bodecea
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2009
- 185,066
- 66,456
Terrorism? There's nothing in the Constitution about this, is there?We have a serious left-wing terrorism problem in this country.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Terrorism? There's nothing in the Constitution about this, is there?We have a serious left-wing terrorism problem in this country.
Yet he didn’t lie as you stupidly keep claiming like the good cult member you are.He was actually under oath in the hearings, as I understand it.
So you encourage breaking federal law by protesting at a justice’s home. Learn about laws foreigner.Great stuff. My experience with this is that it is better to lobby at their homes. It gets inside their head and any small noise they hear sets them off.
Not every night. Sometimes leave a gap of a few nights so that they think it is over. Or tell them you are oming and go and do something else.
It fucks their heads up.
Cry harder. Your lies have been debunked several times, but you keep parroting them. Listen to all sides of the case.Yet, he didn’t hear a case on the legality of Roe v Wade, he heard a case on Mississippi’s 15 week ban
He expanded it
HE LIED
He responded that “as a judge” he would respect the “important precedent” of Roe v. Wade and its reaffirmations.
He showed no respect to the precedence of Roe v WadeIt's what he didn't say is what counts, and he didn't say that he wouldn't overrule it. He said he would RESPECT the important precedent.
You can respect something, but still change it.
How can you be arrested for protesting ? Isnt it one of your "rights" ?So you encourage breaking federal law by protesting at a justice’s home. Learn about laws foreigner.
Oh, if ya feel like, go ahead and start a thread on it, but I wouldn't change this thread to that subject. This one is doing fine with the hysterics over protesters outside a restaurant, where the guy they were protesting, didn't even hear or see the protestors outside, business not disrupted, no assaults, no arrests, and it turned out the headline on the original linked article was same as thread title, but the story underneath just didn't support it. I just got off another thread where the posted twitter vid did not say what the twitter twat posted, so our member got screwed by no watching the vid before posting. I see this crap every day, and it gets boring, to tell the truth. I understand and all. Some people just want attentention. Some want to break a new story and don't even read their own source material. Some sources used here post crazy ass headlines to get clicks, and the story completely different than headline. Some people just don't learn to look before they leap.You used the term "hysterical nonsense" to describe how people were reacting to the Cavanaugh situation in the OP. I just asked if it was similar to the hysterical nonsense being displayed by the left regarding the RvW turnover. Do you really need me to walk you through this like a child?
Not confused at all. Passive/aggressive trolling won't work on me.
He showed no respect to the precedence of Roe v Wade
He threw it out first chance he got
He LIED
Thanks for your opinion, RW. You didn't hear the case, he did.He showed no respect to the precedence of Roe v Wade
He threw it out first chance he got
He LIED
He intentionally deceived congress and the public.No he didn't, only in the minds of liberals like yourself.
He would have never stated how he would have vote on a possible upcoming case.
You're a candy-ass wimp. Now go brush the cheetoh dust off your dirty t-shirt, punk.< flick >
Less that ten seconds, asshole.
No weapons needed.
Of course he lied...about more than one thing. Makes him a perfect match for Republican White-wing toadies.Yet he didn’t lie as you stupidly keep claiming like the good cult member you are.
How is that breaking federal law?So you encourage breaking federal law by protesting at a justice’s home. Learn about laws foreigner.
He told Trump a different story on his position on Roe v Wade than he told the Senate and key Senate voters
He told them he considered Roe v Wade to be settled law
HE LIED
He threw out Roe v Wade...he lied about believing it to be established law. What else did he feel comfortable lying about while under oath.He didn't throw it out at all, just modified it.
Abortion is still quite legal, the decision was merely to grant people the sacred Right to Choose whether to keep it legal in every state.
This is a FOREIGNER meddling in our politics. ^^^Great stuff. My experience with this is that it is better to lobby at their homes. It gets inside their head and any small noise they hear sets them off.
Not every night. Sometimes leave a gap of a few nights so that they think it is over. Or tell them you are oming and go and do something else.
It fucks their heads up.
More “precedents” that he respects?No he didn’t you stupid troll. Better tell the Court to cancel the Brown vs Board of Education and Dred Scott decisions too. He never stated how he would vote if a case came up. Stop lying. Oh wait, that’s all you ever do....