Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let us know when you intend on singing "we are the world".how did it save your job, exactly?
The first time home buyers tax incentive.
It saved the real estate industry.
Just the auto industry was more than a million jobs.
Funny how the GObP/Repubs were all kinds of critical right up until it was time to take credit. Then, there they'd be, holding a shovel or a big pair of scissors to cut that ribbon and get their pictures taken.
Yes it was successful but it wasn't big enough. Neither was the second one. And, yes, it was tax cuts which the pub/bag voter took but won't acknowledge.
Difference between this time and last is that President Obama saved the world market from collapse the first time. This time, the world collapse could take us with it.
Won't the GObP/Repubs be thrilled. They'll be able to keep right on lying and hang it Obama. The 99% will be hurt bad but that's not their problem because their owned by the 1%.
He is an apologist for Papa Obama
Well, the stimulus did create 5 to 25 million jobs.
Oh wait...it saved that many. Until it ran out.
I noticed that filings for unemployment are up.
It is nothing more than trying to lay the groundwork for Obama's platform for re-election which we already know is nothing more than "it coulda been worse, huh". Because there is absolutely no way to even estimate or attempt to measure "jobs saved", it means all claims by Obama apologists about the number of jobs saved by the so-called stimulus bill are nothing but made up BULLSHIT. 
how did it save your job, exactly?
The first time home buyers tax incentive.
It saved the real estate industry.
Just the auto industry was more than a million jobs.
Funny how the GObP/Repubs were all kinds of critical right up until it was time to take credit. Then, there they'd be, holding a shovel or a big pair of scissors to cut that ribbon and get their pictures taken.
Yes it was successful but it wasn't big enough. Neither was the second one. And, yes, it was tax cuts which the pub/bag voter took but won't acknowledge.
Difference between this time and last is that President Obama saved the world market from collapse the first time. This time, the world collapse could take us with it.
Won't the GObP/Repubs be thrilled. They'll be able to keep right on lying and hang it Obama. The 99% will be hurt bad but that's not their problem because their owned by the 1%.
This time, the world collapse could take us with it.
Let's hope it does.
Becaues then, everyone living off the government is going to find out what it means to work.
Well
it is not like he knows what he is talking about
He did not know the Soviet Union was socialist
Careful,
He'll ink off and post another one of those stupid graphs.
For the left
Father forgive them, for they know not what they do
For the left
Father forgive them, for they know not what they do
This time, the world collapse could take us with it.
Let's hope it does.
Becaues then, everyone living off the government is going to find out what it means to work.
And, under the circumstance of the worldwide economic meltdown (like that which might have happened in 2007) everybody living off their own labors would have to find out what it means not to have a job.
What you are hoping for (the removal of what you percieve as social parasites) isn't what will happen.
...for thine economy maketh the sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
For the left
Father forgive them, for they know not what they do
Who is this "left" you speak of, Neo?
The movers and shakers in the central and sovereign banks?
The 6 major shadow Banksters controlling 98% of all derivative debt?
ARE those people the "lefties" of which you speak?
Those folks are, after all, the people in charge.
I ask this because it seems rather silly to think of the world leading capitalistic banksters as socialists.
But if that's who you mean when you speak of members of the left, then I join you in chiding "the LEFT" for fucking up the world.'
Well
it is not like he knows what he is talking about
He did not know the Soviet Union was socialist
Careful,
He'll ink off and post another one of those stupid graphs.
I've seen these graphs about 25 times thanks to Chris. One thing he has never done is debunked my argument that the economy was already bottoming out when Obama took office.
Tell me, how on earth can you attribute that "growth" to Obama when had been in office barely a month? An economy the size and scope of ours does not turn on a dime. It was also months before the stimulus could have had any meaningful impact.
I never get an answer, usually just more red-herring arguments and more graphs. I don't think that even he understands the graphs he posts.
I've seen these graphs about 25 times thanks to Chris. One thing he has never done is debunked my argument that the economy was already bottoming out when Obama took office.
Tell me, how on earth can you attribute that "growth" to Obama when had been in office barely a month? An economy the size and scope of ours does not turn on a dime. It was also months before the stimulus could have had any meaningful impact.
I never get an answer, usually just more red-herring arguments and more graphs. I don't think that even he understands the graphs he posts.
The stimulus stopped the deflationary spiral and created the growth.
Basic economics.
I've seen these graphs about 25 times thanks to Chris. One thing he has never done is debunked my argument that the economy was already bottoming out when Obama took office.
Tell me, how on earth can you attribute that "growth" to Obama when had been in office barely a month? An economy the size and scope of ours does not turn on a dime. It was also months before the stimulus could have had any meaningful impact.
I never get an answer, usually just more red-herring arguments and more graphs. I don't think that even he understands the graphs he posts.
The stimulus stopped the deflationary spiral and created the growth.
Basic economics.
Wait wait wait, I thought you were going to make a point to back up your graph. Tell me how on earth the stimulus could have had an affect on these numbers in the early months of 2009 when the economy was stabilizing?
