Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Anarcho-syndicalism (also referred to as revolutionary syndicalism[1]) is a theory of anarchism which views revolutionary industrial unionism or syndicalism as a method for workers in capitalist society to gain control of an economy and use that control to influence broader society. Syndicalists consider their economic theories a strategy for facilitating worker self-activity and as an alternative co-operative economic system with democratic values and production centered on meeting human needs."GeorgePhillip is a Marxist. They don't believe in the notion of the nation state. That is, of course, unless we're discussing a communist nation
Anarcho-syndicalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bripat believes if he says nice things about the rich, they will give him some of his money back.
If the parents want to leave them here, I suppose there's no legal means to stop them. Of course, they need to provide them with a legal guardian who will provide their needs for them. Otherwise, it's with the parents they go. It's illegal to abandon your children in this country.What's your justification for deporting innocent US citizens?Of course, the children of illegals should be deported along with their parents if and when caught! What a silly question!
How much is Jake offering to pay you for the privilege of mowing your lawn?Hello, INS, My neighbor Jake Starkey-o keeps wanting to mow my lawn, I think he's Illegal
How does the rich investing in exotic financial instruments which extract as opposed to produce wealth stimulate productivity or create jobs?Nope, I don't expect the rich to give me a dime. I expect the will either invest their money or spend it. In the former case, the increase the productivity of the economy and create jobs. In the later case, they create jobs
1. I have said nothing about hating immigrants, legal or otherwise. I don't recall anyone else saying that either. That you can't understand that a Conflict of Interest and a desire to pursue MY interests is not about "hate" is just you being unable/unwilling to understand people different than you.
. You are welcome to post an example of me stating that I "hate" immigrants. Hint: Do'nt waste a lot of time looking.
2. I've disagreed with your racist belief system that there are jobs that whites can't do.
3. I want American jobs to go to Americans.
1. Seriously? I've been here for slightly over a year and I've encountered you several times. Your hatred to minorities are well known. Go back and read post of your fellow racist. Be honest once in a while.
2. I'm not a racist........ I like all kinds or races........ Whites, blacks, brown, yellow and purple........ My company are predominantly whites. My comments about whites not willing or cannot stand hard dirty labor are 100% correct. That's the reality. That has nothing to do with racist belief...... This is live experience you are dealing with...... My guess with most of you are either old timers that work very hard in the past or just plain zero experience.
3. You want American jobs goes to Americans only........ What is that supposed to mean? Knowing you as a racist and your cronies that are anti legal immigrants here........... You only want WHITE Americans to have these jobs. PERIOD..........That is where you and your cronies stand.
1. I challenge you to post a quote of me saying something racist. I have issued this challenge to many libs. NOne of them have been able to do so. You won't either.
2. When you state that a whole group of people defined by race is in some way inferior, ie not willing or able to work hard, that is racism as traditionally defined.
3. I want American jobs to go to Americans. I can't make that any simpler or clearer for you.
1. You are a liar. You've always been a racist. Do you want me to go all the threads and look for your post? What kind of challenge is that?
2. Let me repeat it to your thick skull. My company is predominantly whites.... If I'm a racist against whites..... My company should be full of minorities.
3. Please be honest and answer the question.
1. I challenge you to post a quote of my saying something racist. It is an impossible challenge. You cannot do it. NOne of your ideological ilk could do it.
2. No. Your racist belief is that Whites are not capable/willing of hard physical work, so having whites in less physically demanding jobs does NOT mean that your stated belief is not racist.
3. I W-A-N-T A-M-E-R-I-C-A-N J-O-B-S T-O G-O T-O A-M-E-R-I-C-A-N-S.
1. You are a racist.
2. You are a retarded.
3. That is not answer. You are avoiding the question.
I see you mania is at full capacity this morning.Total bullshit, all of your posts reek of overwrought melodramatic rants .It is NOT about how I feel.
It is about the fact that the Law is as written, ie these people are NOT welcome. OTherwise WE, THE PEOPLE would have changed the law.
