Compromise

[Blues Man]

I do

Actually I keep an AR in my truck with 10 30 round magazines with a level 4 plate carrier and ballistic helmet

Because you never know when the zombie apocalypse will start.
I only have 6 mags; I need another set of pouches.

What do you need all the mags for?? Are you expecting to carry out a mass shooting?

Well, why does it matter?

Does he have the right to have that equipment or not?

What if he is able to stop a mass shooting at some point? Are you going to complain about it then?

.

When has a citizen armed with a AR ever stopped a mass shooting?

Irrelevant

No civilian is obligated to stop any crime

Hell the cops aren't legally obligated to come to the aid of anyone

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[Blues Man]

Well, why does it matter?

Does he have the right to have that equipment or not?

What if he is able to stop a mass shooting at some point? Are you going to complain about it then?

.

When has a citizen armed with a AR ever stopped a mass shooting?

In Texas.

.

Nope. That one was already over, and the shooter had left the building. A guy did chase him as he was leaving though.

Shot him dead as he was leaving the church.

It is irrelevant anyway. A mass shooting will be stopped by a concealed handgun more than anything else.

.

So you acknowledge the claim that an AR would stop an active shooter is pure bullshit. Good.
When has a citizen with a handgun ever stopped an active mass shooter during his attack?

Irrelevant

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[Blues Man]

Well, why does it matter?

Does he have the right to have that equipment or not?

What if he is able to stop a mass shooting at some point? Are you going to complain about it then?

.

When has a citizen armed with a AR ever stopped a mass shooting?

Is that a new rule now? Lol

Not sure what kind of rule you might be talking about, but answer the question.

The answer is, fuck you, that is irrelevant.

Stopping mass shootings is not the objective of all firearm ownership.

.

Then quit claiming that as an excuse to have military style weapons, dumb ass.

The only military style weapon I have is a shotgun

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[Blues Man]

Man stops what deputies said would otherwise have likely been a mass public shooting - Crime Prevention Research Center

Concealed handgun permit holder stops man who enters an Alabama McDonalds firing his gun - Crime Prevention Research Center

Concealed handgun permit holder stops gunman who was firing his gun at Titusville, Florida back to school event - Crime Prevention Research Center

In less than 20 seconds, I found these.

You lose.

.

Wow. Three whole incidents, and your own link only says it might have become a mass public shooting. Not too much to crow about.

Guns saved 94 thousand lives last year

You got a credible link for that? "Gun Nuts R Us" isn't credible.

No one has any sources that the other will accept, so if you haven't noticed this thread is about the compromise of Gun owners and the coming of the end of compromise of gun owners. THERE WILL BE NONE

Perhaps not willingly. The country wants reasonable gun control, and that will happen.

So which of the 20000 plus state and federal gun laws are not reasonable?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Thanks for posting a fake certificate
Anyway for extra credit for your attempt here is a couple of my old law enforcement reference booksView attachment 276232 View attachment 276230

Why would I have a copy on hand? lol

You showed a picture of a book. If I show you a picture of a Maserati, does that mean I have one?

I showed you a picture that I just took of my book I have on hand. Here it is opened in my handView attachment 276255

I have a picture of my Maserati with the door open too.

Yawn you can't change my history.
Good for you why do you have one?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The only military style weapon I have is a shotgun

It's funny how they forget that ALL GUNS are designed for military use, or derived from those designed for military use.

"military style weapons"



Makes me want to punch them for their nonsense.

.

 

[Blues Man]

Why are you scared of something that doesn't exist?

You didn't answer me, do you walk around with an assault weapon??

Again why do you fear something that doesn't exist?

Oh man semantics.

Do you walk around with a semi automatic weapon?

Just answer the question and stop being a coward.

Yes I do as a matter of fact I carry one and keep an AR with 10 30 round magazines and a level IV plate carrier with a Ballistic Helmet in my truck

A person doesn't need all that in our nation.

