BREAKING: Trump fires Comey....YOU'RE FIRED!

[Ame®icano]

Sally Yates wasn't using the executive order to base her judgment from. She was using liberal talking-points that weren't in writing to resist the lawful order of the President. By law the president has the right to decide who can enter the US thru the Health And Human Services Dept and Homeland Security.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Well I guess you don't know what the Ass Clown did. Right now the 2.0 version is under review by 12 Federal District court judges in the 4th district court--and just the other day--Sean Spicer was made aware that Trump still had on his campaign web-site, during the daily White House briefing--the campaign promise of a Muslim travel ban--(after all Judges had seen it .) So it was brought up in court by these judges and now the DOJ is having to defend this executive order with the Pretence that Trump's 2.0 version of the travel ban- is really a travel ban and not a Muslim ban. I doubt they're going to go for that one--LOL The Muslim ban was erased from Trump's website just this Monday--05/07/2017.

"Washington (CNN)A press release touting Donald Trump's controversial plan to ban all Muslim travel into the United States was removed from his campaign website Monday, shortly after White House press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters that he was unaware that the plan was still online."
Trump campaign removes Muslim ban language from website - CNNPolitics.com

For a more detailed explanation of why it was struck down the 1st time, and most likely to be struck down again:
Trump’s Executive Order Is an Unconstitutional Attack on Muslims. It Must Be Struck Down In Its Entirety.

Sally Yates stuffed a rag in Ted Cruz's mouth and ran over him with a steam roller regarding this.

Furthermore Trump is firing anyone--Like Sally Yates and FBI Director James Comey whom have intimate knowlege of this Russian investigation--just like Richard Nixon did.

The travel ban was a legal document. Only it's contents can be used to consider what it can be judged on. Trump never said all Muslims were banned from entering the US. Feel free to post specifically any "THIS IS A MUSLIM TRAVEL BAN" verbage you can find in the Executive Order.

The law says a person can not be discriminated against based on their country of origin. She schooled Ted Cruz on this and I already told you this. Did you have a selective ability of reasoning?

Actually Cuba was under a travel ban for decades. You can ban anyone if their country of origin meets specific critieria.

but you can not target them by religion.

EO did not target anyone by the religion.

 

[Aries]

Yates position put her as the top lawyer for the FED. Her job is not to blindly cosign what trump does and says out of fear of "betraying him." She felt that the order was unlawful (rightfully so) then it would have been NOT doing her job to defend it.

Sally Yates wasn't using the executive order to base her judgment from. She was using liberal talking-points that weren't in writing to resist the lawful order of the President. By law the president has the right to decide who can enter the US thru the Health And Human Services Dept and Homeland Security.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

courts take intent into account. Are you accusing our court systems of being strictly "liberal"?

Intent?????

This not a discussion about Hillary and her emails. This is a discussion of presidential powers to refuse entry to alien immigrants.

Well when you keep a campaign promise of banning Muslims into this country on your campaign website-which was just erased on 05/07/2017 (after all judges have seen it) then you campaign on a Muslim ban--and then Rudi Guiliani who helped write this executive order--then gets on FOX NEWS and calls it a Muslim ban the Judges will not believe it's a travel ban--but a MUSLIM ban, and THAT violates the Establishment Clause in the U.S. Constitution--

Really reading has never killed anyone yet.
www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/trump_s_executive_order_is_an_unconstitutional_attack_on_muslims.html

It was a G.W. Bush appointee that struck it down the first time.
Who Is Judge James L. Robart And Why Did He Block Trump's Immigration Order?

When you elect a clown--you can expect the circus to come along.

It should be noted that the same type of liberals who fought to strike down the travel ban who defend Sanctuary Cities that protect violent illegals and who refuse to deport and protect criminal illegals who are continually released from jail only to later kill Americans (drunk driving, murder, etc...). The lives of illegals and potential terrorists are more important to them than the lives of Americans. Obama proved that when he mocked Americans for their concern over the 'immigrants' / 'refugees' Obama was letting in the country...only to have one of the terrorists he gave a visa to kill 7 Americans in Ca not long after.

