Can Gun Nuts Please Stop Saying You Need Guns to Protect Yourself From A Potential Tyrannical Government!!!

[Jaxson]

Come get them doosh.

I don't care if you have guns, my 6 year old has 2. You just need a more plausible reason to have them. Mine is self-defence, yours is because of the boogeyman, lol.

 

[hadit]

I don't care if you have guns, my 6 year old has 2. You just need a more plausible reason to have them. Mine is self-defence, yours is because of the boogeyman, lol.

Correction, no one needs a reason to have a gun, they just have that right. If they want to express a reason, it's their reason and your opinion of their reason is totally irrelevant.

 

[woodwork201]

Google? Try Bing or Duck Duck. I haven't used Google in 20 years. Here is one link, but the story is ongoing months old, it would take ten more links to get the full story, and even at that, I only rely on the internet for half the news I get.

Dutch farmers say no to EU climate cult move to shut down farms, cull livestock

Dutch farmers have taken to the highways to raise their alarm over EU-driven plans to kill off 30 percent of their livestock. By TONY MOBILIFONITIS DUTCH farmers are furious and in a fight for surv…

cairnsnews.org

I say google as a verb not a noun. I use Duck Duck Go. But I do find a lot of times I get more results on conservative topics on Bing; Duck Duck Go has to be blocking a lot of conservative results since they get their results from Google and Bing.

 

[woodwork201]

If you're reasoning to have a gun is to overthrown tyrants, then you're delusional. You need a better excuse.

No, my reason to have a gun is so I don't have to overthrow tyrants. It's worked pretty well for 233 years and counting.

 

[woodwork201]

That's not what the 2nd says. You must be a communist.

What does the 2nd say? It says that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Your 6-year-old can, constitutionally speaking, have a gun. But if you give your 6-year-old a gun and don't supervise it, you go to jail for child neglect/endangerment. The 2nd doesn't protect idiots, idiot.

You were having a time with others on this topic. You won't find me so easily defeated.

 

[woodwork201]

Google? Try Bing or Duck Duck. I haven't used Google in 20 years. Here is one link, but the story is ongoing months old, it would take ten more links to get the full story, and even at that, I only rely on the internet for half the news I get.

Dutch farmers say no to EU climate cult move to shut down farms, cull livestock

Dutch farmers have taken to the highways to raise their alarm over EU-driven plans to kill off 30 percent of their livestock. By TONY MOBILIFONITIS DUTCH farmers are furious and in a fight for surv…

cairnsnews.org

Your post said Denmark. Your link says Netherlands. I already said I had seen the stories on the Netherlands. Typo or brain fart? We all do them.

 

[Jaxson]

What does the 2nd say? It says that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Your 6-year-old can, constitutionally speaking, have a gun. But if you give your 6-year-old a gun and don't supervise it, you go to jail for child neglect/endangerment. The 2nd doesn't protect idiots, idiot.

You were having a time with others on this topic. You won't find me so easily defeated.

You said this "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". Then right after, you put conditions on my child carrying a gun. Make up your mind, are you a communist or not?

 

[Jaxson]

No, my reason to have a gun is so I don't have to overthrow tyrants. It's worked pretty well for 233 years and counting.

That's like saying that you carry a gun to keep alligators off the street, and it's worked pretty well for 233 years. At least get yourself a lucid reason.

Btw, guns didn't help the Jan.6 mob.

 

[Canon Shooter]

So how many people are you willing to KILL because you hate liberals and love Trump?

I wouldn't kill anyone simply because they hold a different political ideology than me, nor would I do it simply because I support one person over another.

But the answer to your question depends on what the government is trying to do.

If the government is trying to make a me a "subject" as opposed to a "citizen", then the answer to your question is "As many as it takes"...

 

[Blues Man]

I don't care if you have guns, my 6 year old has 2. You just need a more plausible reason to have them. Mine is self-defence, yours is because of the boogeyman, lol.

No reason needed at all.

 

[Cellblock2429]

You said this "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". Then right after, you put conditions on my child carrying a gun. Make up your mind, are you a communist or not?

/-----/ Please stop with your broken record Appeal to Ridicule. No, the 2nd Amendment does not have an age restriction, I'm guessing the Founding Fathers never envisioned anyone making a ridiculous assertion like yours. They were writing to reasonable adults. Children aren't mature or responsible enough to have firearms. And I'm a lifetime member of the NRA.
Appeal to Ridicule is a type of logical fallacy. Logical fallacy is using false logic to try to make a claim or argument. Appeal to ridicule is a fallacy that attempts to make a claim look ridiculous by mocking it or exaggerating it in a negative way. Appeal to ridicule often uses sarcasm to make an argument look ridiculous. - Softschools.com

 

[Jaxson]

No reason needed at all.