From reading your posts, since you called them guns, it tells me you were never in the military. If you had been in the military you would never use the word gun. You would still hear the TI or DI screaming at you while grabbing his crotch saying that's a gun. What you're holding is a weapon.

I know this because I was in the military. The TI's words screaming over the sound of the weapons still rings in my ears when I see or hear the word gun.

I was formally trained how to use that weapon you carry and is in your home. I know what it's for and it's not for civilian use.

I come from a family of hunters too. My aunt used to sit on her back porch waiting for the right size deer to walk by then, one shot, she had a full freezer of meat. My dad, grandfather and mother used to hunt. No hunter needs a semi automatic weapon and large capacity magazines of bullets.

If you need a lot of ammunition to hit your targets, then you need to go to the shooting range to practice before you hurt yourself.

I grew up with weapons all round me. I've been formally trained by our government how use those weapons of war.

You give up absolutely no rights if you aren't allowed to own a semi automatic weapon. You still have the right to own all the other types of weapons you want.

However you don't have one form of a penis extender and one less object that gives you the false feeling that you have control of your life.

I feel very sorry for the people who have to deal with you on a daily basis.

By the way, your attitude will guarantee that certain weapons will become illegal and removed from our nation. Not compromising will guarantee you do lose the ability to own those semi automatic weapons you have.

It is not up to you to decide what others need

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[Blues Man]

What do you have a vagina for? Do you plan to turn tricks?
:roll:
I have the gun in case I need the gun; I have the ammo in case I need the gun.
If I need the gun, when will I have a chance to resupply the ammo?

I only have 1 vagina, you do not need 6 mags (perhaps 10rounds a mag) =60 shots=?60 bodies, depending on your being a bad shot, maybe 50 bodies.

Did you watch the video?

.

Yes all of it. If it takes more than 10 bullets to hit a target you'd be dead.

So, you're such a great shot under pressure that you believe in 1 shot, 1 kill in an ultra-stress situation?

I want to see you try. That would be funny as hell.

.

No I'm willing to let you have a 10 round mag.

I'm not willing to submit to your decision about my life

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[Blues Man]

Again why do you fear something that doesn't exist?

Oh man semantics.

Do you walk around with a semi automatic weapon?

Just answer the question and stop being a coward.

Yes I do as a matter of fact I carry one and keep an AR with 10 30 round magazines and a level IV plate carrier with a Ballistic Helmet in my truck

A person doesn't need all that in our nation.

From reading your posts, since you called them guns, it tells me you were never in the military. If you had been in the military you would never use the word gun. You would still hear the TI or DI screaming at you while grabbing his crotch saying that's a gun. What you're holding is a weapon.

I know this because I was in the military. The TI's words screaming over the sound of the weapons still rings in my ears when I see or hear the word gun.

I was formally trained how to use that weapon you carry and is in your home. I know what it's for and it's not for civilian use.

I come from a family of hunters too. My aunt used to sit on her back porch waiting for the right size deer to walk by then, one shot, she had a full freezer of meat. My dad, grandfather and mother used to hunt. No hunter needs a semi automatic weapon and large capacity magazines of bullets.

If you need a lot of ammunition to hit your targets, then you need to go to the shooting range to practice before you hurt yourself.

I grew up with weapons all round me. I've been formally trained by our government how use those weapons of war.

You give up absolutely no rights if you aren't allowed to own a semi automatic weapon. You still have the right to own all the other types of weapons you want.

However you don't have one form of a penis extender and one less object that gives you the false feeling that you have control of your life.

I feel very sorry for the people who have to deal with you on a daily basis.

By the way, your attitude will guarantee that certain weapons will become illegal and removed from our nation. Not compromising will guarantee you do lose the ability to own those semi automatic weapons you have.

This is a semi-auto weapon, a single trigger pull fires a single round, you going to ban them too?

View attachment 276110

.

