payoff and another something different, they are both campaign finance law violations. But, we do have a precedent where John Edwards was playing loose with campaign finance law violations regarding payments to women, the DOJ themselves decided not to pursue the case. So, makes me wonder why the state of New York thinks they can arrest someone for something the DOJ had previously decided to let go when it was a Democrat.
 
Yeah, she paid a U.S. firm. That's why she was never charged with a crime for hiring a foreign national.

Sucks to be you.


No, she wasn't charged because the legal system is corrupt as hell.

The time is approaching very fast where everyone is going to ignore the laws of this land.

That's what happens when corruption is this pervasive.
 
No, she wasn't charged because the legal system is corrupt as hell.

The time is approaching very fast where everyone is going to ignore the laws of this land.

That's what happens when corruption is this pervasive.

:itsok:
 
You should save that for you, dumbass. You are the ones who're going to suffer the most.

rotfl-gif.288736
 
You can't be pardon if the judges dismissed the case
View attachment 767498
Judge dismissed the case on December 8, 2020. Trump granted him a pardon on November 25, 2020.


Judge dismisses Flynn case AFTER presidential pardon. Ready to admit you were wrong? I doubt it.
 
Judge dismissed the case on December 8, 2020. Trump granted him a pardon on November 25, 2020.


Judge dismisses Flynn case AFTER presidential pardon. Ready to admit you were wrong? I doubt it.

You're saying that to an abject imbecile. He still won't get it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top