Ya, I know, but he gave one, and it was total bs, lol.

 

[Blues Man]

Ya, I know, but he gave one, and it was total bs, lol.

If no reason is needed then there is not any reason that can be BS

 

[Jaxson]

/-----/ Please stop with your broken record Appeal to Ridicule. No, the 2nd Amendment does not have an age restriction, I'm guessing the Founding Fathers never envisioned anyone making a ridiculous assertion like yours. They were writing to reasonable adults. Children aren't mature or responsible enough to have firearms. And I'm a lifetime member of the NRA.
Appeal to Ridicule is a type of logical fallacy. Logical fallacy is using false logic to try to make a claim or argument. Appeal to ridicule is a fallacy that attempts to make a claim look ridiculous by mocking it or exaggerating it in a negative way. Appeal to ridicule often uses sarcasm to make an argument look ridiculous. - Softschools.com

So if the FF were talking to reasonable adults (who kept slaves, wouldn't let women vote and gave anthrax blankets to the indians), then they for sure weren't't talking about an AR-15 style of weapon, so we can ban them? Geez, you get more incomprehensible by the post.

 

[Jaxson]

If no reason is needed then there is not any reason that can be BS

Yes it can, his was, lol. He said he kept guns to overthrow tyrants. The dude's delusional and possible insane.

 

[Dagosa]

No.

Can you stop using more than one repeated punctuation mark at the end of a sentence?

It makes you look illiterate.

It’s hilarious.

You can’t defeat the govt. They have all the infrastructure.
They‘ll just wait you out till you run out of Viagra and you’ll give up, you bunch of candy asses. .

 

[Cellblock2429]

So if the FF were talking to reasonable adults (who kept slaves, wouldn't let women vote and gave anthrax blankets to the indians), then they for sure weren't't talking about an AR-15 style of weapon, so we can ban them? Geez, you get more incomprehensible by the post.

/-------/ "Geez, you get more incomprehensible by the post."
Sorry about that. I'll dumb it down in the future so you can follow along.
The FF had to cave to the slave-owning democrats to preserve slavery in order to create the nation. That is historical fact. But about 80 years later, the newly formed Republican Party elected our first GOP president to free the slaves and prosecuted a civil war to preserve the nation.
Our FF did know what anthrax was or how to spread it. During the 1800s, doctors saw cases of anthrax but did not yet have a diagnosis for the disease. During this time, the organism that causes anthrax had not yet been discovered, but doctors had noticed a link between the disease and the animal hair industry. Because of this, the disease became known as "wool sorters disease."But nice try.
Yup, there were restrictions on voting, all corrected over the years. (You forgot you had to be a land owner to vote.)
And WTF is an AR-15 style of weapon? You realize the AR-15 is semi-automatic meaning one shot fired with each trigger pull and flintlocks were single shot? And did you know they were developing rapid-fire weapons in colonial times? I bet they never told you that on CNN.

One moment, please...

 

[Lesh]

He said he kept guns to overthrow tyrants.

The Constitution explicitly says the 2A militia is there to prevent attempts to over throw the government

 

[Dagosa]

You are quite wrong and history proves it,

The right to bear arms is meant to protect against government tyranny and it works

View attachment 667892

Looks like the typical gun a holic, s sells like him too.

 

[Jaxson]

/-------/ "Geez, you get more incomprehensible by the post."
Sorry about that. I'll dumb it down in the future so you can follow along.
The FF had to cave to the slave-owning democrats to preserve slavery in order to create the nation. That is historical fact. But about 80 years later, the newly formed Republican Party elected our first GOP president to free the slaves and prosecuted a civil war to preserve the nation.
Our FF did know what anthrax was or how to spread it. During the 1800s, doctors saw cases of anthrax but did not yet have a diagnosis for the disease. During this time, the organism that causes anthrax had not yet been discovered, but doctors had noticed a link between the disease and the animal hair industry. Because of this, the disease became known as "wool sorters disease."But nice try.
Yup, there were restrictions on voting, all corrected over the years. (You forgot you had to be a land owner to vote.)
And WTF is an AR-15 style of weapon? You realize the AR-15 is semi-automatic meaning one shot fired with each trigger pull and flintlocks were single shot? And did you know they were developing rapid-fire weapons in colonial times? I bet they never told you that on CNN.

One moment, please...

View attachment 673639

Do you have any pictures of today's shooters carrying around one of those weapons on a tripod that you used as an example. LOL! Fuck man, get serious.

You've been awarded the Lenin Star.