Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You haven't a clue on modern conservatives...obviously. There aren't too many conservatives who think things were ok when Bush left office. But, conservatives do believe things have gotten worse with Obama in office. I'm sure you won't be able to understand this, but, that would be your problem with comprehension.
If this economy isn't turned around (I'm mean "turned around") and the unemployment isn't below 8% in this next year....we have the wrong person as president.
yup, all these women were lying.
And when Anita Hill's co-workers said she was lying, they were paid off.
It's amazing how you put your mind into pretzels to defend your reality.
Even Clinton's own staff made sure he was never in a car alone with a woman. That's telling in and of itself, but that's exactly what Leon Panetta said in his memoir...
Please get back to reality. You have attacked Hill and defended Jones for weeks. But you're being objective, not partisan, right?
.
Not one person has every backed up Anita Hill's story beyond hearsay.
Once, when walking into an EEOC seminar with Thomas, he asked her, What size are your breasts? according to the transcript of her Senate interview.
Her story was corroborated by a former EEOC speechwriter, who told investigators that Wright had become increasingly uneasy around Thomas because of his comments about her appearance.
Wright's account was corroborated by Rose Jourdain, a former speechwriter who, like Wright, was dismissed by Thomas. Jourdain said Wright had complained that she was "increasingly nervous about being in his presence alone" because of comments "concerning her figure, her body, her breasts, her legs."
Another former Thomas employee, Sukari Hardnett, said of his office, "If you were young, black, female and reasonably attractive, you knew full well you were being inspected and auditioned as a female."
James Millet, a college classmate of Thomas's, recalled "an almost identical episode" at Holy Cross. "Pubic hair was one of the things he talked about," another classmate said. Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson, in "Strange Justice," found two others who recalled a pubic hair-Coke can comment at the EEOC.
Similarly, Thomas had a well-known taste for the kind of extreme pornography Hill said he brought up with her. "Listening to her, it was as if I was listening to the guy I knew speak," said law school classmate Henry Terry. Washington lawyer Fred Cooke saw Thomas, while EEOC chairman, checking out a triple-X video of "The Adventures of Bad Mama Jama."
Dozens of people have backed up the stories about Clinton's harrassment against Jones, Willey, Brodderick, et al.
Oh, and the key thing.
Clinton paid Jones $850,000 to settle the case.
Clinton Paid Jones.
You haven't a clue on modern conservatives...obviously. There aren't too many conservatives who think things were ok when Bush left office. But, conservatives do believe things have gotten worse with Obama in office. I'm sure you won't be able to understand this, but, that would be your problem with comprehension.
If this economy isn't turned around (I'm mean "turned around") and the unemployment isn't below 8% in this next year....we have the wrong person as president.
I know conservatives quite well. They are fully capable of convincing themselves, all reality to the contrary, that the economy is in worse shape today than when Bush was in office.
Obama cannot single handedly fix the economy.
You haven't a clue on modern conservatives...obviously. There aren't too many conservatives who think things were ok when Bush left office. But, conservatives do believe things have gotten worse with Obama in office. I'm sure you won't be able to understand this, but, that would be your problem with comprehension.
If this economy isn't turned around (I'm mean "turned around") and the unemployment isn't below 8% in this next year....we have the wrong person as president.
I know conservatives quite well. They are fully capable of convincing themselves, all reality to the contrary, that the economy is in worse shape today than when Bush was in office.
Obama cannot single handedly fix the economy.
He didn't the first 2 years he was in office, he had the Senate, Congress and his office to work with.
I know conservatives quite well. They are fully capable of convincing themselves, all reality to the contrary, that the economy is in worse shape today than when Bush was in office.
Obama cannot single handedly fix the economy.
He didn't the first 2 years he was in office, he had the Senate, Congress and his office to work with.
Another conservative who has never heard of the filibuster. Interesting.
Anyway, a mess created over almost 30 years does not get cleaned up in 2 or 3 years. It gets improved, not fixed.
He had a 58 count with the democrats along with a liberal independent and a socialist independent in the Senate. Sheesh
He couldn't stop the bleeding until the republicans took control of Congress, Come to think of it, things started going to hell when the democrats took control of Congress under Bush. Too bad Bush never heard of the veto pen.
Senator Kennedy was diagnosed with cancer in May, 2008, died in August, 2009.
Lieberman wasn't uniformly voting with the Democrats.
So no, Obama didn't have Democratic control of the Senate, and he can't single handedly fix the economy.
Start with the most basic fact of all: virtually none of the $1.5 trillion of cratering subprime mortgages were backed by Fannie or Freddie. That’s right — most subprime mortgages did not meet Fannie or Freddie’s strict lending standards. All those no money down, no interest for a year, low teaser rate loans? All the loans made without checking a borrower’s income or employment history? All made in the private sector, without any support from Fannie and Freddie.
Fannie and Freddie, however, didn't pressure lenders to sell them more loans; they struggled to keep pace with their private sector competitors. In fact, their regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, imposed new restrictions in 2006 that led to Fannie and Freddie losing even more market share in the booming subprime market.
Obama cannot defend his policies in a fair debate !!Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis | McClatchy
Fannie and Freddie, however, didn't pressure lenders to sell them more loans; they struggled to keep pace with their private sector competitors. In fact, their regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, imposed new restrictions in 2006 that led to Fannie and Freddie losing even more market share in the booming subprime market.
Read more: Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis | McClatchy
Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis | McClatchy
Fannie and Freddie, however, didn't pressure lenders to sell them more loans; they struggled to keep pace with their private sector competitors. In fact, their regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, imposed new restrictions in 2006 that led to Fannie and Freddie losing even more market share in the booming subprime market.
Read more: Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis | McClatchy
Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis | McClatchy
Fannie and Freddie, however, didn't pressure lenders to sell them more loans; they struggled to keep pace with their private sector competitors. In fact, their regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, imposed new restrictions in 2006 that led to Fannie and Freddie losing even more market share in the booming subprime market.
Read more: Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis | McClatchy
You are just unsuccessfully trying to cover tracks. That needs to include HUD, and FHA. Plenty of blame to go around, true enough. You are in denial about Fannie and Freddie who insured the loans.
You are just unsuccessfully trying to cover tracks. That needs to include HUD, and FHA. Plenty of blame to go around, true enough. You are in denial about Fannie and Freddie who insured the loans.
Those who blame this on the CRA and FM and FM for the mortgage crisis are misinformed, and are unfamiliar with why it is that private lenders kept loosening their standards.
You are just unsuccessfully trying to cover tracks. That needs to include HUD, and FHA. Plenty of blame to go around, true enough. You are in denial about Fannie and Freddie who insured the loans.
Those who blame this on the CRA and FM and FM for the mortgage crisis are misinformed, and are unfamiliar with why it is that private lenders kept loosening their standards.
