Congress voted against funding a cure for cancer just to block a win for Biden

[Nostra]

This is the thread title:

Congress voted against funding a cure for cancer just to block a win for Biden​

that implies there is a cure but Congress would not pass the funding for it. There is no cure. The thread is dishonest.

Plus, Tater already claimed he “ended cancer”, so why do we need to spend more money?

 

[Crepitus]

This is the thread title:

Congress voted against funding a cure for cancer just to block a win for Biden​

that implies there is a cure but Congress would not pass the funding for it. There is no cure. The thread is dishonest.

Dude, if this petty hairsplitting shit is all you got then you have just basically admitted you lost.

Now get lost.

 

[Independent thinker]

Dude, if this petty hairsplitting shit is all you got then you have just basically admitted you lost.

Now get lost.

You are already lost.

 

[Markle]

The words "funding for" are in there too.

Don't be dishonest.

With every desperate lie, you throw up here, you destroy any credibility you might have left. Why? Wouldn't you be better served by dealing with facts, or do you have none that support your opinions?

 

[Smokin' OP]

This is the thread title:

Congress voted against funding a cure for cancer just to block a win for Biden​

that implies there is a cure but Congress would not pass the funding for it. There is no cure. The thread is dishonest.

WTF?
If there was a cure for cancer?
Why would they need funding?