Colorado is after this guy.

[westwall]

Nope, Dogmaphobe: that rant is not even near the Planet Reality.

If the Muslim offers certain wares publicly in the commercial forum, then he has to serve. Period.

But if he does not offer Matzos, then you can't make him do them for you.

And if he doesn't offer custom cakes to the general public YOU CAN'T FORCE him either. See, you finally figured it out!

If he offers designed cakes to the public, then he trapped himself.

He doesn't silly boy. People come to him and ASK. He does not offer. Sheesh, where do you imbeciles come from.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nope, Dogmaphobe: that rant is not even near the Planet Reality.

If the Muslim offers certain wares publicly in the commercial forum, then he has to serve. Period.

But if he does not offer Matzos, then you can't make him do them for you.

And if he doesn't offer custom cakes to the general public YOU CAN'T FORCE him either. See, you finally figured it out!

If he offers designed cakes to the public, then he trapped himself.

He doesn't silly boy. People come to him and ASK. He does not offer. Sheesh, where do you imbeciles come from.

Nope, Dogmaphobe: that rant is not even near the Planet Reality.

If the Muslim offers certain wares publicly in the commercial forum, then he has to serve. Period.

But if he does not offer Matzos, then you can't make him do them for you.

And if he doesn't offer custom cakes to the general public YOU CAN'T FORCE him either. See, you finally figured it out!

If he offers designed cakes to the public, then he trapped himself.

He doesn't silly boy. People come to him and ASK. He does not offer. Sheesh, where do you imbeciles come from.

If it is public knowledge, then it is public advertised. And there lies the rub, silly girl.

 

[westwall]

Nope, Dogmaphobe: that rant is not even near the Planet Reality.

If the Muslim offers certain wares publicly in the commercial forum, then he has to serve. Period.

But if he does not offer Matzos, then you can't make him do them for you.

And if he doesn't offer custom cakes to the general public YOU CAN'T FORCE him either. See, you finally figured it out!

If he offers designed cakes to the public, then he trapped himself.

He doesn't silly boy. People come to him and ASK. He does not offer. Sheesh, where do you imbeciles come from.

Nope, Dogmaphobe: that rant is not even near the Planet Reality.

If the Muslim offers certain wares publicly in the commercial forum, then he has to serve. Period.

But if he does not offer Matzos, then you can't make him do them for you.

And if he doesn't offer custom cakes to the general public YOU CAN'T FORCE him either. See, you finally figured it out!

If he offers designed cakes to the public, then he trapped himself.

He doesn't silly boy. People come to him and ASK. He does not offer. Sheesh, where do you imbeciles come from.

If it is public knowledge, then it is public advertised. And there lies the rub, silly girl.

What is public knowledge? You're not very smart are you. The customer has to ASK. It is not publicly available Why are simple facts so hard for you.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

During

Nope, Dogmaphobe: that rant is not even near the Planet Reality.

Thanks Jakey. When I said "everybody" knows how Coyote would react, I really should have said "everybody astute".

I appreciate your pointing that out and my apologies if you felt included against your will.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Do Muslims make Matzos as part of the professional product publicly?

westwall and marty are having trouble with PA laws.

I have trouble when PA laws are applied to things that are not actual Public Accomodations.

You on the other hand approve of government tyranny when it suits you.

Fakey has wet dreams of being Stalin.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Jarl is projecting again!

 

[Jarlaxle]

He is breaking the law

Bake the cake or find a new business

What hubris you have placing yourself above the Supreme Court.

Delusions of adequacy.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Let's be consistent. Some laws are illegitimate and Unconstitutional, and the only reason you're pretending to demand blind obedience to any and all laws is because you [Coyote] like THIS law, and think your approval makes it Constitutional. You and I both know that you don't consider laws you disagree with binding on you at all, regardless of their Constitutionality and legality.

…Including the Constitution itself. The First Amendment is quite clear enough about freedoms of expression, religion, conscience, and association. Coyote, like most left wrong-wing filth, is all too willing to violate the highest law of this nation, if she doesn't like how it is applied, all the while hypocritically playing empty lip service to “the rule of law”.

 

[dblack]

Nope, Dogmaphobe: that rant is not even near the Planet Reality.

