Yurt
Gold Member
has the twitter campaign worked yet?
No, they've gone to plan B now. Facebook...
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
has the twitter campaign worked yet?
No, they've gone to plan B now. Facebook...
has the twitter campaign worked yet?
No, they've gone to plan B now. Facebook...
![]()
The new way....
Someone does something bad...you get home put on your PJ's and take action using social media.
Yup.If you are in Middle School.
It is helping to bring about a unifying of nations to go after a specific terrorist organization. It may or may not turn out to be precedent setting.
The internet also has been used to cause rebellion in Egypt, Libya, to start riots in London. Probably started the riots on Sept. 11th 2012.
Wtf dood?
I've never attempted to "silence" anybody; had it pulled on me (see AzMike above) but all I did was take umbrage at being called a "liar" for not having heard a religious angle to the original story.
Did you get that? A "liar" for not having heard. The troll presumes to look out from inside my head.
As for post 163, yes you were the first to bring it up, it's still back there in quotes, and you used it to try to wedge a couple of other posters on your own self-confessed assumption that they were anti-Christian. Something they never brought up at all. So don't play innocent; it's on the record.
Frankly it wasn't all that big a deal but when Asshole called me a liar, you know what I did? Nothing. I let it go. Then when I didn't take his bait, he came after me. So cut the bullshit. Let's move on.
Frankly, I'm surprised at you willfully ignoring it. First, the article itself mentions that Boko Haram is a group of "islamist militants." Second, the actions they undertook are indeed anti-Christian. And kidrocks? Given his/her posting history, and what I've seen them post, that individual is indeed anti-Christian. Sure, and then again you referring to the God I worship as an "imaginary sky pixie" kinda takes the legs right from under your argument. You can't call me for inserting religion into a debate when you resorted to saying those things.
Moreover, you fail to look at the story from a wider scope. Extremist Muslims all over northern and central Africa have taken to killing Jews and Christians. This is a much broader religious issue than you think. These terrorists are motivated by their twisted versions of Islam. Therefore, and as seen in the past, all of their actions; the murder, the bombings, the persecution of Christians, Women and Jews are all motivated by their twisted religious devotion.
No TK, these "wider scopes" and "anti-Christians" and "extremist Muslims all over Africa" inferred from outside sources, none of that was a part of this thread until you brought in, in post 163, "these girls are Christians" and tried to make a wedge out of it against posters who never themselves brought it up. That IS trolling, and I called it what it was, period. And I noted the irony where your same post chastised others for politicizing, while oblivious to having just done it yourself.
It's not a big deal and would have died there but for the Old Troll who got bored and came after me hours later, after you were already gone.
And "sky pixie" is a common term I've picked up here, was a response to Windbag's observation about praying to a "#", and the term in no way specifies Christianity or any other religion anyway. Plus that was long, long after post 163, so let's not get creative with the sequencing.
As noted elsewhere, this thread is not about the militants or the kidnapping. It's about the idea of twitting. All this extra baggage about "these are Christians" and "those are Muslims" I'll have to take your word for it but for the purpose of this thread it's all irrelevant.
No, Pogo, Boko Haram is just as "anti-Christian" as the rest. No inference is needed, since Boko is a prime example. It was not trolling either. You may think you have some magician's power to alter reality or make it what you will, but not here. Reality isn't what you tell it to be. Trolling is what the OP did. Moreover, the irony here is that you failed to notice how in the very title of this thread, the author MADE it a political issue by mentioning conservatives by name. So, the damage had already been done long before I stepped foot in here. He set the table, not I.No TK, these "wider scopes" and "anti-Christians" and "extremist Muslims all over Africa" inferred from outside sources, none of that was a part of this thread until you brought in, in post 163, "these girls are Christians" and tried to make a wedge out of it against posters who never themselves brought it up. That IS trolling, and I called it what it was, period. And I noted the irony where your same post chastised others for politicizing, while oblivious to having just done it yourself.
I've been debating on political boards for a few years now. What I've learned most recently is that instead of responding to everything and every post, you have the option to ignore them. There was no need for this fracas, the name calling, the abject puerility. The author had long been shamed into abandoning his own thread, as I thought when I left. Then I was taken aback when I saw people still discussing post 163. But nevermind. We aren't even discussing it anymore, just semantics and minutia.It's not a big deal and would have died there but for the Old Troll who got bored and came after me hours later, after you were already gone.
