Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't have to justify it. That's why it's called a right. I have it because I can. Deal with it
The justification is the same as the need for big trucks and fast cars. I asked you why you NEED it.
The point that you refuse to acknowledge is that nobody is under any obligation to justify his “need” to exercise a right. That's an important defining characteristic of a right, that one is allowed to exercise it without having to show any need or justification for doing so,and without having to seek permission from anyone, least of all from government.
The burden is entirely on those such as you, who would deny the exercise of a right, to prove that such a denial is necessary and justifiable.
Me either but its better to have it than need it and not have it.Claifornia first banned the buying of new 30 round magazines....then, since book burners/gun grabbers won't stop till they get all guns....then, commie governor jerry brown outlawed the previous grandfathered 30 round magazines...now, 5 California citizens....all law abiding...are suing the morons in the California government for violating their 2nd Amendment Right to bear arms...
NRA hits back in court over California magazine ban
As a gun owner, I can't think of one reason I would need a thirty round magazine.
A thirty round magazine is designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading. That's it, no other reason.
No...it is designed to help save the life of the user....defending himself against attack and protecting his family...it allows them to do so without having to change a magazine more times than they might have to with fewer bullets......that is important because if you are injured in a fight, the adrenalin and injury may make it harder to switch out magazines...
Criminals can get whatever magazines they want and can rape rob and murder with illegal guns and magazines.....
Civilians who have to defend themselves and their families...may face more than one attacker and those attackers may be armed with their own guns.......so again...the 30 round magazine allows a good person to defend themselves and their families......
I don't have to justify it. That's why it's called a right. I have it because I can. Deal with it
The justification is the same as the need for big trucks and fast cars. I asked you why you NEED it.
The point that you refuse to acknowledge is that nobody is under any obligation to justify his “need” to exercise a right. That's an important defining characteristic of a right, that one is allowed to exercise it without having to show any need or justification for doing so,and without having to seek permission from anyone, least of all from government.
The burden is entirely on those such as you, who would deny the exercise of a right, to prove that such a denial is necessary and justifiable.
I didn't think that gun attachments were a 'right?'
Again, I'm not asking for a justification, I'm asking for a need to have a 30 round magazine that was designed and engineered to kill a number of people without reloading.
Claifornia first banned the buying of new 30 round magazines....then, since book burners/gun grabbers won't stop till they get all guns....then, commie governor jerry brown outlawed the previous grandfathered 30 round magazines...now, 5 California citizens....all law abiding...are suing the morons in the California government for violating their 2nd Amendment Right to bear arms...
NRA hits back in court over California magazine ban
As a gun owner, I can't think of one reason I would need a thirty round magazine.
That's not the point... is it?
That IS the point. Why would one NEED to have a 30 round magazine that is designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading?
For self defense, for competition, for hunting, for collecting...that is why the 8 million rifles in the hands of American people are not a threat.........normal people use them without breaking the law...
And...if you use one to break the law...you can already be arrested and put in jail.......
Me either but its better to have it than need it and not have it.Claifornia first banned the buying of new 30 round magazines....then, since book burners/gun grabbers won't stop till they get all guns....then, commie governor jerry brown outlawed the previous grandfathered 30 round magazines...now, 5 California citizens....all law abiding...are suing the morons in the California government for violating their 2nd Amendment Right to bear arms...
NRA hits back in court over California magazine ban
As a gun owner, I can't think of one reason I would need a thirty round magazine.
A thirty round magazine is designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading. That's it, no other reason.
No...it is designed to help save the life of the user....defending himself against attack and protecting his family...it allows them to do so without having to change a magazine more times than they might have to with fewer bullets......that is important because if you are injured in a fight, the adrenalin and injury may make it harder to switch out magazines...
Criminals can get whatever magazines they want and can rape rob and murder with illegal guns and magazines.....
Civilians who have to defend themselves and their families...may face more than one attacker and those attackers may be armed with their own guns.......so again...the 30 round magazine allows a good person to defend themselves and their families......
