Breaking WP: Donald Trump was recorded having extremely lewd conversation about women in 2005(Text)

Rich guy gets easy poontang his entire life.

Rich guy brags about it.

Color me shocked.

Rich guy is running for president of the most powerful nation in the world......at least he was.

They are already considering replacing him. I just heard it on the news.

They'll regret it. If they think Trump has destroyed the party, wait until they try to depose a man 13 million people nominated to be their president. The Republican party will die.
 
Last edited:
Interesting. Here we have a thread trashing Trump for the things he said about women, but here we also have Miss Esmaralda calling Trump's wife "a sleaze".

Another irony happens to be that many of the liberals on this thread espouse a woman's right to "do what she wants with her body". So how come it was wrong for Melania to use her body in that manner? I mean, women's rights, ya know? Power to the matriarchy!!

How pathetic.

You guys reek of double standards and hypocrisy tonight.


QUOTE THE SLEAZE part for me.
 
Interesting. Here we have a thread trashing Trump for the things he said about women, but here we also have Miss Esmaralda calling Trump's wife "a sleaze".

Another irony happens to be that many of the liberals on this thread espouse a woman's right to "do what she wants with her body". So how come it was wrong for Melania to use her body in that manner? I mean, women's rights, ya know? Power to the matriarchy!!

How pathetic.

You guys reek of double standards and hypocrisy tonight.


QUOTE THE SLEAZE part for me.

Easily obliged.

Fashion model. LMAO She did soft core porn. She's a sleaze.

Suddenly she's a "sleaze", however, I thought according to the hallowed liberal women's rights platform that women were/are supposed to be allowed to do what they wanted with their bodies, am I wrong? Isn't that the assertion you make when defending a woman's "right to choose"?
 
Last edited:
Interesting. Here we have a thread trashing Trump for the things he said about women, but here we also have Miss Esmaralda calling Trump's wife "a sleaze".

Another irony happens to be that many of the liberals on this thread espouse a woman's right to "do what she wants with her body". So how come it was wrong for Melania to use her body in that manner? I mean, women's rights, ya know? Power to the matriarchy!!

How pathetic.

You guys reek of double standards and hypocrisy tonight.


QUOTE THE SLEAZE part for me.

Easily obliged.

Fashion model. LMAO She did soft core porn. She's a sleaze.

Suddenly she's a "sleaze", however, I thought according to the hallowed liberal women's rights platform that women were/are supposed to be allowed to do what they wanted with their bodies, am I wrong? Isn't that the assertion you make when defending a woman's "right to choose"?


This is NOT what a fashion model does. 'Fashion' refers to clothing: she isn't wearing any. It's pornograpy. How many of you men would like your wife, sister, mother or daughter to do this kind of thing? Few I think. You'd have to say you would be more than fine with your loved ones doing this, or adimit you realize it is porn. Men jerk off looking at this kind of picture. It's porn.,



maybe I missed it because it wasnt there ...'''

ESMERALDA SAID:

This is NOT what a fashion model does. 'Fashion' refers to clothing: she isn't wearing any. It's pornograpy. How many of you men would like your wife, sister, mother or daughter to do this kind of thing? Few I think. You'd have to say you would be more than fine with your loved ones doing this, or adimit you realize it is porn. Men jerk off looking at this kind of picture. It's porn.,


nope, still not there ...
 
Last edited:
Interesting. Here we have a thread trashing Trump for the things he said about women, but here we also have Miss Esmaralda calling Trump's wife "a sleaze".

Another irony happens to be that many of the liberals on this thread espouse a woman's right to "do what she wants with her body". So how come it was wrong for Melania to use her body in that manner? I mean, women's rights, ya know? Power to the matriarchy!!

How pathetic.

You guys reek of double standards and hypocrisy tonight.


QUOTE THE SLEAZE part for me.

Easily obliged.

Fashion model. LMAO She did soft core porn. She's a sleaze.

Suddenly she's a "sleaze", however, I thought according to the hallowed liberal women's rights platform that women were/are supposed to be allowed to do what they wanted with their bodies, am I wrong? Isn't that the assertion you make when defending a woman's "right to choose"?


