Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
O ran against Wall Street in his first election, then after he won, gave them everything they wanted and more.You’re dreaming. The leaders on Wall Street don’t give a shit who wins. They know they always win. You need to realize the potus is not king. And Wall Street fears no one. Just as they compromised Ears and totally controlled him, they figure they can do the same to Bernie.
Well, no, they don't think they can do that with Bernie. That's the problem. And again, they'll do their level best before we get there to get Trump re-elected.
LOL. Do you even think before posting? LMFAO.If Donnie did stop and frisk, your media would have you screaming out of your mind. Since Mike did it, your media excuses it. You are so predictable.
Donnie would have done it for no other reason than to be a racist prick.
Mike was trying to address a real crime problem. Oh, yeah, and funny thing, the people of New York elected him three times. NEW YORK CITY. Not exactly a place where they wear MAGA hats and love Jesus.
Bloomberg is a piece of shit.
However, after last night he is a dead piece of shit.
Again- Bloomberg can buy and sell you, buddy. He can buy and sell Fauxohauntos.
No one ever based their vote on a debate.
Yeah.... Nope.I didn't say you were defending me.Why are you defending the rabid moron?Your opinion is suspect since as a tRumpling you aren't really allowed to have your own.
View attachment 307720
I wasn't defending you...…...but was defending anyone's right to have an opinion especially if it disagreed with yours
Comprehension issues?
Sure you did...……..right when you asked why I was defending 'the rabid moron?'
Comprehension issues of your own????????
But as I also said, I was defending ANYONE's right to have an opinion...…..and that even includes YOU. You do have a right to your opinion and Tipsycatlover has a right to hers and I have a right to mine...…..whether you like it or not.
And since you don't 'get' that point is why I've called YOU The Rabid Moron...…...get it? got it? good!
Yes Hillary sold meetings with the Sec of State. Your point?FYI, FROM YOUR LINKHere you go Lahota. From that bastion of Trumpism … the Wash Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5b5200-6882-11e6-8225-fbb8a6fc65bc_story.html
In each case, according to emails released Monday from Hillary Clinton’s time as secretary of state, the requests were directed to Clinton’s deputy chief of staff and confidante, Huma Abedin, who engaged with other top aides and sometimes Clinton herself about how to respond.
The emails show that, in these and similar cases, the donors did not always get what they wanted, particularly when they sought anything more than a meeting.
Yeah that’s the conventional wisdom. I tend to think Bernie beats Donnie.Please no. There are not many outcomes worse than that.The party is a fucking mess, so I don't really know what it claims to be at this point.If you think the Ds need to nominate another corporatist warmonger like O or HER, you are mistaken. Why nominate a republican? Essentially resulting in a choice between an R or another R.Sounds like Bloomberg got pounded pretty effectively last night.I really don't think so! I welcome any credible views to the contrary. Here is what I think:
1. If Bernie wins the democratic primary - we'll likely have four more years of Trump*.
2. If Bernie loses the democratic primary - his supporters will likely not support the winner. Trump* wins.
3. Therefore, either way, it looks good for Trump*.
4. I'm watching Bloomberg very closely.
I'm no expert on this stuff, but it's pretty clear that the party, in general, thinks Bernie would be beaten pretty handily, and therefore so would democratic socialism for a while.
The party is an absolute mess right now. The nutters have too much influence.
.
The D Party claims to be the progressive party. Shouldn’t they nominate a progressive? Thus giving the American people a real choice.
Remember, the top priority isn't their principles, it's beating Trump.
I'd like to see Bloomberg break off and run Indy.
.
All that does is ensure the nomination goes to Bernie and, even worse, gives the party someone to point to for Bernie's loss rather than accepting that running a open socialist is a bad idea.
IOW, lets just give Trump another term AND send the only opposition to insanity further down their own insane road. Your entertainment is not worth it
I dont need to. The polls are saying it for me.Polls have him beating Trump. Bernie would win the popular vote either way
Oh, PLEASE keep telling yourself that.