Anyone can point out that obvious fact.,
AND as a member of that group, it is completely reasonable for me to use the word "We" .
Your refusal to face that simple fact is an issue of YOUR troubled mind.
In this I am not so much as Speaking FOR the People as pointing out what they/we have said.
Your dislike of my writing style does not change the fact that the Democratically enacted Laws of our nation, make it ILLEGAL for these people to be here.
That certainly fits the definition of the word, "unwelcome".
Do you have something to say that relates to that fact?
Pretty much the Primary Method of "Debate" with liberals.
Since, there is no way for them to honestly defend or advance their policies and positions on their merits,
they instead look for ways, any way, regardless of truthfulness to marginalize the messenger.
Very dishonest, very rude, and, considering the effect on Civil Discourse, Civil Society and Policy, very, very destructive.
BUT, it is generally very effect.
They are dicks like that.Yammering, ranting, spewing .I see you mania is at full capacity this morning.Total bullshit, all of your posts reek of overwrought melodramatic rants .It is NOT about how I feel.
It is about the fact that the Law is as written, ie these people are NOT welcome. OTherwise WE, THE PEOPLE would have changed the law.
Anyone can point out that obvious fact.,
AND as a member of that group, it is completely reasonable for me to use the word "We" .
Your refusal to face that simple fact is an issue of YOUR troubled mind.
In this I am not so much as Speaking FOR the People as pointing out what they/we have said.
Your dislike of my writing style does not change the fact that the Democratically enacted Laws of our nation, make it ILLEGAL for these people to be here.
That certainly fits the definition of the word, "unwelcome".
Do you have something to say that relates to that fact?
Pretty much the Primary Method of "Debate" with liberals.
Since, there is no way for them to honestly defend or advance their policies and positions on their merits,
they instead look for ways, any way, regardless of truthfulness to marginalize the messenger.
Very dishonest, very rude, and, considering the effect on Civil Discourse, Civil Society and Policy, very, very destructive.
BUT, it is generally very effect.
They are dicks like that.
Repeat as needed.
You are certainly are not speaking for 'we the people' you are giving your mistaken opinion.Nope, and how you feelz is unimportant. You don't speak for 'we' except in your troubled mind.I am merely referencing the law/policy as it has been crafted by the democratically elected representatives of the people. As a member of the group ie the People, that crafted these laws, I have every moral and legal right to use "we". YOur conspiracy theories are of no interest to me.Correll, no, you do not speak for the "we" in our laws. You have no authority to do so.
The laws are as they are, but you have no authority to speak for them. You have no moral or legal right to use 'we.'
I remember a huge fight with someone who got disappeared because he had the same problem as you, and I suspect that person is coaching you. He was wrong then and you are now.
It is NOT about how I feel.
It is about the fact that the Law is as written, ie these people are NOT welcome. OTherwise WE, THE PEOPLE would have changed the law.
Anyone can point out that obvious fact.,
AND as a member of that group, it is completely reasonable for me to use the word "We" .
Your refusal to face that simple fact is an issue of YOUR troubled mind.
In this I am not so much as Speaking FOR the People as pointing out what they/we have said.
Where in the constitution does it state border protection is the primary function of government?Those are your silly words, you ignorant millennial. Don't forget your essential oilsYes, exactly, dumbfuck. So how can you claim illegal aliens don't drive down the wages of American citizens?Remember that correll and bripat are here for grins and chuckles.
If the immigrants were forced to leave, the agricombines and food processing plants would have to increase their wages dramatically.. Either you are for a free enterprise system or you manipulate it. Obviously you are for statist intervention.
Defending the border is the primary responsibility of a government.
Wanting the government to do that, hardly defines anyone as a statist.
Try to be less dishonest.
Depending on how the government conducts its apprehensions, it would need to spend $100 billion to $300 billion arresting and removing all undocumented immigrants residing in the country, a process that we estimate would take 20 years. In addition, to prevent any new undocumented immigrants going forward, the government would at a minimum have to maintain current immigration enforcement levels. This results in an additional $315 billion in continuing enforcement costs over that time period.”
