Zone1 Calling/accusing other members "groomer"

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the problem is that the accusations fly based on nothing to do with pedophilia.

If you voted for Biden you are called a "groomer enabler". That sort of thing is bullshit.

Now if you want kiddie porn available to all, there is a case to be made. But the way baseless accusations fly around this place it is simply ridiculous.
 
If we had a poster here promoting a book written for children that depicted a 12 year old GIRL performing fellatio, we would not be having this conversation.

For starters, everybody would recognize it as grooming. EVERYBODY would denounce it and most importantly, this website would not be targeting posters that opposed it. It is only because it involves a BOY that people do not see this for what it is and this website is taking such an active role in enabling it.

I swear, the need to virtue signal outweighs common sense for too many people. That is the only reason people are supporting this shit and the only reason this website is trying to make pariahs out of those who oppose it.

If it were a book training a 12 year old girl to give a blow job, we would have none of this nonsense because people WOULD be allowed to call it what it is.

I don't know that that is at all true.

I think these mods would just as happily tolerate content defending or advocating the sexual abuse of a girl as they would a boy.

At least it would take away the excuse of calling anyone who opposes it “homophobic”. But I don't think we are very far away from the time when a term will come into common use to directly smear those who oppose pedophilia of bigotry, the way “homophobic” is used to similarly smear those who recognize homosexuality for the sick perversion that it is.
 
Last edited:
Pretty soon we'll have movies with prominent actors diddling children and leftists will pack the movies to watch it.
 
I think the problem is that the accusations fly based on nothing to do with pedophilia.

If you voted for Biden you are called a "groomer enabler". That sort of thing is bullshit.

Now if you want kiddie porn available to all, there is a case to be made. But the way baseless accusations fly around this place it is simply ridiculous.
There are posters here, one who is posting on this thread, who do want explicit images of children having sex with other children and with adults made available to children.

I have no idea whether he is a groomer or not in his personal life. But by advocating for the normalization of explicit sexual images for children, he certainly makes life easier for people who are.
 
Now if you want kiddie porn available to all, there is a case to be made. But the way baseless accusations fly around this place it is simply ridiculous.
Tommy has been promoting a book that depicts a very underaged boy performing fellatio. It is an illustration, but if it was real children, the material would be illegal...
 
Tommy has been promoting a book that depicts a very underaged boy performing fellatio. It is an illustration, but if it was real children, the material would be illegal...

That photo, and I've seen it, would be banned on here.

Everyone think hard
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top