Congress voted against funding a cure for cancer just to block a win for Biden

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

If it ain’t in the article then it cannot be the reason?

Is that your logic here, Taz?

So you agree with the OP that Republicans want people to die of cancer in order to prevent giving a "win" to Biden?

Interesting.

Not surprising logic, since you're a Binar.

 

[Crepitus]

As a Canadian observer I would say: What is wrong with you people?

This board isn't a safe place to air your dirty laundry.

Huh? Why not?

 

[Crepitus]

Cancer can only be treated with limited success. A cure is a fool's errand and you would know that if you had an iota of knowledge.

So we might as well not try?

Hodgkin lymphoma? That used to be a death sentence. Now 80% curable.

Breast cancer? Prostate cancer? Thyroid? Skin melanoma?

All had recent success finding cures.

Next time you get sick you gonna use leaches or antibiotics? Because those were the fruits of research too.

 

[Crepitus]

Nowhere in the article, nor in the one they linked to, did I see a single Republican quoted or even mentioned by name as opposing funding in order to prevent giving Biden a win.

Oh come on.

 

[Crepitus]

sure it is,,

so now youre an expert on cancer research,,

The few things I'm considered an expert on are not applicable to the medical field.

However, I read. These things are not secrets, They make the news.

But you are getting really good at building straw men!

 

[Crepitus]

JOE BIDEN IS A CANCER TO OUR SOCIETY!

Well done, monorail mind. You successfully avoided contributing yet again.

 

[Crepitus]

Wow that doctor had the cure for cancer but won’t develop it without funding from congress?? How pathetic

Making shit up is just lying creatively you know.

 

[struth]

Making shit up is just lying creatively you know.

I didn’t create the title to this thread

 

[Crepitus]

I didn’t create the title to this thread

USA today did. But it's not a lie if that's what you're trying to imply.

Your post was.

 

[struth]

USA today did. But it's not a lie if that's what you're trying to imply.

Your post was.

How was my post a lie? Did USA Today lie about the op-Ed then?

 

[scruffy]

How hate filled do you have to be to do that?

You would think that if anything could be bipartisan it would be curing cancer.

What is wrong with these people?

Congress voted against funding a cure for cancer just to block a win for Biden

The Moonshot program was the largest, organized effort by the U.S. government to find cancer cures. Congress voted it down.

www.yahoo.com

Money will not cure cancer.

 

[scruffy]

But you are getting really good at building straw men!

You looking in the mirror?

 

[progressive hunter]

The few things I'm considered an expert on are not applicable to the medical field.

However, I read. These things are not secrets, They make the news.

But you are getting really good at building straw men!

well somebodies got to build your ego,,

 

[Nostra]

How hate filled do you have to be to do that?

You would think that if anything could be bipartisan it would be curing cancer.

What is wrong with these people?

Congress voted against funding a cure for cancer just to block a win for Biden

The Moonshot program was the largest, organized effort by the U.S. government to find cancer cures. Congress voted it down.

www.yahoo.com

Wait, what? So you are claiming Tater lies all those times he claimed he ended cancer?

 

[Nostra]

That's why they need money for research.

DERP

Tater already cured cancer.

 

[Nostra]

Nowhere in the article, nor in the one they linked to, did I see a single Republican quoted or even mentioned by name as opposing funding in order to prevent giving Biden a win.

Well then, OP doesn’t have the required link supporting factual claims.

What is the usual next step?

 

[struth]

Tater already cured cancer.

Well to be fair, obama put him in charge of curing cancer nearly a decade ago…and here he is now, apparently failed at his job.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Oh come on.

Maybe I missed it. Perhaps you can point it out?

 

[BackAgain]

"However, with the ever-present dysfunction of Congress, maybe predictably, the program has been stalled. Some Republicans, refusing to give Biden a “win,” voted against the renewal of funding.

Even though this would be a win for all Americans – and humanity – it apparently did not outweigh the politics of making a Democrat look good. This is the definition of party over country."

Such is the reprehensible right.

What a crock.

 

[BackAgain]

So you agree with the OP that Republicans want people to die of cancer in order to prevent giving a "win" to Biden?

Not even remotely akin to anything I said — nor a reasonable inference from anything I said.

Why do you insist on being a hack?

Interesting.

No. You’re really not.

Not surprising logic, since you're a Binar.

Stupidity defines you.