If the Muslim offers certain wares publicly in the commercial forum, then he has to serve. Period.

But if he does not offer Matzos, then you can't make him do them for you.

And if he doesn't offer custom cakes to the general public YOU CAN'T FORCE him either. See, you finally figured it out!

If he offers designed cakes to the public, then he trapped himself.

Just like Facebookburning and Alex Jones, amiright?

It is the same basic principle.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Let's be consistent. Some laws are illegitimate and Unconstitutional, and the only reason you're pretending to demand blind obedience to any and all laws is because you [Coyote] like THIS law, and think your approval makes it Constitutional. You and I both know that you don't consider laws you disagree with binding on you at all, regardless of their Constitutionality and legality.

…Including the Constitution itself. The First Amendment is quite clear enough about freedoms of expression, religion, conscience, and association. Coyote, like most left wrong-wing filth, is all too willing to violate the highest law of this nation, if she doesn't like how it is applied, all the while hypocritically playing empty lip service to “the rule of law”.

Blaylock "is all too willing to violate the highest law of the nation, if" he "doesn't like how it is applied . . ."

 

[dblack]

Blaylock "is all too willing to violate the highest law of the nation, if" he "doesn't like how it is applied . . ."

Fakey is sportscasting again.

 

[Coyote]

Lets be consistent.

Yes. Let's.

Everybody here knows damn well that if it were a Muslim baker, you would be saying NONE of these things

Heck, a Muslim baker could lop off the head of the tranny and you would be here refusing to say there is anything wrong with it, you would be ridiculing those who objected to it by indicating it was funny and you would be demanding people attack some christians, instead.

Now you are being pathetic and silly. In Colorado, if they serve the public they cannot discrimminate. Sorry you are too dense to comprehend it

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Lets be consistent.

Yes. Let's.

Everybody here knows damn well that if it were a Muslim baker, you would be saying NONE of these things

Heck, a Muslim baker could lop off the head of the tranny and you would be here refusing to say there is anything wrong with it, you would be ridiculing those who objected to it by indicating it was funny and you would be demanding people attack some christians, instead.

Now you are being pathetic and silly. In Colorado, if they serve the public they cannot discrimminate. Sorry you are too dense to comprehend it

In the United States the First guarantees an indivudual the right to freedom of religion, it shall not be stifled nor infringed That overrides any PA law.

A Constituional right is paramount.

 

[dblack]

Lets be consistent.

Yes. Let's.

Everybody here knows damn well that if it were a Muslim baker, you would be saying NONE of these things

Heck, a Muslim baker could lop off the head of the tranny and you would be here refusing to say there is anything wrong with it, you would be ridiculing those who objected to it by indicating it was funny and you would be demanding people attack some christians, instead.

Now you are being pathetic and silly. In Colorado, if they serve the public they cannot discrimminate. Sorry you are too dense to comprehend it

Actually, they can. They just can't say why. If their reason is covered by a 'protected class', they can still discriminate, as long as they remain silent about the reason.

 

[Coyote]

Lets be consistent.

Yes. Let's.

Everybody here knows damn well that if it were a Muslim baker, you would be saying NONE of these things

Heck, a Muslim baker could lop off the head of the tranny and you would be here refusing to say there is anything wrong with it, you would be ridiculing those who objected to it by indicating it was funny and you would be demanding people attack some christians, instead.

Now you are being pathetic and silly. In Colorado, if they serve the public they cannot discrimminate. Sorry you are too dense to comprehend it

In the United States the First guarantees an indivudual the right to freedom of religion, it shall not be stifled nor infringed That overrides any PA law.

A Constituional right is paramount.

It is not unlimited however and that is the issue to be resolved...at what point does one right overrule another? I think on one side there are thise clearly trying to bait and set up people like the baker but on the other side ther are people stretching the meaning of religious freedom until it becomes a thin veneer to mask blatent discrimmination.

 

[dblack]

It is not unlimited however and that is the issue to be resolved...at what point does one right overrule another?

If there actually were two rights conflicting, you'd have a point. Cake is not a right.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Lets be consistent.

Yes. Let's.