A well trained individual with a Glock can't do the same?
Claifornia first banned the buying of new 30 round magazines....then, since book burners/gun grabbers won't stop till they get all guns....then, commie governor jerry brown outlawed the previous grandfathered 30 round magazines...now, 5 California citizens....all law abiding...are suing the morons in the California government for violating their 2nd Amendment Right to bear arms...
NRA hits back in court over California magazine ban
As a gun owner, I can't think of one reason I would need a thirty round magazine.
That's not the point... is it?
That IS the point. Why would one NEED to have a 30 round magazine that is designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading?
Why do you need to have a Television?
Me either but its better to have it than need it and not have it.Claifornia first banned the buying of new 30 round magazines....then, since book burners/gun grabbers won't stop till they get all guns....then, commie governor jerry brown outlawed the previous grandfathered 30 round magazines...now, 5 California citizens....all law abiding...are suing the morons in the California government for violating their 2nd Amendment Right to bear arms...
NRA hits back in court over California magazine ban
As a gun owner, I can't think of one reason I would need a thirty round magazine.
A thirty round magazine is designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading. That's it, no other reason.
No...it is designed to help save the life of the user....defending himself against attack and protecting his family...it allows them to do so without having to change a magazine more times than they might have to with fewer bullets......that is important because if you are injured in a fight, the adrenalin and injury may make it harder to switch out magazines...
Criminals can get whatever magazines they want and can rape rob and murder with illegal guns and magazines.....
Civilians who have to defend themselves and their families...may face more than one attacker and those attackers may be armed with their own guns.......so again...the 30 round magazine allows a good person to defend themselves and their families......
A well trained individual with a Glock can't do the same?
Claifornia first banned the buying of new 30 round magazines....then, since book burners/gun grabbers won't stop till they get all guns....then, commie governor jerry brown outlawed the previous grandfathered 30 round magazines...now, 5 California citizens....all law abiding...are suing the morons in the California government for violating their 2nd Amendment Right to bear arms...
NRA hits back in court over California magazine ban
As a gun owner, I can't think of one reason I would need a thirty round magazine.
That's not the point... is it?
That IS the point. Why would one NEED to have a 30 round magazine that is designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading?
Why do you need to have a Television?
I don't, but it's nice to have, and it isn't designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading.
Claifornia first banned the buying of new 30 round magazines....then, since book burners/gun grabbers won't stop till they get all guns....then, commie governor jerry brown outlawed the previous grandfathered 30 round magazines...now, 5 California citizens....all law abiding...are suing the morons in the California government for violating their 2nd Amendment Right to bear arms...
NRA hits back in court over California magazine ban
As a gun owner, I can't think of one reason I would need a thirty round magazine.
That's not the point... is it?
That IS the point. Why would one NEED to have a 30 round magazine that is designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading?
For self defense, for competition, for hunting, for collecting...that is why the 8 million rifles in the hands of American people are not a threat.........normal people use them without breaking the law...
And...if you use one to break the law...you can already be arrested and put in jail.......
A hand gun is a much better weapon for self-defense.
You can't compete without a 30 round clip?
You can't hunt without a 30 round clip?
You can't collect without a 30 round clip?
I desire a .50 caliber machine gun or two....so I can have one?Claifornia first banned the buying of new 30 round magazines....then, since book burners/gun grabbers won't stop till they get all guns....then, commie governor jerry brown outlawed the previous grandfathered 30 round magazines...now, 5 California citizens....all law abiding...are suing the morons in the California government for violating their 2nd Amendment Right to bear arms...
NRA hits back in court over California magazine ban
As a gun owner, I can't think of one reason I would need a thirty round magazine.
BEcause they desire to own one....that is all they need. There is absolutely no reason to ban them unless you are irrational and hate guns.
...or when violently attacking.....As a gun owner, I can't think of one reason I would need a thirty round magazine.