“Removing all undocumented immigrants would cause the labor force to shrink by 6.4 percent, which translates to a loss of 11 million workers. As a result, 20 years from now the economy would be nearly 6 percent or $1.6 trillion smaller than it would be if the government did not remove all undocumented immigrants.”
You are certainly are not speaking for 'we the people' you are giving your mistaken opinion.Nope, and how you feelz is unimportant. You don't speak for 'we' except in your troubled mind.I am merely referencing the law/policy as it has been crafted by the democratically elected representatives of the people. As a member of the group ie the People, that crafted these laws, I have every moral and legal right to use "we". YOur conspiracy theories are of no interest to me.Correll, no, you do not speak for the "we" in our laws. You have no authority to do so.
The laws are as they are, but you have no authority to speak for them. You have no moral or legal right to use 'we.'
I remember a huge fight with someone who got disappeared because he had the same problem as you, and I suspect that person is coaching you. He was wrong then and you are now.
It is NOT about how I feel.
It is about the fact that the Law is as written, ie these people are NOT welcome. OTherwise WE, THE PEOPLE would have changed the law.
Anyone can point out that obvious fact.,
AND as a member of that group, it is completely reasonable for me to use the word "We" .
Your refusal to face that simple fact is an issue of YOUR troubled mind.
In this I am not so much as Speaking FOR the People as pointing out what they/we have said.
How does the rich investing in exotic financial instruments which extract as opposed to produce wealth stimulate productivity or create jobs?Nope, I don't expect the rich to give me a dime. I expect the will either invest their money or spend it. In the former case, the increase the productivity of the economy and create jobs. In the later case, they create jobs
Yes, Correll, you have made racist statements, they have been pointed out many and many times. You do not ever get just once more, Correll. You are what you are: a liar.
Yes, Correll, you have made racist statements, they have been pointed out many and many times. You do not ever get just once more, Correll. You are what you are: a liar.
Anyhow, as I was saying earlier in the thread, there are many reasons to be against illegal immigration:
1. Healthcare: They don't have any; therefore the burden falls on the taxpayers if they get sick or injured.
2. Criminal activity: It's harder to trace and track them if they commit a crime.
3. Lack of medical clearance when they enter the country: They could be ill with a communicable disease, some of which are still very common in third world countries but were pretty much eradicated here in the States.
4. They are used by people for slave labor paying them very low wages, not providing them with any benefits, no unemployment, and no workmen's comp.
Just to name a few.
I said to remove the incentives so that they no longer WANT to be here illegally. Now, address that.
and ive said ENFORCE THE LAWS ON THE BOOKS FOR OVER A DECADE rather than create more government ...
address THAT
So then you agree with me. Why are you yelling? You people need to calm the hell down. What is wrong with you?
your ignorance ... sufferig fools isn't my forte'
What ignorance is that? You just said that you agree with me. Now, stop insulting and try to discuss the issues like an adult. Thanks.
you pretend to sit the fence and be in the middle and talk in circles to do it.
Yes, Correll, you have made racist statements, they have been pointed out many and many times. You do not ever get just once more, Correll. You are what you are: a liar.
Quote one, douche bag. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.Yes, Correll, you have made racist statements, they have been pointed out many and many times. You do not ever get just once more, Correll. You are what you are: a liar.
No "just once more" for you.No they have not been. You once tried and you failed.Yes, Correll, you have made racist statements, they have been pointed out many and many times. You do not ever get just once more, Correll. You are what you are: a liar.
No "just once more" for you.No they have not been. You once tried and you failed.Yes, Correll, you have made racist statements, they have been pointed out many and many times. You do not ever get just once more, Correll. You are what you are: a liar.
Look at all the frenetic and maniacal posting by Correll and bri-pat, neither of them saying anything of worth at all.