This is NOT what a fashion model does. 'Fashion' refers to clothing: she isn't wearing any. It's pornograpy. How many of you men would like your wife, sister, mother or daughter to do this kind of thing? Few I think. You'd have to say you would be more than fine with your loved ones doing this, or adimit you realize it is porn. Men jerk off looking at this kind of picture. It's porn.,



maybe I missed it because it wasnt there ...

Are you sure you want people knowing about your expertise on pornography? Creep.

All jokes aside, the only thing you missed was the point. In 2000 and 2002 she posed nude for a French men's magazine and GQ. This was well before she even met Trump. You defend the honor of women but resort to labeling them at the same time. Posing nude twice for two magazines hardly qualifies as a porn career.

But now she's a sleaze for doing it. Would she be if her husband happened to be the Democratic nominee? Can you answer that for me?
 
Interesting. Here we have a thread trashing Trump for the things he said about women, but here we also have Miss Esmaralda calling Trump's wife "a sleaze".

Another irony happens to be that many of the liberals on this thread espouse a woman's right to "do what she wants with her body". So how come it was wrong for Melania to use her body in that manner? I mean, women's rights, ya know? Power to the matriarchy!!

How pathetic.

You guys reek of double standards and hypocrisy tonight.


QUOTE THE SLEAZE part for me.

Easily obliged.

Fashion model. LMAO She did soft core porn. She's a sleaze.

Suddenly she's a "sleaze", however, I thought according to the hallowed liberal women's rights platform that women were/are supposed to be allowed to do what they wanted with their bodies, am I wrong? Isn't that the assertion you make when defending a woman's "right to choose"?


This is NOT what a fashion model does. 'Fashion' refers to clothing: she isn't wearing any. It's pornograpy. How many of you men would like your wife, sister, mother or daughter to do this kind of thing? Few I think. You'd have to say you would be more than fine with your loved ones doing this, or adimit you realize it is porn. Men jerk off looking at this kind of picture. It's porn.,



maybe I missed it because it wasnt there ...'''

ESMERALDA SAID:

This is NOT what a fashion model does. 'Fashion' refers to clothing: she isn't wearing any. It's pornograpy. How many of you men would like your wife, sister, mother or daughter to do this kind of thing? Few I think. You'd have to say you would be more than fine with your loved ones doing this, or adimit you realize it is porn. Men jerk off looking at this kind of picture. It's porn.,


nope, still not there ...

Nice edit by the way. You're trying to cover her tracks. Not happening.

Post #860
 
Colorado Rep. Mike Coffman calls on Trump to step down
AURORA, Colo. (CBS4)– Republican Rep. Mike Coffman has broken from his party’s ranks and has said that Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump should “step aside.”

Coffman released this statement on Friday evening: “For the good of the country, and to give the Republicans a chance of defeating Hillary Clinton, Mr. Trump should step aside. His defeat at this point seems almost certain. And four years of Hillary Clinton is not what is best for this country. Mr. Trump should put the country first and do the right thing.”

This comes hours after audio of Trump making lewd comments about women made headlines.


Coffman: 'Trump Should Step Aside'
 
Interesting. Here we have a thread trashing Trump for the things he said about women, but here we also have Miss Esmaralda calling Trump's wife "a sleaze".

Another irony happens to be that many of the liberals on this thread espouse a woman's right to "do what she wants with her body". So how come it was wrong for Melania to use her body in that manner? I mean, women's rights, ya know? Power to the matriarchy!!

How pathetic.

You guys reek of double standards and hypocrisy tonight.


QUOTE THE SLEAZE part for me.

Easily obliged.

Fashion model. LMAO She did soft core porn. She's a sleaze.

Suddenly she's a "sleaze", however, I thought according to the hallowed liberal women's rights platform that women were/are supposed to be allowed to do what they wanted with their bodies, am I wrong? Isn't that the assertion you make when defending a woman's "right to choose"?
I do not adhere to anyone's platform or agenda. I think as an individual. IMO I think women who are prostiitutes, strippers, or nude models take away the dignity of all women. I think there are a thousand other ways to earn living. There is no reason or excuse for it other than you are selling yourself as a sexual object. IMO such women are sleazes.
 
Interesting. Here we have a thread trashing Trump for the things he said about women, but here we also have Miss Esmaralda calling Trump's wife "a sleaze".