That is not a semiautomatic weapon. The energy from firing does not cock the hammer and rotate the cylinder. For a gun nut, you don't knw much about guns, do you?

It is a minor technical distinction

The end result is one round per trigger pull

I suppose a Gatling gun with a hand crank is not an automatic weapon even though the result is continuous fire

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[Blues Man]

The only military style weapon I have is a shotgun

It's funny how they forget that ALL GUNS are designed for military use, or derived from those designed for military use.

"military style weapons"



Makes me want to punch them for their nonsense.

.

None of my rifles have been designed for military use and none of them would meet military specs

My shotgun has

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

the 2nd is for idiot gun owners to ignore all the rights they're loosing , because they think a gun makes them 'free' Clay

~S~

I suppose you believe you can vote a tyrant out of control of the government. do you support the police and only want them armed?

Guns won’t get rid of a ‘tyrant,’ either.

Guns are for individual self-defense, not to ‘overthrow’ a government incorrectly perceived to have become ‘tyrannical.’

Insurrectionist dogma is as ridiculous as it is wrongheaded, in no manner supported by Second Amendment case law.

The notion is a naïve and childish fantasy.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

the 2nd is for idiot gun owners to ignore all the rights they're loosing , because they think a gun makes them 'free' Clay

~S~

I suppose you believe you can vote a tyrant out of control of the government. do you support the police and only want them armed?

Guns won’t get rid of a ‘tyrant,’ either.

Guns are for individual self-defense, not to ‘overthrow’ a government incorrectly perceived to have become ‘tyrannical.’

Insurrectionist dogma is as ridiculous as it is wrongheaded, in no manner supported by Second Amendment case law.

The notion is a naïve and childish fantasy.

You truly are naïve and childish Trump doesn't step down congress says he should stay then what?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Yes my law enforcement training taught me how to handle nut bags

Binge watching "COPS" while point your finger at the screen and yelling pew! pew! pew! doesn't qualify as law enforcement experience.

Good luck with your delusion
View attachment 276204

When you put a fake document forward as proof of your silly claims, you should at least check that the image isn't partially reversed.
View attachment 276210

I would venture a guess that he did that on purpose to avoid outing his IRL identity on an anonymous forum.

But, that's just a guess.

.

Then it can't be considered proof of anything.

So, you are so cocksucking unreasonable that you want the dude to dox himself before you believe anything. He even gave you his first name for fuck's sake.

You're a fucking douche.

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

the 2nd is for idiot gun owners to ignore all the rights they're loosing , because they think a gun makes them 'free' Clay

~S~

I suppose you believe you can vote a tyrant out of control of the government. do you support the police and only want them armed?

Guns won’t get rid of a ‘tyrant,’ either.

Guns are for individual self-defense, not to ‘overthrow’ a government incorrectly perceived to have become ‘tyrannical.’

Insurrectionist dogma is as ridiculous as it is wrongheaded, in no manner supported by Second Amendment case law.

The notion is a naïve and childish fantasy.

Yeah, I bet the British Common Law didn't support the Colonial insurrection and rebellion.



Some things are extra-constitutional and extra-judicial. The right to bear arms is a pre-existing right. Case law can go fuck itself when it comes to putting down tyranny.

.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

the 2nd is for idiot gun owners to ignore all the rights they're loosing , because they think a gun makes them 'free' Clay

~S~

I suppose you believe you can vote a tyrant out of control of the government. do you support the police and only want them armed?

Guns won’t get rid of a ‘tyrant,’ either.

Guns are for individual self-defense, not to ‘overthrow’ a government incorrectly perceived to have become ‘tyrannical.’

Insurrectionist dogma is as ridiculous as it is wrongheaded, in no manner supported by Second Amendment case law.

The notion is a naïve and childish fantasy.

Yeah, I bet the British Common Law didn't support the Colonial insurrection and rebellion.



Some things are extra-constitutional and extra-judicial. The right to bear arms is a pre-existing right. Case law can go fuck itself when it comes to putting down tyranny.