I'm going to be perfectly honest here. As a child, my grandmother always said, "Don't go around repeating what other people say. It'll get you into trouble." I believe that the term "sky pixie" is a religiously bigoted term, and is very offensive to me as a Christian. Who cares about the sequencing.And "sky pixie" is a common term I've picked up here, was a response to Windbag's observation about praying to a "#", and the term in no way specifies Christianity or any other religion anyway. Plus that was long, long after post 163, so let's not get creative with the sequencing.
First of all:As noted elsewhere, this thread is not about the militants or the kidnapping. It's about the idea of twitting. All this extra baggage about "these are Christians" and "those are Muslims" I'll have to take your word for it but for the purpose of this thread it's all irrelevant.
Second, you started this by coming after me. Why are you quitting?Boko Haram, a group of Islamist militants, attacked a school in Chibok nearly one month ago and kidnapped 276 individuals. Since, they took eight additional girls and threatened to sell them all on the market.
If the WH really wanted to make a difference and do something of substance...
They should have used Facebook and unfriended the kidnappers.
Frankly, I'm surprised at you willfully ignoring it. First, the article itself mentions that Boko Haram is a group of "islamist militants." Second, the actions they undertook are indeed anti-Christian. And kidrocks? Given his/her posting history, and what I've seen them post, that individual is indeed anti-Christian. Sure, and then again you referring to the God I worship as an "imaginary sky pixie" kinda takes the legs right from under your argument. You can't call me for inserting religion into a debate when you resorted to saying those things.
Moreover, you fail to look at the story from a wider scope. Extremist Muslims all over northern and central Africa have taken to killing Jews and Christians. This is a much broader religious issue than you think. These terrorists are motivated by their twisted versions of Islam. Therefore, and as seen in the past, all of their actions; the murder, the bombings, the persecution of Christians, Women and Jews are all motivated by their twisted religious devotion.
No TK, these "wider scopes" and "anti-Christians" and "extremist Muslims all over Africa" inferred from outside sources, none of that was a part of this thread until you brought in, in post 163, "these girls are Christians" and tried to make a wedge out of it against posters who never themselves brought it up. That IS trolling, and I called it what it was, period. And I noted the irony where your same post chastised others for politicizing, while oblivious to having just done it yourself.
It's not a big deal and would have died there but for the Old Troll who got bored and came after me hours later, after you were already gone.
And "sky pixie" is a common term I've picked up here, was a response to Windbag's observation about praying to a "#", and the term in no way specifies Christianity or any other religion anyway. Plus that was long, long after post 163, so let's not get creative with the sequencing.
As noted elsewhere, this thread is not about the militants or the kidnapping. It's about the idea of twitting. All this extra baggage about "these are Christians" and "those are Muslims" I'll have to take your word for it but for the purpose of this thread it's all irrelevant.
No, Pogo, Boko Haram is just as "anti-Christian" as the rest. No inference is needed, since Boko is a prime example. It was not trolling either.
Trolling is what the OP did.
Moreover, the irony here is that you failed to notice how in the very title of this thread, the author MADE it a political issue by mentioning conservatives by name.
So, the damage had already been done long before I stepped foot in here. He set the table, not I.
I've been debating on political boards for a few years now. What I've learned most recently is that instead of responding to everything and every post, you have the option to ignore them.
There was no need for this fracas, the name calling, the abject puerility.
The author had long been shamed into abandoning his own thread, as I thought when I left. Then I was taken aback when I saw people still discussing post 163. But nevermind. We aren't even discussing it anymore, just semantics and minutia.
I'm going to be perfectly honest here. As a child, my grandmother always said, "Don't go around repeating what other people say. It'll get you into trouble."
I believe that the term "sky pixie" is a religiously bigoted term, and is very offensive to me as a Christian. Who cares about the sequencing.
As noted elsewhere, this thread is not about the militants or the kidnapping. It's about the idea of twitting. All this extra baggage about "these are Christians" and "those are Muslims" I'll have to take your word for it but for the purpose of this thread it's all irrelevant.
First of all:
Second, you started this by coming after me. Why are you quitting?Boko Haram, a group of Islamist militants, attacked a school in Chibok nearly one month ago and kidnapped 276 individuals. Since, they took eight additional girls and threatened to “sell” them all on the market.
Twitter losers whining that non twitterers tell everyone how utterly POINTLESS this STUPID practice is.