That's not the point... is it?
That IS the point. Why would one NEED to have a 30 round magazine that is designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading?
Why do you need to have a Television?
I don't, but it's nice to have, and it isn't designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading.
A gun isn't either...it is designed to make it easier for the user to survive being violently attacked.
I desire a .50 caliber machine gun or two....so I can have one?Claifornia first banned the buying of new 30 round magazines....then, since book burners/gun grabbers won't stop till they get all guns....then, commie governor jerry brown outlawed the previous grandfathered 30 round magazines...now, 5 California citizens....all law abiding...are suing the morons in the California government for violating their 2nd Amendment Right to bear arms...
NRA hits back in court over California magazine ban
As a gun owner, I can't think of one reason I would need a thirty round magazine.
BEcause they desire to own one....that is all they need. There is absolutely no reason to ban them unless you are irrational and hate guns.
...or when violently attacking.....That's not the point... is it?
That IS the point. Why would one NEED to have a 30 round magazine that is designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading?
Why do you need to have a Television?
I don't, but it's nice to have, and it isn't designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading.
A gun isn't either...it is designed to make it easier for the user to survive being violently attacked.
...or when violently attacking.....That's not the point... is it?
That IS the point. Why would one NEED to have a 30 round magazine that is designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading?
Why do you need to have a Television?
I don't, but it's nice to have, and it isn't designed and manufactured to kill multiple people without reloading.
A gun isn't either...it is designed to make it easier for the user to survive being violently attacked.
did you have help moving those goal posts?....lets go back to what you said about the reason one buys a gun or ammo....."To increase profits for gun manufacturers for which the NRA is a marketing concern".....i have never heard or read a gun owner saying thats why they bought their guns,but i have seen anti gunners say this,like you just did.....now as for what you just said....why the hell do you think gun manufacturers would donate to the NRA?.....that answer there just told me you dont own guns....Why don't you write the real reason; To increase profits for gun manufacturers for which the NRA is a marketing concern.
Then why does more than half of the income for the NRA come directly or indirectly from gun manufacturers?
Take Sandy Hook. A bad guy kills and the NRA uses hysteria marketing to convince the weak minded that the government is going to take away their guns. Gun sales skyrocket. Who wins?
How many gun manufacturers pay for NRA membership when you buy their weapon?
Pepe Le Pew and his cohorts become millionaires from a non-profit. Pretty sweet!
It isn't hysteria.....hilary had a plan to use the courts to attack gun makers, and the 4th circuit court of appeals just ruled that military style weapons are not protected by the second amendment....and since bolt action rifles, pump action shotguns, lever action rifles and 6 shot revolvers...as well as most modern pistols use a magazine, and have been used in the military......that is an attack on the right to own guns that is serious and imminent.......
I don't have to justify it. That's why it's called a right. I have it because I can. Deal with it
The justification is the same as the need for big trucks and fast cars. I asked you why you NEED it.
The point that you refuse to acknowledge is that nobody is under any obligation to justify his “need” to exercise a right. That's an important defining characteristic of a right, that one is allowed to exercise it without having to show any need or justification for doing so,and without having to seek permission from anyone, least of all from government.
The burden is entirely on those such as you, who would deny the exercise of a right, to prove that such a denial is necessary and justifiable.
The same tactic was used to keep blacks from voting......the democrats didn't think blacks had a need to vote....since white democrats could run the government without them...so they created poll taxes and literacy tests to keep blacks from voting......
did you have help moving those goal posts?....lets go back to what you said about the reason one buys a gun or ammo....."To increase profits for gun manufacturers for which the NRA is a marketing concern".....i have never heard or read a gun owner saying thats why they bought their guns,but i have seen anti gunners say this,like you just did.....now as for what you just said....why the hell do you think gun manufacturers would donate to the NRA?.....that answer there just told me you dont own guns....