It should be noted that the same republicans crying to ban muslims also say they "love our constitution."
It is the same republicans that say "don't play the race card" that also say "mexicans are rapists and dangerous"
It is the same republicans that continually bash illegal immigrants that voted in a First lady who came here on a visiting visa that did not permit her to work, broke our laws and worked anyways, and illegally collected +30k in untaxed dollars.

 

[Aries]

Well I guess you don't know what the Ass Clown did. Right now the 2.0 version is under review by 12 Federal District court judges in the 4th district court--and just the other day--Sean Spicer was made aware that Trump still had on his campaign web-site, during the daily White House briefing--the campaign promise of a Muslim travel ban--(after all Judges had seen it .) So it was brought up in court by these judges and now the DOJ is having to defend this executive order with the Pretence that Trump's 2.0 version of the travel ban- is really a travel ban and not a Muslim ban. I doubt they're going to go for that one--LOL The Muslim ban was erased from Trump's website just this Monday--05/07/2017.

"Washington (CNN)A press release touting Donald Trump's controversial plan to ban all Muslim travel into the United States was removed from his campaign website Monday, shortly after White House press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters that he was unaware that the plan was still online."
Trump campaign removes Muslim ban language from website - CNNPolitics.com

For a more detailed explanation of why it was struck down the 1st time, and most likely to be struck down again:
Trump’s Executive Order Is an Unconstitutional Attack on Muslims. It Must Be Struck Down In Its Entirety.

Sally Yates stuffed a rag in Ted Cruz's mouth and ran over him with a steam roller regarding this.

Furthermore Trump is firing anyone--Like Sally Yates and FBI Director James Comey whom have intimate knowlege of this Russian investigation--just like Richard Nixon did.

The travel ban was a legal document. Only it's contents can be used to consider what it can be judged on. Trump never said all Muslims were banned from entering the US. Feel free to post specifically any "THIS IS A MUSLIM TRAVEL BAN" verbage you can find in the Executive Order.

The law says a person can not be discriminated against based on their country of origin. She schooled Ted Cruz on this and I already told you this. Did you have a selective ability of reasoning?

Actually Cuba was under a travel ban for decades. You can ban anyone if their country of origin meets specific critieria.

but you can not target them by religion.

EO did not target anyone by the religion.

Intent did. Trump gave plenty of material bragging all campaign about "banning muslims."
Not sure if you're new to the country but the justice system takes intent into consideration.

 

[mudwhistle]

Sally Yates wasn't using the executive order to base her judgment from. She was using liberal talking-points that weren't in writing to resist the lawful order of the President. By law the president has the right to decide who can enter the US thru the Health And Human Services Dept and Homeland Security.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Well I guess you don't know what the Ass Clown did. Right now the 2.0 version is under review by 12 Federal District court judges in the 4th district court--and just the other day--Sean Spicer was made aware that Trump still had on his campaign web-site, during the daily White House briefing--the campaign promise of a Muslim travel ban--(after all Judges had seen it .) So it was brought up in court by these judges and now the DOJ is having to defend this executive order with the Pretence that Trump's 2.0 version of the travel ban- is really a travel ban and not a Muslim ban. I doubt they're going to go for that one--LOL The Muslim ban was erased from Trump's website just this Monday--05/07/2017.

"Washington (CNN)A press release touting Donald Trump's controversial plan to ban all Muslim travel into the United States was removed from his campaign website Monday, shortly after White House press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters that he was unaware that the plan was still online."
Trump campaign removes Muslim ban language from website - CNNPolitics.com

For a more detailed explanation of why it was struck down the 1st time, and most likely to be struck down again:
Trump’s Executive Order Is an Unconstitutional Attack on Muslims. It Must Be Struck Down In Its Entirety.

Sally Yates stuffed a rag in Ted Cruz's mouth and ran over him with a steam roller regarding this.