Another irony happens to be that many of the liberals on this thread espouse a woman's right to "do what she wants with her body". So how come it was wrong for Melania to use her body in that manner? I mean, women's rights, ya know? Power to the matriarchy!!

How pathetic.

You guys reek of double standards and hypocrisy tonight.


QUOTE THE SLEAZE part for me.

Easily obliged.

Fashion model. LMAO She did soft core porn. She's a sleaze.

Suddenly she's a "sleaze", however, I thought according to the hallowed liberal women's rights platform that women were/are supposed to be allowed to do what they wanted with their bodies, am I wrong? Isn't that the assertion you make when defending a woman's "right to choose"?
I do not defend any group stance or platform: I think for myself.
 
Interesting. Here we have a thread trashing Trump for the things he said about women, but here we also have Miss Esmaralda calling Trump's wife "a sleaze".

Another irony happens to be that many of the liberals on this thread espouse a woman's right to "do what she wants with her body". So how come it was wrong for Melania to use her body in that manner? I mean, women's rights, ya know? Power to the matriarchy!!

How pathetic.

You guys reek of double standards and hypocrisy tonight.


QUOTE THE SLEAZE part for me.

Easily obliged.

Fashion model. LMAO She did soft core porn. She's a sleaze.

Suddenly she's a "sleaze", however, I thought according to the hallowed liberal women's rights platform that women were/are supposed to be allowed to do what they wanted with their bodies, am I wrong? Isn't that the assertion you make when defending a woman's "right to choose"?


This is NOT what a fashion model does. 'Fashion' refers to clothing: she isn't wearing any. It's pornograpy. How many of you men would like your wife, sister, mother or daughter to do this kind of thing? Few I think. You'd have to say you would be more than fine with your loved ones doing this, or adimit you realize it is porn. Men jerk off looking at this kind of picture. It's porn.,



maybe I missed it because it wasnt there ...

Are you sure you want people knowing about your expertise on pornography? Creep.

All jokes aside, the only thing you missed was the point. In 2000 and 2002 she posed nude for a French men's magazine and GQ. This was well before she even met Trump. You defend the honor of women but resort to labeling them at the same time. Posing nude twice for two magazines hardly qualifies as a porn career.

But now she's a sleaze for doing it. Would she be if her husband happened to be the Democratic nominee? Can you answer that for me?
Any woman who poses for pictures like that is not doing it for the honor of women but just the opposite. It doesn't matter what party she is: this is not someone who should represent the US as first lady. She has no dignity.
 
I think as an individual.

Really? I find that hard to believe. People who think as individuals disabuse themselves from rigid ideologies. They only assume them after due consideration of their merits.

IMO I think women who are prostitutes, strippers, or nude models take away the dignity of all women.

But what of the pro-choice argument? The whole premise is that a woman should be able to choose what she wants to do with her body? So I guess that platform is conditional then?

There is no reason or excuse for it other than you are selling yourself as a sexual object.

So if I get this right, if you are a pro-choice liberal, defending a woman's right to choose, should she not be able to sell her body if she wants to?
 
I do not defend any group stance or platform: I think for myself.

Nonsense. I've been on this board for nearly four years now, long enough to get the general idea on the political stances of the posters here. Including you. You side mostly with the liberals on this board, and that must mean you also support a woman's right to choose to have an abortion (and for the record, "the right to choose" has further implications other than abortion, you know, like posing nude, being a porn star, prostitute or stripper).
 
CuOgwIWWEAA7E44.jpg
 
Breaking WP: Donald Trump was recorded having extremely lewd conversation about women in 2005(Text)
Trump recorded having extremely lewd conversation about women in 2005
He really screwed himself----so many shallow people will CAPITALIZE on silly banter between men that was never meant to be heard by anyone other than a gaggle of slightly inebriated GUYS (PS) I did two years in the US Navy




 
While the qu33rs are all butthurt that men are interested in a women biologically unless they are fatsos, which is totally normal and the reason why mankind exists, the Obama/Crooked Hillary White House celebrate duded inserting themselves into another dude's anus as a great civil rights thing, but it only results in shit on some qu33r's dick.

150626213815-rainbow-white-house-large-169.jpg
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top