Then why does more than half of the income for the NRA come directly or indirectly from gun manufacturers?
Take Sandy Hook. A bad guy kills and the NRA uses hysteria marketing to convince the weak minded that the government is going to take away their guns. Gun sales skyrocket. Who wins?
How many gun manufacturers pay for NRA membership when you buy their weapon?
Pepe Le Pew and his cohorts become millionaires from a non-profit. Pretty sweet!
It isn't hysteria.....hilary had a plan to use the courts to attack gun makers, and the 4th circuit court of appeals just ruled that military style weapons are not protected by the second amendment....and since bolt action rifles, pump action shotguns, lever action rifles and 6 shot revolvers...as well as most modern pistols use a magazine, and have been used in the military......that is an attack on the right to own guns that is serious and imminent.......
Sure it was, but the issue is 30 round magazines.
Really? You believe that many would have died that quickly with a shotgun...or a revolver?No reason? What the hell does a citizen need a thirty round magazine on a semi-auto for? I do realize they come in real handy in clearing out grade school classrooms and crowded movie theaters. We require a special license to own and shoot a .45 Thompson. That same license should be required for high capacity magazine in semi-automatic guns.Claifornia first banned the buying of new 30 round magazines....then, since book burners/gun grabbers won't stop till they get all guns....then, commie governor jerry brown outlawed the previous grandfathered 30 round magazines...now, 5 California citizens....all law abiding...are suing the morons in the California government for violating their 2nd Amendment Right to bear arms...
NRA hits back in court over California magazine ban
As a gun owner, I can't think of one reason I would need a thirty round magazine.
BEcause they desire to own one....that is all they need. There is absolutely no reason to ban them unless you are irrational and hate guns.
Do you realize that those small children could just as easily have been murdered with a shotgun.....or multiple shotguns...or even revolvers......
There is no need for a special license...since you guys like gun laws this is how we handle it......
You make a law that states if you use a 30 round magazine in a crime...you go to jail for 30 years for the 30 round magazine all by itself...
And there you go.......you get a law....we get to keep normal magazines....everyone is happy...right?
did you have help moving those goal posts?....lets go back to what you said about the reason one buys a gun or ammo....."To increase profits for gun manufacturers for which the NRA is a marketing concern".....i have never heard or read a gun owner saying thats why they bought their guns,but i have seen anti gunners say this,like you just did.....now as for what you just said....why the hell do you think gun manufacturers would donate to the NRA?.....that answer there just told me you dont own guns....Why don't you write the real reason; To increase profits for gun manufacturers for which the NRA is a marketing concern.
Then why does more than half of the income for the NRA come directly or indirectly from gun manufacturers?
Take Sandy Hook. A bad guy kills and the NRA uses hysteria marketing to convince the weak minded that the government is going to take away their guns. Gun sales skyrocket. Who wins?
How many gun manufacturers pay for NRA membership when you buy their weapon?
Pepe Le Pew and his cohorts become millionaires from a non-profit. Pretty sweet!
How many gun manufacturers pay for NRA membership when you buy their weapon?
None.......I became a life member all on my lonesome....
I'm sorry to hear that people are being forced to have abortions.Kinda like planned parenthood murdering more babies increases profits? Especially those black babies, they make a killing off them, you know? The innocent that don't have a choice to life? Because of cowards, like yourself.Claifornia first banned the buying of new 30 round magazines....then, since book burners/gun grabbers won't stop till they get all guns....then, commie governor jerry brown outlawed the previous grandfathered 30 round magazines...now, 5 California citizens....all law abiding...are suing the morons in the California government for violating their 2nd Amendment Right to bear arms...
NRA hits back in court over California magazine ban
As a gun owner, I can't think of one reason I would need a thirty round magazine.
BEcause they desire to own one....that is all they need. There is absolutely no reason to ban them unless you are irrational and hate guns.
Why don't you write the real reason; To increase profits for gun manufacturers for which the NRA is a marketing concern.