Furthermore Trump is firing anyone--Like Sally Yates and FBI Director James Comey whom have intimate knowlege of this Russian investigation--just like Richard Nixon did.

The travel ban was a legal document. Only it's contents can be used to consider what it can be judged on. Trump never said all Muslims were banned from entering the US. Feel free to post specifically any "THIS IS A MUSLIM TRAVEL BAN" verbage you can find in the Executive Order.

The law says a person can not be discriminated against based on their country of origin. She schooled Ted Cruz on this and I already told you this. Did you have a selective ability of reasoning?

Actually Cuba was under a travel ban for decades. You can ban anyone if their country of origin meets specific critieria.

That's an embargo... and people could come here from Cuba, but American citizens were not supposed to travel to Cuba.

It is a trade embargo which deals with trade goods and doing business in Cuba which is still in effect.

There was also a travel ban in place.

 

[Aries]

Yates position put her as the top lawyer for the FED. Her job is not to blindly cosign what trump does and says out of fear of "betraying him." She felt that the order was unlawful (rightfully so) then it would have been NOT doing her job to defend it.

Sally Yates wasn't using the executive order to base her judgment from. She was using liberal talking-points that weren't in writing to resist the lawful order of the President. By law the president has the right to decide who can enter the US thru the Health And Human Services Dept and Homeland Security.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Well I guess you don't know what the Ass Clown did. Right now the 2.0 version is under review by 12 Federal District court judges in the 4th district court--and just the other day--Sean Spicer was made aware that Trump still had on his campaign web-site, during the daily White House briefing--the campaign promise of a Muslim travel ban--(after all Judges had seen it .) So it was brought up in court by these judges and now the DOJ is having to defend this executive order with the Pretence that Trump's 2.0 version of the travel ban- is really a travel ban and not a Muslim ban. I doubt they're going to go for that one--LOL The Muslim ban was erased from Trump's website just this Monday--05/07/2017.

"Washington (CNN)A press release touting Donald Trump's controversial plan to ban all Muslim travel into the United States was removed from his campaign website Monday, shortly after White House press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters that he was unaware that the plan was still online."
Trump campaign removes Muslim ban language from website - CNNPolitics.com

For a more detailed explanation of why it was struck down the 1st time, and most likely to be struck down again:
Trump’s Executive Order Is an Unconstitutional Attack on Muslims. It Must Be Struck Down In Its Entirety.

Sally Yates stuffed a rag in Ted Cruz's mouth and ran over him with a steam roller regarding this.

Furthermore Trump is firing anyone--Like Sally Yates and FBI Director James Comey whom have intimate knowlege of this Russian investigation--just like Richard Nixon did.

The travel ban was a legal document. Only it's contents can be used to consider what it can be judged on. Trump never said all Muslims were banned from entering the US. Feel free to post specifically any "THIS IS A MUSLIM TRAVEL BAN" verbage you can find in the Executive Order.

The law says a person can not be discriminated against based on their country of origin. She schooled Ted Cruz on this and I already told you this. Did you have a selective ability of reasoning?

This is the part where you cite the law or provide the link to it, since your interpretation of the law cannot be trusted.

We’ll See You in Court: Why Trump’s Executive Order on Refugees Violates the Establishment Clause

 

[mudwhistle]

The travel ban was a legal document. Only it's contents can be used to consider what it can be judged on. Trump never said all Muslims were banned from entering the US. Feel free to post specifically any "THIS IS A MUSLIM TRAVEL BAN" verbage you can find in the Executive Order.

The law says a person can not be discriminated against based on their country of origin. She schooled Ted Cruz on this and I already told you this. Did you have a selective ability of reasoning?

Actually Cuba was under a travel ban for decades. You can ban anyone if their country of origin meets specific critieria.

but you can not target them by religion.

EO did not target anyone by the religion.

Intent did. Trump gave plenty of material bragging all campaign about "banning muslims."
Not sure if you're new to the country but the justice system takes intent into consideration.

