bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,164
- 47,312
A senior senator having OPEN conversations with an ambassador == nothing wrong. What's wrong with YOU where it think THAT is a conflict of interest?
So, you don't mind that he lied to Congress about it?
He did not intentionally misrepresent the facts. He was asked about "collusion between the CAMPAIGN and the Russians" There was no "collusion" that he was aware of. And any "contact" he might have had -- was NO SECRET and NOT collusion.
He should UNrecuse himself and let the War begin... Like the Dems would do if they were in this position of being hounded on innuendo and stuff that "Lahkota doesn't know"..
During Watergate, Republicans were on the right side of history.
There is no side to be on here. And the history being made is the DEMISE of both corrupt party dynasties.
I'm on the KILL the GOP/DNC side.. That's what side I'm taking. Because they are killing my country with their power tripping and incompetency.
It's my country too - and I'm on the Democratic side. I used to vote mostly Republican - until the GOP became pure evil.
Sure you did. A guy who would defend Pol Pot voting Republican? Yeah, that happens every day.