Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Which means it should be a nationwide god given right by writing it into the United States Constitution as an Amendment which is covered in my opening post if you had bothered to read it.
None of those were castle doctrine.The only one full of that is you.
Screaming BLM mob surrounds fearful Milwaukee homeowner, he gets arrested after showing a weapon
A Milwaukee homeowner was arrested for the alleged crime of pulling a weapon on local activists who'd trespassed onto his home in the middle of the night.www.bizpacreview.com
St. Louis couple who brandished guns had right to defend property: attorney
Lawyer for the couple says they acted legally under Missouri's Castle Doctrine.www.foxnews.com
Teenager charged over killings at Kenosha protest
Arrest comes after three nights of unrest in Kenosha following the police shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man.www.aljazeera.com
*****SMILE*****
No need to. If you can't say, it's because you're full of shit.
Thanks for confirming what I already suspected.
View attachment 510771
The only one full of that is you.
Screaming BLM mob surrounds fearful Milwaukee homeowner, he gets arrested after showing a weapon
A Milwaukee homeowner was arrested for the alleged crime of pulling a weapon on local activists who'd trespassed onto his home in the middle of the night.
St. Louis couple who brandished guns had right to defend property: attorney
Lawyer for the couple says they acted legally under Missouri's Castle Doctrine.
Teenager charged over killings at Kenosha protest
Arrest comes after three nights of unrest in Kenosha following the police shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man.
*****SMILE*****
None of those are cases where someone was arrested for using a firearm to stop a rioter who was breaking into their house.
The first one was a crowd gathered outside the home ...
The second one was a crowd passing by a home. ...
The third one didn't even involve a home.
Again, thanks for proving you were full of shit as I suspected all along. Even you know it which is why your initial response was to tell me to hunt for a case with Google.
I don't think you deserve a photo of Ashli Babbitt on your profile, nor has that Congress for many years had any intention of affording to ordinary American citizens the rights and means of defending themselves.Our Congresspersons made it quite evident that they agree on this issue when they felt threatened that day and carried out their will on an unarmed protestor within the Capitol building.
Congress will never let people have F-16's or Nukes.I don't think you deserve a photo of Ashli Babbitt on your profile, nor has that Congress for many years had any intention of affording to ordinary American citizens the rights and means of defending themselves.
None of those were castle doctrine.The only one full of that is you.
Screaming BLM mob surrounds fearful Milwaukee homeowner, he gets arrested after showing a weapon
A Milwaukee homeowner was arrested for the alleged crime of pulling a weapon on local activists who'd trespassed onto his home in the middle of the night.
St. Louis couple who brandished guns had right to defend property: attorney
Lawyer for the couple says they acted legally under Missouri's Castle Doctrine.
Teenager charged over killings at Kenosha protest
Arrest comes after three nights of unrest in Kenosha following the police shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man.
*****SMILE*****
Brandishing (as I already previously mentioned) and gunfights in the streets.
As faun pointed out, why did you lie about people being arrested for defending their castle?
None of those are cases where someone was arrested for using a firearm to stop a rioter who was breaking into their house.
The first one was a crowd gathered outside the home to annoy the homeowner with loud music and lights. They never even stepped onto the guys property, no less tried to break in. The homeowner was arrested for handling a firearm while intoxicated.
The second one was a crowd passing by a home. They too never even stepped onto the couple's property, no less tried to break in. They were arrested for brandishing a firearm at someone who wasn't threatening them.
I don't think you deserve a photo of Ashli Babbitt on your profile, nor has that Congress for many years had any intention of affording to ordinary American citizens the rights and means of defending themselves.
None of those were castle doctrine.The only one full of that is you.
Screaming BLM mob surrounds fearful Milwaukee homeowner, he gets arrested after showing a weapon
A Milwaukee homeowner was arrested for the alleged crime of pulling a weapon on local activists who'd trespassed onto his home in the middle of the night.