Actually I've had a couple of years of Paralegal training. Intent is a consideration in criminal law. What does this have to do with Trump being on trial for a crime?

 

[Ame®icano]

The travel ban was a legal document. Only it's contents can be used to consider what it can be judged on. Trump never said all Muslims were banned from entering the US. Feel free to post specifically any "THIS IS A MUSLIM TRAVEL BAN" verbage you can find in the Executive Order.

The law says a person can not be discriminated against based on their country of origin. She schooled Ted Cruz on this and I already told you this. Did you have a selective ability of reasoning?

Actually Cuba was under a travel ban for decades. You can ban anyone if their country of origin meets specific critieria.

but you can not target them by religion.

EO did not target anyone by the religion.

Intent did. Trump gave plenty of material bragging all campaign about "banning muslims."
Not sure if you're new to the country but the justice system takes intent into consideration.

Intent was to ban radical Muslims from countries prone to terrorism. The same EO with the same intent that Barry issued earlier. If what you say is truth, and it's not, EO would ban every Muslim from every Muslim country.

 

[WEATHER53]

Intent
I did not intend to burn you house down, I did not do it on purpose, I was negligent but not reckless so in lib reality I did Not burn your house down

 

[Aries]

The law says a person can not be discriminated against based on their country of origin. She schooled Ted Cruz on this and I already told you this. Did you have a selective ability of reasoning?

Actually Cuba was under a travel ban for decades. You can ban anyone if their country of origin meets specific critieria.

but you can not target them by religion.

EO did not target anyone by the religion.

Intent did. Trump gave plenty of material bragging all campaign about "banning muslims."
Not sure if you're new to the country but the justice system takes intent into consideration.

Actually I've had a couple of years of Paralegal training. Intent is a consideration in criminal law. What does this have to do with Trump being on trial for a crime?

not very good at your job? How would verbal admission of intent not matter here?
He confessed his purpose was not to protect americans but to stop ban muslims from entering.
Just like he confessed to sexual assault.
When will trump be held accountable for his actions and words? Never?
Obviously intent is covered here too because that's why both muslim bans were blocked.

 

[easyt65]

It should be noted that the same republicans crying to ban muslims also say they "love our constitution."
It is the same republicans that say "don't play the race card" that also say "mexicans are rapists and dangerous"
It is the same republicans that continually bash illegal immigrants that voted in a First lady who came here on a visiting visa that did not permit her to work, broke our laws and worked anyways, and illegally collected +30k in untaxed dollars.

'Race card'? No one has said all Muslims are terrorists. Barak Obama himself, though, pointed out that these countries were the most dangerous / threatening to the US because the majority of the countries as a whole consisted of terrorists / US-hating people. He also admitted - and demonstrated when a terrorist to whom he gave a visa later killed 7 Americans in Ca - his vetting process of people from these countries did not fully work, that continuing to bring them in would pose a threat to US citizens. Obama's own Intel agencies warned that ISIS had - DID - already infiltrated the ranks of refugees.

Now snowflakes want to wrap themselves in the Constitution and attack Trump for doing something about the dangers to US citizens that Obama initially pointed out while placing those countries on his 'list'. Funny...

 

[mudwhistle]

Sally Yates wasn't using the executive order to base her judgment from. She was using liberal talking-points that weren't in writing to resist the lawful order of the President. By law the president has the right to decide who can enter the US thru the Health And Human Services Dept and Homeland Security.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Well I guess you don't know what the Ass Clown did. Right now the 2.0 version is under review by 12 Federal District court judges in the 4th district court--and just the other day--Sean Spicer was made aware that Trump still had on his campaign web-site, during the daily White House briefing--the campaign promise of a Muslim travel ban--(after all Judges had seen it .) So it was brought up in court by these judges and now the DOJ is having to defend this executive order with the Pretence that Trump's 2.0 version of the travel ban- is really a travel ban and not a Muslim ban. I doubt they're going to go for that one--LOL The Muslim ban was erased from Trump's website just this Monday--05/07/2017.

