Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You have sure been fooled by the gun lobby. They shoot rifle rounds which are more likely to kill. They have large capacity magazines. Rifles are easier to fire faster. Police are often outgunned by these rifles.Because they look cool. The gun is no more deadly than any other semi auto weapon. The only difference is looksThe gun isn't the reason. The killer is. And you can shoot as many people with a handgun as you can with a long rifle. In fact a handgun theoretically is more dangerous because it can be easily concealed.....yet the focus is on long guns that fire rounds at the same rate handguns do.Completely relevant. One shooter should not be able to kill 50+ people really quickly in one shooting. Why do you think bombs are illegal?Irrelevant. Have more people been murdered by handguns or long rifles?Our worst mass shootings have been done with ar type rifles.
Murders in Chicago are so high that when you hear the news it sounds like a casualty report from a war zone. And most of those are murdered with hand guns. Yet not a peep from the left. WHY?
So why do shooters use an assault rifle for mass shootings??
It's not a gun culture issue. It is a breakdown of society issue. There are just as many guns in the suburbs but all the violence is in the inner city's. See if you can figure it outYes we have a gun culture problem.We have a big gun problem.
No, we have a BIG cultural problem. Sadly the left is too much of a coward to address this problem.
Countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a fraction of ours and rarely have mass shootings.
And we have mass shootings everywhere. Again, any mass shootings are rare with strong gun control. Other countries have gangs and crime, they are just not as well armed.It's not a gun culture issue. It is a breakdown of society issue. There are just as many guns in the suburbs but all the violence is in the inner city's. See if you can figure it outYes we have a gun culture problem.We have a big gun problem.
No, we have a BIG cultural problem. Sadly the left is too much of a coward to address this problem.
Countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a fraction of ours and rarely have mass shootings.
You have sure been fooled by the gun lobby. They shoot rifle rounds which are more likely to kill. They have large capacity magazines. Rifles are easier to fire faster. Police are often outgunned by these rifles.Because they look cool. The gun is no more deadly than any other semi auto weapon. The only difference is looksThe gun isn't the reason. The killer is. And you can shoot as many people with a handgun as you can with a long rifle. In fact a handgun theoretically is more dangerous because it can be easily concealed.....yet the focus is on long guns that fire rounds at the same rate handguns do.Completely relevant. One shooter should not be able to kill 50+ people really quickly in one shooting. Why do you think bombs are illegal?Irrelevant. Have more people been murdered by handguns or long rifles?
Murders in Chicago are so high that when you hear the news it sounds like a casualty report from a war zone. And most of those are murdered with hand guns. Yet not a peep from the left. WHY?
So why do shooters use an assault rifle for mass shootings??
Because when it comes to guns it is not facts it is emotion.Colt Suspends Manufacture Of Controversial AR-15 For Civilian Market
Makes no sense to me. More people are murdered with handguns but the scary AR 15 is eliminated?
You have sure been fooled by the gun lobby. They shoot rifle rounds which are more likely to kill. They have large capacity magazines. Rifles are easier to fire faster. Police are often outgunned by these rifles.Because they look cool. The gun is no more deadly than any other semi auto weapon. The only difference is looksThe gun isn't the reason. The killer is. And you can shoot as many people with a handgun as you can with a long rifle. In fact a handgun theoretically is more dangerous because it can be easily concealed.....yet the focus is on long guns that fire rounds at the same rate handguns do.Completely relevant. One shooter should not be able to kill 50+ people really quickly in one shooting. Why do you think bombs are illegal?
So why do shooters use an assault rifle for mass shootings??
All rifles don't fire faster than some handguns. That's more liberal myth.
why can you not define an assault rifle?The gun isn't the reason. The killer is. And you can shoot as many people with a handgun as you can with a long rifle. In fact a handgun theoretically is more dangerous because it can be easily concealed.....yet the focus is on long guns that fire rounds at the same rate handguns do.Completely relevant. One shooter should not be able to kill 50+ people really quickly in one shooting. Why do you think bombs are illegal?Irrelevant. Have more people been murdered by handguns or long rifles?Our worst mass shootings have been done with ar type rifles.Colt Suspends Manufacture Of Controversial AR-15 For Civilian Market
Makes no sense to me. More people are murdered with handguns but the scary AR 15 is eliminated?
Murders in Chicago are so high that when you hear the news it sounds like a casualty report from a war zone. And most of those are murdered with hand guns. Yet not a peep from the left. WHY?
So why do shooters use an assault rifle for mass shootings??
You mean like Sweden that has seen a large increase in smuggled in automatic weapons and hand gernades.And we have mass shootings everywhere. Again, any mass shootings are rare with strong gun control. Other countries have gangs and crime, they are just not as well armed.It's not a gun culture issue. It is a breakdown of society issue. There are just as many guns in the suburbs but all the violence is in the inner city's. See if you can figure it outYes we have a gun culture problem.We have a big gun problem.
No, we have a BIG cultural problem. Sadly the left is too much of a coward to address this problem.
Countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a fraction of ours and rarely have mass shootings.
Any semi auto rifle capable of using large capacity magazines should be banned.why can you not define an assault rifle?The gun isn't the reason. The killer is. And you can shoot as many people with a handgun as you can with a long rifle. In fact a handgun theoretically is more dangerous because it can be easily concealed.....yet the focus is on long guns that fire rounds at the same rate handguns do.Completely relevant. One shooter should not be able to kill 50+ people really quickly in one shooting. Why do you think bombs are illegal?Irrelevant. Have more people been murdered by handguns or long rifles?Our worst mass shootings have been done with ar type rifles.