St. Louis couple who brandished guns had right to defend property: attorney
Lawyer for the couple says they acted legally under Missouri's Castle Doctrine.
Teenager charged over killings at Kenosha protest
Arrest comes after three nights of unrest in Kenosha following the police shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man.
*****SMILE*****
Brandishing (as I already previously mentioned) and gunfights in the streets.
As faun pointed out, why did you lie about people being arrested for defending their castle?
View attachment 510835
Quit lying.
The first two I cited were homeowners on their property.
*****SMILE*****
View attachment 510836
None of those are cases where someone was arrested for using a firearm to stop a rioter who was breaking into their house.
The first one was a crowd gathered outside the home to annoy the homeowner with loud music and lights. They never even stepped onto the guys property, no less tried to break in. The homeowner was arrested for handling a firearm while intoxicated.
The second one was a crowd passing by a home. They too never even stepped onto the couple's property, no less tried to break in. They were arrested for brandishing a firearm at someone who wasn't threatening them.
And the homeowners never fired a shot yet they had repercussions taken against them by law enforcement.
*****SMILE*****
None of those were castle doctrine.The only one full of that is you.
Screaming BLM mob surrounds fearful Milwaukee homeowner, he gets arrested after showing a weapon
A Milwaukee homeowner was arrested for the alleged crime of pulling a weapon on local activists who'd trespassed onto his home in the middle of the night.
St. Louis couple who brandished guns had right to defend property: attorney
Lawyer for the couple says they acted legally under Missouri's Castle Doctrine.
Teenager charged over killings at Kenosha protest
Arrest comes after three nights of unrest in Kenosha following the police shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man.
*****SMILE*****
Brandishing (as I already previously mentioned) and gunfights in the streets.
As faun pointed out, why did you lie about people being arrested for defending their castle?
View attachment 510835
Quit lying.
The first two I cited were homeowners on their property.
*****SMILE*****
The liar is you.
The homeowners were on their property but no one was trying to break into their homes. The Castle Doctrine didn't apply to any of those cases.
Maybe the problem is just that you don't know what the Castle Doctrine is?
View attachment 510836
None of those are cases where someone was arrested for using a firearm to stop a rioter who was breaking into their house.
The first one was a crowd gathered outside the home to annoy the homeowner with loud music and lights. They never even stepped onto the guys property, no less tried to break in. The homeowner was arrested for handling a firearm while intoxicated.
The second one was a crowd passing by a home. They too never even stepped onto the couple's property, no less tried to break in. They were arrested for brandishing a firearm at someone who wasn't threatening them.
And the homeowners never fired a shot yet they had repercussions taken against them by law enforcement.
*****SMILE*****
I don't know what you're trying to change your point to?
I already pointed out why they were arrested.
1. Handling a loaded firearm while intoxicated. That's a crime in Milwaukee.
2. Brandishing a firearm against someone not threatening you. That's a crime in Missouri.
3. Shooting people. That's a crime in Wisconsin.
Being on your property is not the same as being inside your castle.You're right the homeowners were on their property and no one was shot but the homeowners in at least one case were arrested and their firearm confiscated.
*****SMILE*****
www.masslive.com
Being on your property is not the same as being inside your castle.You're right the homeowners were on their property and no one was shot but the homeowners in at least one case were arrested and their firearm confiscated.
*****SMILE*****
That's why it's not called the "property doctrine"
Had a stone wall surrounding the property with ironwork gate that had been broken into as far as I'm concerned they were inside their castle.
Had a stone wall surrounding the property with ironwork gate that had been broken into as far as I'm concerned they were inside their castle.
Would you hold the same as the barricades erected outside of the Capitol on January 6th.
If so, they not only had full justification to shoot Ashli Babbit who was inside the castle, but they could have shot the rest of the insurrectionists before they even got into the building.
Now that I could support.
Everybody already has the "castle doctrine" under common law.And they did shoot her which is why it should be everyone's Constitutional right to be able to do the same.