"Washington (CNN)A press release touting Donald Trump's controversial plan to ban all Muslim travel into the United States was removed from his campaign website Monday, shortly after White House press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters that he was unaware that the plan was still online."
Trump campaign removes Muslim ban language from website - CNNPolitics.com

For a more detailed explanation of why it was struck down the 1st time, and most likely to be struck down again:
Trump’s Executive Order Is an Unconstitutional Attack on Muslims. It Must Be Struck Down In Its Entirety.

Sally Yates stuffed a rag in Ted Cruz's mouth and ran over him with a steam roller regarding this.

Furthermore Trump is firing anyone--Like Sally Yates and FBI Director James Comey whom have intimate knowlege of this Russian investigation--just like Richard Nixon did.

The travel ban was a legal document. Only it's contents can be used to consider what it can be judged on. Trump never said all Muslims were banned from entering the US. Feel free to post specifically any "THIS IS A MUSLIM TRAVEL BAN" verbage you can find in the Executive Order.

The law says a person can not be discriminated against based on their country of origin. She schooled Ted Cruz on this and I already told you this. Did you have a selective ability of reasoning?

This is the part where you cite the law or provide the link to it, since your interpretation of the law cannot be trusted.

We’ll See You in Court: Why Trump’s Executive Order on Refugees Violates the Establishment Clause

Sloppy logic to say the least.

• This article assumes that if it is a Muslim majority country....only Muslims would migrate from it.
• The article assumes that all Muslim majority countries are banned, which is not the case.
• The article assumes that anyone who wants to migrate to the US can. This is not true.

 

[mudwhistle]

Actually Cuba was under a travel ban for decades. You can ban anyone if their country of origin meets specific critieria.

but you can not target them by religion.

EO did not target anyone by the religion.

Intent did. Trump gave plenty of material bragging all campaign about "banning muslims."
Not sure if you're new to the country but the justice system takes intent into consideration.

Actually I've had a couple of years of Paralegal training. Intent is a consideration in criminal law. What does this have to do with Trump being on trial for a crime?

not very good at your job? How would verbal admission of intent not matter here?
He confessed his purpose was not to protect americans but to stop ban muslims from entering.
Just like he confessed to sexual assault.
When will trump be held accountable for his actions and words? Never?
Obviously intent is covered here too because that's why both muslim bans were blocked.

Post some quotes or STFU.

All I've seen is the media and Democrats calling it a "MUSLIM BAN".

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Fox News reported the former FBI director had resigned, when he had in fact been fired. http://www.snopes.com/fox-news-comey/


FACT CHECK: Did Fox News Report That James Comey Resigned?

RATING

MOSTLY TRUE

 

[Aries]

It should be noted that the same republicans crying to ban muslims also say they "love our constitution."
It is the same republicans that say "don't play the race card" that also say "mexicans are rapists and dangerous"
It is the same republicans that continually bash illegal immigrants that voted in a First lady who came here on a visiting visa that did not permit her to work, broke our laws and worked anyways, and illegally collected +30k in untaxed dollars.

'Race card'? No one has said all Muslims are terrorists. Barak Obama himself, though, pointed out that these countries were the most dangerous / threatening to the US because the majority of the countries as a whole consisted of terrorists / US-hating people. He also admitted - and demonstrated when a terrorist to whom he gave a visa to later killed 7 Americans in Ca - his vetting process of people from these countries did not fully work, that continuing to bring them in would pose a threat to US citizens. Obama's own Intel agencies warned that ISIS had - DID - already infiltrated the ranks of refugees.

Now snowflakes want to wrap themselves in the Constitution and attack Trump for doing something about the dangers to US citizens that Obama initially pointed out while placing those countries on his 'list'. Funny...

I am far more likely to be killed by a right wing nut job than a "refugee terrorist,"
I am far more likely to die from lack of healthcare than a terrorist attack,
hell I am even more likely to die falling out of bed than a "refugee terrorist" ... whats next, ban beds?
when will we start doing something about actual threats to our citizens?