I'm all in.I think we are, or at least enough of us are.I think you're wrong, and Bernie can beat tRump. It seems to me like it's finally time for his ideas to get a shot. Yes, the tRumplings are already crying "socialism" the same way religious fanatics cried "heresy" during the Inquisition but it doesn't seem to have the impact it had last time around. The electorate is changing, responding to four years racism, Russians, and ineptitude. The people are sick of tRump.I really don't think so! I welcome any credible views to the contrary. Here is what I think:
1. If Bernie wins the democratic primary - we'll likely have four more years of Trump*.
2. If Bernie loses the democratic primary - his supporters will likely not support the winner. Trump* wins.
3. Therefore, either way, it looks good for Trump*.
4. I'm watching Bloomberg very closely.
I agree that the electorate is changing - but Bernie is too far left for this time. America isn't there yet.
By all means, run him and let's see.
For those Bernie supporters that think Socialism would be great. Seek out many Chinese that fled mainland China and ask them what they think of Socialism. They will get an earful and it isn't good.I really don't think so! I welcome any credible views to the contrary. Here is what I think:
1. If Bernie wins the democratic primary - we'll likely have four more years of Trump*.
2. If Bernie loses the democratic primary - his supporters will likely not support the winner. Trump* wins.
3. Therefore, either way, it looks good for Trump*.
4. I'm watching Bloomberg very closely.
Sanders could beat Trump, depends on the economy at the time and also many Sanders supporters voted for Trump in 2016. Also in 2016, Sanders polled better than Clinton when matched against Trump.
That’s right. Bernie just might achieve a broad base and win the general.Yeah that’s the conventional wisdom. I tend to think Bernie beats Donnie.Please no. There are not many outcomes worse than that.The party is a fucking mess, so I don't really know what it claims to be at this point.If you think the Ds need to nominate another corporatist warmonger like O or HER, you are mistaken. Why nominate a republican? Essentially resulting in a choice between an R or another R.Sounds like Bloomberg got pounded pretty effectively last night.
I'm no expert on this stuff, but it's pretty clear that the party, in general, thinks Bernie would be beaten pretty handily, and therefore so would democratic socialism for a while.
The party is an absolute mess right now. The nutters have too much influence.
.
The D Party claims to be the progressive party. Shouldn’t they nominate a progressive? Thus giving the American people a real choice.
Remember, the top priority isn't their principles, it's beating Trump.
I'd like to see Bloomberg break off and run Indy.
.
All that does is ensure the nomination goes to Bernie and, even worse, gives the party someone to point to for Bernie's loss rather than accepting that running a open socialist is a bad idea.
IOW, lets just give Trump another term AND send the only opposition to insanity further down their own insane road. Your entertainment is not worth it
How do you figure? A general election ain't a Democrat primary. It's all about broad-based appeal to a wide variety of people, and I don't see that describing Bernie in any way.
Many of the wealthy elite feel that way. That should tell us something about them.
Many of the wealthy elite feel that way. That should tell us something about them.
Delusional. You clearly aren’t informed.Many of the wealthy elite feel that way. That should tell us something about them.
It tells us that at least they are not self destructive like you are.
Then again, you only have your mother's basement to lose.
Delusional. You clearly aren’t informed.Many of the wealthy elite feel that way. That should tell us something about them.
It tells us that at least they are not self destructive like you are.
Then again, you only have your mother's basement to lose.
That’s right. Bernie just might achieve a broad base and win the general.Yeah that’s the conventional wisdom. I tend to think Bernie beats Donnie.Please no. There are not many outcomes worse than that.The party is a fucking mess, so I don't really know what it claims to be at this point.If you think the Ds need to nominate another corporatist warmonger like O or HER, you are mistaken. Why nominate a republican? Essentially resulting in a choice between an R or another R.
The D Party claims to be the progressive party. Shouldn’t they nominate a progressive? Thus giving the American people a real choice.
Remember, the top priority isn't their principles, it's beating Trump.
I'd like to see Bloomberg break off and run Indy.
.
All that does is ensure the nomination goes to Bernie and, even worse, gives the party someone to point to for Bernie's loss rather than accepting that running a open socialist is a bad idea.
IOW, lets just give Trump another term AND send the only opposition to insanity further down their own insane road. Your entertainment is not worth it
How do you figure? A general election ain't a Democrat primary. It's all about broad-based appeal to a wide variety of people, and I don't see that describing Bernie in any way.
Many of the wealthy elite feel that way. That should tell us something about them.