Everybody here knows damn well that if it were a Muslim baker, you would be saying NONE of these things

Heck, a Muslim baker could lop off the head of the tranny and you would be here refusing to say there is anything wrong with it, you would be ridiculing those who objected to it by indicating it was funny and you would be demanding people attack some christians, instead.

Now you are being pathetic and silly. In Colorado, if they serve the public they cannot discrimminate. Sorry you are too dense to comprehend it

In the United States the First guarantees an indivudual the right to freedom of religion, it shall not be stifled nor infringed That overrides any PA law.

A Constituional right is paramount.

It is not unlimited however and that is the issue to be resolved...at what point does one right overrule another? I think on one side there are thise clearly trying to bait and set up people like the baker but on the other side ther are people stretching the meaning of religious freedom until it becomes a thin veneer to mask blatent discrimmination.

The man is a Christian. In Christianity homosexuality is clearly sinful. He's within his constitutional rights to refuse.

These gays targeting these Christians and yes they are can easily find a baker to accomodate them but instead they're pushing it. Then absolutely shocked when the push back begins.

 

[Coyote]

Lets be consistent.

Yes. Let's.

Everybody here knows damn well that if it were a Muslim baker, you would be saying NONE of these things

Heck, a Muslim baker could lop off the head of the tranny and you would be here refusing to say there is anything wrong with it, you would be ridiculing those who objected to it by indicating it was funny and you would be demanding people attack some christians, instead.

Now you are being pathetic and silly. In Colorado, if they serve the public they cannot discrimminate. Sorry you are too dense to comprehend it

In the United States the First guarantees an indivudual the right to freedom of religion, it shall not be stifled nor infringed That overrides any PA law.

A Constituional right is paramount.

It is not unlimited however and that is the issue to be resolved...at what point does one right overrule another? I think on one side there are thise clearly trying to bait and set up people like the baker but on the other side ther are people stretching the meaning of religious freedom until it becomes a thin veneer to mask blatent discrimmination.

The man is a Christian. In Christianity homosexuality is clearly sinful. He's within his constitutional rights to refuse.

These gays targeting these Christians and yes they are can easily find a baker to accomodate them but instead they're pushing it. Then absolutely shocked when the push back begins.

It is not unlimited however and that is the issue to be resolved...at what point does one right overrule another?

If there actually were two rights conflicting, you'd have a point. Cake is not a right.

You are right, cake isnt.. However...that is not the right in question.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Yes. Let's.

Everybody here knows damn well that if it were a Muslim baker, you would be saying NONE of these things

Heck, a Muslim baker could lop off the head of the tranny and you would be here refusing to say there is anything wrong with it, you would be ridiculing those who objected to it by indicating it was funny and you would be demanding people attack some christians, instead.

Now you are being pathetic and silly. In Colorado, if they serve the public they cannot discrimminate. Sorry you are too dense to comprehend it

In the United States the First guarantees an indivudual the right to freedom of religion, it shall not be stifled nor infringed That overrides any PA law.

A Constituional right is paramount.

It is not unlimited however and that is the issue to be resolved...at what point does one right overrule another? I think on one side there are thise clearly trying to bait and set up people like the baker but on the other side ther are people stretching the meaning of religious freedom until it becomes a thin veneer to mask blatent discrimmination.

The man is a Christian. In Christianity homosexuality is clearly sinful. He's within his constitutional rights to refuse.

These gays targeting these Christians and yes they are can easily find a baker to accomodate them but instead they're pushing it. Then absolutely shocked when the push back begins.

It is not unlimited however and that is the issue to be resolved...at what point does one right overrule another?

If there actually were two rights conflicting, you'd have a point. Cake is not a right.

You are right, cake isnt.. However...that is not the right in question.

The right in question is religious freedom, a constituional right. Your pesky PA state law doesn't have a prayer

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Now you are being pathetic and silly. In Colorado, if they serve the public they cannot discrimminate. Sorry you are too dense to comprehend it

I am not the one incapable of differentiating between discrimination and demands for a contracted service. That would be you.

My pointing out the nature of your usual Islamic agitprop is neither pathetic nor silly. If it were an Islamist baker, you would be all about religious freedom and everybody here besides the benightedly inobservant Jakey knows that.