Fatal terror attacks by refugees in the US: Zero - CNN.com

 

[Aries]

Well I guess you don't know what the Ass Clown did. Right now the 2.0 version is under review by 12 Federal District court judges in the 4th district court--and just the other day--Sean Spicer was made aware that Trump still had on his campaign web-site, during the daily White House briefing--the campaign promise of a Muslim travel ban--(after all Judges had seen it .) So it was brought up in court by these judges and now the DOJ is having to defend this executive order with the Pretence that Trump's 2.0 version of the travel ban- is really a travel ban and not a Muslim ban. I doubt they're going to go for that one--LOL The Muslim ban was erased from Trump's website just this Monday--05/07/2017.

"Washington (CNN)A press release touting Donald Trump's controversial plan to ban all Muslim travel into the United States was removed from his campaign website Monday, shortly after White House press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters that he was unaware that the plan was still online."
Trump campaign removes Muslim ban language from website - CNNPolitics.com

For a more detailed explanation of why it was struck down the 1st time, and most likely to be struck down again:
Trump’s Executive Order Is an Unconstitutional Attack on Muslims. It Must Be Struck Down In Its Entirety.

Sally Yates stuffed a rag in Ted Cruz's mouth and ran over him with a steam roller regarding this.

Furthermore Trump is firing anyone--Like Sally Yates and FBI Director James Comey whom have intimate knowlege of this Russian investigation--just like Richard Nixon did.

The travel ban was a legal document. Only it's contents can be used to consider what it can be judged on. Trump never said all Muslims were banned from entering the US. Feel free to post specifically any "THIS IS A MUSLIM TRAVEL BAN" verbage you can find in the Executive Order.

The law says a person can not be discriminated against based on their country of origin. She schooled Ted Cruz on this and I already told you this. Did you have a selective ability of reasoning?

This is the part where you cite the law or provide the link to it, since your interpretation of the law cannot be trusted.

We’ll See You in Court: Why Trump’s Executive Order on Refugees Violates the Establishment Clause

Sloppy logic to say the least.

• This article assumes that if it is a Muslim majority country....only Muslims would migrate from it.
• The article assumes that all Muslim majority countries are banned, which is not the case.
• The article assumes that anyone who wants to migrate to the US can. This is not true.

You're not understanding. It doesn't matter that not everyone effected is Muslim. It doesn't matter it wasn't every Muslim country. None of that matters. What matters is that you can not target muslims, and trump did. Why is that so difficult to understand? I am having trouble figuring out where your comprehension is failing.

Can not discriminate by religion.
Trump boasted about banning a specific religion.

its really really not rocket science.
If I could simplify it any further for you God knows I would....

 

[easyt65]

I am far more likely to be killed by a right wing nut job than a "refugee terrorist,"
I am far more likely to die from lack of healthcare than a terrorist attack,
hell I am even more likely to die falling out of bed than a "refugee terrorist" ... whats next, ban beds?

I am sure the 7 Americans in Ca who died at the hands of the terrorist to whom Obama gave a visa thought the same thing as well before they were murdered.

 

[Aries]

I am far more likely to be killed by a right wing nut job than a "refugee terrorist,"
I am far more likely to die from lack of healthcare than a terrorist attack,
hell I am even more likely to die falling out of bed than a "refugee terrorist" ... whats next, ban beds?

I am sure the 7 Americans in Ca who died at the hands of the terrorist to whom Obama gave a visa thought the same thing as well before they were murdered.

so they weren't refugees? So your point is?
All muslims are terrorists?


Yea, you're just a racist bud. God forbid your wife shower late at night you might see the towel on her head and open fire.

 

[westwall]

You do realize, do you not, that you are saying it is A-OK for a PRIVATE company to determine who gets to run for the POTUS job.

Is the DNC and RNC a private organization or not?