.

How does he expect to remove a tyrant?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The only military style weapon I have is a shotgun

It's funny how they forget that ALL GUNS are designed for military use, or derived from those designed for military use.

"military style weapons"



Makes me want to punch them for their nonsense.

.

None of my rifles have been designed for military use and none of them would meet military specs

My shotgun has

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

My point is using "military weapons of war" is difference without a distinction.

It's bullshit. They are trying to bullshit their way into a bullshit "assault weapons" ban, but we all know they want a total ban, which is why we must kill them all.

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

the 2nd is for idiot gun owners to ignore all the rights they're loosing , because they think a gun makes them 'free' Clay

~S~

I suppose you believe you can vote a tyrant out of control of the government. do you support the police and only want them armed?

Guns won’t get rid of a ‘tyrant,’ either.

Guns are for individual self-defense, not to ‘overthrow’ a government incorrectly perceived to have become ‘tyrannical.’

Insurrectionist dogma is as ridiculous as it is wrongheaded, in no manner supported by Second Amendment case law.

The notion is a naïve and childish fantasy.

Yeah, I bet the British Common Law didn't support the Colonial insurrection and rebellion.



Some things are extra-constitutional and extra-judicial. The right to bear arms is a pre-existing right. Case law can go fuck itself when it comes to putting down tyranny.

.

How does he expect to remove a tyrant?

Lawsuits.



It worked for Hitler, right?

.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Binge watching "COPS" while point your finger at the screen and yelling pew! pew! pew! doesn't qualify as law enforcement experience.

Good luck with your delusion
View attachment 276204

When you put a fake document forward as proof of your silly claims, you should at least check that the image isn't partially reversed.
View attachment 276210

I would venture a guess that he did that on purpose to avoid outing his IRL identity on an anonymous forum.

But, that's just a guess.

.

Then it can't be considered proof of anything.

So, you are so cocksucking unreasonable that you want the dude to dox himself before you believe anything. He even gave you his first name for fuck's sake.

You're a fucking douche.

.

Everything I produced shows that I am what I said I was. Certificate of Training, radar certification, Police Firearms certification, and Law Enforcement certificate all would indicate that I have been a police officer. all with the same first name.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

the 2nd is for idiot gun owners to ignore all the rights they're loosing , because they think a gun makes them 'free' Clay

~S~

I suppose you believe you can vote a tyrant out of control of the government. do you support the police and only want them armed?

Guns won’t get rid of a ‘tyrant,’ either.

Guns are for individual self-defense, not to ‘overthrow’ a government incorrectly perceived to have become ‘tyrannical.’

Insurrectionist dogma is as ridiculous as it is wrongheaded, in no manner supported by Second Amendment case law.

The notion is a naïve and childish fantasy.

Yeah, I bet the British Common Law didn't support the Colonial insurrection and rebellion.



Some things are extra-constitutional and extra-judicial. The right to bear arms is a pre-existing right. Case law can go fuck itself when it comes to putting down tyranny.

.

How does he expect to remove a tyrant?

Lawsuits.



It worked for Hitler, right?

.

That's how we did it with King George lol

 

[BULLDOG]

Actually I keep an AR in my truck with 10 30 round magazines with a level 4 plate carrier and ballistic helmet

Because you never know when the zombie apocalypse will start.
I only have 6 mags; I need another set of pouches.

What do you need all the mags for?? Are you expecting to carry out a mass shooting?

Well, why does it matter?

Does he have the right to have that equipment or not?

What if he is able to stop a mass shooting at some point? Are you going to complain about it then?

.

When has a citizen armed with a AR ever stopped a mass shooting?

Irrelevant

No civilian is obligated to stop any crime

Hell the cops aren't legally obligated to come to the aid of anyone

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

It's not irrelevant when the previous poster claimed that was a valid reason to allow assault weapons to be sold to the public.