Murders in Chicago are so high that when you hear the news it sounds like a casualty report from a war zone. And most of those are murdered with hand guns. Yet not a peep from the left. WHY?
So why do shooters use an assault rifle for mass shootings??
bullshit. you've obviously never shot either and are just throwing up liberal bullshit.You have sure been fooled by the gun lobby. They shoot rifle rounds which are more likely to kill. They have large capacity magazines. Rifles are easier to fire faster. Police are often outgunned by these rifles.Because they look cool. The gun is no more deadly than any other semi auto weapon. The only difference is looksThe gun isn't the reason. The killer is. And you can shoot as many people with a handgun as you can with a long rifle. In fact a handgun theoretically is more dangerous because it can be easily concealed.....yet the focus is on long guns that fire rounds at the same rate handguns do.
So why do shooters use an assault rifle for mass shootings??
All rifles don't fire faster than some handguns. That's more liberal myth.
And its easier to shoot rounds with a assault rifle, instead of a handgun.
Any semi auto rifle capable of using large capacity magazines should be banned.why can you not define an assault rifle?The gun isn't the reason. The killer is. And you can shoot as many people with a handgun as you can with a long rifle. In fact a handgun theoretically is more dangerous because it can be easily concealed.....yet the focus is on long guns that fire rounds at the same rate handguns do.Completely relevant. One shooter should not be able to kill 50+ people really quickly in one shooting. Why do you think bombs are illegal?Irrelevant. Have more people been murdered by handguns or long rifles?
Murders in Chicago are so high that when you hear the news it sounds like a casualty report from a war zone. And most of those are murdered with hand guns. Yet not a peep from the left. WHY?
So why do shooters use an assault rifle for mass shootings??
They have a tiny homicide rate compared to us and much fewer guns.You mean like Sweden that has seen a large increase in smuggled in automatic weapons and hand gernades.And we have mass shootings everywhere. Again, any mass shootings are rare with strong gun control. Other countries have gangs and crime, they are just not as well armed.It's not a gun culture issue. It is a breakdown of society issue. There are just as many guns in the suburbs but all the violence is in the inner city's. See if you can figure it outYes we have a gun culture problem.We have a big gun problem.
No, we have a BIG cultural problem. Sadly the left is too much of a coward to address this problem.
Countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a fraction of ours and rarely have mass shootings.
Future mass killers applaud you.Any semi auto rifle capable of using large capacity magazines should be banned.why can you not define an assault rifle?The gun isn't the reason. The killer is. And you can shoot as many people with a handgun as you can with a long rifle. In fact a handgun theoretically is more dangerous because it can be easily concealed.....yet the focus is on long guns that fire rounds at the same rate handguns do.Completely relevant. One shooter should not be able to kill 50+ people really quickly in one shooting. Why do you think bombs are illegal?
So why do shooters use an assault rifle for mass shootings??
No, it should not.
You have sure been fooled by the gun lobby. They shoot rifle rounds which are more likely to kill. They have large capacity magazines. Rifles are easier to fire faster. Police are often outgunned by these rifles.Because they look cool. The gun is no more deadly than any other semi auto weapon. The only difference is looksThe gun isn't the reason. The killer is. And you can shoot as many people with a handgun as you can with a long rifle. In fact a handgun theoretically is more dangerous because it can be easily concealed.....yet the focus is on long guns that fire rounds at the same rate handguns do.
So why do shooters use an assault rifle for mass shootings??
All rifles don't fire faster than some handguns. That's more liberal myth.
And its easier to shoot rounds with a assault rifle, instead of a handgun.
Future mass killers applaud you.Any semi auto rifle capable of using large capacity magazines should be banned.why can you not define an assault rifle?The gun isn't the reason. The killer is. And you can shoot as many people with a handgun as you can with a long rifle. In fact a handgun theoretically is more dangerous because it can be easily concealed.....yet the focus is on long guns that fire rounds at the same rate handguns do.
So why do shooters use an assault rifle for mass shootings??
No, it should not.
Large capacity magazines have no place in hunting.You have sure been fooled by the gun lobby. They shoot rifle rounds which are more likely to kill. They have large capacity magazines. Rifles are easier to fire faster. Police are often outgunned by these rifles.Because they look cool. The gun is no more deadly than any other semi auto weapon. The only difference is looksSo why do shooters use an assault rifle for mass shootings??
All rifles don't fire faster than some handguns. That's more liberal myth.
And its easier to shoot rounds with a assault rifle, instead of a handgun.
Would a .223 be a good rifle for deer hunting? Lets say you have a 300-400 yard shot.
Nor do you care our children are regularly gunned down.Future mass killers applaud you.Any semi auto rifle capable of using large capacity magazines should be banned.why can you not define an assault rifle?So why do shooters use an assault rifle for mass shootings??
No, it should not.
I could care less what some nut job thinks about me.
They also have far fewer people and an even less diverse one.They have a tiny homicide rate compared to us and much fewer guns.You mean like Sweden that has seen a large increase in smuggled in automatic weapons and hand gernades.And we have mass shootings everywhere. Again, any mass shootings are rare with strong gun control. Other countries have gangs and crime, they are just not as well armed.It's not a gun culture issue. It is a breakdown of society issue. There are just as many guns in the suburbs but all the violence is in the inner city's. See if you can figure it outYes we have a gun culture problem.No, we have a BIG cultural problem. Sadly the left is too much of a coward to address this problem.
Countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a fraction of ours and rarely have mass shootings.