Doesn't matter. The POTUS is supposed to be a representative of the PEOPLE. The fact that the RNC and the DNC control who even gets to run means that they control the government whcih means that PRIVATE organisations are placing themselves, and their interests, before the WE The People. Which is a clear assault on the Constitutional Republic that the US was founded as.

Ah yes, you mean like corporations considered as persons. Not sure how that applies here but a valid point nonetheless.

Yes. Get rid of ALL of that bullshit. Why do you agree to let a small oligarchy determine which lesser of two evils we get to vote for? Ultimately we are only voting for evil, the oligarchs don't care because no matter which candidate gets "elected" they still control them.

Face it pogo, the system is rigged against the PEOPLE of the USA and you seem to not care.

You wouldn't happen to be a Bernie Sanders supporter?

I was till he sold out to the shrilary.

 

[westwall]

Which is policy making or deciding on constitutionality of the EO?

Yates position put her as the top lawyer for the FED. Her job is not to blindly cosign what trump does and says out of fear of "betraying him." She felt that the order was unlawful (rightfully so) then it would have been NOT doing her job to defend it.

Sally Yates wasn't using the executive order to base her judgment from. She was using liberal talking-points that weren't in writing to resist the lawful order of the President. By law the president has the right to decide who can enter the US thru the Health And Human Services Dept and Homeland Security.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Well I guess you don't know what the Ass Clown did. Right now the 2.0 version is under review by 12 Federal District court judges in the 4th district court--and just the other day--Sean Spicer was made aware that Trump still had on his campaign web-site, during the daily White House briefing--the campaign promise of a Muslim travel ban--(after all Judges had seen it .) So it was brought up in court by these judges and now the DOJ is having to defend this executive order with the Pretence that Trump's 2.0 version of the travel ban- is really a travel ban and not a Muslim ban. I doubt they're going to go for that one--LOL The Muslim ban was erased from Trump's website just this Monday--05/07/2017.

"Washington (CNN)A press release touting Donald Trump's controversial plan to ban all Muslim travel into the United States was removed from his campaign website Monday, shortly after White House press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters that he was unaware that the plan was still online."
Trump campaign removes Muslim ban language from website - CNNPolitics.com

For a more detailed explanation of why it was struck down the 1st time, and most likely to be struck down again:
Trump’s Executive Order Is an Unconstitutional Attack on Muslims. It Must Be Struck Down In Its Entirety.

Sally Yates stuffed a rag in Ted Cruz's mouth and ran over him with a steam roller regarding this.

Furthermore Trump is firing anyone--Like Sally Yates and FBI Director James Comey whom have intimate knowlege of this Russian investigation--just like Richard Nixon did.

The travel ban was a legal document. Only it's contents can be used to consider what it can be judged on. Trump never said all Muslims were banned from entering the US. Feel free to post specifically any "THIS IS A MUSLIM TRAVEL BAN" verbage you can find in the Executive Order.

The law says a person can not be discriminated against based on their country of origin. She schooled Ted Cruz on this and I already told you this. Did you have a selective ability of reasoning?

The law does NOT say that. It says you CAN discriminate based on where they are from. Carter used that to enact his ban. What you may not do is apply a religious component. Go back to school.

 

[Ame®icano]

Actually Cuba was under a travel ban for decades. You can ban anyone if their country of origin meets specific critieria.

but you can not target them by religion.

EO did not target anyone by the religion.

Intent did. Trump gave plenty of material bragging all campaign about "banning muslims."
Not sure if you're new to the country but the justice system takes intent into consideration.

Actually I've had a couple of years of Paralegal training. Intent is a consideration in criminal law. What does this have to do with Trump being on trial for a crime?

not very good at your job? How would verbal admission of intent not matter here?
He confessed his purpose was not to protect americans but to stop ban muslims from entering.
Just like he confessed to sexual assault.
When will trump be held accountable for his actions and words? Never?
Obviously intent is covered here too because that's why both muslim bans were blocked.

Following your skewed logic, the intent of the any law that lock up criminals is actually to lock up blacks.