aris2chat
Gold Member
- Feb 17, 2012
- 18,678
- 4,687
- 280
cloning the blood from the turin cloth
Clay, not blood, so my Red clay Pokey comment is quite accurate a description of what you'd clone.
This clone the Turin rumor was started by an online scam to raise money, I know this because I was the one who reported them to the Berkley Police.
my previous pist in this topic:
3)Scamers in Berkley, CA tried to raise money to clone fictional Jesus through the clay mark called blood stain on the shroud of Turin. The 6+' man depicted in the shroud is to tall for the mentioned 4'6" Christ in the myth or any Jew of that era.
The church mentioned they had the shroud of Yehuda not Jesus therefore any real shroud which this isn't (dated much kater the the era they want to claim it in), would have been for the wrong christ then they worship as the main face of the image.
Fact: the church when interest fades or id in question, always manages to make new relics appear to repeak interest.
Example: there was a catheric relic
claimed the skull of Jesus where they swore & claimed the relic was the skull of Jesus only to be proven to be a female skull and that is when suddenly the shroud appeared to save face.
There was a historic Jesus. Son of god? I doubt it, no more so than we are. The idea of a creator figure would mean we are all the children of god.
A man named jesus lived and crucified, but so were 250,000 jews during roman times. Jesus' brother James did go on to become a leader in the synagogue of Jerusalem. The apostles were real historic figures as well.
A lot of the myths came much later.