Anyway Pogo, we're beating a dead horse now. Let the poor animal rest in peace. Precedents had already been set in this thread to discuss the religion of these girls. I've got dinner to finish. Just waiting on the chuck to defrost.
That's because it's stupid. Hash tags don't free hostages. Action does. The Bring Back Our Girls Internet campaign, if you can call it that, is just a way for politicians and Hollywood celebrities to feel good about themselves.
It's also a way of dissipating energy that could have been constructive elsewhere. Kind of like a political heat sink -- it dissipates and dissolves, no muss no fuss. As George Carlin noted in the past, we used to simply "declare war" on issues -- "War on Drugs, War on Poverty, War on Crime --- we don't do anything about it, we just declare war on it."
Now we don't even do that -- we tweet, preferably before the light turns green for the mall where we're going for what really matters -- that new iPad.
I always say, "if a wrecker is for wrecks, what's Twitter for?"
Spare us your elitist bullshit. Thanks.
Anyway Pogo, we're beating a dead horse now. Let the poor animal rest in peace. Precedents had already been set in this thread to discuss the religion of these girls. I've got dinner to finish. Just waiting on the chuck to defrost.
You know it's ah, kind of late in the day for the weight thing, just sayin'. I'm down 40 btw.
I have to stand corrected, I actually did have an exchange with the OP. I forgot about it because I didn't even remember who he was --
It's also a way of dissipating energy that could have been constructive elsewhere. Kind of like a political heat sink -- it dissipates and dissolves, no muss no fuss. As George Carlin noted in the past, we used to simply "declare war" on issues -- "War on Drugs, War on Poverty, War on Crime --- we don't do anything about it, we just declare war on it."
Now we don't even do that -- we tweet, preferably before the light turns green for the mall where we're going for what really matters -- that new iPad.
I always say, "if a wrecker is for wrecks, what's Twitter for?"
Spare us your elitist bullshit. Thanks.
Anyway Pogo, we're beating a dead horse now. Let the poor animal rest in peace. Precedents had already been set in this thread to discuss the religion of these girls. I've got dinner to finish. Just waiting on the chuck to defrost.
You know it's ah, kind of late in the day for the weight thing, just sayin'. I'm down 40 btw.
I have to stand corrected, I actually did have an exchange with the OP. I forgot about it because I didn't even remember who he was --
Spare us your elitist bullshit. Thanks.
I have to stand corrected, I actually did have an exchange with the OP. I forgot about it because I didn't even remember who he was --
yea he seems to have disappeared....Kid did not rock to well in this thread....
You know it's ah, kind of late in the day for the weight thing, just sayin'. I'm down 40 btw.
I have to stand corrected, I actually did have an exchange with the OP. I forgot about it because I didn't even remember who he was --
I have to stand corrected, I actually did have an exchange with the OP. I forgot about it because I didn't even remember who he was --
yea he seems to have disappeared....Kid did not rock to well in this thread....
What the hell... I happen to have a very fulfilled life people. Don't have time to hang around here all day. I have things to do, to see, to smell (roses). Busy, busy, busy.
Anyways, I see you r-wingers are still mocking, still smirking, and talking crap about me.
How predictable is that?
BTW... has your congressman rescued the girls yet?
You know it's ah, kind of late in the day for the weight thing, just sayin'. I'm down 40 btw.
I have to stand corrected, I actually did have an exchange with the OP. I forgot about it because I didn't even remember who he was --
I have to stand corrected, I actually did have an exchange with the OP. I forgot about it because I didn't even remember who he was --
yea he seems to have disappeared....Kid did not rock to well in this thread....
What the hell... I happen to have a very fulfilled life people. Don't have time to hang around here all day. I have things to do, to see, to smell (roses). Busy, busy, busy.
Anyways, I see you r-wingers are still mocking, still smirking, and talking crap about me.
How predictable is that?
BTW... has your congressman rescued the girls yet?
I have to stand corrected, I actually did have an exchange with the OP. I forgot about it because I didn't even remember who he was --
yea he seems to have disappeared....Kid did not rock to well in this thread....
What the hell... I happen to have a very fulfilled life people. Don't have time to hang around here all day. I have things to do, to see, to smell (roses). Busy, busy, busy.
Anyways, I see you r-wingers are still mocking, still smirking, and talking crap about me.
How predictable is that?
BTW... has your congressman rescued the girls yet?
mine is Loretta Sanchez....she would not soil her hands on something like that........